How do Hill and Matheus N. compare?

Hill has more season points (38 vs 21), Hill is more owned (2.6% vs 0.9%), Hill is cheaper (5.5m vs 5.9m), Hill has the higher Start rate (100% vs 56%), Hill has more Bonus (4 vs 1), but Hill has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hill

22 stats won

Matheus N.

6 stats won

Who wins more stats: Hill or Matheus N.?

Hill wins 22 of 28 stats

Hill wins 22 of the 28 stats with an outright best. Others: Matheus N. 6.

Points
Hill: 38Matheus N.: 21
xGI (6 gw)
Hill: 0.04Matheus N.: 0.05
Price
Hill: £5.5mMatheus N.: £5.9m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionHillMatheus N.
Price & ownership21
Playing time40
Recent form32
Season totals41
Set pieces01
Bonus40
Fixtures10
FPL ranks41
Total226

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Hill: Points 38, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 144, Mins (6 gw) 90, DC (6 gw) 12.8, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Matheus N.: Points 21, xGI (6 gw) 0.05, BPS 85, Mins (6 gw) 73, DC (6 gw) 5.5, Upcoming FDR 3.20.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Hill leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatHillMatheus N.
Price

5.5m−0.4m vs best

5.9m(best)

Ownership

2.6%(best)

0.9%−1.7% vs best

Top 10k ownership

8.9%(best)

0.0%−8.9% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Hill leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatHillMatheus N.
Starts

9(best)

5−4 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

56%−44% vs best

Minutes (season)

810(best)

468−342 vs best

Avg minutes

90(best)

52−38 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Hill leads 3 of 5
Who has better recent form?
StatHillMatheus N.
Mins (6 gw)

90(best)

73−17 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.01−0.01 vs best

0.02(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.03

0.03

xGI (6 gw)

0.04−0.01 vs best

0.05(best)

DC (6 gw)

12.83(best)

5.50−7.33 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.87(best)

1.24+0.37 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Hill leads 4 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatHillMatheus N.
Points

38(best)

21−17 vs best

Goals

0

0

Assists

0

0

Total xG

0.05−0.10 vs best

0.15(best)

Total xA

0.92(best)

0.21−0.71 vs best

DC (season)

101(best)

34−67 vs best

Clean sheets

3(best)

2−1 vs best

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Matheus N. leads 1 of 1
Who takes the set pieces?
StatHillMatheus N.
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

4th choice(best)

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Hill leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatHillMatheus N.
BPS

144(best)

85−59 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

20.2(best)

13.5−6.7 vs best

Bonus

4(best)

1−3 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.7(best)

0.2−0.5 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Hill leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatHillMatheus N.
Next 5 GWs

IPS

(A)

10

NFO

(H)

11

FUL

(A)

12

BHA

(H)

13

HUL

(H)

14

NFO

(A)

10

FUL

(H)

11

ARS

(A)

12

LEE

(H)

13

BRE

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80(best)

3.20+0.40 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Hill leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatHillMatheus N.
Form

6.5(best)

6th DEF · 12th overall

2.5

57th DEF · 160th overall

ICT index

35.4(best)

22nd DEF · 80th overall

15.6

85th DEF · 235th overall

Selected

42nd DEF(best)

115th overall

74th DEF

189th overall

Points per game

4.2(best)

33rd DEF · 75th overall

3.5

54th DEF · 125th overall

Cost rank

15th DEF

140th overall

9th DEF(best)

86th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • HillBOU

    1. BOU v IPS away, gameweek 10: 1.56 projected goals, 35% clean sheet chance
    2. BOU v NFO home, gameweek 11: 1.54 projected goals, 39% clean sheet chance

  • Matheus N.MCI

    1. MCI v NFO away, gameweek 10: 1.74 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. MCI v FUL home, gameweek 11: 2.13 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Matheus N. (MCI) 0.8 expected clean sheets, Hill (BOU) 0.7 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Hill−0.1Hill: 0 goals from 0.05 xG (−0.1)
  • Matheus N.−0.1Matheus N.: 0 goals from 0.15 xG (−0.1)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Hill−0.9Hill: 0 assists from 0.92 xA (−0.9)
  • Matheus N.−0.2Matheus N.: 0 assists from 0.21 xA (−0.2)

