How do Gravenberch and Tielemans compare?

Tielemans has more season points (24 vs 11), Tielemans is more owned (1.2% vs 0.9%), Tielemans is cheaper (5.7m vs 5.8m), Tielemans has the higher Start rate (89% vs 44%), Tielemans has more Bonus (2 vs 0), but Gravenberch has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hide stats where they're level

Comparing 2 midfielders

Tielemans wins most stats

Liverpool

LIV · 5.8m

4 stats won

Man Utd

MUN · 5.7m

22 stats won

Who wins more stats: Gravenberch or Tielemans?

Tielemans wins 22 of 26 stats

Tielemans wins 22 of the 26 stats with an outright best. Others: Gravenberch 4.

Points: Gravenberch: 11Tielemans: 24
xGI (6 gw): Gravenberch: 0.04Tielemans: 0.15
Price: Gravenberch: £5.8mTielemans: £5.7m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
Section	Gravenberch	Tielemans
Price & ownership	1	1
Playing time	0	4
Recent form	1	4
Season totals	0	4
Set pieces	0	1
Bonus	0	4
Fixtures	1	0
FPL ranks	1	4
Total	4	22

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Gravenberch: Points 11, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 70, Mins (6 gw) 37, DC (6 gw) 5.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Tielemans: Points 24, xGI (6 gw) 0.15, BPS 136, Mins (6 gw) 57, DC (6 gw) 7.2, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Split

Who is more expensive and more owned?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tielemans
Price	5.8m(best)	5.7m−0.1m vs best
Ownership	0.9%−0.3% vs best	1.2%(best)

Top 10k ownership	0.0%	0.0%
Availability	75% · Foot injury - 75% chance of playing	Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Tielemans leads 4 of 4

Who starts and plays more minutes?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tielemans
Starts	4−4 vs best	8(best)

Start rate	44%−45% vs best	89%(best)

Minutes (season)	341−247 vs best	588(best)

Avg minutes	38−27 vs best	65(best)

Who has better recent form?

Tielemans leads 4 of 5

Who has better recent form?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tielemans
Mins (6 gw)	37−20 vs best	57(best)

xG (6 gw)	0.02	0.02
xA (6 gw)	0.02−0.11 vs best	0.13(best)

xGI (6 gw)	0.04−0.11 vs best	0.15(best)

DC (6 gw)	5.00−2.17 vs best	7.17(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better	0.40(best)	0.94+0.54 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Tielemans leads 4 of 4

Who has scored more this season?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tielemans
Points	11−13 vs best	24(best)

Goals	0	0
Assists	1	1
Total xG	0.17−0.50 vs best	0.67(best)

Total xA	0.17−0.90 vs best	1.07(best)

DC (season)	44−24 vs best	68(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Tielemans leads 1 of 1

Who takes the set pieces?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tielemans
Corners & indirect FKs	—	—
Direct free kicks	—	—
Penalties	—	3rd choice(best)
Penalties missed · lower is better	0	0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Tielemans leads 4 of 4

Who is collecting more bonus?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tielemans
BPS	70−66 vs best	136(best)

BPS (6 gw)	5.8−7.5 vs best	13.3(best)

Bonus	0−2 vs best	2(best)

Bonus (6 gw)	0.0−0.3 vs best	0.3(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Gravenberch leads 1 of 1

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tielemans
Next 5 GWs	CRY (A) 10 MUN (H) 11 EVE (A) 12 SUN (H) 13 CHE (A) 14	AVL (H) 10 LIV (A) 11 BRE (H) 12 NEW (A) 13 COV (H) 14
Avg FDR · lower is better	2.80(best)	3.00+0.20 vs best

See alsoSeason calendar Team rating Projected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Tielemans leads 4 of 5

How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tielemans
Form	0.5 173rd MID · 355th overall	2.5(best) 72nd MID · 159th overall
ICT index	17.3 104th MID · 218th overall	34.8(best) 50th MID · 85th overall
Selected	62nd MID 190th overall	52nd MID(best) 159th overall
Points per game	1.6 143rd MID · 311th overall	3.0(best) 71st MID · 169th overall
Cost rank	64th MID(best) 100th overall	67th MID 106th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

GravenberchLIV
1. LIV v CRY away, gameweek 10: 1.91 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
2. LIV v MUN home, gameweek 11: 1.70 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
TielemansMUN
1. MUN v AVL home, gameweek 10: 1.50 projected goals, 29% clean sheet chance
2. MUN v LIV away, gameweek 11: 1.00 projected goals, 18% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Gravenberch (LIV) 3.6 projected team goals, Tielemans (MUN) 2.5 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

Gravenberch−0.2Gravenberch: 0 goals from 0.17 xG (−0.2)
Tielemans−0.7Tielemans: 0 goals from 0.67 xG (−0.7)

