How do Hill and Tarkowski compare?

Tarkowski has more season points (54 vs 38), Tarkowski is more owned (19% vs 2.6%), Hill is cheaper (5.5m vs 6.2m), Tarkowski has more Bonus (7 vs 4), but Hill has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hill

10 stats won

Tarkowski

15 stats won

Who wins more stats: Hill or Tarkowski?

Tarkowski wins 15 of 25 stats

Tarkowski wins 15 of the 25 stats with an outright best. Others: Hill 10.

Points
Hill: 38Tarkowski: 54
xGI (6 gw)
Hill: 0.04Tarkowski: 0.02
Price
Hill: £5.5mTarkowski: £6.2m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionHillTarkowski
Price & ownership03
Playing time00
Recent form50
Season totals25
Set pieces00
Bonus04
Fixtures10
FPL ranks23
Total1015

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Hill: Points 38, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 144, Mins (6 gw) 90, DC (6 gw) 12.8, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Tarkowski: Points 54, xGI (6 gw) 0.02, BPS 195, Mins (6 gw) 90, DC (6 gw) 10.5, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Tarkowski leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatHillTarkowski
Price

5.5m−0.7m vs best

6.2m(best)

Ownership

2.6%−16% vs best

19%(best)

Top 10k ownership

8.9%−0.4% vs best

9.3%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

No outright winner
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatHillTarkowski
Starts

9

9

Start rate

100%

100%

Minutes (season)

810

810

Avg minutes

90

90

Who has better recent form?

Hill leads 5 of 5
Who has better recent form?
StatHillTarkowski
Mins (6 gw)

90

90

xG (6 gw)

0.01(best)

0.00−0.01 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.03(best)

0.01−0.02 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.04(best)

0.02−0.02 vs best

DC (6 gw)

12.83(best)

10.50−2.33 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.87(best)

1.36+0.49 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Tarkowski leads 5 of 7
Who has scored more this season?
StatHillTarkowski
Points

38−16 vs best

54(best)

Goals

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Assists

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Total xG

0.05−0.13 vs best

0.18(best)

Total xA

0.92(best)

0.11−0.81 vs best

DC (season)

101(best)

94−7 vs best

Clean sheets

3−1 vs best

4(best)

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatHillTarkowski
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Tarkowski leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatHillTarkowski
BPS

144−51 vs best

195(best)

BPS (6 gw)

20.2−1.8 vs best

22.0(best)

Bonus

4−3 vs best

7(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.7−0.1 vs best

0.8(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Hill leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatHillTarkowski
Next 5 GWs

IPS

(A)

10

NFO

(H)

11

FUL

(A)

12

BHA

(H)

13

HUL

(H)

14

COV

(H)

10

BRE

(A)

11

LIV

(H)

12

AVL

(A)

13

FUL

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80(best)

3.00+0.20 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Tarkowski leads 3 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatHillTarkowski
Form

6.5(best)

6th DEF · 12th overall

2.8

49th DEF · 136th overall

ICT index

35.4(best)

22nd DEF · 80th overall

34.7

25th DEF · 87th overall

Selected

42nd DEF

115th overall

7th DEF(best)

21st overall

Points per game

4.2

33rd DEF · 75th overall

6.0(best)

7th DEF · 17th overall

Cost rank

15th DEF

140th overall

4th DEF(best)

51st overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • HillBOU

    1. BOU v IPS away, gameweek 10: 1.56 projected goals, 35% clean sheet chance
    2. BOU v NFO home, gameweek 11: 1.54 projected goals, 39% clean sheet chance

  • TarkowskiEVE

    1. EVE v COV home, gameweek 10: 1.64 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
    2. EVE v BRE away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Hill (BOU) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Tarkowski (EVE) 0.6 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Hill−0.1Hill: 0 goals from 0.05 xG (−0.1)
  • Tarkowski+0.8Tarkowski: 1 goals from 0.18 xG (+0.8)

Tarkowski has 0.8 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Hill−0.9Hill: 0 assists from 0.92 xA (−0.9)
  • Tarkowski+0.9Tarkowski: 1 assists from 0.11 xA (+0.9)

