How do Garnacho and Gravenberch compare?

Gravenberch has more season points (11 vs 4), Gravenberch is more owned (0.9% vs 0.3%), Garnacho is cheaper (5.7m vs 5.8m), Gravenberch has the higher Start rate (44% vs 0%), but Garnacho has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.40 vs 2.80).

Garnacho

2 stats won

Gravenberch

23 stats won

Who wins more stats: Garnacho or Gravenberch?

Gravenberch wins 23 of 25 stats

Gravenberch wins 23 of the 25 stats with an outright best. Others: Garnacho 2.

Points
Garnacho: 4Gravenberch: 11
xGI (6 gw)
Garnacho: 0.02Gravenberch: 0.04
Price
Garnacho: £5.7mGravenberch: £5.8m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionGarnachoGravenberch
Price & ownership02
Playing time04
Recent form15
Season totals05
Set pieces00
Bonus02
Fixtures10
FPL ranks05
Total223

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Garnacho: Points 4, xGI (6 gw) 0.02, BPS 14, Mins (6 gw) 1, DC (6 gw) 0.0, Upcoming FDR 2.40. Gravenberch: Points 11, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 70, Mins (6 gw) 37, DC (6 gw) 5.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Gravenberch leads 2 of 2
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatGarnachoGravenberch
Price

5.7m−0.1m vs best

5.8m(best)

Ownership

0.3%−0.6% vs best

0.9%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.0%

0.0%

Availability

Available

75% · Foot injury - 75% chance of playing

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Gravenberch leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatGarnachoGravenberch
Starts

0−4 vs best

4(best)

Start rate

0%−44% vs best

44%(best)

Minutes (season)

34−307 vs best

341(best)

Avg minutes

4−34 vs best

38(best)

Who has better recent form?

Gravenberch leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatGarnachoGravenberch
Mins (6 gw)

1−36 vs best

37(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.01−0.01 vs best

0.02(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.01−0.01 vs best

0.02(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.02−0.02 vs best

0.04(best)

DC (6 gw)

0.00−5.00 vs best

5.00(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.00(best)

0.40+0.40 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Gravenberch leads 5 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatGarnachoGravenberch
Points

4−7 vs best

11(best)

Goals

0

0

Assists

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Total xG

0.09−0.08 vs best

0.17(best)

Total xA

0.05−0.12 vs best

0.17(best)

DC (season)

2−42 vs best

44(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatGarnachoGravenberch
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Gravenberch leads 2 of 2
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatGarnachoGravenberch
BPS

14−56 vs best

70(best)

BPS (6 gw)

0.8−5.0 vs best

5.8(best)

Bonus

0

0

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0

0.0

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Garnacho leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatGarnachoGravenberch
Next 5 GWs

MUN

(A)

10

SUN

(H)

11

IPS

(A)

12

EVE

(H)

13

CRY

(H)

14

CRY

(A)

10

MUN

(H)

11

EVE

(A)

12

SUN

(H)

13

CHE

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.40(best)

2.80+0.40 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Gravenberch leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatGarnachoGravenberch
Form

0.2

188th MID · 384th overall

0.5(best)

173rd MID · 355th overall

ICT index

2.9

187th MID · 387th overall

17.3(best)

104th MID · 218th overall

Selected

108th MID

304th overall

62nd MID(best)

190th overall

Points per game

1.0

208th MID · 427th overall

1.6(best)

143rd MID · 311th overall

Cost rank

71st MID

113th overall

64th MID(best)

100th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • GarnachoAVL

    1. AVL v MUN away, gameweek 10: 1.24 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance
    2. AVL v SUN home, gameweek 11: 1.44 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
  • GravenberchLIV

    1. LIV v CRY away, gameweek 10: 1.91 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
    2. LIV v MUN home, gameweek 11: 1.70 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Gravenberch (LIV) 3.6 projected team goals, Garnacho (AVL) 2.7 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Garnacho−0.1Garnacho: 0 goals from 0.09 xG (−0.1)
  • Gravenberch−0.2Gravenberch: 0 goals from 0.17 xG (−0.2)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Garnacho−0.1Garnacho: 0 assists from 0.05 xA (−0.1)
  • Gravenberch+0.8Gravenberch: 1 assists from 0.17 xA (+0.8)

