How do Garnacho and Tielemans compare?

Tielemans has more season points (24 vs 4), Tielemans is more owned (1.2% vs 0.3%), Tielemans has the higher Start rate (89% vs 0%), Tielemans has more Bonus (2 vs 0), but Garnacho has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.40 vs 3.00).

← Back to players Pick different players

Garnacho

2 stats won

Tielemans

25 stats won

Who wins more stats: Garnacho or Tielemans?

Tielemans wins 25 of 27 stats

Tielemans wins 25 of the 27 stats with an outright best. Others: Garnacho 2.

Points
Garnacho: 4Tielemans: 24
xGI (6 gw)
Garnacho: 0.02Tielemans: 0.15
Price
Garnacho: £5.7mTielemans: £5.7m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionGarnachoTielemans
Price & ownership01
Playing time04
Recent form15
Season totals05
Set pieces01
Bonus04
Fixtures10
FPL ranks05
Total225

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Garnacho: Points 4, xGI (6 gw) 0.02, BPS 14, Mins (6 gw) 1, DC (6 gw) 0.0, Upcoming FDR 2.40. Tielemans: Points 24, xGI (6 gw) 0.15, BPS 136, Mins (6 gw) 57, DC (6 gw) 7.2, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Tielemans leads 1 of 1
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatGarnachoTielemans
Price

5.7m

5.7m

Ownership

0.3%−0.9% vs best

1.2%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.0%

0.0%

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Tielemans leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatGarnachoTielemans
Starts

0−8 vs best

8(best)

Start rate

0%−89% vs best

89%(best)

Minutes (season)

34−554 vs best

588(best)

Avg minutes

4−61 vs best

65(best)

Who has better recent form?

Tielemans leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatGarnachoTielemans
Mins (6 gw)

1−56 vs best

57(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.01−0.01 vs best

0.02(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.01−0.12 vs best

0.13(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.02−0.13 vs best

0.15(best)

DC (6 gw)

0.00−7.17 vs best

7.17(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.00(best)

0.94+0.94 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Tielemans leads 5 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatGarnachoTielemans
Points

4−20 vs best

24(best)

Goals

0

0

Assists

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Total xG

0.09−0.58 vs best

0.67(best)

Total xA

0.05−1.02 vs best

1.07(best)

DC (season)

2−66 vs best

68(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Tielemans leads 1 of 1
Who takes the set pieces?
StatGarnachoTielemans
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

3rd choice(best)

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Tielemans leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatGarnachoTielemans
BPS

14−122 vs best

136(best)

BPS (6 gw)

0.8−12.5 vs best

13.3(best)

Bonus

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.3 vs best

0.3(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Garnacho leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatGarnachoTielemans
Next 5 GWs

MUN

(A)

10

SUN

(H)

11

IPS

(A)

12

EVE

(H)

13

CRY

(H)

14

AVL

(H)

10

LIV

(A)

11

BRE

(H)

12

NEW

(A)

13

COV

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.40(best)

3.00+0.60 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Tielemans leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatGarnachoTielemans
Form

0.2

188th MID · 384th overall

2.5(best)

72nd MID · 159th overall

ICT index

2.9

187th MID · 387th overall

34.8(best)

50th MID · 85th overall

Selected

108th MID

304th overall

52nd MID(best)

159th overall

Points per game

1.0

208th MID · 427th overall

3.0(best)

71st MID · 169th overall

Cost rank

71st MID

113th overall

67th MID(best)

106th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • GarnachoAVL

    1. AVL v MUN away, gameweek 10: 1.24 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance
    2. AVL v SUN home, gameweek 11: 1.44 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

  • TielemansMUN

    1. MUN v AVL home, gameweek 10: 1.50 projected goals, 29% clean sheet chance
    2. MUN v LIV away, gameweek 11: 1.00 projected goals, 18% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Garnacho (AVL) 2.7 projected team goals, Tielemans (MUN) 2.5 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Garnacho−0.1Garnacho: 0 goals from 0.09 xG (−0.1)
  • Tielemans−0.7Tielemans: 0 goals from 0.67 xG (−0.7)

