How do Gravenberch and M.Sangaré compare?

M.Sangaré has more season points (31 vs 11), M.Sangaré is more owned (6.2% vs 0.9%), M.Sangaré is cheaper (5.4m vs 5.8m), M.Sangaré has the higher Start rate (67% vs 44%), M.Sangaré has more Bonus (3 vs 0), but Gravenberch has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.60).

← Back to players Pick different players

Gravenberch

5 stats won

M.Sangaré

22 stats won

Who wins more stats: Gravenberch or M.Sangaré?

M.Sangaré wins 22 of 27 stats

M.Sangaré wins 22 of the 27 stats with an outright best. Others: Gravenberch 5.

Points
Gravenberch: 11M.Sangaré: 31
xGI (6 gw)
Gravenberch: 0.04M.Sangaré: 0.08
Price
Gravenberch: £5.8mM.Sangaré: £5.4m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionGravenberchM.Sangaré
Price & ownership12
Playing time04
Recent form24
Season totals05
Set pieces00
Bonus03
Fixtures10
FPL ranks14
Total522

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Gravenberch: Points 11, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 70, Mins (6 gw) 37, DC (6 gw) 5.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80. M.Sangaré: Points 31, xGI (6 gw) 0.08, BPS 121, Mins (6 gw) 58, DC (6 gw) 11.3, Upcoming FDR 3.60.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

M.Sangaré leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatGravenberchM.Sangaré
Price

5.8m(best)

5.4m−0.4m vs best

Ownership

0.9%−5.3% vs best

6.2%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.0%−4.2% vs best

4.2%(best)

Availability

75% · Foot injury - 75% chance of playing

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

M.Sangaré leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatGravenberchM.Sangaré
Starts

4−2 vs best

6(best)

Start rate

44%−23% vs best

67%(best)

Minutes (season)

341−214 vs best

555(best)

Avg minutes

38−24 vs best

62(best)

Who has better recent form?

M.Sangaré leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatGravenberchM.Sangaré
Mins (6 gw)

37−21 vs best

58(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.02(best)

0.01−0.01 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.02−0.05 vs best

0.07(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.04−0.04 vs best

0.08(best)

DC (6 gw)

5.00−6.33 vs best

11.33(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.40(best)

1.00+0.60 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

M.Sangaré leads 5 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatGravenberchM.Sangaré
Points

11−20 vs best

31(best)

Goals

0

0

Assists

1−1 vs best

2(best)

Total xG

0.17−0.31 vs best

0.48(best)

Total xA

0.17−0.61 vs best

0.78(best)

DC (season)

44−56 vs best

100(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatGravenberchM.Sangaré
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

M.Sangaré leads 3 of 3
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatGravenberchM.Sangaré
BPS

70−51 vs best

121(best)

BPS (6 gw)

5.8−4.9 vs best

10.7(best)

Bonus

0−3 vs best

3(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0

0.0

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Gravenberch leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatGravenberchM.Sangaré
Next 5 GWs

CRY

(A)

10

MUN

(H)

11

EVE

(A)

12

SUN

(H)

13

CHE

(A)

14

BHA

(A)

10

EVE

(H)

11

MUN

(A)

12

ARS

(H)

13

MCI

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80(best)

3.60+0.80 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

M.Sangaré leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatGravenberchM.Sangaré
Form

0.5

173rd MID · 355th overall

2.2(best)

75th MID · 174th overall

ICT index

17.3

104th MID · 218th overall

26.3(best)

75th MID · 135th overall

Selected

62nd MID

190th overall

19th MID(best)

58th overall

Points per game

1.6

143rd MID · 311th overall

3.4(best)

48th MID · 129th overall

Cost rank

64th MID(best)

100th overall

116th MID

187th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • GravenberchLIV

    1. LIV v CRY away, gameweek 10: 1.91 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
    2. LIV v MUN home, gameweek 11: 1.70 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance

  • M.SangaréBRE

    1. BRE v BHA away, gameweek 10: 1.17 projected goals, 19% clean sheet chance
    2. BRE v EVE home, gameweek 11: 1.53 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Gravenberch (LIV) 3.6 projected team goals, M.Sangaré (BRE) 2.7 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Gravenberch−0.2Gravenberch: 0 goals from 0.17 xG (−0.2)
  • M.Sangaré−0.5M.Sangaré: 0 goals from 0.48 xG (−0.5)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Gravenberch+0.8Gravenberch: 1 assists from 0.17 xA (+0.8)
  • M.Sangaré+1.2M.Sangaré: 2 assists from 0.78 xA (+1.2)

