How do Manzambi and Rogers compare?

Rogers has more season points (50 vs 38), Rogers is more owned (52.5% vs 7.1%), Manzambi is cheaper (6.1m vs 8.2m), Rogers has the higher Start rate (100% vs 56%), Manzambi has more Bonus (7 vs 3), but Manzambi has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.40 vs 2.80).

Manzambi

10 stats won

Rogers

20 stats won

Who wins more stats: Manzambi or Rogers?

Rogers wins 20 of 30 stats

Rogers wins 20 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Manzambi 10.

Points
Manzambi: 38Rogers: 50
xGI (6 gw)
Manzambi: 0.36Rogers: 0.32
Price
Manzambi: £6.1mRogers: £8.2m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionManzambiRogers
Price & ownership03
Playing time04
Recent form32
Season totals15
Set pieces11
Bonus22
Fixtures10
FPL ranks23
Total1020

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Manzambi: Points 38, xGI (6 gw) 0.36, BPS 138, Mins (6 gw) 64, DC (6 gw) 4.7, Upcoming FDR 2.40. Rogers: Points 50, xGI (6 gw) 0.32, BPS 230, Mins (6 gw) 89, DC (6 gw) 8.7, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Rogers leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatManzambiRogers
Price

6.1m−2.1m vs best

8.2m(best)

Ownership

7.1%−45.4% vs best

52.5%(best)

Top 10k ownership

34.6%−55.3% vs best

89.9%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Rogers leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatManzambiRogers
Starts

5−4 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

56%−44% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

384−406 vs best

790(best)

Avg minutes

43−45 vs best

88(best)

Who has better recent form?

Manzambi leads 3 of 5
Who has better recent form?
StatManzambiRogers
Mins (6 gw)

64−25 vs best

89(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.27

0.27

xA (6 gw)

0.10(best)

0.05−0.05 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.36(best)

0.32−0.04 vs best

DC (6 gw)

4.67−4.00 vs best

8.67(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.01(best)

1.29+0.28 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Rogers leads 5 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatManzambiRogers
Points

38−12 vs best

50(best)

Goals

2−3 vs best

5(best)

Assists

3(best)

1−2 vs best

Total xG

1.60−1.18 vs best

2.78(best)

Total xA

0.58−0.86 vs best

1.44(best)

DC (season)

28−41 vs best

69(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Split
Who takes the set pieces?
StatManzambiRogers
Corners & indirect FKs

—

6th choice(best)

Direct free kicks

2nd choice(best)

4th choice

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Split
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatManzambiRogers
BPS

138−92 vs best

230(best)

BPS (6 gw)

23.0−0.8 vs best

23.8(best)

Bonus

7(best)

3−4 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

1.2(best)

0.3−0.9 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Manzambi leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatManzambiRogers
Next 5 GWs

MUN

(A)

10

SUN

(H)

11

IPS

(A)

12

EVE

(H)

13

CRY

(H)

14

SUN

(A)

10

LEE

(H)

11

NFO

(A)

12

CRY

(H)

13

LIV

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.40(best)

2.80+0.40 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Rogers leads 3 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatManzambiRogers
Form

6.0(best)

6th MID · 17th overall

5.2

12th MID · 29th overall

ICT index

43.6

34th MID · 51st overall

70.7(best)

7th MID · 9th overall

Selected

15th MID

49th overall

1st MID(best)

2nd overall

Points per game

6.3(best)

2nd MID · 8th overall

5.6

9th MID · 25th overall

Cost rank

45th MID

65th overall

4th MID(best)

6th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • ManzambiAVL

    1. AVL v MUN away, gameweek 10: 1.24 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance
    2. AVL v SUN home, gameweek 11: 1.44 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
  • RogersCHE

    1. CHE v SUN away, gameweek 10: 1.48 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. CHE v LEE home, gameweek 11: 1.60 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Rogers (CHE) 3.1 projected team goals, Manzambi (AVL) 2.7 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Manzambi+0.4Manzambi: 2 goals from 1.60 xG (+0.4)
  • Rogers+2.2Rogers: 5 goals from 2.78 xG (+2.2)

