How do Manzambi and Ødegaard compare?

Ødegaard has more season points (39 vs 38), Ødegaard is more owned (16.5% vs 7.1%), Manzambi is cheaper (6.1m vs 6.7m), Ødegaard has the higher Start rate (100% vs 56%), Manzambi has more Bonus (7 vs 6), but Manzambi has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.40 vs 3.20).

Manzambi

11 stats won

Ødegaard

20 stats won

Who wins more stats: Manzambi or Ødegaard?

Ødegaard wins 20 of 31 stats

Ødegaard wins 20 of the 31 stats with an outright best. Others: Manzambi 11.

Points
Manzambi: 38Ødegaard: 39
xGI (6 gw)
Manzambi: 0.36Ødegaard: 0.37
Price
Manzambi: £6.1mØdegaard: £6.7m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionManzambiØdegaard
Price & ownership12
Playing time04
Recent form24
Season totals14
Set pieces12
Bonus31
Fixtures10
FPL ranks23
Total1120

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Manzambi: Points 38, xGI (6 gw) 0.36, BPS 138, Mins (6 gw) 64, DC (6 gw) 4.7, Upcoming FDR 2.40. Ødegaard: Points 39, xGI (6 gw) 0.37, BPS 194, Mins (6 gw) 85, DC (6 gw) 4.3, Upcoming FDR 3.20.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Ødegaard leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatManzambiØdegaard
Price

6.1m−0.6m vs best

6.7m(best)

Ownership

7.1%−9.4% vs best

16.5%(best)

Top 10k ownership

34.6%(best)

4.0%−30.6% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Ødegaard leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatManzambiØdegaard
Starts

5−4 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

56%−44% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

384−349 vs best

733(best)

Avg minutes

43−38 vs best

81(best)

Who has better recent form?

Ødegaard leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatManzambiØdegaard
Mins (6 gw)

64−21 vs best

85(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.27(best)

0.19−0.08 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.10−0.08 vs best

0.18(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.36−0.01 vs best

0.37(best)

DC (6 gw)

4.67(best)

4.33−0.34 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.01+0.07 vs best

0.94(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Ødegaard leads 4 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatManzambiØdegaard
Points

38−1 vs best

39(best)

Goals

2

2

Assists

3(best)

0−3 vs best

Total xG

1.60−0.56 vs best

2.16(best)

Total xA

0.58−1.56 vs best

2.14(best)

DC (season)

28−14 vs best

42(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Ødegaard leads 2 of 3
Who takes the set pieces?
StatManzambiØdegaard
Corners & indirect FKs

—

3rd choice(best)

Direct free kicks

2nd choice(best)

4th choice

Penalties

—

3rd choice(best)

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Manzambi leads 3 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatManzambiØdegaard
BPS

138−56 vs best

194(best)

BPS (6 gw)

23.0(best)

15.5−7.5 vs best

Bonus

7(best)

6−1 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

1.2(best)

0.0−1.2 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Manzambi leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatManzambiØdegaard
Next 5 GWs

MUN

(A)

10

SUN

(H)

11

IPS

(A)

12

EVE

(H)

13

CRY

(H)

14

HUL

(H)

10

NEW

(A)

11

MCI

(H)

12

BRE

(A)

13

TOT

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.40(best)

3.20+0.80 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Ødegaard leads 3 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatManzambiØdegaard
Form

6.0(best)

6th MID · 17th overall

2.5

73rd MID · 161st overall

ICT index

43.6

34th MID · 51st overall

60.7(best)

13th MID · 18th overall

Selected

15th MID

49th overall

8th MID(best)

23rd overall

Points per game

6.3(best)

2nd MID · 8th overall

4.3

27th MID · 67th overall

Cost rank

45th MID

65th overall

19th MID(best)

31st overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • ManzambiAVL

    1. AVL v MUN away, gameweek 10: 1.24 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance
    2. AVL v SUN home, gameweek 11: 1.44 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
  • ØdegaardARS