Tielemans has 0.7 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

Gravenberch+0.8Gravenberch: 1 assists from 0.17 xA (+0.8)
Tielemans−0.1Tielemans: 1 assists from 1.07 xA (−0.1)

Gravenberch has 0.8 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

Gravenberch · 11 pts71% from appearances
−3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Tielemans · 24 pts56% from appearances
−1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
Source	Gravenberch	Tielemans
Appearances	10	14
Assists	3	3
Clean sheets	1	0
Defensive contribution	0	6
Bonus	0	2
Deductions	−3	−1
Total	11	24

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

Gravenberch1.0(2)
Tielemans3.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

Gravenberch3.0(2)
Tielemans3.2(5)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

Gravenberch1.0(3)
Tielemans2.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Tielemans 2.0 points per game, Gravenberch 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

Gravenberch1.0(4)
Tielemans2.3(4)

Away

Gravenberch2.3(3)
Tielemans3.8(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Tielemans 3.8 points per game, Gravenberch 2.3 points per game.

Gravenberch11%
0 goals and 1 assist of 9 LIV goals
Tielemans10%
0 goals and 1 assist of 10 MUN goals

Gravenberch is involved in 11% of LIV's goals, against 10% for Tielemans.

Who is a rotation risk?

Gravenberch1 of 9 full games
1 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play
Tielemans3 of 9 full games
3 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

Gravenberch79.8
Tielemans130.0

Creativity

Gravenberch68.8
Tielemans169.0

Threat

Gravenberch24.0
Tielemans49.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Gravenberch's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Tielemans's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

Gravenberch−1.1k2.0k out867 in
Tielemans−5.5k5.9k out384 in

Managers are selling all of them; Gravenberch the least (−1.1k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Gravenberch 1.9 points per £m (129th), Tielemans 4.2 points per £m (64th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

From To

Gravenberch
Tielemans

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Tielemans 16, Gravenberch 4.

How far ahead is Gravenberch? Above zero Gravenberch leads; below, Tielemans.

Tielemans is 12 points ahead of Gravenberch over these gameweeks. Tielemans's was 15 (GW 7).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

GW 4
Gravenberch, gameweek 4: 1 points v FUL home, 59 minutes
Tielemans, gameweek 4: 2 points v MCI home, 66 minutes
GW 5
Gravenberch, gameweek 5: 1 points v BOU away, 9 minutes
Tielemans, gameweek 5: 4 points v FUL away, 90 minutes
GW 6
Gravenberch, gameweek 6: -1 points v MCI home, 61 minutes
Tielemans, gameweek 6: 3 points v TOT home, 58 minutes
GW 7
Gravenberch, gameweek 7: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutes
Tielemans, gameweek 7: 7 points v LEE away, 83 minutes
GW 8
Gravenberch, gameweek 8: 3 points v BHA home, 90 minutes
Tielemans, gameweek 8: 0 points v BOU home, 45 minutes
GW 9
Gravenberch, gameweek 9: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutes
Tielemans, gameweek 9: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutes

Gravenberch: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Tielemans: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek

Points by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tielemans
4	1	2
5	1	4
6	-1	3
7	0	7
8	3	0
9	0	0

Minutes

Values by gameweek

Minutes by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tielemans
4	59	66
5	9	90
6	61	58
7	0	83
8	90	45
9	0	0

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tielemans
4	0.04	0.00
5	0.00	0.09
6	0.07	0.00
7	0.00	0.02
8	0.00	0.00
9	0.00	0.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek

Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tielemans
4	0.01	0.04
5	0.01	0.20
6	0.02	0.14
7	0.00	0.41
8	0.07	0.00
9	0.00	0.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek

Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tielemans
4	0.05	0.04
5	0.01	0.29
6	0.09	0.14
7	0.00	0.43
8	0.07	0.00
9	0.00	0.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek

Defensive contribution by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tielemans
4	10	5
5	1	13
6	8	18
7	0	7
8	11	0
9	0	0

Goals

Values by gameweek

Goals by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tielemans
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Assists

Values by gameweek

Assists by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tielemans
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	1
8	0	0
9	0	0

Ownership

Values by gameweek

Ownership by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tielemans
4	1.3%	1.7%
5	1.2%	1.5%
6	1.0%	1.4%
7	0.9%	1.4%
8	0.9%	1.4%
9	0.9%	1.3%

Price

Values by gameweek

Price by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tielemans
4	£5.9m	£5.9m
5	£5.9m	£5.8m
6	£5.8m	£5.8m
7	£5.8m	£5.7m
8	£5.8m	£5.7m
9	£5.8m	£5.7m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek

Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tielemans
4	—	—
5	0.0%	0.0%
6	0.0%	0.0%
7	0.0%	0.0%
8	0.0%	0.0%
9	0.0%	0.0%