Hill has 0.9 fewer assists than xA; Tarkowski has 0.9 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Hill+3.0Hill: 13 conceded from 10.00 xGC (+3.0)
  • Tarkowski−4.0Tarkowski: 9 conceded from 12.99 xGC (−4.0)

Hill has conceded 3.0 more than xGC; Tarkowski has conceded 4.0 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Hill · 38 pts41% from appearances

    −6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Tarkowski · 54 pts30% from appearances

    −6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceHillTarkowski
Appearances1818
Goals06
Assists03
Clean sheets1216
Defensive contribution1010
Bonus47
Deductions−6−6
Total3854

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Hill7.0(1)
  • Tarkowski7.7(3)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Hill4.8(5)
  • Tarkowski5.7(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Hill2.3(3)
  • Tarkowski4.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Tarkowski 4.7 points per game, Hill 2.3 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Hill4.6(5)
  • Tarkowski5.8(4)

Away

  • Hill3.8(4)
  • Tarkowski6.2(5)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Tarkowski 6.2 points per game, Hill 3.8 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Hill0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 14 BOU goals

  • Tarkowski22%

    1 goal and 1 assist of 9 EVE goals

Tarkowski is involved in 22% of EVE's goals, against 0% for Hill.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Hill9 of 9 full games

    9 × 90 minutes

  • Tarkowski9 of 9 full games

    9 × 90 minutes

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Hill236.6
  • Tarkowski259.0

Creativity

  • Hill95.0
  • Tarkowski51.8

Threat

  • Hill23.0
  • Tarkowski36.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Hill's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Tarkowski's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Hill+28.7k4.9k out33.6k in
  • Tarkowski+14.0k22.1k out36.1k in

Hill has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+28.7k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Hill 6.9 points per £m (33rd), Tarkowski 8.7 points per £m (10th). Median 3.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Hill
  • Tarkowski

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Tarkowski 33, Hill 32.

How far ahead is Hill? Above zero Hill leads; below, Tarkowski.

Tarkowski is 1 point ahead of Hill over these gameweeks. Tarkowski's was 17 (GW 6).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Hill, gameweek 4: 2 points v BRE home, 90 minutes
    Tarkowski, gameweek 4: 8 points v TOT away, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Hill, gameweek 5: 4 points v LIV home, 90 minutes
    Tarkowski, gameweek 5: 14 points v IPS home, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Hill, gameweek 6: 2 points v CHE away, 90 minutes
    Tarkowski, gameweek 6: 3 points v HUL away, 90 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Hill, gameweek 7: 7 points v SUN home, 90 minutes
    Tarkowski, gameweek 7: 0 points v CHE home, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Hill, gameweek 8: 11 points v MUN away, 90 minutes
    Tarkowski, gameweek 8: 2 points v ARS away, 90 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Hill, gameweek 9: 6 points v LEE home, 90 minutes
    Tarkowski, gameweek 9: 6 points v NEW away, 90 minutes

Hill: 1 haul (10+), 2 blanks (0–2); Tarkowski: 1 haul (10+), 2 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWHillTarkowski
428
5414
623
770
8112
966

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWHillTarkowski
49090
59090
69090
79090
89090
99090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWHillTarkowski
40.000.00
50.000.01
60.000.00
70.040.00
80.000.00
90.010.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWHillTarkowski
40.010.01
50.020.01
60.020.01
70.100.05
80.010.01
90.000.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWHillTarkowski
40.010.01
50.020.02
60.020.01
70.140.05
80.010.01
90.010.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWHillTarkowski
4118
51512
61117
797
82210
999

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWHillTarkowski
40.500.69
51.651.44
61.101.33
70.071.47
81.171.96
90.711.29

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWHillTarkowski
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWHillTarkowski
400
501
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWHillTarkowski
40.8%11.6%
50.7%14.9%
60.8%18.9%
70.8%18.5%
80.8%18.1%
93.1%19.2%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWHillTarkowski
4£5.5m£6.0m
5£5.5m£6.1m
6£5.5m£6.2m
7£5.5m£6.2m
8£5.5m£6.2m
9£5.5m£6.2m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWHillTarkowski
4——
50.1%30.9%
60.1%16.5%
70.1%11.1%
80.2%8.9%
98.9%9.3%