How do Gravenberch and Johnson compare?

Johnson has more season points (14 vs 11), Gravenberch is more owned (0.9% vs 0.1%), Johnson has the higher Start rate (56% vs 44%), but Gravenberch has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

← Back to players Pick different players

Gravenberch

10 stats won

Johnson

13 stats won

Who wins more stats: Gravenberch or Johnson?

Johnson wins 13 of 23 stats

Johnson wins 13 of the 23 stats with an outright best. Others: Gravenberch 10.

Points
Gravenberch: 11Johnson: 14
xGI (6 gw)
Gravenberch: 0.04Johnson: 0.23
Price
Gravenberch: £5.8mJohnson: £5.8m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionGravenberchJohnson
Price & ownership10
Playing time04
Recent form24
Season totals23
Set pieces00
Bonus20
Fixtures10
FPL ranks22
Total1013

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Gravenberch: Points 11, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 70, Mins (6 gw) 37, DC (6 gw) 5.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Johnson: Points 14, xGI (6 gw) 0.23, BPS 41, Mins (6 gw) 48, DC (6 gw) 3.5, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Gravenberch leads 1 of 1
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatGravenberchJohnson
Price

5.8m

5.8m

Ownership

0.9%(best)

0.1%−0.8% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.0%

0.0%

Availability

75% · Foot injury - 75% chance of playing

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Johnson leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatGravenberchJohnson
Starts

4−1 vs best

5(best)

Start rate

44%−12% vs best

56%(best)

Minutes (season)

341−48 vs best

389(best)

Avg minutes

38−5 vs best

43(best)

Who has better recent form?

Johnson leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatGravenberchJohnson
Mins (6 gw)

37−11 vs best

48(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.02−0.15 vs best

0.17(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.02−0.04 vs best

0.06(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.04−0.19 vs best

0.23(best)

DC (6 gw)

5.00(best)

3.50−1.50 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.40(best)

0.89+0.49 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Johnson leads 3 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatGravenberchJohnson
Points

11−3 vs best

14(best)

Goals

0

0

Assists

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Total xG

0.17−0.90 vs best

1.07(best)

Total xA

0.17−0.22 vs best

0.39(best)

DC (season)

44(best)

33−11 vs best

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatGravenberchJohnson
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Gravenberch leads 2 of 2
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatGravenberchJohnson
BPS

70(best)

41−29 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

5.8(best)

5.7−0.1 vs best

Bonus

0

0

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0

0.0

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Gravenberch leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatGravenberchJohnson
Next 5 GWs

CRY

(A)

10

MUN

(H)

11

EVE

(A)

12

SUN

(H)

13

CHE

(A)

14

COV

(H)

10

BRE

(A)

11

LIV

(H)

12

AVL

(A)

13

FUL

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80(best)

3.00+0.20 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Split
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatGravenberchJohnson
Form

0.5

173rd MID · 355th overall

1.2(best)

120th MID · 260th overall

ICT index

17.3(best)

104th MID · 218th overall

13.1

123rd MID · 261st overall

Selected

62nd MID(best)

190th overall

145th MID

398th overall

Points per game

1.6

143rd MID · 311th overall

1.6

142nd MID · 310th overall

Cost rank

64th MID

100th overall

61st MID(best)

97th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • GravenberchLIV

    1. LIV v CRY away, gameweek 10: 1.91 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
    2. LIV v MUN home, gameweek 11: 1.70 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance

  • JohnsonEVE

    1. EVE v COV home, gameweek 10: 1.64 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
    2. EVE v BRE away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Gravenberch (LIV) 3.6 projected team goals, Johnson (EVE) 2.6 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Gravenberch−0.2Gravenberch: 0 goals from 0.17 xG (−0.2)
  • Johnson−1.1Johnson: 0 goals from 1.07 xG (−1.1)

Johnson has 1.1 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Gravenberch+0.8Gravenberch: 1 assists from 0.17 xA (+0.8)
  • Johnson−0.4Johnson: 0 assists from 0.39 xA (−0.4)

Gravenberch has 0.8 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Gravenberch · 11 pts71% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Johnson · 14 pts88% from appearances

    −2 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceGravenberchJohnson
Appearances1014
Assists30
Clean sheets12
Deductions−3−2
Total1114

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Gravenberch1.0(2)
  • Johnson2.0(3)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Gravenberch3.0(2)
  • Johnson1.3(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Gravenberch1.0(3)
  • Johnson1.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Johnson 1.3 points per game, Gravenberch 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Gravenberch1.0(4)
  • Johnson1.5(4)

Away

  • Gravenberch2.3(3)
  • Johnson1.6(5)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Gravenberch 2.3 points per game, Johnson 1.6 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Gravenberch11%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 9 LIV goals

  • Johnson0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 9 EVE goals

Gravenberch is involved in 11% of LIV's goals, against 0% for Johnson.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Gravenberch1 of 9 full games

    1 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play

  • Johnson0 of 9 full games

    5 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Gravenberch79.8
  • Johnson31.6

Creativity

  • Gravenberch68.8
  • Johnson70.7

Threat

  • Gravenberch24.0
  • Johnson32.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Gravenberch's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Johnson's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Gravenberch−1.1k2.0k out867 in
  • Johnson−64241 out177 in

Managers are selling all of them; Johnson the least (−64 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Gravenberch 1.9 points per £m (129th), Johnson 2.4 points per £m (112th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Gravenberch
  • Johnson

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Johnson 11, Gravenberch 4.

How far ahead is Gravenberch? Above zero Gravenberch leads; below, Johnson.

Johnson is 7 points ahead of Gravenberch over these gameweeks. Johnson's was 8 (GW 7).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Gravenberch, gameweek 4: 1 points v FUL home, 59 minutes
    Johnson, gameweek 4: 3 points v TOT away, 74 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Gravenberch, gameweek 5: 1 points v BOU away, 9 minutes
    Johnson, gameweek 5: 3 points v IPS home, 65 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Gravenberch, gameweek 6: -1 points v MCI home, 61 minutes
    Johnson, gameweek 6: 2 points v HUL away, 65 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Gravenberch, gameweek 7: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutes
    Johnson, gameweek 7: 1 points v CHE home, 5 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Gravenberch, gameweek 8: 3 points v BHA home, 90 minutes
    Johnson, gameweek 8: 2 points v ARS away, 71 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Gravenberch, gameweek 9: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutes
    Johnson, gameweek 9: 0 points v NEW away, 10 minutes

Gravenberch: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Johnson: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWGravenberchJohnson
413
513
6-12
701
832
900

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWGravenberchJohnson
45974
5965
66165
705
89071
9010

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWGravenberchJohnson
40.040.16
50.000.82
60.070.04
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWGravenberchJohnson
40.010.18
50.010.00
60.020.17
70.000.00
80.070.00
90.000.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWGravenberchJohnson
40.050.34
50.010.82
60.090.21
70.000.00
80.070.00
90.000.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWGravenberchJohnson
4106
518
685
700
8112
900

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWGravenberchJohnson
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWGravenberchJohnson
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWGravenberchJohnson
41.3%0.1%
51.2%0.1%
61.0%0.1%
70.9%0.1%
80.9%0.1%
90.9%0.1%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWGravenberchJohnson
4£5.9m£5.9m
5£5.9m£5.9m
6£5.8m£5.9m
7£5.8m£5.9m
8£5.8m£5.9m
9£5.8m£5.8m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWGravenberchJohnson
4——
50.0%0.0%
60.0%0.0%
70.0%0.0%
80.0%0.0%
90.0%0.0%