    1. ARS v HUL home, gameweek 10: 2.79 projected goals, 53% clean sheet chance
    2. ARS v NEW away, gameweek 11: 1.80 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Ødegaard (ARS) 4.6 projected team goals, Manzambi (AVL) 2.7 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Manzambi+0.4Manzambi: 2 goals from 1.60 xG (+0.4)
  • Ødegaard−0.2Ødegaard: 2 goals from 2.16 xG (−0.2)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Manzambi+2.4Manzambi: 3 assists from 0.58 xA (+2.4)
  • Ødegaard−2.1Ødegaard: 0 assists from 2.14 xA (−2.1)

Ødegaard has 2.1 fewer assists than xA; Manzambi has 2.4 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Manzambi · 38 pts29% from appearances

  • Ødegaard · 39 pts45% from appearances

    −1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceManzambiØdegaard
Appearances1118
Goals1010
Assists90
Clean sheets16
Bonus76
Deductions0−1
Total3839

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Manzambi7.0(1)
  • Ødegaard7.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Manzambi7.5(4)
  • Ødegaard2.5(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Manzambi1.0(1)
  • Ødegaard5.0(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Ødegaard 5.0 points per game, Manzambi 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Manzambi3.5(4)
  • Ødegaard6.3(4)

Away

  • Manzambi12.0(2)
  • Ødegaard2.8(5)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Manzambi 12.0 points per game, Ødegaard 2.8 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Manzambi50%

    2 goals and 3 assists of 10 AVL goals

  • Ødegaard14%

    2 goals and 0 assists of 14 ARS goals

Manzambi is involved in 50% of AVL's goals, against 14% for Ødegaard.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Manzambi0 of 9 full games

    5 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 3 × Didn't play

  • Ødegaard2 of 9 full games

    2 × 90 minutes, 7 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Manzambi161.6
  • Ødegaard163.6

Creativity

  • Manzambi106.7
  • Ødegaard274.1

Threat

  • Manzambi168.0
  • Ødegaard169.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Manzambi's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Ødegaard's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Manzambi+96.3k6.0k out102k in
  • Ødegaard−30.3k48.6k out18.3k in

Manzambi has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+96.3k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Manzambi 6.2 points per £m (17th), Ødegaard 5.8 points per £m (26th). Median 2.5.
  • Manzambi
  • Ødegaard

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Manzambi 38, Ødegaard 15.

How far ahead is Manzambi? Above zero Manzambi leads; below, Ødegaard.

Manzambi is 23 points ahead of Ødegaard over these gameweeks. Manzambi's biggest lead was 23 (GW 9); Ødegaard's was 2 (GW 4).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Manzambi, gameweek 4: 1 points v NFO home, 27 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 4: 3 points v SUN away, 84 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Manzambi, gameweek 5: 13 points v TOT away, 71 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 5: 2 points v BHA away, 72 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Manzambi, gameweek 6: 5 points v BRE home, 85 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 6: 1 points v LEE home, 89 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Manzambi, gameweek 7: 11 points v NEW away, 71 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 7: 3 points v NFO away, 90 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Manzambi, gameweek 8: 1 points v MCI home, 65 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 8: 3 points v EVE home, 90 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Manzambi, gameweek 9: 7 points v FUL home, 65 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 9: 3 points v LIV away, 87 minutes

Manzambi: 2 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2); Ødegaard: 0 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWManzambiØdegaard
413
5132
651
7113
813
973

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWManzambiØdegaard
42784
57172
68589
77190
86590
96587

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWManzambiØdegaard
40.000.00
50.440.07
60.540.82
70.450.00
80.070.26
90.100.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWManzambiØdegaard
40.080.25
50.160.02
60.160.12
70.170.16
80.000.42
90.010.12

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWManzambiØdegaard
40.080.25
50.600.09
60.700.94
70.620.16
80.070.68
90.110.12

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWManzambiØdegaard
425
572
646
732
863
968

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWManzambiØdegaard
400
510
600
710
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWManzambiØdegaard
400
510
610
700
800
910

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWManzambiØdegaard
40.1%19.1%
50.1%20.0%
60.8%20.4%
72.1%19.0%
83.0%18.4%
97.4%16.4%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWManzambiØdegaard
4£5.9m£6.7m
5£5.9m£6.8m
6£5.9m£6.8m
7£5.9m£6.8m
8£6.0m£6.8m
9£6.1m£6.7m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWManzambiØdegaard
4——
50.0%16.7%
60.4%14.5%
76.4%9.5%
87.8%7.1%
934.6%4.0%