How do Calvert-Lewin and Mateta compare?

Calvert-Lewin has more season points (37 vs 3), Calvert-Lewin is more owned (20.8% vs 1.2%), Calvert-Lewin is cheaper (6.1m vs 6.3m), Calvert-Lewin has the higher Start rate (100% vs 33%), Calvert-Lewin has more Bonus (7 vs 0), but Mateta has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 3.00 vs 3.20).

Calvert-Lewin

24 stats won

Mateta

4 stats won

Who wins more stats: Calvert-Lewin or Mateta?

Calvert-Lewin wins 24 of 28 stats

Calvert-Lewin wins 24 of the 28 stats with an outright best. Others: Mateta 4.

Points
Calvert-Lewin: 37Mateta: 3
xGI (6 gw)
Calvert-Lewin: 0.39Mateta: 0.21
Price
Calvert-Lewin: £6.1mMateta: £6.3m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionCalvert-LewinMateta
Price & ownership21
Playing time40
Recent form51
Season totals50
Set pieces00
Bonus40
Fixtures01
FPL ranks41
Total244

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

Calvert-Lewin: Points 37, xGI (6 gw) 0.39, BPS 118, Mins (6 gw) 87, xG (6 gw) 0.38, Upcoming FDR 3.20. Mateta: Points 3, xGI (6 gw) 0.21, BPS -2, Mins (6 gw) 17, xG (6 gw) 0.21, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Calvert-Lewin leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatCalvert-LewinMateta
Price

6.1m−0.2m vs best

6.3m(best)

Ownership

20.8%(best)

1.2%−19.6% vs best

Top 10k ownership

25.7%(best)

0.0%−25.7% vs best

Availability

Available

0% · Suspended until 2 Dec

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Calvert-Lewin leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatCalvert-LewinMateta
Starts

9(best)

3−6 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

33%−67% vs best

Minutes (season)

773(best)

164−609 vs best

Avg minutes

86(best)

18−68 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Calvert-Lewin leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatCalvert-LewinMateta
Mins (6 gw)

87(best)

17−70 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.38(best)

0.21−0.17 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.01(best)

0.00−0.01 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.39(best)

0.21−0.18 vs best

DC (6 gw)

3.50(best)

1.17−2.33 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.17+0.85 vs best

0.32(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Calvert-Lewin leads 5 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatCalvert-LewinMateta
Points

37(best)

3−34 vs best

Goals

3(best)

0−3 vs best

Assists

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Total xG

3.91(best)

1.96−1.95 vs best

Total xA

0.14(best)

0.04−0.10 vs best

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatCalvert-LewinMateta
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

1st choice

1st choice

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Calvert-Lewin leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatCalvert-LewinMateta
BPS

118(best)

-2−120 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

14.8(best)

0.2−14.6 vs best

Bonus

7(best)

0−7 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.8(best)

0.0−0.8 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Mateta leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatCalvert-LewinMateta
Next 5 GWs

TOT

(H)

10

CHE

(A)

11

COV

(H)

12

MCI

(A)

13

IPS

(H)

14

LIV

(H)

10

COV

(A)

11

HUL

(H)

12

CHE

(A)

13

AVL

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.20+0.20 vs best

3.00(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Calvert-Lewin leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatCalvert-LewinMateta
Form

3.8(best)

10th FWD · 77th overall

0.2

43rd FWD · 386th overall

ICT index

41.5(best)

10th FWD · 54th overall

11.3

29th FWD · 280th overall

Selected

5th FWD(best)

18th overall

23rd FWD

163rd overall

Points per game

4.1(best)

8th FWD · 83rd overall

0.8

50th FWD · 444th overall

Cost rank

14th FWD

62nd overall

13th FWD(best)

47th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • Calvert-LewinLEE

    1. LEE v TOT home, gameweek 10: 1.19 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. LEE v CHE away, gameweek 11: 0.96 projected goals, 20% clean sheet chance
  • MatetaCRY

    1. CRY v LIV home, gameweek 10: 1.00 projected goals, 15% clean sheet chance
    2. CRY v COV away, gameweek 11: 1.18 projected goals, 25% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Mateta (CRY) 2.2 projected team goals, Calvert-Lewin (LEE) 2.1 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Calvert-Lewin−0.9Calvert-Lewin: 3 goals from 3.91 xG (−0.9)
  • Mateta−2.0Mateta: 0 goals from 1.96 xG (−2.0)