Tielemans has 0.7 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Garnacho−0.1Garnacho: 0 assists from 0.05 xA (−0.1)
  • Tielemans−0.1Tielemans: 1 assists from 1.07 xA (−0.1)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Garnacho · 4 pts100% from appearances

  • Tielemans · 24 pts56% from appearances

    −1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceGarnachoTielemans
Appearances414
Assists03
Defensive contribution06
Bonus02
Deductions0−1
Total424

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Garnacho1.0(2)
  • Tielemans3.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • GarnachoNo games
  • Tielemans3.2(5)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Garnacho1.0(2)
  • Tielemans2.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Tielemans 2.0 points per game, Garnacho 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Garnacho1.0(2)
  • Tielemans2.3(4)

Away

  • Garnacho1.0(2)
  • Tielemans3.8(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Tielemans 3.8 points per game, Garnacho 1.0 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Garnacho0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 1 AVL goals

  • Tielemans10%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 10 MUN goals

Tielemans is involved in 10% of MUN's goals, against 0% for Garnacho.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Garnacho0 of 9 full games

    4 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

  • Tielemans3 of 9 full games

    3 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Garnacho5.2
  • Tielemans130.0

Creativity

  • Garnacho18.1
  • Tielemans169.0

Threat

  • Garnacho5.0
  • Tielemans49.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Garnacho's biggest score is creativity, a creator; Tielemans's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Garnacho−263507 out244 in
  • Tielemans−5.5k5.9k out386 in

Managers are selling all of them; Garnacho the least (−263 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Garnacho 0.7 points per £m (179th), Tielemans 4.2 points per £m (64th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Garnacho
  • Tielemans

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Tielemans 16, Garnacho 1.

How far ahead is Garnacho? Above zero Garnacho leads; below, Tielemans.

Tielemans is 15 points ahead of Garnacho over these gameweeks. Tielemans's was 16 (GW 7).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Garnacho, gameweek 4: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 4: 2 points v MCI home, 66 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Garnacho, gameweek 5: 0 points v TOT away, 0 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 5: 4 points v FUL away, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Garnacho, gameweek 6: 0 points v BRE home, 0 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 6: 3 points v TOT home, 58 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Garnacho, gameweek 7: 0 points v NEW away, 0 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 7: 7 points v LEE away, 83 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Garnacho, gameweek 8: 0 points v MCI home, 0 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 8: 0 points v BOU home, 45 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Garnacho, gameweek 9: 1 points v FUL home, 3 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 9: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutes

Garnacho: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Tielemans: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWGarnachoTielemans
402
504
603
707
800
910

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWGarnachoTielemans
4066
5090
6058
7083
8045
930

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWGarnachoTielemans
40.000.00
50.000.09
60.000.00
70.000.02
80.000.00
90.090.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWGarnachoTielemans
40.000.04
50.000.20
60.000.14
70.000.41
80.000.00
90.050.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWGarnachoTielemans
40.000.04
50.000.29
60.000.14
70.000.43
80.000.00
90.140.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWGarnachoTielemans
405
5013
6018
707
800
900

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWGarnachoTielemans
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWGarnachoTielemans
400
500
600
701
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWGarnachoTielemans
40.4%1.7%
50.3%1.5%
60.3%1.4%
70.3%1.4%
80.3%1.4%
90.3%1.3%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWGarnachoTielemans
4£5.9m£5.9m
5£5.8m£5.8m
6£5.8m£5.8m
7£5.7m£5.7m
8£5.7m£5.7m
9£5.7m£5.7m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWGarnachoTielemans
4——
5—0.0%
6—0.0%
7—0.0%
8—0.0%
9—0.0%