How do Gravenberch and Tel compare?

Tel has more season points (23 vs 11), Gravenberch is more owned (0.9% vs 0.5%), Tel is cheaper (5.6m vs 5.8m), Tel has the higher Start rate (56% vs 44%), but Tel has more Bonus (3 vs 0).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hide stats where they're level

Comparing 2 midfielders

Tel wins most stats

Liverpool

LIV · 5.8m

8 stats won

Spurs

TOT · 5.6m

22 stats won

Who wins more stats: Gravenberch or Tel?

Tel wins 22 of 30 stats

Tel wins 22 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Gravenberch 8.

Points: Gravenberch: 11Tel: 23
xGI (6 gw): Gravenberch: 0.04Tel: 0.13
Price: Gravenberch: £5.8mTel: £5.6m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
Section	Gravenberch	Tel
Price & ownership	2	1
Playing time	0	4
Recent form	2	4
Season totals	2	4
Set pieces	0	2
Bonus	0	4
Fixtures	0	0
FPL ranks	2	3
Total	8	22

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Gravenberch: Points 11, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 70, Mins (6 gw) 37, DC (6 gw) 5.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Tel: Points 23, xGI (6 gw) 0.13, BPS 103, Mins (6 gw) 34, DC (6 gw) 2.2, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Gravenberch leads 2 of 3

Who is more expensive and more owned?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tel
Price	5.8m(best)	5.6m−0.2m vs best
Ownership	0.9%(best)	0.5%−0.4% vs best

Top 10k ownership	0.0%−0.6% vs best	0.6%(best)

Availability	75% · Foot injury - 75% chance of playing	Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Tel leads 4 of 4

Who starts and plays more minutes?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tel
Starts	4−1 vs best	5(best)

Start rate	44%−12% vs best	56%(best)

Minutes (season)	341−94 vs best	435(best)

Avg minutes	38−10 vs best	48(best)

Who has better recent form?

Tel leads 4 of 6

Who has better recent form?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tel
Mins (6 gw)	37(best)	34−3 vs best

xG (6 gw)	0.02−0.06 vs best	0.08(best)

xA (6 gw)	0.02−0.03 vs best	0.05(best)

xGI (6 gw)	0.04−0.09 vs best	0.13(best)

DC (6 gw)	5.00(best)	2.17−2.83 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better	0.40+0.19 vs best	0.21(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Tel leads 4 of 6

Who has scored more this season?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tel
Points	11−12 vs best	23(best)

Goals	0−1 vs best	1(best)

Assists	1(best)	0−1 vs best

Total xG	0.17−0.49 vs best	0.66(best)

Total xA	0.17−0.29 vs best	0.46(best)

DC (season)	44(best)	26−18 vs best

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Tel leads 2 of 2

Who takes the set pieces?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tel
Corners & indirect FKs	—	3rd choice(best)
Direct free kicks	—	3rd choice(best)
Penalties	—	—
Penalties missed · lower is better	0	0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Tel leads 4 of 4

Who is collecting more bonus?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tel
BPS	70−33 vs best	103(best)

BPS (6 gw)	5.8−5.0 vs best	10.8(best)

Bonus	0−3 vs best	3(best)

Bonus (6 gw)	0.0−0.5 vs best	0.5(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tel
Next 5 GWs	CRY (A) 10 MUN (H) 11 EVE (A) 12 SUN (H) 13 CHE (A) 14	LEE (A) 10 IPS (H) 11 SUN (A) 12 FUL (H) 13 ARS (H) 14
Avg FDR · lower is better	2.80	2.80

See alsoSeason calendar Team rating Projected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Tel leads 3 of 5

How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Stat	Gravenberch	Tel
Form	0.5 173rd MID · 355th overall	3.8(best) 31st MID · 76th overall
ICT index	17.3 104th MID · 218th overall	35.2(best) 48th MID · 83rd overall
Selected	62nd MID(best) 190th overall	81st MID 245th overall
Points per game	1.6 143rd MID · 311th overall	3.3(best) 53rd MID · 138th overall
Cost rank	64th MID(best) 100th overall	76th MID 119th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

GravenberchLIV
1. LIV v CRY away, gameweek 10: 1.91 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
2. LIV v MUN home, gameweek 11: 1.70 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
TelTOT
1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Gravenberch (LIV) 3.6 projected team goals, Tel (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

Gravenberch−0.2Gravenberch: 0 goals from 0.17 xG (−0.2)
Tel+0.3Tel: 1 goals from 0.66 xG (+0.3)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