Rogers has 2.2 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Manzambi+2.4Manzambi: 3 assists from 0.58 xA (+2.4)
  • Rogers−0.4Rogers: 1 assists from 1.44 xA (−0.4)

Manzambi has 2.4 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Manzambi · 38 pts29% from appearances

  • Rogers · 50 pts47% from goals

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceManzambiRogers
Appearances1118
Goals1025
Assists93
Clean sheets12
Defensive contribution02
Bonus73
Deductions0−3
Total3850

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Manzambi7.0(1)
  • Rogers8.0(1)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Manzambi7.5(4)
  • Rogers5.8(5)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Manzambi1.0(1)
  • Rogers4.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Rogers 4.3 points per game, Manzambi 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Manzambi3.5(4)
  • Rogers6.4(5)

Away

  • Manzambi12.0(2)
  • Rogers4.5(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Manzambi 12.0 points per game, Rogers 4.5 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Manzambi50%

    2 goals and 3 assists of 10 AVL goals

  • Rogers32%

    5 goals and 1 assist of 19 CHE goals

Manzambi is involved in 50% of AVL's goals, against 32% for Rogers.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Manzambi0 of 9 full games

    5 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 3 × Didn't play

  • Rogers6 of 9 full games

    6 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Manzambi161.6
  • Rogers272.6

Creativity

  • Manzambi106.7
  • Rogers222.8

Threat

  • Manzambi168.0
  • Rogers212.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Manzambi's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Rogers's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Manzambi+96.4k6.0k out102k in
  • Rogers+175k7.1k out182k in

Rogers has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+175k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Manzambi 6.2 points per £m (17th), Rogers 6.1 points per £m (21st). Median 2.5.
  • Manzambi
  • Rogers

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Manzambi 38, Rogers 31.

How far ahead is Manzambi? Above zero Manzambi leads; below, Rogers.

Manzambi is 7 points ahead of Rogers over these gameweeks. Manzambi's biggest lead was 9 (GW 7); Rogers's was 7 (GW 4).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Manzambi, gameweek 4: 1 points v NFO home, 27 minutes
    Rogers, gameweek 4: 8 points v HUL home, 90 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Manzambi, gameweek 5: 13 points v TOT away, 71 minutes
    Rogers, gameweek 5: 2 points v BRE away, 90 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Manzambi, gameweek 6: 5 points v BRE home, 85 minutes
    Rogers, gameweek 6: 9 points v BOU home, 83 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Manzambi, gameweek 7: 11 points v NEW away, 71 minutes
    Rogers, gameweek 7: 2 points v EVE away, 90 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Manzambi, gameweek 8: 1 points v MCI home, 65 minutes
    Rogers, gameweek 8: 1 points v TOT home, 90 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Manzambi, gameweek 9: 7 points v FUL home, 65 minutes
    Rogers, gameweek 9: 9 points v MUN home, 90 minutes

Manzambi: 2 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2); Rogers: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWManzambiRogers
418
5132
659
7112
811
979

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWManzambiRogers
42790
57190
68583
77190
86590
96590

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWManzambiRogers
40.000.21
50.440.33
60.540.18
70.450.17
80.070.06
90.100.65

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWManzambiRogers
40.080.02
50.160.07
60.160.07
70.170.06
80.000.03
90.010.05

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWManzambiRogers
40.080.23
50.600.40
60.700.25
70.620.23
80.070.09
90.110.70

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWManzambiRogers
426
578
6413
7311
866
968

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWManzambiRogers
401
510
601
710
800
901

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWManzambiRogers
400
510
610
700
800
910

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWManzambiRogers
40.1%35.9%
50.1%40.4%
60.8%43.1%
72.1%47.4%
83.0%49.9%
97.4%51.2%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWManzambiRogers
4£5.9m£7.6m
5£5.9m£7.7m
6£5.9m£7.8m
7£5.9m£7.9m
8£6.0m£8.0m
9£6.1m£8.1m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWManzambiRogers
4——
50.0%53.6%
60.4%78.3%
76.4%81.0%
87.8%83.0%
934.6%89.9%