Mateta has 2.0 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Calvert-Lewin+0.9Calvert-Lewin: 1 assists from 0.14 xA (+0.9)
  • Mateta±0.0Mateta: 0 assists from 0.04 xA (±0.0)

Calvert-Lewin has 0.9 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Calvert-Lewin · 37 pts45% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Mateta · 3 pts100% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceCalvert-LewinMateta
Appearances186
Goals120
Assists30
Bonus70
Deductions−3−3
Total373

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Calvert-Lewin1.5(2)
  • MatetaNo games

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Calvert-Lewin7.3(4)
  • Mateta0.7(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Calvert-Lewin1.7(3)
  • Mateta1.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Calvert-Lewin 1.7 points per game, Mateta 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Calvert-Lewin7.3(4)
  • Mateta2.0(1)

Away

  • Calvert-Lewin1.6(5)
  • Mateta0.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Calvert-Lewin 1.6 points per game, Mateta 0.3 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Calvert-Lewin44%

    3 goals and 1 assist of 9 LEE goals

  • Mateta

    No CRY goals yet in matches played

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Calvert-Lewin6 of 9 full games

    6 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89

  • Mateta0 of 9 full games

    2 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Calvert-Lewin139.4
  • Mateta7.0

Creativity

  • Calvert-Lewin55.4
  • Mateta23.9

Threat

  • Calvert-Lewin227.0
  • Mateta84.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Calvert-Lewin's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Mateta's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Calvert-Lewin−52.6k77.0k out24.3k in
  • Mateta−4.4k4.8k out450 in

Managers are selling all of them; Mateta the least (−4.4k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: Calvert-Lewin 6.1 points per £m (7th), Mateta 0.5 points per £m (46th). Median 2.3.
  • Calvert-Lewin
  • Mateta

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Calvert-Lewin 27, Mateta 1.

How far ahead is Calvert-Lewin? Above zero Calvert-Lewin leads; below, Mateta.

Calvert-Lewin is 26 points ahead of Mateta over these gameweeks. Calvert-Lewin's biggest lead was 26 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Calvert-Lewin, gameweek 4: 10 points v NEW home, 77 minutes
    Mateta, gameweek 4: 0 points v IPS home, 0 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Calvert-Lewin, gameweek 5: 2 points v CRY home, 90 minutes
    Mateta, gameweek 5: 0 points v LEE away, 0 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Calvert-Lewin, gameweek 6: 2 points v ARS away, 90 minutes
    Mateta, gameweek 6: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Calvert-Lewin, gameweek 7: 9 points v MUN home, 90 minutes
    Mateta, gameweek 7: 1 points v BHA away, 29 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Calvert-Lewin, gameweek 8: 2 points v SUN away, 84 minutes
    Mateta, gameweek 8: 2 points v NEW home, 61 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Calvert-Lewin, gameweek 9: 2 points v BOU away, 90 minutes
    Mateta, gameweek 9: -2 points v TOT away, 12 minutes

Calvert-Lewin: 1 haul (10+), 4 blanks (0–2); Mateta: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinMateta
4100
520
620
791
822
92-2

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinMateta
4770
5900
6900
79029
88461
99012

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinMateta
40.870.00
50.520.00
60.000.00
70.600.46
80.000.80
90.310.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinMateta
40.000.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.050.01
80.010.00
90.000.01

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinMateta
40.870.00
50.520.00
60.000.00
70.650.47
80.010.80
90.310.01

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinMateta
450
580
640
734
801
912

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinMateta
410
500
600
710
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinMateta
410
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinMateta
421.5%1.6%
526.7%1.4%
622.6%1.2%
722.8%1.2%
822.9%1.2%
920.9%1.2%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinMateta
4£6.0m£6.4m
5£6.0m£6.3m
6£6.0m£6.3m
7£6.0m£6.3m
8£6.1m£6.3m
9£6.1m£6.3m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWCalvert-LewinMateta
4——
544.0%0.0%
625.5%0.0%
741.6%0.0%
839.8%0.0%
925.7%0.0%