How do Mateta and Richarlison compare?

Mateta has more season points (3 vs 2), Mateta is more owned (1.2% vs 0.5%), Richarlison is cheaper (5.9m vs 6.3m), Mateta has the higher Start rate (33% vs 11%), but Richarlison has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

Mateta

19 stats won

Richarlison

4 stats won

Who wins more stats: Mateta or Richarlison?

Mateta wins 19 of 23 stats

Mateta wins 19 of the 23 stats with an outright best. Others: Richarlison 4.

Points
Mateta: 3Richarlison: 2
xGI (6 gw)
Mateta: 0.21Richarlison: 0.00
Price
Mateta: £6.3mRicharlison: £5.9m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionMatetaRicharlison
Price & ownership20
Playing time40
Recent form41
Season totals30
Set pieces10
Bonus11
Fixtures01
FPL ranks41
Total194

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

Mateta: Points 3, xGI (6 gw) 0.21, BPS -2, Mins (6 gw) 17, xG (6 gw) 0.21, Upcoming FDR 3.00. Richarlison: Points 2, xGI (6 gw) 0.00, BPS 6, Mins (6 gw) 0, xG (6 gw) 0.00, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Mateta leads 2 of 2
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatMatetaRicharlison
Price

6.3m(best)

5.9m−0.4m vs best

Ownership

1.2%(best)

0.5%−0.7% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.0%

0.0%

Availability

0% · Suspended until 2 Dec

0% · not included in squad.

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Mateta leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatMatetaRicharlison
Starts

3(best)

1−2 vs best

Start rate

33%(best)

11%−22% vs best

Minutes (season)

164(best)

67−97 vs best

Avg minutes

18(best)

7−11 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Mateta leads 4 of 5
Who has better recent form?
StatMatetaRicharlison
Mins (6 gw)

17(best)

0−17 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.21(best)

0.00−0.21 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.00

0.00

xGI (6 gw)

0.21(best)

0.00−0.21 vs best

DC (6 gw)

1.17(best)

0.00−1.17 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.32+0.32 vs best

0.00(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Mateta leads 3 of 3
Who has scored more this season?
StatMatetaRicharlison
Points

3(best)

2−1 vs best

Goals

0

0

Assists

0

0

Total xG

1.96(best)

0.00−1.96 vs best

Total xA

0.04(best)

0.00−0.04 vs best

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Mateta leads 1 of 1
Who takes the set pieces?
StatMatetaRicharlison
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

1st choice(best)

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Split
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatMatetaRicharlison
BPS

-2−8 vs best

6(best)

BPS (6 gw)

0.2(best)

0.0−0.2 vs best

Bonus

0

0

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0

0.0

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Richarlison leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatMatetaRicharlison
Next 5 GWs

LIV

(H)

10

COV

(A)

11

HUL

(H)

12

CHE

(A)

13

AVL

(A)

14

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.00+0.20 vs best

2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Mateta leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatMatetaRicharlison
Form

0.2(best)

43rd FWD · 386th overall

0.0

74th FWD · 654th overall

ICT index

11.3(best)

29th FWD · 280th overall

0.2

50th FWD · 443rd overall

Selected

23rd FWD(best)

163rd overall

36th FWD

242nd overall

Points per game

0.8

50th FWD · 444th overall

2.0(best)

30th FWD · 281st overall

Cost rank

13th FWD(best)

47th overall

19th FWD

80th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • MatetaCRY

    1. CRY v LIV home, gameweek 10: 1.00 projected goals, 15% clean sheet chance
    2. CRY v COV away, gameweek 11: 1.18 projected goals, 25% clean sheet chance
  • RicharlisonTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Richarlison (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals, Mateta (CRY) 2.2 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Mateta−2.0Mateta: 0 goals from 1.96 xG (−2.0)
  • Richarlison±0.0Richarlison: 0 goals from 0.00 xG (±0.0)

Mateta has 2.0 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Mateta±0.0Mateta: 0 assists from 0.04 xA (±0.0)
  • Richarlison±0.0Richarlison: 0 assists from 0.00 xA (±0.0)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Mateta · 3 pts100% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Richarlison · 2 pts100% from appearances

Season points by source
SourceMatetaRicharlison
Appearances62
Deductions−30
Total32

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • MatetaNo games
  • RicharlisonNo games

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Mateta0.7(3)
  • RicharlisonNo games

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Mateta1.0(1)
  • Richarlison2.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Richarlison 2.0 points per game, Mateta 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Mateta2.0(1)
  • RicharlisonNo games

Away

  • Mateta0.3(3)
  • Richarlison2.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Richarlison 2.0 points per game, Mateta 0.3 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Mateta

    No CRY goals yet in matches played

  • Richarlison

    No TOT goals yet in matches played

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Mateta0 of 9 full games

    2 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

  • Richarlison0 of 9 full games

    1 × 60–89, 8 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Mateta7.0
  • Richarlison0.0

Creativity

  • Mateta23.9
  • Richarlison2.2

Threat

  • Mateta84.0
  • Richarlison0.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Mateta's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Richarlison's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Mateta−4.4k4.9k out451 in
  • Richarlison−466466 out0 in

Managers are selling all of them; Richarlison the least (−466 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: Mateta 0.5 points per £m (46th), Richarlison 0.3 points per £m (49th). Median 2.3.
  • Mateta
  • Richarlison

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Mateta 1, Richarlison 0.

How far ahead is Mateta? Above zero Mateta leads; below, Richarlison.

Mateta is 1 point ahead of Richarlison over these gameweeks. Mateta's biggest lead was 3 (GW 8).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Mateta, gameweek 4: 0 points v IPS home, 0 minutes
    Richarlison, gameweek 4: 0 points v EVE home, 0 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Mateta, gameweek 5: 0 points v LEE away, 0 minutes
    Richarlison, gameweek 5: 0 points v AVL home, 0 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Mateta, gameweek 6: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutes
    Richarlison, gameweek 6: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Mateta, gameweek 7: 1 points v BHA away, 29 minutes
    Richarlison, gameweek 7: 0 points v COV home, 0 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Mateta, gameweek 8: 2 points v NEW home, 61 minutes
    Richarlison, gameweek 8: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Mateta, gameweek 9: -2 points v TOT away, 12 minutes
    Richarlison, gameweek 9: 0 points v CRY home, 0 minutes

Mateta: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Richarlison: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWMatetaRicharlison
400
500
600
710
820
9-20

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWMatetaRicharlison
400
500
600
7290
8610
9120

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWMatetaRicharlison
40.000.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.460.00
80.800.00
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWMatetaRicharlison
40.000.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.010.00
80.000.00
90.010.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWMatetaRicharlison
40.000.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.470.00
80.800.00
90.010.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWMatetaRicharlison
400
500
600
740
810
920

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWMatetaRicharlison
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWMatetaRicharlison
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWMatetaRicharlison
41.6%0.9%
51.4%0.7%
61.2%0.6%
71.2%0.6%
81.2%0.5%
91.2%0.5%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWMatetaRicharlison
4£6.4m£5.9m
5£6.3m£5.9m
6£6.3m£5.9m
7£6.3m£5.9m
8£6.3m£5.9m
9£6.3m£5.9m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWMatetaRicharlison
4——
50.0%0.1%
60.0%0.0%
70.0%0.0%
80.0%0.0%
90.0%0.0%