How do Manzambi and Tavernier compare?

Tavernier has more season points (55 vs 38), Tavernier is more owned (27.7% vs 7.1%), Manzambi is cheaper (6.1m vs 6.6m), Tavernier has the higher Start rate (100% vs 56%), Tavernier has more Bonus (12 vs 7), but Manzambi has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.40 vs 2.80).

Manzambi

4 stats won

Tavernier

27 stats won

Who wins more stats: Manzambi or Tavernier?

Tavernier wins 27 of 31 stats

Tavernier wins 27 of the 31 stats with an outright best. Others: Manzambi 4.

Points
Manzambi: 38Tavernier: 55
xGI (6 gw)
Manzambi: 0.36Tavernier: 0.54
Price
Manzambi: £6.1mTavernier: £6.6m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionManzambiTavernier
Price & ownership03
Playing time04
Recent form06
Season totals15
Set pieces03
Bonus13
Fixtures10
FPL ranks13
Total427

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Manzambi: Points 38, xGI (6 gw) 0.36, BPS 138, Mins (6 gw) 64, DC (6 gw) 4.7, Upcoming FDR 2.40. Tavernier: Points 55, xGI (6 gw) 0.54, BPS 243, Mins (6 gw) 80, DC (6 gw) 6.3, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Tavernier leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatManzambiTavernier
Price

6.1m−0.5m vs best

6.6m(best)

Ownership

7.1%−20.6% vs best

27.7%(best)

Top 10k ownership

34.6%−30.7% vs best

65.3%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Tavernier leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatManzambiTavernier
Starts

5−4 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

56%−44% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

384−366 vs best

750(best)

Avg minutes

43−40 vs best

83(best)

Who has better recent form?

Tavernier leads 6 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatManzambiTavernier
Mins (6 gw)

64−16 vs best

80(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.27−0.10 vs best

0.37(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.10−0.07 vs best

0.17(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.36−0.18 vs best

0.54(best)

DC (6 gw)

4.67−1.66 vs best

6.33(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.01+0.23 vs best

0.78(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Tavernier leads 5 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatManzambiTavernier
Points

38−17 vs best

55(best)

Goals

2−3 vs best

5(best)

Assists

3(best)

0−3 vs best

Total xG

1.60−2.11 vs best

3.71(best)

Total xA

0.58−0.78 vs best

1.36(best)

DC (season)

28−38 vs best

66(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Tavernier leads 3 of 3
Who takes the set pieces?
StatManzambiTavernier
Corners & indirect FKs

—

1st choice(best)

Direct free kicks

2nd choice

1st choice(best)

Penalties

—

3rd choice(best)

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Tavernier leads 3 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatManzambiTavernier
BPS

138−105 vs best

243(best)

BPS (6 gw)

23.0−1.7 vs best

24.7(best)

Bonus

7−5 vs best

12(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

1.2(best)

1.0−0.2 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Manzambi leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatManzambiTavernier
Next 5 GWs

MUN

(A)

10

SUN

(H)

11

IPS

(A)

12

EVE

(H)

13

CRY

(H)

14

IPS

(A)

10

NFO

(H)

11

FUL

(A)

12

BHA

(H)

13

HUL

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.40(best)

2.80+0.40 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Tavernier leads 3 of 4
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatManzambiTavernier
Form

6.0

6th MID · 17th overall

6.0

7th MID · 19th overall

ICT index

43.6

34th MID · 51st overall

73.0(best)

3rd MID · 4th overall

Selected

15th MID

49th overall

5th MID(best)

10th overall

Points per game

6.3(best)

2nd MID · 8th overall

6.1

4th MID · 11th overall

Cost rank

45th MID

65th overall

22nd MID(best)

34th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • ManzambiAVL

    1. AVL v MUN away, gameweek 10: 1.24 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance
    2. AVL v SUN home, gameweek 11: 1.44 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
  • TavernierBOU

    1. BOU v IPS away, gameweek 10: 1.56 projected goals, 35% clean sheet chance
    2. BOU v NFO home, gameweek 11: 1.54 projected goals, 39% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Tavernier (BOU) 3.1 projected team goals, Manzambi (AVL) 2.7 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Manzambi+0.4Manzambi: 2 goals from 1.60 xG (+0.4)
  • Tavernier+1.3Tavernier: 5 goals from 3.71 xG (+1.3)

