How do Gravenberch and King compare?

King has more season points (36 vs 11), King is more owned (3.6% vs 0.9%), King is cheaper (5.5m vs 5.8m), King has the higher Start rate (100% vs 44%), King has more Bonus (3 vs 0), but Gravenberch has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.40).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hide stats where they're level

Comparing 2 midfielders

King wins most stats

Liverpool

LIV · 5.8m

5 stats won

Fulham

FUL · 5.5m

21 stats won

Who wins more stats: Gravenberch or King?

King wins 21 of 26 stats

King wins 21 of the 26 stats with an outright best. Others: Gravenberch 5.

Points: Gravenberch: 11King: 36
xGI (6 gw): Gravenberch: 0.04King: 0.32
Price: Gravenberch: £5.8mKing: £5.5m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
Section	Gravenberch	King
Price & ownership	1	2
Playing time	0	4
Recent form	2	4
Season totals	0	4
Set pieces	0	0
Bonus	0	3
Fixtures	1	0
FPL ranks	1	4
Total	5	21

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Gravenberch: Points 11, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 70, Mins (6 gw) 37, DC (6 gw) 5.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80. King: Points 36, xGI (6 gw) 0.32, BPS 174, Mins (6 gw) 78, DC (6 gw) 4.2, Upcoming FDR 3.40.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

King leads 2 of 3

Who is more expensive and more owned?
Stat	Gravenberch	King
Price	5.8m(best)	5.5m−0.3m vs best
Ownership	0.9%−2.7% vs best	3.6%(best)

Top 10k ownership	0.0%−5.2% vs best	5.2%(best)

Availability	75% · Foot injury - 75% chance of playing	Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

King leads 4 of 4

Who starts and plays more minutes?
Stat	Gravenberch	King
Starts	4−5 vs best	9(best)

Start rate	44%−56% vs best	100%(best)

Minutes (season)	341−394 vs best	735(best)

Avg minutes	38−44 vs best	82(best)

Who has better recent form?

King leads 4 of 6

Who has better recent form?
Stat	Gravenberch	King
Mins (6 gw)	37−41 vs best	78(best)

xG (6 gw)	0.02−0.13 vs best	0.15(best)

xA (6 gw)	0.02−0.15 vs best	0.17(best)

xGI (6 gw)	0.04−0.28 vs best	0.32(best)

DC (6 gw)	5.00(best)	4.17−0.83 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better	0.40(best)	0.78+0.38 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

King leads 4 of 4

Who has scored more this season?
Stat	Gravenberch	King
Points	11−25 vs best	36(best)

Goals	0−2 vs best	2(best)

Assists	1	1
Total xG	0.17−1.69 vs best	1.86(best)

Total xA	0.17−1.17 vs best	1.34(best)

DC (season)	44	44

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner

Who takes the set pieces?
Stat	Gravenberch	King
Corners & indirect FKs	—	—
Direct free kicks	—	—
Penalties	—	—
Penalties missed · lower is better	0	0

Who is collecting more bonus?

King leads 3 of 3

Who is collecting more bonus?
Stat	Gravenberch	King
BPS	70−104 vs best	174(best)

BPS (6 gw)	5.8−9.9 vs best	15.7(best)

Bonus	0−3 vs best	3(best)

Bonus (6 gw)	0.0	0.0

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Gravenberch leads 1 of 1

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Stat	Gravenberch	King
Next 5 GWs	CRY (A) 10 MUN (H) 11 EVE (A) 12 SUN (H) 13 CHE (A) 14	NEW (H) 10 MCI (A) 11 BOU (H) 12 TOT (A) 13 EVE (A) 14
Avg FDR · lower is better	2.80(best)	3.40+0.60 vs best

See alsoSeason calendar Team rating Projected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

King leads 4 of 5

How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Stat	Gravenberch	King
Form	0.5 173rd MID · 355th overall	3.0(best) 45th MID · 113th overall
ICT index	17.3 104th MID · 218th overall	61.3(best) 12th MID · 16th overall
Selected	62nd MID 190th overall	33rd MID(best) 93rd overall
Points per game	1.6 143rd MID · 311th overall	4.0(best) 34th MID · 92nd overall
Cost rank	64th MID(best) 100th overall	97th MID 154th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

GravenberchLIV
1. LIV v CRY away, gameweek 10: 1.91 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
2. LIV v MUN home, gameweek 11: 1.70 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
KingFUL
1. FUL v NEW home, gameweek 10: 1.54 projected goals, 33% clean sheet chance
2. FUL v MCI away, gameweek 11: 0.91 projected goals, 12% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Gravenberch (LIV) 3.6 projected team goals, King (FUL) 2.4 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

