How do Gravenberch and Okafor compare?

Okafor has more season points (23 vs 11), Gravenberch is more owned (0.9% vs 0.3%), Okafor has the higher Start rate (67% vs 44%), Okafor has more Bonus (1 vs 0), but Gravenberch has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hide stats where they're level

Comparing 2 midfielders

Okafor wins most stats

Liverpool

LIV · 5.8m

7 stats won

Leeds

LEE · 5.8m

20 stats won

Who wins more stats: Gravenberch or Okafor?

Okafor wins 20 of 27 stats

Okafor wins 20 of the 27 stats with an outright best. Others: Gravenberch 7.

Points: Gravenberch: 11Okafor: 23
xGI (6 gw): Gravenberch: 0.04Okafor: 0.08
Price: Gravenberch: £5.8mOkafor: £5.8m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
Section	Gravenberch	Okafor
Price & ownership	1	0
Playing time	0	4
Recent form	2	4
Season totals	2	4
Set pieces	0	0
Bonus	0	4
Fixtures	1	0
FPL ranks	1	4
Total	7	20

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Gravenberch: Points 11, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 70, Mins (6 gw) 37, DC (6 gw) 5.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Okafor: Points 23, xGI (6 gw) 0.08, BPS 100, Mins (6 gw) 52, DC (6 gw) 2.8, Upcoming FDR 3.20.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Gravenberch leads 1 of 1

Who is more expensive and more owned?
Stat	Gravenberch	Okafor
Price	5.8m	5.8m
Ownership	0.9%(best)	0.3%−0.6% vs best

Top 10k ownership	0.0%	0.0%
Availability	75% · Foot injury - 75% chance of playing	75% · Thigh injury - 75% chance of playing

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Okafor leads 4 of 4

Who starts and plays more minutes?
Stat	Gravenberch	Okafor
Starts	4−2 vs best	6(best)

Start rate	44%−23% vs best	67%(best)

Minutes (season)	341−126 vs best	467(best)

Avg minutes	38−14 vs best	52(best)

Who has better recent form?

Okafor leads 4 of 6

Who has better recent form?
Stat	Gravenberch	Okafor
Mins (6 gw)	37−15 vs best	52(best)

xG (6 gw)	0.02−0.02 vs best	0.04(best)

xA (6 gw)	0.02−0.02 vs best	0.04(best)

xGI (6 gw)	0.04−0.04 vs best	0.08(best)

DC (6 gw)	5.00(best)	2.83−2.17 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better	0.40(best)	0.57+0.17 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Okafor leads 4 of 6

Who has scored more this season?
Stat	Gravenberch	Okafor
Points	11−12 vs best	23(best)

Goals	0−1 vs best	1(best)

Assists	1(best)	0−1 vs best

Total xG	0.17−0.15 vs best	0.32(best)

Total xA	0.17−0.27 vs best	0.44(best)

DC (season)	44(best)	24−20 vs best

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner

Who takes the set pieces?
Stat	Gravenberch	Okafor
Corners & indirect FKs	—	—
Direct free kicks	—	—
Penalties	—	—
Penalties missed · lower is better	0	0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Okafor leads 4 of 4

Who is collecting more bonus?
Stat	Gravenberch	Okafor
BPS	70−30 vs best	100(best)

BPS (6 gw)	5.8−5.9 vs best	11.7(best)

Bonus	0−1 vs best	1(best)

Bonus (6 gw)	0.0−0.2 vs best	0.2(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Gravenberch leads 1 of 1

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Stat	Gravenberch	Okafor
Next 5 GWs	CRY (A) 10 MUN (H) 11 EVE (A) 12 SUN (H) 13 CHE (A) 14	TOT (H) 10 CHE (A) 11 COV (H) 12 MCI (A) 13 IPS (H) 14
Avg FDR · lower is better	2.80(best)	3.20+0.40 vs best

See alsoSeason calendar Team rating Projected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Okafor leads 4 of 5

How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Stat	Gravenberch	Okafor
Form	0.5 173rd MID · 355th overall	1.2(best) 121st MID · 261st overall
ICT index	17.3 104th MID · 218th overall	19.0(best) 99th MID · 201st overall
Selected	62nd MID(best) 190th overall	100th MID 292nd overall
Points per game	1.6 143rd MID · 311th overall	2.9(best) 77th MID · 179th overall
Cost rank	64th MID 100th overall	62nd MID(best) 98th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

GravenberchLIV
1. LIV v CRY away, gameweek 10: 1.91 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
2. LIV v MUN home, gameweek 11: 1.70 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
OkaforLEE
1. LEE v TOT home, gameweek 10: 1.19 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
2. LEE v CHE away, gameweek 11: 0.96 projected goals, 20% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Gravenberch (LIV) 3.6 projected team goals, Okafor (LEE) 2.1 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