Gravenberch+0.8Gravenberch: 1 assists from 0.17 xA (+0.8)
Tel−0.5Tel: 0 assists from 0.46 xA (−0.5)

Gravenberch has 0.8 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

Gravenberch · 11 pts71% from appearances
−3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Tel · 23 pts52% from appearances

Season points by source
Source	Gravenberch	Tel
Appearances	10	12
Goals	0	5
Assists	3	0
Clean sheets	1	3
Bonus	0	3
Deductions	−3	0
Total	11	23

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

Gravenberch1.0(2)
Tel2.3(3)

Medium (FDR 3)

Gravenberch3.0(2)
Tel1.5(2)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

Gravenberch1.0(3)
Tel6.5(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Tel 6.5 points per game, Gravenberch 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

Gravenberch1.0(4)
Tel1.8(4)

Away

Gravenberch2.3(3)
Tel5.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Tel 5.3 points per game, Gravenberch 2.3 points per game.

Gravenberch11%
0 goals and 1 assist of 9 LIV goals
Tel14%
1 goal and 0 assists of 7 TOT goals

Tel is involved in 14% of TOT's goals, against 11% for Gravenberch.

Who is a rotation risk?

Gravenberch1 of 9 full games
1 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play
Tel1 of 9 full games
1 × 90 minutes, 4 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

Gravenberch79.8
Tel81.0

Creativity

Gravenberch68.8
Tel138.1

Threat

Gravenberch24.0
Tel135.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Gravenberch's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Tel's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

Gravenberch−1.1k2.0k out867 in
Tel+2.3k2.3k out4.6k in

Tel has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+2.3k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Gravenberch 1.9 points per £m (129th), Tel 4.1 points per £m (69th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

From To

Gravenberch
Tel

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Tel 16, Gravenberch 4.

How far ahead is Gravenberch? Above zero Gravenberch leads; below, Tel.

Tel is 12 points ahead of Gravenberch over these gameweeks. Gravenberch's biggest lead was 1 (GW 5); Tel's was 12 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

GW 4
Gravenberch, gameweek 4: 1 points v FUL home, 59 minutes
Tel, gameweek 4: 1 points v EVE home, 27 minutes
GW 5
Gravenberch, gameweek 5: 1 points v BOU away, 9 minutes
Tel, gameweek 5: 0 points v AVL home, 0 minutes
GW 6
Gravenberch, gameweek 6: -1 points v MCI home, 61 minutes
Tel, gameweek 6: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutes
GW 7
Gravenberch, gameweek 7: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutes
Tel, gameweek 7: 1 points v COV home, 3 minutes
GW 8
Gravenberch, gameweek 8: 3 points v BHA home, 90 minutes
Tel, gameweek 8: 11 points v CHE away, 88 minutes
GW 9
Gravenberch, gameweek 9: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutes
Tel, gameweek 9: 3 points v CRY home, 87 minutes

Gravenberch: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Tel: 1 haul (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek

Points by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tel
4	1	1
5	1	0
6	-1	0
7	0	1
8	3	11
9	0	3

Minutes

Values by gameweek

Minutes by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tel
4	59	27
5	9	0
6	61	0
7	0	3
8	90	88
9	0	87

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tel
4	0.04	0.01
5	0.00	0.00
6	0.07	0.00
7	0.00	0.04
8	0.00	0.14
9	0.00	0.27

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek

Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tel
4	0.01	0.09
5	0.01	0.00
6	0.02	0.00
7	0.00	0.01
8	0.07	0.07
9	0.00	0.15

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek

Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tel
4	0.05	0.10
5	0.01	0.00
6	0.09	0.00
7	0.00	0.05
8	0.07	0.21
9	0.00	0.42

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek

Defensive contribution by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tel
4	10	0
5	1	0
6	8	0
7	0	0
8	11	4
9	0	9

Goals

Values by gameweek

Goals by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tel
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	1
9	0	0

Assists

Values by gameweek

Assists by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tel
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Ownership

Values by gameweek

Ownership by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tel
4	1.3%	0.2%
5	1.2%	0.2%
6	1.0%	0.2%
7	0.9%	0.2%
8	0.9%	0.1%
9	0.9%	0.6%

Price

Values by gameweek

Price by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tel
4	£5.9m	£5.8m
5	£5.9m	£5.8m
6	£5.8m	£5.7m
7	£5.8m	£5.7m
8	£5.8m	£5.6m
9	£5.8m	£5.6m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek

Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Tel
4	—	—
5	0.0%	0.0%
6	0.0%	0.0%
7	0.0%	0.0%
8	0.0%	0.0%
9	0.0%	0.6%