Gravenberch−0.2Gravenberch: 0 goals from 0.17 xG (−0.2)
King+0.1King: 2 goals from 1.86 xG (+0.1)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

Gravenberch+0.8Gravenberch: 1 assists from 0.17 xA (+0.8)
King−0.3King: 1 assists from 1.34 xA (−0.3)

Gravenberch has 0.8 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

Gravenberch · 11 pts71% from appearances
−3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
King · 36 pts49% from appearances
−1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
Source	Gravenberch	King
Appearances	10	18
Goals	0	10
Assists	3	3
Clean sheets	1	3
Bonus	0	3
Deductions	−3	−1
Total	11	36

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

Gravenberch1.0(2)
King5.0(4)

Medium (FDR 3)

Gravenberch3.0(2)
King2.0(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

Gravenberch1.0(3)
King5.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: King 5.0 points per game, Gravenberch 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

Gravenberch1.0(4)
King5.3(4)

Away

Gravenberch2.3(3)
King3.0(5)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: King 3.0 points per game, Gravenberch 2.3 points per game.

Gravenberch11%
0 goals and 1 assist of 9 LIV goals
King33%
2 goals and 1 assist of 9 FUL goals

King is involved in 33% of FUL's goals, against 11% for Gravenberch.

Who is a rotation risk?

Gravenberch1 of 9 full games
1 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play
King3 of 9 full games
3 × 90 minutes, 6 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

Gravenberch79.8
King160.8

Creativity

Gravenberch68.8
King187.9

Threat

Gravenberch24.0
King265.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Gravenberch's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; King's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

Gravenberch−1.1k2.0k out867 in
King−18.9k21.7k out2.9k in

Managers are selling all of them; Gravenberch the least (−1.1k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Gravenberch 1.9 points per £m (129th), King 6.5 points per £m (14th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

From To

Gravenberch
King

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: King 17, Gravenberch 4.

How far ahead is Gravenberch? Above zero Gravenberch leads; below, King.

King is 13 points ahead of Gravenberch over these gameweeks. King's was 13 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

GW 4
Gravenberch, gameweek 4: 1 points v FUL home, 59 minutes
King, gameweek 4: 3 points v LIV away, 76 minutes
GW 5
Gravenberch, gameweek 5: 1 points v BOU away, 9 minutes
King, gameweek 5: 2 points v MUN home, 79 minutes
GW 6
Gravenberch, gameweek 6: -1 points v MCI home, 61 minutes
King, gameweek 6: 2 points v IPS away, 75 minutes
GW 7
Gravenberch, gameweek 7: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutes
King, gameweek 7: 2 points v HUL home, 77 minutes
GW 8
Gravenberch, gameweek 8: 3 points v BHA home, 90 minutes
King, gameweek 8: 6 points v COV away, 80 minutes
GW 9
Gravenberch, gameweek 9: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutes
King, gameweek 9: 2 points v AVL away, 78 minutes

Gravenberch: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); King: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek

Points by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	King
4	1	3
5	1	2
6	-1	2
7	0	2
8	3	6
9	0	2

Minutes

Values by gameweek

Minutes by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	King
4	59	76
5	9	79
6	61	75
7	0	77
8	90	80
9	0	78

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	King
4	0.04	0.21
5	0.00	0.38
6	0.07	0.00
7	0.00	0.19
8	0.00	0.13
9	0.00	0.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek

Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	King
4	0.01	0.09
5	0.01	0.03
6	0.02	0.28
7	0.00	0.32
8	0.07	0.08
9	0.00	0.20

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek

Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	King
4	0.05	0.30
5	0.01	0.41
6	0.09	0.28
7	0.00	0.51
8	0.07	0.21
9	0.00	0.20

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek

Defensive contribution by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	King
4	10	4
5	1	5
6	8	3
7	0	4
8	11	3
9	0	6

Goals

Values by gameweek

Goals by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	King
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Assists

Values by gameweek

Assists by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	King
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	1
9	0	0

Ownership

Values by gameweek

Ownership by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	King
4	1.3%	1.2%
5	1.2%	2.0%
6	1.0%	4.8%
7	0.9%	4.9%
8	0.9%	4.6%
9	0.9%	3.6%

Price

Values by gameweek

Price by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	King
4	£5.9m	£5.5m
5	£5.9m	£5.5m
6	£5.8m	£5.6m
7	£5.8m	£5.6m
8	£5.8m	£5.6m
9	£5.8m	£5.6m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek

Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	King
4	—	—
5	0.0%	2.4%
6	0.0%	9.6%
7	0.0%	10.0%
8	0.0%	12.5%
9	0.0%	5.2%