Tavernier has 1.3 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Manzambi+2.4Manzambi: 3 assists from 0.58 xA (+2.4)
  • Tavernier−1.4Tavernier: 0 assists from 1.36 xA (−1.4)

Tavernier has 1.4 fewer assists than xA; Manzambi has 2.4 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Manzambi · 38 pts29% from appearances

  • Tavernier · 55 pts43% from goals

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceManzambiTavernier
Appearances1118
Goals1025
Assists90
Clean sheets13
Bonus712
Deductions0−3
Total3855

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Manzambi7.0(1)
  • Tavernier10.0(1)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Manzambi7.5(4)
  • Tavernier6.4(5)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Manzambi1.0(1)
  • Tavernier4.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Tavernier 4.3 points per game, Manzambi 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Manzambi3.5(4)
  • Tavernier4.8(5)

Away

  • Manzambi12.0(2)
  • Tavernier7.8(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Manzambi 12.0 points per game, Tavernier 7.8 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Manzambi50%

    2 goals and 3 assists of 10 AVL goals

  • Tavernier36%

    5 goals and 0 assists of 14 BOU goals

Manzambi is involved in 50% of AVL's goals, against 36% for Tavernier.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Manzambi0 of 9 full games

    5 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 3 × Didn't play

  • Tavernier3 of 9 full games

    3 × 90 minutes, 6 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Manzambi161.6
  • Tavernier258.0

Creativity

  • Manzambi106.7
  • Tavernier240.0

Threat

  • Manzambi168.0
  • Tavernier231.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Manzambi's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Tavernier's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Manzambi+96.4k6.0k out102k in
  • Tavernier+264k11.6k out275k in

Tavernier has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+264k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Manzambi 6.2 points per £m (17th), Tavernier 8.3 points per £m (4th). Median 2.5.
  • Manzambi
  • Tavernier

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Manzambi 38, Tavernier 34.

How far ahead is Manzambi? Above zero Manzambi leads; below, Tavernier.

Manzambi is 4 points ahead of Tavernier over these gameweeks. Manzambi's biggest lead was 9 (GW 7); Tavernier's was 7 (GW 4).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Manzambi, gameweek 4: 1 points v NFO home, 27 minutes
    Tavernier, gameweek 4: 8 points v BRE home, 82 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Manzambi, gameweek 5: 13 points v TOT away, 71 minutes
    Tavernier, gameweek 5: 2 points v LIV home, 74 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Manzambi, gameweek 6: 5 points v BRE home, 85 minutes
    Tavernier, gameweek 6: 1 points v CHE away, 72 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Manzambi, gameweek 7: 11 points v NEW away, 71 minutes
    Tavernier, gameweek 7: 10 points v SUN home, 78 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Manzambi, gameweek 8: 1 points v MCI home, 65 minutes
    Tavernier, gameweek 8: 10 points v MUN away, 86 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Manzambi, gameweek 9: 7 points v FUL home, 65 minutes
    Tavernier, gameweek 9: 3 points v LEE home, 90 minutes

Manzambi: 2 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2); Tavernier: 2 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWManzambiTavernier
418
5132
651
71110
8110
973

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWManzambiTavernier
42782
57174
68572
77178
86586
96590

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWManzambiTavernier
40.000.20
50.440.00
60.540.00
70.451.19
80.070.72
90.100.10

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWManzambiTavernier
40.080.47
50.160.11
60.160.04
70.170.16
80.000.21
90.010.03

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWManzambiTavernier
40.080.67
50.600.11
60.700.04
70.621.35
80.070.93
90.110.13

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWManzambiTavernier
428
576
645
7310
866
963

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWManzambiTavernier
401
510
600
711
801
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWManzambiTavernier
400
510
610
700
800
910

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWManzambiTavernier
40.1%3.9%
50.1%6.6%
60.8%7.3%
72.1%7.9%
83.0%13.5%
97.4%27.0%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWManzambiTavernier
4£5.9m£6.0m
5£5.9m£6.1m
6£5.9m£6.1m
7£5.9m£6.1m
8£6.0m£6.2m
9£6.1m£6.5m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWManzambiTavernier
4——
50.0%4.8%
60.4%4.1%
76.4%15.0%
87.8%42.4%
934.6%65.3%