Hill has 0.9 fewer assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Hill+3.0Hill: 13 conceded from 10.00 xGC (+3.0)
  • Matheus N.−2.6Matheus N.: 5 conceded from 7.57 xGC (−2.6)

Hill has conceded 3.0 more than xGC; Matheus N. has conceded 2.6 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Hill · 38 pts41% from appearances

    −6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Matheus N. · 21 pts50% from appearances

    −1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceHillMatheus N.
Appearances1811
Clean sheets128
Defensive contribution102
Bonus41
Deductions−6−1
Total3821

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Hill7.0(1)
  • Matheus N.1.5(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Hill4.8(5)
  • Matheus N.5.0(2)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Hill2.3(3)
  • Matheus N.4.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Matheus N. 4.0 points per game, Hill 2.3 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Hill4.6(5)
  • Matheus N.1.5(4)

Away

  • Hill3.8(4)
  • Matheus N.7.5(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Matheus N. 7.5 points per game, Hill 3.8 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Hill0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 14 BOU goals

  • Matheus N.0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 14 MCI goals

Hill is involved in 0% of BOU's goals, against 0% for Matheus N..

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Hill9 of 9 full games

    9 × 90 minutes

  • Matheus N.4 of 9 full games

    4 × 90 minutes, 1 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 3 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Hill236.6
  • Matheus N.95.4

Creativity

  • Hill95.0
  • Matheus N.31.7

Threat

  • Hill23.0
  • Matheus N.29.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Hill's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Matheus N.'s biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Hill+28.8k4.9k out33.7k in
  • Matheus N.+407965 out1.4k in

Hill has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+28.8k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Hill 6.9 points per £m (33rd), Matheus N. 3.6 points per £m (77th). Median 3.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Hill
  • Matheus N.

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Hill 32, Matheus N. 20.

How far ahead is Hill? Above zero Hill leads; below, Matheus N..

Hill is 12 points ahead of Matheus N. over these gameweeks. Hill's biggest lead was 12 (GW 9); Matheus N.'s was 8 (GW 6).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Hill, gameweek 4: 2 points v BRE home, 90 minutes
    Matheus N., gameweek 4: 9 points v MUN away, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Hill, gameweek 5: 4 points v LIV home, 90 minutes
    Matheus N., gameweek 5: 1 points v SUN home, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Hill, gameweek 6: 2 points v CHE away, 90 minutes
    Matheus N., gameweek 6: 6 points v LIV away, 90 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Hill, gameweek 7: 7 points v SUN home, 90 minutes
    Matheus N., gameweek 7: 2 points v IPS home, 75 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Hill, gameweek 8: 11 points v MUN away, 90 minutes
    Matheus N., gameweek 8: 0 points v AVL away, 0 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Hill, gameweek 9: 6 points v LEE home, 90 minutes
    Matheus N., gameweek 9: 2 points v BHA home, 90 minutes

Hill: 1 haul (10+), 2 blanks (0–2); Matheus N.: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWHillMatheus N.
429
541
626
772
8110
962

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWHillMatheus N.
49090
59090
69090
79075
8900
99090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWHillMatheus N.
40.000.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.040.00
80.000.00
90.010.15

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWHillMatheus N.
40.010.01
50.020.01
60.020.01
70.100.03
80.010.00
90.000.11

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWHillMatheus N.
40.010.01
50.020.01
60.020.01
70.140.03
80.010.00
90.010.26

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWHillMatheus N.
41111
5159
6115
793
8220
995

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWHillMatheus N.
40.501.00
51.653.57
61.100.94
70.070.96
81.170.00
90.711.00

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWHillMatheus N.
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWHillMatheus N.
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWHillMatheus N.
40.8%0.9%
50.7%1.0%
60.8%1.0%
70.8%1.1%
80.8%1.0%
93.1%0.9%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWHillMatheus N.
4£5.5m£5.9m
5£5.5m£5.9m
6£5.5m£5.9m
7£5.5m£5.9m
8£5.5m£5.9m
9£5.5m£5.9m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWHillMatheus N.
4——
50.1%0.0%
60.1%0.0%
70.1%0.1%
80.2%0.0%
98.9%0.0%