How do Barnes and Scott compare?

Barnes has more season points (42 vs 30), Barnes is more owned (7.4% vs 2.2%), Scott is cheaper (5.9m vs 6.1m), Barnes has the higher Start rate (100% vs 56%), Scott has more Bonus (5 vs 3), but Scott has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).

← Back to players Pick different players

Barnes

24 stats won

Scott

7 stats won

Who wins more stats: Barnes or Scott?

Barnes wins 24 of 31 stats

Barnes wins 24 of the 31 stats with an outright best. Others: Scott 7.

Points
Barnes: 42Scott: 30
xGI (6 gw)
Barnes: 0.37Scott: 0.07
Price
Barnes: £6.1mScott: £5.9m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionBarnesScott
Price & ownership30
Playing time40
Recent form51
Season totals51
Set pieces02
Bonus31
Fixtures01
FPL ranks41
Total247

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Barnes: Points 42, xGI (6 gw) 0.37, BPS 167, Mins (6 gw) 88, DC (6 gw) 5.8, Upcoming FDR 3.20. Scott: Points 30, xGI (6 gw) 0.07, BPS 129, Mins (6 gw) 30, DC (6 gw) 3.8, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Barnes leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatBarnesScott
Price

6.1m(best)

5.9m−0.2m vs best

Ownership

7.4%(best)

2.2%−5.2% vs best

Top 10k ownership

11.6%(best)

0.0%−11.6% vs best

Availability

Available

0% · Thigh injury - Expected back 21 Nov

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Barnes leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatBarnesScott
Starts

9(best)

5−4 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

56%−44% vs best

Minutes (season)

796(best)

446−350 vs best

Avg minutes

88(best)

50−38 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Barnes leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatBarnesScott
Mins (6 gw)

88(best)

30−58 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.22(best)

0.05−0.17 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.15(best)

0.02−0.13 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.37(best)

0.07−0.30 vs best

DC (6 gw)

5.83(best)

3.83−2.00 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.73+1.37 vs best

0.36(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Barnes leads 5 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatBarnesScott
Points

42(best)

30−12 vs best

Goals

2(best)

1−1 vs best

Assists

3(best)

2−1 vs best

Total xG

1.54(best)

0.64−0.90 vs best

Total xA

0.96(best)

0.42−0.54 vs best

DC (season)

53−7 vs best

60(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Scott leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatBarnesScott
Corners & indirect FKs

4th choice

2nd choice(best)

Direct free kicks

—

4th choice(best)

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Barnes leads 3 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatBarnesScott
BPS

167(best)

129−38 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

18.2(best)

6.0−12.2 vs best

Bonus

3−2 vs best

5(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.2(best)

0.0−0.2 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Scott leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatBarnesScott
Next 5 GWs

FUL

(A)

10

ARS

(H)

11

BHA

(A)

12

MUN

(H)

13

SUN

(H)

14

IPS

(A)

10

NFO

(H)

11

FUL

(A)

12

BHA

(H)

13

HUL

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.20+0.40 vs best

2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Barnes leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatBarnesScott
Form

3.5(best)

35th MID · 85th overall

0.0

294th MID · 659th overall

ICT index

54.1(best)

20th MID · 27th overall

30.5

66th MID · 118th overall

Selected

14th MID(best)

46th overall

42nd MID

126th overall

Points per game

4.7

20th MID · 49th overall

6.0(best)

6th MID · 15th overall

Cost rank

43rd MID(best)

63rd overall

59th MID

90th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • BarnesNEW

    1. NEW v FUL away, gameweek 10: 1.12 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
    2. NEW v ARS home, gameweek 11: 0.89 projected goals, 17% clean sheet chance

