How do Mateta and Strand Larsen compare?

Strand Larsen has more season points (21 vs 3), Mateta is more owned (1.2% vs 0.5%), Strand Larsen is cheaper (6.0m vs 6.3m), Strand Larsen has the higher Start rate (56% vs 33%), but Strand Larsen has more Bonus (2 vs 0).

← Back to players Pick different players

Mateta

8 stats won

Strand Larsen

19 stats won

Who wins more stats: Mateta or Strand Larsen?

Strand Larsen wins 19 of 27 stats

Strand Larsen wins 19 of the 27 stats with an outright best. Others: Mateta 8.

Points
Mateta: 3Strand Larsen: 21
xGI (6 gw)
Mateta: 0.21Strand Larsen: 0.27
Price
Mateta: £6.3mStrand Larsen: £6.0m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionMatetaStrand Larsen
Price & ownership20
Playing time04
Recent form24
Season totals14
Set pieces10
Bonus04
Fixtures00
FPL ranks23
Total819

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

Mateta: Points 3, xGI (6 gw) 0.21, BPS -2, Mins (6 gw) 17, xG (6 gw) 0.21, Upcoming FDR 3.00. Strand Larsen: Points 21, xGI (6 gw) 0.27, BPS 95, Mins (6 gw) 51, xG (6 gw) 0.18, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Mateta leads 2 of 2
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatMatetaStrand Larsen
Price

6.3m(best)

6.0m−0.3m vs best

Ownership

1.2%(best)

0.5%−0.7% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.0%

0.0%

Availability

0% · Suspended until 2 Dec

75% · Ankle injury - 75% chance of playing

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Strand Larsen leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatMatetaStrand Larsen
Starts

3−2 vs best

5(best)

Start rate

33%−23% vs best

56%(best)

Minutes (season)

164−276 vs best

440(best)

Avg minutes

18−31 vs best

49(best)

Who has better recent form?

Strand Larsen leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatMatetaStrand Larsen
Mins (6 gw)

17−34 vs best

51(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.21(best)

0.18−0.03 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.00−0.09 vs best

0.09(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.21−0.06 vs best

0.27(best)

DC (6 gw)

1.17−1.16 vs best

2.33(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.32(best)

1.11+0.79 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Strand Larsen leads 4 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatMatetaStrand Larsen
Points

3−18 vs best

21(best)

Goals

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Assists

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Total xG

1.96(best)

1.41−0.55 vs best

Total xA

0.04−0.49 vs best

0.53(best)

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Mateta leads 1 of 1
Who takes the set pieces?
StatMatetaStrand Larsen
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

1st choice(best)

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Strand Larsen leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatMatetaStrand Larsen
BPS

-2−97 vs best

95(best)

BPS (6 gw)

0.2−12.3 vs best

12.5(best)

Bonus

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.3 vs best

0.3(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatMatetaStrand Larsen
Next 5 GWs

LIV

(H)

10

COV

(A)

11

HUL

(H)

12

CHE

(A)

13

AVL

(A)

14

LIV

(H)

10

COV

(A)

11

HUL

(H)

12

CHE

(A)

13

AVL

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.00

3.00

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Strand Larsen leads 3 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatMatetaStrand Larsen
Form

0.2

43rd FWD · 386th overall

1.8(best)

24th FWD · 222nd overall

ICT index

11.3

29th FWD · 280th overall

22.4(best)

20th FWD · 169th overall

Selected

23rd FWD(best)

163rd overall

37th FWD

257th overall

Points per game

0.8

50th FWD · 444th overall

3.0(best)

17th FWD · 172nd overall

Cost rank

13th FWD(best)

47th overall

16th FWD

69th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • MatetaCRY

    1. CRY v LIV home, gameweek 10: 1.00 projected goals, 15% clean sheet chance
    2. CRY v COV away, gameweek 11: 1.18 projected goals, 25% clean sheet chance

