How do Calafiori and Hill compare?

Calafiori has more season points (51 vs 38), Calafiori is more owned (48% vs 2.6%), Hill is cheaper (5.5m vs 5.9m), Hill has the higher Start rate (100% vs 89%), Hill has more Bonus (4 vs 3), but Hill has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).

← Back to players Pick different players

Calafiori

17 stats won

Hill

13 stats won

Who wins more stats: Calafiori or Hill?

Calafiori wins 17 of 30 stats

Calafiori wins 17 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Hill 13.

Points
Calafiori: 51Hill: 38
xGI (6 gw)
Calafiori: 0.18Hill: 0.04
Price
Calafiori: £5.9mHill: £5.5m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionCalafioriHill
Price & ownership30
Playing time04
Recent form33
Season totals61
Set pieces00
Bonus13
Fixtures01
FPL ranks41
Total1713

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Calafiori: Points 51, xGI (6 gw) 0.18, BPS 146, Mins (6 gw) 77, DC (6 gw) 4.5, Upcoming FDR 3.20. Hill: Points 38, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 144, Mins (6 gw) 90, DC (6 gw) 12.8, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Calafiori leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatCalafioriHill
Price

5.9m(best)

5.5m−0.4m vs best

Ownership

48%(best)

2.6%−45% vs best

Top 10k ownership

66.1%(best)

8.9%−57.2% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Hill leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatCalafioriHill
Starts

8−1 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

89%−11% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

699−111 vs best

810(best)

Avg minutes

78−12 vs best

90(best)

Who has better recent form?

Split
Who has better recent form?
StatCalafioriHill
Mins (6 gw)

77−13 vs best

90(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.11(best)

0.01−0.10 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.07(best)

0.03−0.04 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.18(best)

0.04−0.14 vs best

DC (6 gw)

4.50−8.33 vs best

12.83(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.99+0.12 vs best

0.87(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Calafiori leads 6 of 7
Who has scored more this season?
StatCalafioriHill
Points

51(best)

38−13 vs best

Goals

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Assists

2(best)

0−2 vs best

Total xG

1.22(best)

0.05−1.17 vs best

Total xA

1.00(best)

0.92−0.08 vs best

DC (season)

36−65 vs best

101(best)

Clean sheets

5(best)

3−2 vs best

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatCalafioriHill
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Hill leads 3 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatCalafioriHill
BPS

146(best)

144−2 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

14.2−6.0 vs best

20.2(best)

Bonus

3−1 vs best

4(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.2−0.5 vs best

0.7(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Hill leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatCalafioriHill
Next 5 GWs

HUL

(H)

10

NEW

(A)

11

MCI

(H)

12

BRE

(A)

13

TOT

(A)

14

IPS

(A)

10

NFO

(H)

11

FUL

(A)

12

BHA

(H)

13

HUL

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.20+0.40 vs best

2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Calafiori leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatCalafioriHill
Form

5.5

8th DEF · 23rd overall

6.5(best)

6th DEF · 12th overall

ICT index

37.1(best)

19th DEF · 73rd overall

35.4

22nd DEF · 80th overall

Selected

1st DEF(best)

3rd overall

42nd DEF

115th overall

Points per game

5.7(best)

10th DEF · 23rd overall

4.2

33rd DEF · 75th overall

Cost rank

10th DEF(best)

87th overall

15th DEF

140th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • CalafioriARS

    1. ARS v HUL home, gameweek 10: 2.79 projected goals, 53% clean sheet chance
    2. ARS v NEW away, gameweek 11: 1.80 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

  • HillBOU

    1. BOU v IPS away, gameweek 10: 1.56 projected goals, 35% clean sheet chance
    2. BOU v NFO home, gameweek 11: 1.54 projected goals, 39% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Calafiori (ARS) 0.9 expected clean sheets, Hill (BOU) 0.7 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Calafiori−0.2Calafiori: 1 goals from 1.22 xG (−0.2)
  • Hill−0.1Hill: 0 goals from 0.05 xG (−0.1)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Calafiori+1.0Calafiori: 2 assists from 1.00 xA (+1.0)
  • Hill−0.9Hill: 0 assists from 0.92 xA (−0.9)

