How do Evanilson and Mateta compare?

Evanilson has more season points (52 vs 3), Evanilson is more owned (18.1% vs 1.2%), Mateta is cheaper (6.3m vs 6.4m), Evanilson has the higher Start rate (100% vs 33%), Evanilson has more Bonus (7 vs 0), but Evanilson has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

Evanilson

28 stats won

Mateta

2 stats won

Who wins more stats: Evanilson or Mateta?

Evanilson wins 28 of 30 stats

Evanilson wins 28 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Mateta 2.

Points
Evanilson: 52Mateta: 3
xGI (6 gw)
Evanilson: 0.61Mateta: 0.21
Price
Evanilson: £6.4mMateta: £6.3m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionEvanilsonMateta
Price & ownership30
Playing time40
Recent form51
Season totals50
Set pieces11
Bonus40
Fixtures10
FPL ranks50
Total282

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

Evanilson: Points 52, xGI (6 gw) 0.61, BPS 233, Mins (6 gw) 85, xG (6 gw) 0.48, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Mateta: Points 3, xGI (6 gw) 0.21, BPS -2, Mins (6 gw) 17, xG (6 gw) 0.21, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Evanilson leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatEvanilsonMateta
Price

6.4m(best)

6.3m−0.1m vs best

Ownership

18.1%(best)

1.2%−16.9% vs best

Top 10k ownership

25.8%(best)

0.0%−25.8% vs best

Availability

Available

0% · Suspended until 2 Dec

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Evanilson leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatEvanilsonMateta
Starts

9(best)

3−6 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

33%−67% vs best

Minutes (season)

753(best)

164−589 vs best

Avg minutes

84(best)

18−66 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Evanilson leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatEvanilsonMateta
Mins (6 gw)

85(best)

17−68 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.48(best)

0.21−0.27 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.13(best)

0.00−0.13 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.61(best)

0.21−0.40 vs best

DC (6 gw)

6.33(best)

1.17−5.16 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.81+0.49 vs best

0.32(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Evanilson leads 5 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatEvanilsonMateta
Points

52(best)

3−49 vs best

Goals

4(best)

0−4 vs best

Assists

4(best)

0−4 vs best

Total xG

3.60(best)

1.96−1.64 vs best

Total xA

1.01(best)

0.04−0.97 vs best

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Split
Who takes the set pieces?
StatEvanilsonMateta
Corners & indirect FKs

7th choice(best)

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

1st choice(best)

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Evanilson leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatEvanilsonMateta
BPS

233(best)

-2−235 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

33.5(best)

0.2−33.3 vs best

Bonus

7(best)

0−7 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

1.2(best)

0.0−1.2 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Evanilson leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatEvanilsonMateta
Next 5 GWs

IPS

(A)

10

NFO

(H)

11

FUL

(A)

12

BHA

(H)

13

HUL

(H)

14

LIV

(H)

10

COV

(A)

11

HUL

(H)

12

CHE

(A)

13

AVL

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80(best)

3.00+0.20 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Evanilson leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatEvanilsonMateta
Form

8.5(best)

1st FWD · 2nd overall

0.2

43rd FWD · 386th overall

ICT index

60.9(best)

4th FWD · 17th overall

11.3

29th FWD · 280th overall

Selected

6th FWD(best)

22nd overall

23rd FWD

163rd overall

Points per game

5.8(best)

4th FWD · 20th overall

0.8

50th FWD · 444th overall

Cost rank

12th FWD(best)

44th overall

13th FWD

47th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • EvanilsonBOU

    1. BOU v IPS away, gameweek 10: 1.56 projected goals, 35% clean sheet chance
    2. BOU v NFO home, gameweek 11: 1.54 projected goals, 39% clean sheet chance
  • MatetaCRY

    1. CRY v LIV home, gameweek 10: 1.00 projected goals, 15% clean sheet chance
    2. CRY v COV away, gameweek 11: 1.18 projected goals, 25% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Evanilson (BOU) 3.1 projected team goals, Mateta (CRY) 2.2 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Evanilson+0.4Evanilson: 4 goals from 3.60 xG (+0.4)
  • Mateta−2.0Mateta: 0 goals from 1.96 xG (−2.0)

