How do Gravenberch and Lewis-Potter compare?

Lewis-Potter has more season points (38 vs 11), Lewis-Potter is more owned (1.9% vs 0.9%), Lewis-Potter is cheaper (5.5m vs 5.8m), Lewis-Potter has the higher Start rate (100% vs 44%), Lewis-Potter has more Bonus (5 vs 0), but Gravenberch has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.60).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hide stats where they're level

Comparing 2 midfielders

Lewis-Potter wins most stats

Liverpool

LIV · 5.8m

4 stats won

Brentford

BRE · 5.5m

26 stats won

Who wins more stats: Gravenberch or Lewis-Potter?

Lewis-Potter wins 26 of 30 stats

Lewis-Potter wins 26 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Gravenberch 4.

Points: Gravenberch: 11Lewis-Potter: 38
xGI (6 gw): Gravenberch: 0.04Lewis-Potter: 0.10
Price: Gravenberch: £5.8mLewis-Potter: £5.5m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
Section	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
Price & ownership	1	2
Playing time	0	4
Recent form	1	5
Season totals	0	5
Set pieces	0	2
Bonus	0	4
Fixtures	1	0
FPL ranks	1	4
Total	4	26

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Gravenberch: Points 11, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 70, Mins (6 gw) 37, DC (6 gw) 5.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Lewis-Potter: Points 38, xGI (6 gw) 0.10, BPS 148, Mins (6 gw) 75, DC (6 gw) 6.0, Upcoming FDR 3.60.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Lewis-Potter leads 2 of 3

Who is more expensive and more owned?
Stat	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
Price	5.8m(best)	5.5m−0.3m vs best
Ownership	0.9%−1.0% vs best	1.9%(best)

Top 10k ownership	0.0%−0.4% vs best	0.4%(best)

Availability	75% · Foot injury - 75% chance of playing	Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Lewis-Potter leads 4 of 4

Who starts and plays more minutes?
Stat	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
Starts	4−5 vs best	9(best)

Start rate	44%−56% vs best	100%(best)

Minutes (season)	341−374 vs best	715(best)

Avg minutes	38−41 vs best	79(best)

Who has better recent form?

Lewis-Potter leads 5 of 6

Who has better recent form?
Stat	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
Mins (6 gw)	37−38 vs best	75(best)

xG (6 gw)	0.02−0.04 vs best	0.06(best)

xA (6 gw)	0.02−0.02 vs best	0.04(best)

xGI (6 gw)	0.04−0.06 vs best	0.10(best)

DC (6 gw)	5.00−1.00 vs best	6.00(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better	0.40(best)	1.23+0.83 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Lewis-Potter leads 5 of 5

Who has scored more this season?
Stat	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
Points	11−27 vs best	38(best)

Goals	0−2 vs best	2(best)

Assists	1	1
Total xG	0.17−1.23 vs best	1.40(best)

Total xA	0.17−0.73 vs best	0.90(best)

DC (season)	44−19 vs best	63(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Lewis-Potter leads 2 of 2

Who takes the set pieces?
Stat	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
Corners & indirect FKs	—	4th choice(best)
Direct free kicks	—	1st choice(best)
Penalties	—	—
Penalties missed · lower is better	0	0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Lewis-Potter leads 4 of 4

Who is collecting more bonus?
Stat	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
BPS	70−78 vs best	148(best)

BPS (6 gw)	5.8−7.2 vs best	13.0(best)

Bonus	0−5 vs best	5(best)

Bonus (6 gw)	0.0−0.3 vs best	0.3(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Gravenberch leads 1 of 1

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Stat	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
Next 5 GWs	CRY (A) 10 MUN (H) 11 EVE (A) 12 SUN (H) 13 CHE (A) 14	BHA (A) 10 EVE (H) 11 MUN (A) 12 ARS (H) 13 MCI (H) 14
Avg FDR · lower is better	2.80(best)	3.60+0.80 vs best

See alsoSeason calendar Team rating Projected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Lewis-Potter leads 4 of 5

How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Stat	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
Form	0.5 173rd MID · 355th overall	4.0(best) 26th MID · 69th overall
ICT index	17.3 104th MID · 218th overall	43.6(best) 33rd MID · 50th overall
Selected	62nd MID 190th overall	44th MID(best) 131st overall
Points per game	1.6 143rd MID · 311th overall	4.2(best) 29th MID · 74th overall
Cost rank	64th MID(best) 100th overall	82nd MID 134th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

GravenberchLIV
1. LIV v CRY away, gameweek 10: 1.91 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
2. LIV v MUN home, gameweek 11: 1.70 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
Lewis-PotterBRE
1. BRE v BHA away, gameweek 10: 1.17 projected goals, 19% clean sheet chance
2. BRE v EVE home, gameweek 11: 1.53 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Gravenberch (LIV) 3.6 projected team goals, Lewis-Potter (BRE) 2.7 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

Gravenberch−0.2Gravenberch: 0 goals from 0.17 xG (−0.2)
Lewis-Potter+0.6Lewis-Potter: 2 goals from 1.40 xG (+0.6)