  • ScottBOU

    1. BOU v IPS away, gameweek 10: 1.56 projected goals, 35% clean sheet chance
    2. BOU v NFO home, gameweek 11: 1.54 projected goals, 39% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Scott (BOU) 3.1 projected team goals, Barnes (NEW) 2.0 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Barnes+0.5Barnes: 2 goals from 1.54 xG (+0.5)
  • Scott+0.4Scott: 1 goals from 0.64 xG (+0.4)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Barnes+2.0Barnes: 3 assists from 0.96 xA (+2.0)
  • Scott+1.6Scott: 2 assists from 0.42 xA (+1.6)

Barnes has 2.0 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Barnes · 42 pts43% from appearances

  • Scott · 30 pts33% from appearances

Season points by source
SourceBarnesScott
Appearances1810
Goals105
Assists96
Clean sheets20
Defensive contribution04
Bonus35
Deductions00
Total4230

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Barnes6.3(3)
  • ScottNo games

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Barnes4.2(5)
  • Scott8.7(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Barnes2.0(1)
  • Scott2.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Barnes 2.0 points per game, Scott 2.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Barnes5.4(5)
  • Scott6.0(3)

Away

  • Barnes3.8(4)
  • Scott6.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Scott 6.0 points per game, Barnes 3.8 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Barnes42%

    2 goals and 3 assists of 12 NEW goals

  • Scott50%

    1 goal and 2 assists of 6 BOU goals

Scott is involved in 50% of BOU's goals, against 42% for Barnes.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Barnes8 of 9 full games

    8 × 90 minutes, 1 × 60–89

  • Scott4 of 9 full games

    4 × 90 minutes, 1 × 60–89, 4 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Barnes164.4
  • Scott102.8

Creativity

  • Barnes185.0
  • Scott146.4

Threat

  • Barnes192.0
  • Scott56.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Barnes's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Scott's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Barnes−16.2k25.2k out8.9k in
  • Scott−9.5k9.6k out128 in

Managers are selling all of them; Scott the least (−9.5k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Barnes 6.9 points per £m (11th), Scott 5.1 points per £m (41st). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Barnes
  • Scott

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Barnes 25, Scott 6.

How far ahead is Barnes? Above zero Barnes leads; below, Scott.

Barnes is 19 points ahead of Scott over these gameweeks. Barnes's biggest lead was 19 (GW 9); Scott's was 2 (GW 4).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Barnes, gameweek 4: 2 points v LEE away, 90 minutes
    Scott, gameweek 4: 4 points v BRE home, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Barnes, gameweek 5: 9 points v HUL home, 90 minutes
    Scott, gameweek 5: 2 points v LIV home, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Barnes, gameweek 6: 2 points v COV away, 90 minutes
    Scott, gameweek 6: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Barnes, gameweek 7: 2 points v AVL home, 90 minutes
    Scott, gameweek 7: 0 points v SUN home, 0 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Barnes, gameweek 8: 8 points v CRY away, 76 minutes
    Scott, gameweek 8: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Barnes, gameweek 9: 2 points v EVE home, 90 minutes
    Scott, gameweek 9: 0 points v LEE home, 0 minutes

Barnes: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2); Scott: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWBarnesScott
424
592
620
720
880
920

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWBarnesScott
49090
59090
6900
7900
8760
9900

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWBarnesScott
40.290.19
50.110.12
60.350.00
70.270.00
80.270.00
90.030.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWBarnesScott
40.310.05
50.110.07
60.350.00
70.040.00
80.010.00
90.080.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWBarnesScott
40.600.24
50.220.19
60.700.00
70.310.00
80.280.00
90.110.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWBarnesScott
4615
598
670
730
860
940

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWBarnesScott
400
500
600
700
810
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWBarnesScott
400
520
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWBarnesScott
42.7%6.2%
54.6%5.8%
68.5%4.2%
78.0%3.1%
87.4%2.6%
97.6%2.3%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWBarnesScott
4£6.0m£6.1m
5£6.0m£6.1m
6£6.1m£6.1m
7£6.1m£6.0m
8£6.1m£6.0m
9£6.1m£5.9m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWBarnesScott
4——
516.8%1.5%
615.6%0.5%
712.9%0.2%
818.0%0.1%
911.6%0.0%