How do Maatsen and Robertson compare?

Robertson has more season points (36 vs 13), Robertson is more owned (2.4% vs 0.4%), Robertson is cheaper (4.3m vs 4.4m), Robertson has the higher Start rate (78% vs 67%), Robertson has more Bonus (3 vs 1), but Maatsen has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.40 vs 2.80).

Maatsen

7 stats won

Robertson

24 stats won

Who wins more stats: Maatsen or Robertson?

Robertson wins 24 of 31 stats

Robertson wins 24 of the 31 stats with an outright best. Others: Maatsen 7.

Points
Maatsen: 13Robertson: 36
xGI (6 gw)
Maatsen: 0.06Robertson: 0.24
Price
Maatsen: £4.4mRobertson: £4.3m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionMaatsenRobertson
Price & ownership12
Playing time04
Recent form24
Season totals24
Set pieces02
Bonus04
Fixtures10
FPL ranks14
Total724

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Maatsen: Points 13, xGI (6 gw) 0.06, BPS 39, Mins (6 gw) 45, DC (6 gw) 2.8, Upcoming FDR 2.40. Robertson: Points 36, xGI (6 gw) 0.24, BPS 139, Mins (6 gw) 65, DC (6 gw) 2.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Robertson leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatMaatsenRobertson
Price

4.4m(best)

4.3m−0.1m vs best

Ownership

0.4%−2.0% vs best

2.4%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.2%−2.3% vs best

2.5%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Robertson leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatMaatsenRobertson
Starts

6−1 vs best

7(best)

Start rate

67%−11% vs best

78%(best)

Minutes (season)

515−59 vs best

574(best)

Avg minutes

57−7 vs best

64(best)

Who has better recent form?

Robertson leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatMaatsenRobertson
Mins (6 gw)

45−20 vs best

65(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.05(best)

0.04−0.01 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.01−0.20 vs best

0.21(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.06−0.18 vs best

0.24(best)

DC (6 gw)

2.83(best)

2.00−0.83 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.91+0.36 vs best

0.55(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Robertson leads 4 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatMaatsenRobertson
Points

13−23 vs best

36(best)

Goals

0

0

Assists

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Total xG

0.40(best)

0.27−0.13 vs best

Total xA

0.50−0.82 vs best

1.32(best)

DC (season)

37(best)

27−10 vs best

Clean sheets

1−2 vs best

3(best)

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Robertson leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatMaatsenRobertson
Corners & indirect FKs

—

6th choice(best)

Direct free kicks

—

7th choice(best)

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Robertson leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatMaatsenRobertson
BPS

39−100 vs best

139(best)

BPS (6 gw)

4.0−15.3 vs best

19.3(best)

Bonus

1−2 vs best

3(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.5 vs best

0.5(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Maatsen leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatMaatsenRobertson
Next 5 GWs

MUN

(A)

10

SUN

(H)

11

IPS

(A)

12

EVE

(H)

13

CRY

(H)

14

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.40(best)

2.80+0.40 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Robertson leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatMaatsenRobertson
Form

1.0

98th DEF · 270th overall

4.8(best)

13th DEF · 34th overall

ICT index

15.7

84th DEF · 233rd overall

45.0(best)

6th DEF · 45th overall

Selected

103rd DEF

281st overall

44th DEF(best)

118th overall

Points per game

2.2

93rd DEF · 238th overall

4.5(best)

23rd DEF · 55th overall

Cost rank

137th DEF(best)

537th overall

146th DEF

570th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • MaatsenAVL

    1. AVL v MUN away, gameweek 10: 1.24 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance
    2. AVL v SUN home, gameweek 11: 1.44 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
  • RobertsonTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Robertson (TOT) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Maatsen (AVL) 0.6 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Maatsen−0.4Maatsen: 0 goals from 0.40 xG (−0.4)
  • Robertson−0.3Robertson: 0 goals from 0.27 xG (−0.3)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Maatsen−0.5Maatsen: 0 assists from 0.50 xA (−0.5)
  • Robertson+0.7Robertson: 2 assists from 1.32 xA (+0.7)

