How do Chalobah and De Cuyper compare?

De Cuyper has more season points (69 vs 0), De Cuyper is more owned (45.1% vs 0.1%), De Cuyper is cheaper (5.4m vs 5.5m), De Cuyper has the higher Start rate (100% vs 0%), but De Cuyper has more Bonus (9 vs 0).

← Back to players Pick different players

Chalobah

3 stats won

De Cuyper

28 stats won

Who wins more stats: Chalobah or De Cuyper?

De Cuyper wins 28 of 31 stats

De Cuyper wins 28 of the 31 stats with an outright best. Others: Chalobah 3.

Points
Chalobah: 0De Cuyper: 69
xGI (6 gw)
Chalobah: 0.00De Cuyper: 0.21
Price
Chalobah: £5.5mDe Cuyper: £5.4m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionChalobahDe Cuyper
Price & ownership12
Playing time04
Recent form15
Season totals07
Set pieces02
Bonus04
Fixtures00
FPL ranks14
Total328

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Chalobah: Points 0, xGI (6 gw) 0.00, BPS 0, Mins (6 gw) 0, DC (6 gw) 0.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80. De Cuyper: Points 69, xGI (6 gw) 0.21, BPS 233, Mins (6 gw) 83, DC (6 gw) 3.8, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

De Cuyper leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatChalobahDe Cuyper
Price

5.5m(best)

5.4m−0.1m vs best

Ownership

0.1%−45.0% vs best

45.1%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.0%−68.6% vs best

68.6%(best)

Availability

0% · Has joined Como permanently

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

De Cuyper leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatChalobahDe Cuyper
Starts

0−9 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

0%−100% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

0−741 vs best

741(best)

Avg minutes

0−82 vs best

82(best)

Who has better recent form?

De Cuyper leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatChalobahDe Cuyper
Mins (6 gw)

0−83 vs best

83(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.00−0.10 vs best

0.10(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.00−0.11 vs best

0.11(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.00−0.21 vs best

0.21(best)

DC (6 gw)

0.00−3.83 vs best

3.83(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.00(best)

1.11+1.11 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

De Cuyper leads 7 of 7
Who has scored more this season?
StatChalobahDe Cuyper
Points

0−69 vs best

69(best)

Goals

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Assists

0−4 vs best

4(best)

Total xG

0.00−2.09 vs best

2.09(best)

Total xA

0.00−1.08 vs best

1.08(best)

DC (season)

0−31 vs best

31(best)

Clean sheets

0−6 vs best

6(best)

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

De Cuyper leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatChalobahDe Cuyper
Corners & indirect FKs

—

2nd choice(best)

Direct free kicks

—

4th choice(best)

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

De Cuyper leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatChalobahDe Cuyper
BPS

0−233 vs best

233(best)

BPS (6 gw)

0.0−28.7 vs best

28.7(best)

Bonus

0−9 vs best

9(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−1.2 vs best

1.2(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatChalobahDe Cuyper
Next 5 GWs

SUN

(A)

10

LEE

(H)

11

NFO

(A)

12

CRY

(H)

13

LIV

(H)

14

BRE

(H)

10

HUL

(A)

11

NEW

(H)

12

BOU

(A)

13

NFO

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80

2.80

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

De Cuyper leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatChalobahDe Cuyper
Form

0.0

215th DEF · 642nd overall

7.8(best)

3rd DEF · 5th overall

ICT index

0.0

217th DEF · 653rd overall

59.8(best)

2nd DEF · 19th overall

Selected

168th DEF

471st overall

2nd DEF(best)

6th overall

Points per game

0.0

217th DEF · 653rd overall

7.7(best)

1st DEF · 2nd overall

Cost rank

14th DEF(best)

128th overall

23rd DEF

179th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • ChalobahCHE

    1. CHE v SUN away, gameweek 10: 1.48 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. CHE v LEE home, gameweek 11: 1.60 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

  • De CuyperBHA

    1. BHA v BRE home, gameweek 10: 1.68 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. BHA v HUL away, gameweek 11: 1.95 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Chalobah (CHE) 0.7 expected clean sheets, De Cuyper (BHA) 0.7 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Chalobah±0.0Chalobah: 0 goals from 0.00 xG (±0.0)
  • De Cuyper−0.1De Cuyper: 2 goals from 2.09 xG (−0.1)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Chalobah±0.0Chalobah: 0 assists from 0.00 xA (±0.0)
  • De Cuyper+2.9De Cuyper: 4 assists from 1.08 xA (+2.9)