Hill has 0.9 fewer assists than xA; Calafiori has 1.0 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Calafiori−1.6Calafiori: 5 conceded from 6.57 xGC (−1.6)
  • Hill+3.0Hill: 13 conceded from 10.00 xGC (+3.0)

Hill has conceded 3.0 more than xGC; Calafiori has conceded 1.6 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Calafiori · 51 pts38% from clean sheets

    −1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Hill · 38 pts41% from appearances

    −6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceCalafioriHill
Appearances1718
Goals60
Assists60
Clean sheets2012
Defensive contribution010
Bonus34
Deductions−1−6
Total5138

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Calafiori7.5(2)
  • Hill7.0(1)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Calafiori6.8(4)
  • Hill4.8(5)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Calafiori3.0(3)
  • Hill2.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Calafiori 3.0 points per game, Hill 2.3 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Calafiori5.3(4)
  • Hill4.6(5)

Away

  • Calafiori6.0(5)
  • Hill3.8(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Calafiori 6.0 points per game, Hill 3.8 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Calafiori21%

    1 goal and 2 assists of 14 ARS goals

  • Hill0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 14 BOU goals

Calafiori is involved in 21% of ARS's goals, against 0% for Hill.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Calafiori5 of 9 full games

    5 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59

  • Hill9 of 9 full games

    9 × 90 minutes

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Calafiori148.4
  • Hill236.6

Creativity

  • Calafiori89.0
  • Hill95.0

Threat

  • Calafiori132.0
  • Hill23.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Calafiori's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Hill's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Calafiori−32.5k76.0k out43.6k in
  • Hill+28.8k4.9k out33.7k in

Hill has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+28.8k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Calafiori 8.6 points per £m (12th), Hill 6.9 points per £m (33rd). Median 3.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Calafiori
  • Hill

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Hill 32, Calafiori 29.

How far ahead is Calafiori? Above zero Calafiori leads; below, Hill.

Hill is 3 points ahead of Calafiori over these gameweeks. Calafiori's biggest lead was 8 (GW 6); Hill's was 3 (GW 8).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Calafiori, gameweek 4: 6 points v SUN away, 90 minutes
    Hill, gameweek 4: 2 points v BRE home, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Calafiori, gameweek 5: 1 points v BHA away, 90 minutes
    Hill, gameweek 5: 4 points v LIV home, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Calafiori, gameweek 6: 9 points v LEE home, 81 minutes
    Hill, gameweek 6: 2 points v CHE away, 90 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Calafiori, gameweek 7: 6 points v NFO away, 90 minutes
    Hill, gameweek 7: 7 points v SUN home, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Calafiori, gameweek 8: 1 points v EVE home, 22 minutes
    Hill, gameweek 8: 11 points v MUN away, 90 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Calafiori, gameweek 9: 6 points v LIV away, 90 minutes
    Hill, gameweek 9: 6 points v LEE home, 90 minutes

Calafiori: 0 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2); Hill: 1 haul (10+), 2 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWCalafioriHill
462
514
692
767
8111
966

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWCalafioriHill
49090
59090
68190
79090
82290
99090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWCalafioriHill
40.060.00
50.070.00
60.550.00
70.000.04
80.000.00
90.000.01

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWCalafioriHill
40.010.01
50.030.02
60.060.02
70.300.10
80.000.01
90.020.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWCalafioriHill
40.070.01
50.100.02
60.610.02
70.300.14
80.000.01
90.020.01

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWCalafioriHill
4411
5515
6411
729
8322
999

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWCalafioriHill
41.800.50
51.311.65
60.621.10
70.900.07
80.241.17
91.050.71

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWCalafioriHill
400
500
610
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWCalafioriHill
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWCalafioriHill
449.6%0.8%
550.3%0.7%
651.7%0.8%
753.5%0.8%
855.1%0.8%
946.4%3.1%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWCalafioriHill
4£5.8m£5.5m
5£5.8m£5.5m
6£5.9m£5.5m
7£5.9m£5.5m
8£6.0m£5.5m
9£5.9m£5.5m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWCalafioriHill
4——
578.4%0.1%
695.0%0.1%
795.9%0.1%
890.8%0.2%
966.1%8.9%