  • Strand LarsenCRY

    1. CRY v LIV home, gameweek 10: 1.00 projected goals, 15% clean sheet chance
    2. CRY v COV away, gameweek 11: 1.18 projected goals, 25% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Mateta (CRY) 2.2 projected team goals, Strand Larsen (CRY) 2.2 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Mateta−2.0Mateta: 0 goals from 1.96 xG (−2.0)
  • Strand Larsen−0.4Strand Larsen: 1 goals from 1.41 xG (−0.4)

Mateta has 2.0 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Mateta±0.0Mateta: 0 assists from 0.04 xA (±0.0)
  • Strand Larsen+0.5Strand Larsen: 1 assists from 0.53 xA (+0.5)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Mateta · 3 pts100% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Strand Larsen · 21 pts57% from appearances

Season points by source
SourceMatetaStrand Larsen
Appearances612
Goals04
Assists03
Bonus02
Deductions−30
Total321

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • MatetaNo games
  • Strand Larsen8.0(1)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Mateta0.7(3)
  • Strand Larsen2.3(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Mateta1.0(1)
  • Strand Larsen2.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Strand Larsen 2.0 points per game, Mateta 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Mateta2.0(1)
  • Strand Larsen5.0(3)

Away

  • Mateta0.3(3)
  • Strand Larsen1.5(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Strand Larsen 1.5 points per game, Mateta 0.3 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Mateta

    No CRY goals yet in matches played

  • Strand Larsen22%

    1 goal and 1 assist of 9 CRY goals

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Mateta0 of 9 full games

    2 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

  • Strand Larsen0 of 9 full games

    5 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Mateta7.0
  • Strand Larsen78.4

Creativity

  • Mateta23.9
  • Strand Larsen38.0

Threat

  • Mateta84.0
  • Strand Larsen109.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Mateta's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Strand Larsen's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Mateta−4.4k4.8k out450 in
  • Strand Larsen−3.0k3.1k out80 in

Managers are selling all of them; Strand Larsen the least (−3.0k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: Mateta 0.5 points per £m (46th), Strand Larsen 3.5 points per £m (17th). Median 2.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Mateta
  • Strand Larsen

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Strand Larsen 17, Mateta 1.

How far ahead is Mateta? Above zero Mateta leads; below, Strand Larsen.

Strand Larsen is 16 points ahead of Mateta over these gameweeks. Strand Larsen's was 16 (GW 7).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Mateta, gameweek 4: 0 points v IPS home, 0 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 4: 8 points v IPS home, 83 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Mateta, gameweek 5: 0 points v LEE away, 0 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 5: 2 points v LEE away, 81 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Mateta, gameweek 6: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 6: 5 points v NFO home, 82 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Mateta, gameweek 7: 1 points v BHA away, 29 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 7: 2 points v BHA away, 60 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Mateta, gameweek 8: 2 points v NEW home, 61 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 8: 0 points v NEW home, 0 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Mateta, gameweek 9: -2 points v TOT away, 12 minutes
    Strand Larsen, gameweek 9: 0 points v TOT away, 0 minutes

Mateta: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Strand Larsen: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWMatetaStrand Larsen
408
502
605
712
820
9-20

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWMatetaStrand Larsen
4083
5081
6082
72960
8610
9120

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWMatetaStrand Larsen
40.000.09
50.000.04
60.000.98
70.460.00
80.800.00
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWMatetaStrand Larsen
40.000.02
50.000.17
60.000.33
70.010.00
80.000.00
90.010.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWMatetaStrand Larsen
40.000.11
50.000.21
60.001.31
70.470.00
80.800.00
90.010.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWMatetaStrand Larsen
402
503
607
742
810
920

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWMatetaStrand Larsen
401
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWMatetaStrand Larsen
400
500
601
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWMatetaStrand Larsen
41.6%0.7%
51.4%0.6%
61.2%0.7%
71.2%0.7%
81.2%0.6%
91.2%0.5%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWMatetaStrand Larsen
4£6.4m£6.0m
5£6.3m£6.0m
6£6.3m£6.0m
7£6.3m£6.0m
8£6.3m£6.0m
9£6.3m£6.0m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWMatetaStrand Larsen
4——
50.0%0.2%
60.0%0.2%
70.0%0.1%
80.0%0.1%
90.0%0.0%