How do Schade and Scott compare?

Schade has more season points (45 vs 30), Schade is more owned (14.3% vs 2.2%), Scott is cheaper (5.9m vs 6.2m), Schade has the higher Start rate (89% vs 56%), Schade has more Bonus (6 vs 5), but Scott has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.60).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hide stats where they're level

Comparing 2 midfielders

Schade wins most stats

Brentford

BRE · 6.2m

23 stats won

Bournemouth

BOU · 5.9m

7 stats won

Who wins more stats: Schade or Scott?

Schade wins 23 of 30 stats

Schade wins 23 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Scott 7.

Points: Schade: 45Scott: 30
xGI (6 gw): Schade: 0.25Scott: 0.07
Price: Schade: £6.2mScott: £5.9m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
Section	Schade	Scott
Price & ownership	3	0
Playing time	4	0
Recent form	4	1
Season totals	3	2
Set pieces	1	2
Bonus	4	0
Fixtures	0	1
FPL ranks	4	1
Total	23	7

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Schade: Points 45, xGI (6 gw) 0.25, BPS 161, Mins (6 gw) 70, DC (6 gw) 5.5, Upcoming FDR 3.60. Scott: Points 30, xGI (6 gw) 0.07, BPS 129, Mins (6 gw) 30, DC (6 gw) 3.8, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Schade leads 3 of 3

Who is more expensive and more owned?
Stat	Schade	Scott
Price	6.2m(best)	5.9m−0.3m vs best
Ownership	14.3%(best)	2.2%−12.1% vs best

Top 10k ownership	18.0%(best)	0.0%−18.0% vs best

Availability	Available	0% · Thigh injury - Expected back 21 Nov

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Schade leads 4 of 4

Who starts and plays more minutes?
Stat	Schade	Scott
Starts	8(best)	5−3 vs best

Start rate	89%(best)	56%−33% vs best

Minutes (season)	687(best)	446−241 vs best

Avg minutes	76(best)	50−26 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Schade leads 4 of 5

Who has better recent form?
Stat	Schade	Scott
Mins (6 gw)	70(best)	30−40 vs best

xG (6 gw)	0.22(best)	0.05−0.17 vs best

xA (6 gw)	0.02	0.02
xGI (6 gw)	0.25(best)	0.07−0.18 vs best

DC (6 gw)	5.50(best)	3.83−1.67 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better	1.16+0.80 vs best	0.36(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Schade leads 3 of 5

Who has scored more this season?
Stat	Schade	Scott
Points	45(best)	30−15 vs best

Goals	3(best)	1−2 vs best

Assists	2	2
Total xG	2.12(best)	0.64−1.48 vs best

Total xA	0.34−0.08 vs best	0.42(best)

DC (season)	56−4 vs best	60(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Scott leads 2 of 3

Who takes the set pieces?
Stat	Schade	Scott
Corners & indirect FKs	—	2nd choice(best)
Direct free kicks	—	4th choice(best)
Penalties	2nd choice(best)	—
Penalties missed · lower is better	0	0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Schade leads 4 of 4

Who is collecting more bonus?
Stat	Schade	Scott
BPS	161(best)	129−32 vs best

BPS (6 gw)	16.5(best)	6.0−10.5 vs best

Bonus	6(best)	5−1 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)	0.5(best)	0.0−0.5 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Scott leads 1 of 1

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Stat	Schade	Scott
Next 5 GWs	BHA (A) 10 EVE (H) 11 MUN (A) 12 ARS (H) 13 MCI (H) 14	IPS (A) 10 NFO (H) 11 FUL (A) 12 BHA (H) 13 HUL (H) 14
Avg FDR · lower is better	3.60+0.80 vs best	2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendar Team rating Projected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Schade leads 4 of 5

How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Stat	Schade	Scott
Form	1.5(best) 109th MID · 242nd overall	0.0 294th MID · 659th overall
ICT index	41.5(best) 35th MID · 55th overall	30.5 66th MID · 118th overall
Selected	9th MID(best) 28th overall	42nd MID 126th overall
Points per game	5.0 16th MID · 40th overall	6.0(best) 6th MID · 15th overall
Cost rank	41st MID(best) 60th overall	59th MID 90th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

SchadeBRE
1. BRE v BHA away, gameweek 10: 1.17 projected goals, 19% clean sheet chance
2. BRE v EVE home, gameweek 11: 1.53 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
ScottBOU
1. BOU v IPS away, gameweek 10: 1.56 projected goals, 35% clean sheet chance
2. BOU v NFO home, gameweek 11: 1.54 projected goals, 39% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Scott (BOU) 3.1 projected team goals, Schade (BRE) 2.7 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

Schade+0.9Schade: 3 goals from 2.12 xG (+0.9)
Scott+0.4Scott: 1 goals from 0.64 xG (+0.4)

