How do Hill and Senesi compare?
Hill has more season points (38 vs 5), Senesi is more owned (3% vs 2.6%), Hill is cheaper (5.5m vs 5.7m), Hill has the higher Start rate (100% vs 22%), but Hill has more Bonus (4 vs 0).
Who wins more stats: Hill or Senesi?
Hill wins 22 of 27 stats
Hill wins 22 of the 27 stats with an outright best. Others: Senesi 5.
- Points
- Hill: 38Senesi: 5
- xGI (6 gw)
- Hill: 0.04Senesi: 0.01
- Price
- Hill: £5.5mSenesi: £5.7m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 1 | 2 |
| Playing time | 4 | 0 |
| Recent form | 5 | 1 |
| Season totals | 5 | 0 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 4 | 0 |
| Fixtures | 0 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 3 | 2 |
| Total | 22 | 5 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Senesi leads 2 of 3
| Stat | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 5.5m−0.2m vs best | 5.7m(best) |
| Ownership | 2.6% | 3%(best) |
| Top 10k ownership | 8.9%(best) | 0.0%−8.9% vs best |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Hill leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 9(best) | 2−7 vs best |
| Start rate | 100%(best) | 22%−78% vs best |
| Minutes (season) | 810(best) | 178−632 vs best |
| Avg minutes | 90(best) | 20−70 vs best |
Who has better recent form?
Hill leads 5 of 6
| Stat | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 90(best) | 15−75 vs best |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.01(best) | 0.00−0.01 vs best |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.03(best) | 0.01−0.02 vs best |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.04(best) | 0.01−0.03 vs best |
| DC (6 gw) | 12.83(best) | 0.50−12.33 vs best |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 0.87+0.78 vs best | 0.09(best) |
Who has scored more this season?
Hill leads 5 of 5
| Stat | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 38(best) | 5−33 vs best |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 0.05(best) | 0.00−0.05 vs best |
| Total xA | 0.92(best) | 0.07−0.85 vs best |
| DC (season) | 101(best) | 19−82 vs best |
| Clean sheets | 3(best) | 0−3 vs best |
See alsoDefender stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Hill leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 144(best) | 22−122 vs best |
| BPS (6 gw) | 20.2(best) | 2.0−18.2 vs best |
| Bonus | 4(best) | 0−4 vs best |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.7(best) | 0.0−0.7 vs best |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
No outright winner
| Stat | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | IPS (A) 10 NFO (H) 11 FUL (A) 12 BHA (H) 13 HUL (H) 14 | LEE (A) 10 IPS (H) 11 SUN (A) 12 FUL (H) 13 ARS (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 2.80 | 2.80 |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Hill leads 3 of 5
| Stat | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 6.5(best) 6th DEF · 12th overall | 0.5 120th DEF · 354th overall |
| ICT index | 35.4(best) 22nd DEF · 80th overall | 7.7 116th DEF · 323rd overall |
| Selected | 42nd DEF 115th overall | 38th DEF(best) 106th overall |
| Points per game | 4.2(best) 33rd DEF · 75th overall | 2.5 81st DEF · 209th overall |
| Cost rank | 15th DEF 140th overall | 11th DEF(best) 109th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
HillBOU
- BOU v IPS away, gameweek 10: 1.56 projected goals, 35% clean sheet chance
- BOU v NFO home, gameweek 11: 1.54 projected goals, 39% clean sheet chance
SenesiTOT
- TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
- TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Hill (BOU) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Senesi (TOT) 0.7 expected clean sheets.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals vs xG
- Hill−0.1Hill: 0 goals from 0.05 xG (−0.1)
- Senesi±0.0Senesi: 0 goals from 0.00 xG (±0.0)
Everyone is within half a goal of expected.
Assists vs xA
- Hill−0.9Hill: 0 assists from 0.92 xA (−0.9)
- Senesi−0.1Senesi: 0 assists from 0.07 xA (−0.1)
Hill has 0.9 fewer assists than xA.
Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better
- Hill+3.0Hill: 13 conceded from 10.00 xGC (+3.0)
- Senesi−0.4Senesi: 4 conceded from 4.44 xGC (−0.4)
Hill has conceded 3.0 more than xGC.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Hill · 38 pts41% from appearances
−6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Senesi · 5 pts67% from appearances
−1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
| Source | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 18 | 4 |
| Clean sheets | 12 | 0 |
| Defensive contribution | 10 | 2 |
| Bonus | 4 | 0 |
| Deductions | −6 | −1 |
| Total | 38 | 5 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Hill7.0(1)
- SenesiNo games
Medium (FDR 3)
- Hill4.8(5)
- Senesi2.0(1)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Hill2.3(3)
- Senesi3.0(1)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Senesi 3.0 points per game, Hill 2.3 points per game.
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Hill4.6(5)
- SenesiNo games
Away
- Hill3.8(4)
- Senesi2.5(2)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Hill 3.8 points per game, Senesi 2.5 points per game.
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Hill0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 14 BOU goals
Senesi0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 1 TOT goals
Hill is involved in 0% of BOU's goals, against 0% for Senesi.
Who is a rotation risk?
Hill9 of 9 full games
9 × 90 minutes
Senesi1 of 9 full games
1 × 90 minutes, 1 × 60–89, 7 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Hill236.6
- Senesi49.8
Creativity
- Hill95.0
- Senesi25.0
Threat
- Hill23.0
- Senesi2.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Hill's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Senesi's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Hill+28.8k5.0k out33.7k in
- Senesi−4.7k6.2k out1.5k in
Hill has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+28.8k).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Hill
- Senesi
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Hill, gameweek 4: 2 points v BRE home, 90 minutesSenesi, gameweek 4: 0 points v EVE home, 0 minutesGW 5
Hill, gameweek 5: 4 points v LIV home, 90 minutesSenesi, gameweek 5: 0 points v AVL home, 0 minutesGW 6
Hill, gameweek 6: 2 points v CHE away, 90 minutesSenesi, gameweek 6: 2 points v MUN away, 88 minutesGW 7
Hill, gameweek 7: 7 points v SUN home, 90 minutesSenesi, gameweek 7: 0 points v COV home, 0 minutesGW 8
Hill, gameweek 8: 11 points v MUN away, 90 minutesSenesi, gameweek 8: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutesGW 9
Hill, gameweek 9: 6 points v LEE home, 90 minutesSenesi, gameweek 9: 0 points v CRY home, 0 minutes
Hill: 1 haul (10+), 2 blanks (0–2); Senesi: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2 | 0 |
| 5 | 4 | 0 |
| 6 | 2 | 2 |
| 7 | 7 | 0 |
| 8 | 11 | 0 |
| 9 | 6 | 0 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 90 | 0 |
| 5 | 90 | 0 |
| 6 | 90 | 88 |
| 7 | 90 | 0 |
| 8 | 90 | 0 |
| 9 | 90 | 0 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.04 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| 7 | 0.10 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| 7 | 0.14 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
Defensive contribution
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 11 | 0 |
| 5 | 15 | 0 |
| 6 | 11 | 3 |
| 7 | 9 | 0 |
| 8 | 22 | 0 |
| 9 | 9 | 0 |
Expected goals conceded (xGC)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 1.65 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 1.10 | 0.57 |
| 7 | 0.07 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.71 | 0.00 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.8% | 4.4% |
| 5 | 0.7% | 3.7% |
| 6 | 0.8% | 3.3% |
| 7 | 0.8% | 3.2% |
| 8 | 0.8% | 3.1% |
| 9 | 3.1% | 3.1% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £5.5m | £5.9m |
| 5 | £5.5m | £5.8m |
| 6 | £5.5m | £5.8m |
| 7 | £5.5m | £5.7m |
| 8 | £5.5m | £5.7m |
| 9 | £5.5m | £5.7m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hill | Senesi |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| 6 | 0.1% | 0.1% |
| 7 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| 8 | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| 9 | 8.9% | 0.0% |