Gravenberch has 0.8 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Garnacho · 4 pts100% from appearances

  • Gravenberch · 11 pts71% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceGarnachoGravenberch
Appearances410
Assists03
Clean sheets01
Deductions0−3
Total411

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Garnacho1.0(2)
  • Gravenberch1.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • GarnachoNo games
  • Gravenberch3.0(2)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Garnacho1.0(2)
  • Gravenberch1.0(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Garnacho 1.0 points per game, Gravenberch 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Garnacho1.0(2)
  • Gravenberch1.0(4)

Away

  • Garnacho1.0(2)
  • Gravenberch2.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Gravenberch 2.3 points per game, Garnacho 1.0 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Garnacho0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 1 AVL goals

  • Gravenberch11%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 9 LIV goals

Gravenberch is involved in 11% of LIV's goals, against 0% for Garnacho.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Garnacho0 of 9 full games

    4 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

  • Gravenberch1 of 9 full games

    1 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Garnacho5.2
  • Gravenberch79.8

Creativity

  • Garnacho18.1
  • Gravenberch68.8

Threat

  • Garnacho5.0
  • Gravenberch24.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Garnacho's biggest score is creativity, a creator; Gravenberch's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Garnacho−260504 out244 in
  • Gravenberch−1.1k2.0k out867 in

Managers are selling all of them; Garnacho the least (−260 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Garnacho 0.7 points per £m (179th), Gravenberch 1.9 points per £m (129th). Median 2.5.
  • Garnacho
  • Gravenberch

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Gravenberch 4, Garnacho 1.

How far ahead is Garnacho? Above zero Garnacho leads; below, Gravenberch.

Gravenberch is 3 points ahead of Garnacho over these gameweeks. Gravenberch's was 4 (GW 8).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Garnacho, gameweek 4: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutes
    Gravenberch, gameweek 4: 1 points v FUL home, 59 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Garnacho, gameweek 5: 0 points v TOT away, 0 minutes
    Gravenberch, gameweek 5: 1 points v BOU away, 9 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Garnacho, gameweek 6: 0 points v BRE home, 0 minutes
    Gravenberch, gameweek 6: -1 points v MCI home, 61 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Garnacho, gameweek 7: 0 points v NEW away, 0 minutes
    Gravenberch, gameweek 7: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Garnacho, gameweek 8: 0 points v MCI home, 0 minutes
    Gravenberch, gameweek 8: 3 points v BHA home, 90 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Garnacho, gameweek 9: 1 points v FUL home, 3 minutes
    Gravenberch, gameweek 9: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutes

Garnacho: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Gravenberch: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWGarnachoGravenberch
401
501
60-1
700
803
910

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWGarnachoGravenberch
4059
509
6061
700
8090
930

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWGarnachoGravenberch
40.000.04
50.000.00
60.000.07
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.090.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWGarnachoGravenberch
40.000.01
50.000.01
60.000.02
70.000.00
80.000.07
90.050.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWGarnachoGravenberch
40.000.05
50.000.01
60.000.09
70.000.00
80.000.07
90.140.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWGarnachoGravenberch
4010
501
608
700
8011
900

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWGarnachoGravenberch
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWGarnachoGravenberch
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWGarnachoGravenberch
40.4%1.3%
50.3%1.2%
60.3%1.0%
70.3%0.9%
80.3%0.9%
90.3%0.9%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWGarnachoGravenberch
4£5.9m£5.9m
5£5.8m£5.9m
6£5.8m£5.8m
7£5.7m£5.8m
8£5.7m£5.8m
9£5.7m£5.8m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWGarnachoGravenberch
4——
5—0.0%
6—0.0%
7—0.0%
8—0.0%
9—0.0%