How do Suzuki and Travers compare?
Suzuki has more season points (31 vs 0), Suzuki is more owned (3.1% vs 0%), Suzuki has the higher Start rate (89% vs 0%), Suzuki has more Bonus (5 vs 0), but Suzuki has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.40 vs 3.00).
Comparing 2 goalkeepers
Suzuki wins most stats
Who wins more stats: Suzuki or Travers?
Suzuki wins 20 of 22 stats
Suzuki wins 20 of the 22 stats with an outright best. Others: Travers 2.
- Points
- Suzuki: 31Travers: 0
- Saves
- Suzuki: 29Travers: 0
- Price
- Suzuki: £5.0mTravers: £5.0m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 2 | 0 |
| Playing time | 4 | 0 |
| Recent form | 1 | 1 |
| Season totals | 4 | 0 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 4 | 0 |
| Fixtures | 1 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 4 | 1 |
| Total | 20 | 2 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best GK in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Suzuki leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 5.0m | 5.0m |
| Ownership | 3.1%(best) | 0%−3.1% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 8.5%(best) | 0.0%−8.5% vs best |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Suzuki leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 8(best) | 0−8 vs best |
| Start rate | 89%(best) | 0%−89% vs best |
| Minutes (season) | 720(best) | 0−720 vs best |
| Avg minutes | 80(best) | 0−80 vs best |
Who has better recent form?
Split
| Stat | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 90(best) | 0−90 vs best |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| DC (6 gw) | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 1.62+1.62 vs best | 0.00(best) |
Who has scored more this season?
Suzuki leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 31(best) | 0−31 vs best |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 0 | 0 |
| Total xG | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Total xA | 0.01(best) | 0.00−0.01 vs best |
| Clean sheets | 2(best) | 0−2 vs best |
| Saves | 29(best) | 0−29 vs best |
See alsoGoalkeeper stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
| Penalties saved | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Suzuki leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 163(best) | 0−163 vs best |
| BPS (6 gw) | 19.5(best) | 0.0−19.5 vs best |
| Bonus | 5(best) | 0−5 vs best |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.3(best) | 0.0−0.3 vs best |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Suzuki leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | MUN (A) 10 SUN (H) 11 IPS (A) 12 EVE (H) 13 CRY (H) 14 | COV (H) 10 BRE (A) 11 LIV (H) 12 AVL (A) 13 FUL (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 2.40(best) | 3.00+0.60 vs best |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Suzuki leads 4 of 5
| Stat | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 3.8(best) 7th GK · 73rd overall | 0.0 73rd GK · 594th overall |
| ICT index | 24.2(best) 5th GK · 151st overall | 0.0 73rd GK · 620th overall |
| Selected | 18th GK(best) 104th overall | 60th GK 517th overall |
| Points per game | 3.9(best) 9th GK · 97th overall | 0.0 73rd GK · 620th overall |
| Cost rank | 9th GK 276th overall | 7th GK(best) 269th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
SuzukiAVL
- AVL v MUN away, gameweek 10: 1.24 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance
- AVL v SUN home, gameweek 11: 1.44 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
TraversEVE
- EVE v COV home, gameweek 10: 1.64 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
- EVE v BRE away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Travers (EVE) 0.6 expected clean sheets, Suzuki (AVL) 0.6 expected clean sheets.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better
- Suzuki−2.3Suzuki: 9 conceded from 11.30 xGC (−2.3)
- Travers±0.0Travers: 0 conceded from 0.00 xGC (±0.0)
Suzuki has conceded 2.3 fewer than xGC.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Suzuki · 31 pts42% from appearances
−7 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Travers · 0 pts
| Source | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 16 | 0 |
| Clean sheets | 8 | 0 |
| Saves | 9 | 0 |
| Bonus | 5 | 0 |
| Deductions | −7 | 0 |
| Total | 31 | 0 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Suzuki5.5(2)
- TraversNo games
Medium (FDR 3)
- Suzuki3.5(4)
- TraversNo games
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Suzuki3.0(2)
- TraversNo games
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Suzuki2.2(5)
- TraversNo games
Away
- Suzuki6.7(3)
- TraversNo games
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Suzuki0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 10 AVL goals
Travers
No EVE goals yet in matches played
Who is a rotation risk?
Suzuki8 of 9 full games
8 × 90 minutes, 1 × Didn't play
Travers0 of 9 full games
9 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Suzuki241.2
- Travers0.0
Creativity
- Suzuki0.0
- Travers0.0
Threat
- Suzuki0.0
- Travers0.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Suzuki's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Travers's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Suzuki+3.8k8.3k out12.1k in
- Travers+28103 out131 in
Suzuki has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+3.8k).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every GK who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Suzuki
- Travers
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Suzuki, gameweek 4: 2 points v NFO home, 90 minutesTravers, gameweek 4: 0 points v TOT away, 0 minutesGW 5
Suzuki, gameweek 5: 2 points v TOT away, 90 minutesTravers, gameweek 5: 0 points v IPS home, 0 minutesGW 6
Suzuki, gameweek 6: 2 points v BRE home, 90 minutesTravers, gameweek 6: 0 points v HUL away, 0 minutesGW 7
Suzuki, gameweek 7: 8 points v NEW away, 90 minutesTravers, gameweek 7: 0 points v CHE home, 0 minutesGW 8
Suzuki, gameweek 8: 4 points v MCI home, 90 minutesTravers, gameweek 8: 0 points v ARS away, 0 minutesGW 9
Suzuki, gameweek 9: 1 points v FUL home, 90 minutesTravers, gameweek 9: 0 points v NEW away, 0 minutes
Suzuki: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2); Travers: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2 | 0 |
| 5 | 2 | 0 |
| 6 | 2 | 0 |
| 7 | 8 | 0 |
| 8 | 4 | 0 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 90 | 0 |
| 5 | 90 | 0 |
| 6 | 90 | 0 |
| 7 | 90 | 0 |
| 8 | 90 | 0 |
| 9 | 90 | 0 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goals conceded (xGC)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2.28 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 1.56 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 1.06 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.99 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 1.56 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 2.24 | 0.00 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1.9% | 0.0% |
| 5 | 1.8% | 0.0% |
| 6 | 2.0% | 0.0% |
| 7 | 1.9% | 0.0% |
| 8 | 2.1% | 0.0% |
| 9 | 4.1% | 0.0% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 5 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 6 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 7 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 8 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 9 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Suzuki | Travers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 0.4% | 0.0% |
| 6 | 0.4% | 0.0% |
| 7 | 0.4% | 0.0% |
| 8 | 0.5% | 0.0% |
| 9 | 8.5% | 0.0% |