Maatsen has 0.5 fewer assists than xA; Robertson has 0.7 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Maatsen−1.3Maatsen: 9 conceded from 10.34 xGC (−1.3)
  • Robertson−0.1Robertson: 8 conceded from 8.10 xGC (−0.1)

Maatsen has conceded 1.3 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Maatsen · 13 pts71% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Robertson · 36 pts39% from appearances

    −2 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceMaatsenRobertson
Appearances1215
Assists06
Clean sheets412
Defensive contribution02
Bonus13
Deductions−4−2
Total1336

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Maatsen4.5(2)
  • Robertson4.7(3)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Maatsen1.0(1)
  • Robertson4.3(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Maatsen1.0(3)
  • Robertson4.5(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Robertson 4.5 points per game, Maatsen 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Maatsen1.5(4)
  • Robertson5.2(5)

Away

  • Maatsen3.5(2)
  • Robertson3.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Maatsen 3.5 points per game, Robertson 3.3 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Maatsen0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 4 AVL goals

  • Robertson22%

    0 goals and 2 assists of 9 TOT goals

Robertson is involved in 22% of TOT's goals, against 0% for Maatsen.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Maatsen4 of 9 full games

    4 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 3 × Didn't play

  • Robertson3 of 9 full games

    3 × 90 minutes, 4 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Maatsen61.2
  • Robertson143.8

Creativity

  • Maatsen38.8
  • Robertson213.0

Threat

  • Maatsen57.0
  • Robertson93.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Maatsen's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Robertson's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Maatsen+411484 out895 in
  • Robertson+12.1k2.3k out14.5k in

Robertson has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+12.1k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Maatsen 3.0 points per £m (84th), Robertson 8.4 points per £m (14th). Median 3.3.
  • Maatsen
  • Robertson

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Robertson 30, Maatsen 5.

How far ahead is Maatsen? Above zero Maatsen leads; below, Robertson.

Robertson is 25 points ahead of Maatsen over these gameweeks. Robertson's was 25 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Maatsen, gameweek 4: 1 points v NFO home, 90 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 4: 7 points v EVE home, 90 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Maatsen, gameweek 5: 0 points v TOT away, 0 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 5: 4 points v AVL home, 90 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Maatsen, gameweek 6: 0 points v BRE home, 0 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 6: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Maatsen, gameweek 7: 0 points v NEW away, 0 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 7: 5 points v COV home, 68 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Maatsen, gameweek 8: 2 points v MCI home, 90 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 8: 6 points v CHE away, 64 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Maatsen, gameweek 9: 2 points v FUL home, 90 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 9: 8 points v CRY home, 76 minutes

Maatsen: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Robertson: 0 hauls (10+), 1 blank (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWMaatsenRobertson
417
504
600
705
826
928

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWMaatsenRobertson
49090
5090
600
7068
89064
99076

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWMaatsenRobertson
40.180.07
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.070.04
90.050.10

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWMaatsenRobertson
40.030.09
50.000.26
60.000.00
70.000.02
80.030.10
90.020.77

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWMaatsenRobertson
40.210.16
50.000.26
60.000.00
70.000.02
80.100.14
90.070.87

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWMaatsenRobertson
442
503
600
702
872
963

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWMaatsenRobertson
41.661.11
50.001.16
60.000.00
70.000.52
81.560.39
92.240.14

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWMaatsenRobertson
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWMaatsenRobertson
400
501
600
701
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWMaatsenRobertson
40.9%2.6%
50.5%2.6%
60.4%2.4%
70.4%2.2%
80.3%2.1%
90.4%2.5%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWMaatsenRobertson
4£4.5m£4.4m
5£4.5m£4.4m
6£4.4m£4.4m
7£4.4m£4.4m
8£4.4m£4.4m
9£4.4m£4.3m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWMaatsenRobertson
4——
50.1%1.2%
60.1%0.6%
70.1%0.6%
80.0%0.5%
90.2%2.5%