How do Davies and van Ewijk compare?

van Ewijk has more season points (19 vs 8), van Ewijk is more owned (7% vs 1%), van Ewijk has the higher Start rate (89% vs 0%), but van Ewijk has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.60 vs 2.80).

← Back to players Pick different players

Davies

6 stats won

van Ewijk

20 stats won

Who wins more stats: Davies or van Ewijk?

van Ewijk wins 20 of 26 stats

van Ewijk wins 20 of the 26 stats with an outright best. Others: Davies 6.

Points
Davies: 8van Ewijk: 19
xGI (6 gw)
Davies: 0.01van Ewijk: 0.04
Price
Davies: £3.9mvan Ewijk: £3.9m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionDaviesvan Ewijk
Price & ownership02
Playing time04
Recent form24
Season totals24
Set pieces00
Bonus02
Fixtures01
FPL ranks23
Total620

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Davies: Points 8, xGI (6 gw) 0.01, BPS 19, Mins (6 gw) 4, DC (6 gw) 0.3, Upcoming FDR 2.80. van Ewijk: Points 19, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 55, Mins (6 gw) 75, DC (6 gw) 7.3, Upcoming FDR 2.60.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

van Ewijk leads 2 of 2
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatDaviesvan Ewijk
Price

3.9m

3.9m

Ownership

1%−6% vs best

7%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.1%−3.5% vs best

3.6%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

van Ewijk leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatDaviesvan Ewijk
Starts

0−8 vs best

8(best)

Start rate

0%−89% vs best

89%(best)

Minutes (season)

22−698 vs best

720(best)

Avg minutes

2−78 vs best

80(best)

Who has better recent form?

van Ewijk leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatDaviesvan Ewijk
Mins (6 gw)

4−71 vs best

75(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.01(best)

0.00−0.01 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.00−0.04 vs best

0.04(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.01−0.03 vs best

0.04(best)

DC (6 gw)

0.33−7.00 vs best

7.33(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.04(best)

1.31+1.27 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

van Ewijk leads 4 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatDaviesvan Ewijk
Points

8−11 vs best

19(best)

Goals

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Assists

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Total xG

0.04(best)

0.01−0.03 vs best

Total xA

0.00−0.48 vs best

0.48(best)

DC (season)

2−62 vs best

64(best)

Clean sheets

0

0

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatDaviesvan Ewijk
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

van Ewijk leads 2 of 2
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatDaviesvan Ewijk
BPS

19−36 vs best

55(best)

BPS (6 gw)

3.2−4.0 vs best

7.2(best)

Bonus

0

0

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0

0.0

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

van Ewijk leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatDaviesvan Ewijk
Next 5 GWs

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

EVE

(A)

10

CRY

(H)

11

LEE

(A)

12

IPS

(H)

13

MUN

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80+0.20 vs best

2.60(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

van Ewijk leads 3 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatDaviesvan Ewijk
Form

2.0

67th DEF · 177th overall

3.2(best)

34th DEF · 91st overall

ICT index

4.5

129th DEF · 360th overall

29.0(best)

39th DEF · 124th overall

Selected

73rd DEF

185th overall

17th DEF(best)

50th overall

Points per game

4.0(best)

37th DEF · 84th overall

2.4

82nd DEF · 212th overall

Cost rank

200th DEF(best)

652nd overall

211th DEF

663rd overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • DaviesTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

  • van EwijkCOV

    1. COV v EVE away, gameweek 10: 0.92 projected goals, 19% clean sheet chance
    2. COV v CRY home, gameweek 11: 1.38 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Davies (TOT) 0.7 expected clean sheets, van Ewijk (COV) 0.5 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Davies+1.0Davies: 1 goals from 0.04 xG (+1.0)
  • van Ewijk±0.0van Ewijk: 0 goals from 0.01 xG (±0.0)

Davies has 1.0 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Davies±0.0Davies: 0 assists from 0.00 xA (±0.0)
  • van Ewijk+0.5van Ewijk: 1 assists from 0.48 xA (+0.5)

van Ewijk has 0.5 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Davies−0.3Davies: 0 conceded from 0.25 xGC (−0.3)
  • van Ewijk+3.4van Ewijk: 16 conceded from 12.60 xGC (+3.4)

van Ewijk has conceded 3.4 more than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Davies · 8 pts75% from goals