Mateta has 2.0 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Evanilson+3.0Evanilson: 4 assists from 1.01 xA (+3.0)
  • Mateta±0.0Mateta: 0 assists from 0.04 xA (±0.0)

Evanilson has 3.0 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Evanilson · 52 pts34% from appearances

    −1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Mateta · 3 pts100% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceEvanilsonMateta
Appearances186
Goals160
Assists120
Bonus70
Deductions−1−3
Total523

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Evanilson12.0(1)
  • MatetaNo games

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Evanilson5.4(5)
  • Mateta0.7(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Evanilson4.3(3)
  • Mateta1.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Evanilson 4.3 points per game, Mateta 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Evanilson6.6(5)
  • Mateta2.0(1)

Away

  • Evanilson4.8(4)
  • Mateta0.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Evanilson 4.8 points per game, Mateta 0.3 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Evanilson57%

    4 goals and 4 assists of 14 BOU goals

  • Mateta

    No CRY goals yet in matches played

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Evanilson4 of 9 full games

    4 × 90 minutes, 5 × 60–89

  • Mateta0 of 9 full games

    2 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Evanilson229.4
  • Mateta7.0

Creativity

  • Evanilson152.1
  • Mateta23.9

Threat

  • Evanilson229.0
  • Mateta84.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Evanilson's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Mateta's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Evanilson+414k6.8k out421k in
  • Mateta−4.4k4.9k out451 in

Evanilson has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+414k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: Evanilson 8.1 points per £m (1st), Mateta 0.5 points per £m (46th). Median 2.3.
  • Evanilson
  • Mateta

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Evanilson 41, Mateta 1.

How far ahead is Evanilson? Above zero Evanilson leads; below, Mateta.

Evanilson is 40 points ahead of Mateta over these gameweeks. Evanilson's biggest lead was 40 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Evanilson, gameweek 4: 5 points v BRE home, 90 minutes
    Mateta, gameweek 4: 0 points v IPS home, 0 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Evanilson, gameweek 5: 2 points v LIV home, 90 minutes
    Mateta, gameweek 5: 0 points v LEE away, 0 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Evanilson, gameweek 6: 7 points v CHE away, 90 minutes
    Mateta, gameweek 6: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Evanilson, gameweek 7: 12 points v SUN home, 78 minutes
    Mateta, gameweek 7: 1 points v BHA away, 29 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Evanilson, gameweek 8: 6 points v MUN away, 86 minutes
    Mateta, gameweek 8: 2 points v NEW home, 61 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Evanilson, gameweek 9: 9 points v LEE home, 75 minutes
    Mateta, gameweek 9: -2 points v TOT away, 12 minutes

Evanilson: 1 haul (10+), 1 blank (0–2); Mateta: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWEvanilsonMateta
450
520
670
7121
862
99-2

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWEvanilsonMateta
4900
5900
6900
77829
88661
97512

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWEvanilsonMateta
40.000.00
50.160.00
60.610.00
71.110.46
80.520.80
90.490.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWEvanilsonMateta
40.250.00
50.010.00
60.100.00
70.350.01
80.010.00
90.030.01

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWEvanilsonMateta
40.250.00
50.170.00
60.710.00
71.460.47
80.530.80
90.520.01

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWEvanilsonMateta
440
550
680
764
891
962

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWEvanilsonMateta
400
500
610
710
810
910

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWEvanilsonMateta
410
500
600
710
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWEvanilsonMateta
43.3%1.6%
53.2%1.4%
63.3%1.2%
73.9%1.2%
86.0%1.2%
915.3%1.2%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWEvanilsonMateta
4£6.0m£6.4m
5£6.0m£6.3m
6£6.0m£6.3m
7£6.1m£6.3m
8£6.1m£6.3m
9£6.3m£6.3m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWEvanilsonMateta
4——
50.4%0.0%
60.4%0.0%
71.8%0.0%
84.7%0.0%
925.8%0.0%