M.Sangaré has 1.2 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Gravenberch · 11 pts71% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • M.Sangaré · 31 pts42% from appearances

    −2 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceGravenberchM.Sangaré
Appearances1014
Assists36
Clean sheets12
Defensive contribution08
Bonus03
Deductions−3−2
Total1131

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Gravenberch1.0(2)
  • M.Sangaré2.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Gravenberch3.0(2)
  • M.Sangaré5.5(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Gravenberch1.0(3)
  • M.Sangaré1.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: M.Sangaré 1.7 points per game, Gravenberch 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Gravenberch1.0(4)
  • M.Sangaré3.6(5)

Away

  • Gravenberch2.3(3)
  • M.Sangaré3.3(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: M.Sangaré 3.3 points per game, Gravenberch 2.3 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Gravenberch11%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 9 LIV goals

  • M.Sangaré13%

    0 goals and 2 assists of 16 BRE goals

M.Sangaré is involved in 13% of BRE's goals, against 11% for Gravenberch.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Gravenberch1 of 9 full games

    1 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play

  • M.Sangaré3 of 9 full games

    3 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Gravenberch79.8
  • M.Sangaré140.0

Creativity

  • Gravenberch68.8
  • M.Sangaré81.6

Threat

  • Gravenberch24.0
  • M.Sangaré45.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Gravenberch's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; M.Sangaré's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Gravenberch−1.1k2.0k out867 in
  • M.Sangaré−15.7k16.5k out765 in

Managers are selling all of them; Gravenberch the least (−1.1k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Gravenberch 1.9 points per £m (129th), M.Sangaré 5.7 points per £m (29th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Gravenberch
  • M.Sangaré

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: M.Sangaré 13, Gravenberch 4.

How far ahead is Gravenberch? Above zero Gravenberch leads; below, M.Sangaré.

M.Sangaré is 9 points ahead of Gravenberch over these gameweeks. M.Sangaré's was 9 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Gravenberch, gameweek 4: 1 points v FUL home, 59 minutes
    M.Sangaré, gameweek 4: 4 points v BOU away, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Gravenberch, gameweek 5: 1 points v BOU away, 9 minutes
    M.Sangaré, gameweek 5: 0 points v CHE home, 21 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Gravenberch, gameweek 6: -1 points v MCI home, 61 minutes
    M.Sangaré, gameweek 6: 1 points v AVL away, 38 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Gravenberch, gameweek 7: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutes
    M.Sangaré, gameweek 7: 1 points v LIV home, 45 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Gravenberch, gameweek 8: 3 points v BHA home, 90 minutes
    M.Sangaré, gameweek 8: 4 points v HUL away, 90 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Gravenberch, gameweek 9: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutes
    M.Sangaré, gameweek 9: 3 points v NFO home, 61 minutes

Gravenberch: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); M.Sangaré: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWGravenberchM.Sangaré
414
510
6-11
701
834
903

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWGravenberchM.Sangaré
45990
5921
66138
7045
89090
9061

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWGravenberchM.Sangaré
40.040.00
50.000.00
60.070.00
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.07

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWGravenberchM.Sangaré
40.010.28
50.010.00
60.020.03
70.000.04
80.070.05
90.000.01

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWGravenberchM.Sangaré
40.050.28
50.010.00
60.090.03
70.000.04
80.070.05
90.000.08

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWGravenberchM.Sangaré
41013
513
6811
708
81123
9010

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWGravenberchM.Sangaré
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWGravenberchM.Sangaré
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWGravenberchM.Sangaré
41.3%12.7%
51.2%11.0%
61.0%8.6%
70.9%7.5%
80.9%6.9%
90.9%6.3%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWGravenberchM.Sangaré
4£5.9m£5.7m
5£5.9m£5.7m
6£5.8m£5.6m
7£5.8m£5.5m
8£5.8m£5.5m
9£5.8m£5.4m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWGravenberchM.Sangaré
4——
50.0%11.0%
60.0%10.0%
70.0%8.8%
80.0%6.6%
90.0%4.2%