Gravenberch−0.2Gravenberch: 0 goals from 0.17 xG (−0.2)
Okafor+0.7Okafor: 1 goals from 0.32 xG (+0.7)

Okafor has 0.7 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

Gravenberch+0.8Gravenberch: 1 assists from 0.17 xA (+0.8)
Okafor−0.4Okafor: 0 assists from 0.44 xA (−0.4)

Gravenberch has 0.8 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

Gravenberch · 11 pts71% from appearances
−3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Okafor · 23 pts61% from appearances

Season points by source
Source	Gravenberch	Okafor
Appearances	10	14
Goals	0	5
Assists	3	0
Clean sheets	1	1
Bonus	0	1
Other	0	2
Deductions	−3	0
Total	11	23

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

Gravenberch1.0(2)
Okafor2.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

Gravenberch3.0(2)
Okafor3.5(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

Gravenberch1.0(3)
Okafor2.5(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Okafor 2.5 points per game, Gravenberch 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

Gravenberch1.0(4)
Okafor4.0(4)

Away

Gravenberch2.3(3)
Okafor1.8(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Gravenberch 2.3 points per game, Okafor 1.8 points per game.

Gravenberch11%
0 goals and 1 assist of 9 LIV goals
Okafor11%
1 goal and 0 assists of 9 LEE goals

Gravenberch is involved in 11% of LIV's goals, against 11% for Okafor.

Who is a rotation risk?

Gravenberch1 of 9 full games
1 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play
Okafor0 of 9 full games
6 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

Gravenberch79.8
Okafor69.0

Creativity

Gravenberch68.8
Okafor60.1

Threat

Gravenberch24.0
Okafor62.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Gravenberch's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Okafor's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

Gravenberch−1.1k2.0k out867 in
Okafor−3.1k3.2k out113 in

Managers are selling all of them; Gravenberch the least (−1.1k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Gravenberch 1.9 points per £m (129th), Okafor 4.0 points per £m (72nd). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

From To

Gravenberch
Okafor

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Okafor 17, Gravenberch 4.

How far ahead is Gravenberch? Above zero Gravenberch leads; below, Okafor.

Okafor is 13 points ahead of Gravenberch over these gameweeks. Okafor's was 15 (GW 7).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

GW 4
Gravenberch, gameweek 4: 1 points v FUL home, 59 minutes
Okafor, gameweek 4: 9 points v NEW home, 71 minutes
GW 5
Gravenberch, gameweek 5: 1 points v BOU away, 9 minutes
Okafor, gameweek 5: 3 points v CRY home, 75 minutes
GW 6
Gravenberch, gameweek 6: -1 points v MCI home, 61 minutes
Okafor, gameweek 6: 2 points v ARS away, 70 minutes
GW 7
Gravenberch, gameweek 7: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutes
Okafor, gameweek 7: 2 points v MUN home, 73 minutes
GW 8
Gravenberch, gameweek 8: 3 points v BHA home, 90 minutes
Okafor, gameweek 8: 1 points v SUN away, 25 minutes
GW 9
Gravenberch, gameweek 9: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutes
Okafor, gameweek 9: 0 points v BOU away, 0 minutes

Gravenberch: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Okafor: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek

Points by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Okafor
4	1	9
5	1	3
6	-1	2
7	0	2
8	3	1
9	0	0

Minutes

Values by gameweek

Minutes by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Okafor
4	59	71
5	9	75
6	61	70
7	0	73
8	90	25
9	0	0

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Okafor
4	0.04	0.07
5	0.00	0.02
6	0.07	0.06
7	0.00	0.02
8	0.00	0.07
9	0.00	0.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek

Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Okafor
4	0.01	0.08
5	0.01	0.01
6	0.02	0.01
7	0.00	0.01
8	0.07	0.15
9	0.00	0.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek

Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Okafor
4	0.05	0.15
5	0.01	0.03
6	0.09	0.07
7	0.00	0.03
8	0.07	0.22
9	0.00	0.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek

Defensive contribution by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Okafor
4	10	6
5	1	5
6	8	2
7	0	2
8	11	2
9	0	0

Goals

Values by gameweek

Goals by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Okafor
4	0	1
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Assists

Values by gameweek

Assists by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Okafor
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Ownership

Values by gameweek

Ownership by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Okafor
4	1.3%	0.3%
5	1.2%	0.5%
6	1.0%	0.4%
7	0.9%	0.4%
8	0.9%	0.4%
9	0.9%	0.3%

Price

Values by gameweek

Price by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Okafor
4	£5.9m	£5.9m
5	£5.9m	£5.8m
6	£5.8m	£5.8m
7	£5.8m	£5.8m
8	£5.8m	£5.8m
9	£5.8m	£5.8m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek

Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Okafor
4	—	—
5	0.0%	0.3%
6	0.0%	0.0%
7	0.0%	0.0%
8	0.0%	0.0%
9	0.0%	0.0%