De Cuyper has 2.9 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Chalobah±0.0Chalobah: 0 conceded from 0.00 xGC (±0.0)
  • De Cuyper−5.3De Cuyper: 7 conceded from 12.29 xGC (−5.3)

De Cuyper has conceded 5.3 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Chalobah · 0 pts

  • De Cuyper · 69 pts32% from clean sheets

    −6 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceChalobahDe Cuyper
Appearances018
Goals012
Assists012
Clean sheets024
Bonus09
Deductions0−6
Total069

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • ChalobahNo games
  • De Cuyper8.5(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • ChalobahNo games
  • De Cuyper12.0(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • ChalobahNo games
  • De Cuyper4.0(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • ChalobahNo games
  • De Cuyper8.3(4)

Away

  • ChalobahNo games
  • De Cuyper7.2(5)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Chalobah

    No CHE goals yet in matches played

  • De Cuyper25%

    2 goals and 4 assists of 24 BHA goals

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Chalobah0 of 9 full games

    9 × Didn't play

  • De Cuyper5 of 9 full games

    5 × 90 minutes, 4 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Chalobah0.0
  • De Cuyper193.2

Creativity

  • Chalobah0.0
  • De Cuyper288.0

Threat

  • Chalobah0.0
  • De Cuyper116.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Chalobah's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; De Cuyper's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Chalobah−3838 out0 in
  • De Cuyper+163k4.9k out168k in

De Cuyper has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+163k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: De Cuyper 12.8 points per £m (1st). Median 3.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Chalobah
  • De Cuyper

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: De Cuyper 48, Chalobah 0.

How far ahead is Chalobah? Above zero Chalobah leads; below, De Cuyper.

De Cuyper is 48 points ahead of Chalobah over these gameweeks. De Cuyper's was 48 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Chalobah, gameweek 4: 0 points v HUL home, 0 minutes
    De Cuyper, gameweek 4: 11 points v COV away, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Chalobah, gameweek 5: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutes
    De Cuyper, gameweek 5: 6 points v ARS home, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Chalobah, gameweek 6: 0 points v BOU home, 0 minutes
    De Cuyper, gameweek 6: 15 points v SUN away, 67 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Chalobah, gameweek 7: 0 points v EVE away, 0 minutes
    De Cuyper, gameweek 7: 6 points v CRY home, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Chalobah, gameweek 8: 0 points v TOT home, 0 minutes
    De Cuyper, gameweek 8: 1 points v LIV away, 90 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Chalobah, gameweek 9: 0 points v MUN home, 0 minutes
    De Cuyper, gameweek 9: 9 points v MCI away, 71 minutes

Chalobah: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); De Cuyper: 2 hauls (10+), 1 blank (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWChalobahDe Cuyper
4011
506
6015
706
801
909

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWChalobahDe Cuyper
4090
5090
6067
7090
8090
9071

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWChalobahDe Cuyper
40.000.03
50.000.02
60.000.25
70.000.00
80.000.05
90.000.24

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWChalobahDe Cuyper
40.000.04
50.000.23
60.000.00
70.000.13
80.000.28
90.000.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWChalobahDe Cuyper
40.000.07
50.000.25
60.000.25
70.000.13
80.000.33
90.000.24

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWChalobahDe Cuyper
401
507
603
704
805
903

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWChalobahDe Cuyper
40.001.33
50.001.63
60.000.57
70.000.77
80.001.20
90.001.17

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWChalobahDe Cuyper
400
500
601
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWChalobahDe Cuyper
401
500
600
700
800
901

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWChalobahDe Cuyper
40.1%23.3%
50.1%24.5%
60.1%31.9%
70.1%40.2%
80.1%42.3%
90.1%42.6%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWChalobahDe Cuyper
4£5.5m£4.8m
5£5.5m£4.9m
6£5.5m£5.0m
7£5.5m£5.2m
8£5.5m£5.3m
9£5.5m£5.3m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWChalobahDe Cuyper
4——
5—45.2%
6—84.4%
7—87.2%
8—80.9%
9—68.6%