Lewis-Potter has 0.6 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

Gravenberch+0.8Gravenberch: 1 assists from 0.17 xA (+0.8)
Lewis-Potter+0.1Lewis-Potter: 1 assists from 0.90 xA (+0.1)

Gravenberch has 0.8 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

Gravenberch · 11 pts71% from appearances
−3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Lewis-Potter · 38 pts45% from appearances

Season points by source
Source	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
Appearances	10	17
Goals	0	10
Assists	3	3
Clean sheets	1	3
Bonus	0	5
Deductions	−3	0
Total	11	38

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

Gravenberch1.0(2)
Lewis-Potter2.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

Gravenberch3.0(2)
Lewis-Potter5.3(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

Gravenberch1.0(3)
Lewis-Potter4.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Lewis-Potter 4.3 points per game, Gravenberch 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

Gravenberch1.0(4)
Lewis-Potter5.4(5)

Away

Gravenberch2.3(3)
Lewis-Potter2.8(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Lewis-Potter 2.8 points per game, Gravenberch 2.3 points per game.

Gravenberch11%
0 goals and 1 assist of 9 LIV goals
Lewis-Potter19%
2 goals and 1 assist of 16 BRE goals

Lewis-Potter is involved in 19% of BRE's goals, against 11% for Gravenberch.

Who is a rotation risk?

Gravenberch1 of 9 full games
1 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play
Lewis-Potter3 of 9 full games
3 × 90 minutes, 5 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

Gravenberch79.8
Lewis-Potter171.2

Creativity

Gravenberch68.8
Lewis-Potter162.7

Threat

Gravenberch24.0
Lewis-Potter103.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Gravenberch's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Lewis-Potter's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

Gravenberch−1.1k2.0k out867 in
Lewis-Potter−4.2k6.8k out2.6k in

Managers are selling all of them; Gravenberch the least (−1.1k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Gravenberch 1.9 points per £m (129th), Lewis-Potter 6.9 points per £m (10th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

From To

Gravenberch
Lewis-Potter

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Lewis-Potter 20, Gravenberch 4.

How far ahead is Gravenberch? Above zero Gravenberch leads; below, Lewis-Potter.

Lewis-Potter is 16 points ahead of Gravenberch over these gameweeks. Lewis-Potter's was 16 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

GW 4
Gravenberch, gameweek 4: 1 points v FUL home, 59 minutes
Lewis-Potter, gameweek 4: 1 points v BOU away, 59 minutes
GW 5
Gravenberch, gameweek 5: 1 points v BOU away, 9 minutes
Lewis-Potter, gameweek 5: 3 points v CHE home, 80 minutes
GW 6
Gravenberch, gameweek 6: -1 points v MCI home, 61 minutes
Lewis-Potter, gameweek 6: 2 points v AVL away, 66 minutes
GW 7
Gravenberch, gameweek 7: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutes
Lewis-Potter, gameweek 7: 9 points v LIV home, 76 minutes
GW 8
Gravenberch, gameweek 8: 3 points v BHA home, 90 minutes
Lewis-Potter, gameweek 8: 2 points v HUL away, 77 minutes
GW 9
Gravenberch, gameweek 9: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutes
Lewis-Potter, gameweek 9: 3 points v NFO home, 90 minutes

Gravenberch: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Lewis-Potter: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek

Points by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
4	1	1
5	1	3
6	-1	2
7	0	9
8	3	2
9	0	3

Minutes

Values by gameweek

Minutes by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
4	59	59
5	9	80
6	61	66
7	0	76
8	90	77
9	0	90

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
4	0.04	0.03
5	0.00	0.15
6	0.07	0.04
7	0.00	0.15
8	0.00	0.00
9	0.00	0.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek

Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
4	0.01	0.13
5	0.01	0.01
6	0.02	0.04
7	0.00	0.03
8	0.07	0.02
9	0.00	0.02

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek

Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
4	0.05	0.16
5	0.01	0.16
6	0.09	0.08
7	0.00	0.18
8	0.07	0.02
9	0.00	0.02

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek

Defensive contribution by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
4	10	2
5	1	9
6	8	5
7	0	5
8	11	5
9	0	10

Goals

Values by gameweek

Goals by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	1
8	0	0
9	0	0

Assists

Values by gameweek

Assists by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Ownership

Values by gameweek

Ownership by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
4	1.3%	2.1%
5	1.2%	1.7%
6	1.0%	1.6%
7	0.9%	1.5%
8	0.9%	2.0%
9	0.9%	2.0%

Price

Values by gameweek

Price by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
4	£5.9m	£5.5m
5	£5.9m	£5.5m
6	£5.8m	£5.5m
7	£5.8m	£5.5m
8	£5.8m	£5.5m
9	£5.8m	£5.5m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek

Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GW	Gravenberch	Lewis-Potter
4	—	—
5	0.0%	0.5%
6	0.0%	0.3%
7	0.0%	0.3%
8	0.0%	0.4%
9	0.0%	0.4%