Schade has 0.9 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

Schade+1.7Schade: 2 assists from 0.34 xA (+1.7)
Scott+1.6Scott: 2 assists from 0.42 xA (+1.6)

Schade has 1.7 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

Schade · 45 pts35% from appearances
−1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Scott · 30 pts33% from appearances

Season points by source
Source	Schade	Scott
Appearances	16	10
Goals	15	5
Assists	6	6
Clean sheets	3	0
Defensive contribution	0	4
Bonus	6	5
Deductions	−1	0
Total	45	30

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

Schade2.0(2)
ScottNo games

Medium (FDR 3)

Schade4.3(4)
Scott8.7(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

Schade8.0(3)
Scott2.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Schade 8.0 points per game, Scott 2.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

Schade3.4(5)
Scott6.0(3)

Away

Schade7.0(4)
Scott6.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Schade 7.0 points per game, Scott 6.0 points per game.

Schade31%
3 goals and 2 assists of 16 BRE goals
Scott50%
1 goal and 2 assists of 6 BOU goals

Scott is involved in 50% of BOU's goals, against 31% for Schade.

Who is a rotation risk?

Schade4 of 9 full games
4 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59
Scott4 of 9 full games
4 × 90 minutes, 1 × 60–89, 4 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

Schade159.4
Scott102.8

Creativity

Schade52.3
Scott146.4

Threat

Schade203.0
Scott56.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Schade's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Scott's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

Schade−56.8k68.6k out11.9k in
Scott−9.5k9.6k out126 in

Managers are selling all of them; Scott the least (−9.5k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Schade 7.3 points per £m (7th), Scott 5.1 points per £m (41st). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

From To

Schade
Scott

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Schade 30, Scott 6.

How far ahead is Schade? Above zero Schade leads; below, Scott.

Schade is 24 points ahead of Scott over these gameweeks. Schade's biggest lead was 24 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

GW 4
Schade, gameweek 4: 15 points v BOU away, 90 minutes
Scott, gameweek 4: 4 points v BRE home, 90 minutes
GW 5
Schade, gameweek 5: 9 points v CHE home, 90 minutes
Scott, gameweek 5: 2 points v LIV home, 90 minutes
GW 6
Schade, gameweek 6: 1 points v AVL away, 51 minutes
Scott, gameweek 6: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutes
GW 7
Schade, gameweek 7: 0 points v LIV home, 45 minutes
Scott, gameweek 7: 0 points v SUN home, 0 minutes
GW 8
Schade, gameweek 8: 2 points v HUL away, 61 minutes
Scott, gameweek 8: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutes
GW 9
Schade, gameweek 9: 3 points v NFO home, 83 minutes
Scott, gameweek 9: 0 points v LEE home, 0 minutes

Schade: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Scott: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek

Points by gameweek
GW	Schade	Scott
4	15	4
5	9	2
6	1	0
7	0	0
8	2	0
9	3	0

Minutes

Values by gameweek

Minutes by gameweek
GW	Schade	Scott
4	90	90
5	90	90
6	51	0
7	45	0
8	61	0
9	83	0

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GW	Schade	Scott
4	0.21	0.19
5	0.54	0.12
6	0.41	0.00
7	0.00	0.00
8	0.19	0.00
9	0.00	0.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek

Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GW	Schade	Scott
4	0.10	0.05
5	0.02	0.07
6	0.01	0.00
7	0.01	0.00
8	0.00	0.00
9	0.00	0.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek

Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GW	Schade	Scott
4	0.31	0.24
5	0.56	0.19
6	0.42	0.00
7	0.01	0.00
8	0.19	0.00
9	0.00	0.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek

Defensive contribution by gameweek
GW	Schade	Scott
4	4	15
5	7	8
6	4	0
7	5	0
8	6	0
9	7	0

Goals

Values by gameweek

Goals by gameweek
GW	Schade	Scott
4	2	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Assists

Values by gameweek

Assists by gameweek
GW	Schade	Scott
4	0	0
5	2	0
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Ownership

Values by gameweek

Ownership by gameweek
GW	Schade	Scott
4	3.5%	6.2%
5	7.8%	5.8%
6	16.5%	4.2%
7	13.5%	3.1%
8	15.2%	2.6%
9	15.0%	2.3%

Price

Values by gameweek

Price by gameweek
GW	Schade	Scott
4	£6.0m	£6.1m
5	£6.1m	£6.1m
6	£6.2m	£6.1m
7	£6.2m	£6.0m
8	£6.2m	£6.0m
9	£6.2m	£5.9m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek

Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GW	Schade	Scott
4	—	—
5	23.5%	1.5%
6	20.6%	0.5%
7	16.0%	0.2%
8	21.1%	0.1%
9	18.0%	0.0%