  • van Ewijk · 19 pts64% from appearances

    −6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceDaviesvan Ewijk
Appearances216
Goals60
Assists03
Defensive contribution06
Deductions0−6
Total819

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Davies7.0(1)
  • van Ewijk2.7(3)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • DaviesNo games
  • van Ewijk3.5(2)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Davies1.0(1)
  • van Ewijk1.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: van Ewijk 1.3 points per game, Davies 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Davies7.0(1)
  • van Ewijk2.8(5)

Away

  • Davies1.0(1)
  • van Ewijk1.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: van Ewijk 1.7 points per game, Davies 1.0 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Davies20%

    1 goal and 0 assists of 5 TOT goals

  • van Ewijk13%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 8 COV goals

Davies is involved in 20% of TOT's goals, against 13% for van Ewijk.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Davies0 of 9 full games

    2 × 1–59, 7 × Didn't play

  • van Ewijk8 of 9 full games

    8 × 90 minutes, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Davies36.6
  • van Ewijk142.4

Creativity

  • Davies1.7
  • van Ewijk128.6

Threat

  • Davies7.0
  • van Ewijk19.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Davies's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; van Ewijk's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Davies−9372.4k out1.4k in
  • van Ewijk−4.6k12.0k out7.4k in

Managers are selling all of them; Davies the least (−937 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Davies 2.1 points per £m (101st), van Ewijk 4.9 points per £m (61st). Median 3.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Davies
  • van Ewijk

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: van Ewijk 13, Davies 8.

How far ahead is Davies? Above zero Davies leads; below, van Ewijk.

van Ewijk is 5 points ahead of Davies over these gameweeks. van Ewijk's was 6 (GW 6).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Davies, gameweek 4: 0 points v EVE home, 0 minutes
    van Ewijk, gameweek 4: 0 points v BHA home, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Davies, gameweek 5: 0 points v AVL home, 0 minutes
    van Ewijk, gameweek 5: 0 points v NFO away, 0 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Davies, gameweek 6: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutes
    van Ewijk, gameweek 6: 6 points v NEW home, 90 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Davies, gameweek 7: 7 points v COV home, 21 minutes
    van Ewijk, gameweek 7: 1 points v TOT away, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Davies, gameweek 8: 1 points v CHE away, 1 minutes
    van Ewijk, gameweek 8: 2 points v FUL home, 90 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Davies, gameweek 9: 0 points v CRY home, 0 minutes
    van Ewijk, gameweek 9: 4 points v SUN home, 90 minutes

Davies: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); van Ewijk: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWDaviesvan Ewijk
400
500
606
771
812
904

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWDaviesvan Ewijk
4090
500
6090
72190
8190
9090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWDaviesvan Ewijk
40.000.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.040.00
80.000.01
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWDaviesvan Ewijk
40.000.04
50.000.00
60.000.01
70.000.11
80.000.01
90.000.05

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWDaviesvan Ewijk
40.000.04
50.000.00
60.000.01
70.040.11
80.000.02
90.000.05

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWDaviesvan Ewijk
407
500
6014
726
807
9010

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWDaviesvan Ewijk
40.002.81
50.000.00
60.001.84
70.250.86
80.000.55
90.001.82

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWDaviesvan Ewijk
400
500
600
710
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWDaviesvan Ewijk
400
500
601
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWDaviesvan Ewijk
40.9%10.5%
50.8%9.4%
61.0%7.6%
71.0%7.5%
81.0%7.4%
91.0%7.1%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWDaviesvan Ewijk
4£4.0m£4.0m
5£4.0m£4.0m
6£3.9m£4.0m
7£3.9m£3.9m
8£3.9m£3.9m
9£3.9m£3.9m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWDaviesvan Ewijk
4——
50.1%9.0%
60.1%6.1%
70.1%4.7%
80.1%3.3%
90.1%3.6%