How do Manzambi and Schade compare?

Schade has more season points (45 vs 38), Schade is more owned (14.3% vs 7.1%), Manzambi is cheaper (6.1m vs 6.2m), Schade has the higher Start rate (89% vs 56%), Manzambi has more Bonus (7 vs 6), but Manzambi has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.40 vs 3.60).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hide stats where they're level

Comparing 2 midfielders

Schade wins most stats

Aston Villa

AVL · 6.1m

15 stats won

Brentford

BRE · 6.2m

16 stats won

Who wins more stats: Manzambi or Schade?

Schade wins 16 of 31 stats

Schade wins 16 of the 31 stats with an outright best. Others: Manzambi 15.

Points: Manzambi: 38Schade: 45
xGI (6 gw): Manzambi: 0.36Schade: 0.25
Price: Manzambi: £6.1mSchade: £6.2m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
Section	Manzambi	Schade
Price & ownership	1	2
Playing time	0	4
Recent form	4	2
Season totals	2	4
Set pieces	1	1
Bonus	3	1
Fixtures	1	0
FPL ranks	3	2
Total	15	16

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Manzambi: Points 38, xGI (6 gw) 0.36, BPS 138, Mins (6 gw) 64, DC (6 gw) 4.7, Upcoming FDR 2.40. Schade: Points 45, xGI (6 gw) 0.25, BPS 161, Mins (6 gw) 70, DC (6 gw) 5.5, Upcoming FDR 3.60.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Schade leads 2 of 3

Who is more expensive and more owned?
Stat	Manzambi	Schade
Price	6.1m−0.1m vs best	6.2m(best)
Ownership	7.1%−7.2% vs best	14.3%(best)

Top 10k ownership	34.6%(best)	18.0%−16.6% vs best

Availability	Available	Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Schade leads 4 of 4

Who starts and plays more minutes?
Stat	Manzambi	Schade
Starts	5−3 vs best	8(best)

Start rate	56%−33% vs best	89%(best)

Minutes (season)	384−303 vs best	687(best)

Avg minutes	43−33 vs best	76(best)

Who has better recent form?

Manzambi leads 4 of 6

Who has better recent form?
Stat	Manzambi	Schade
Mins (6 gw)	64−6 vs best	70(best)

xG (6 gw)	0.27(best)	0.22−0.05 vs best

xA (6 gw)	0.10(best)	0.02−0.08 vs best

xGI (6 gw)	0.36(best)	0.25−0.11 vs best

DC (6 gw)	4.67−0.83 vs best	5.50(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better	1.01(best)	1.16+0.15 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Schade leads 4 of 6

Who has scored more this season?
Stat	Manzambi	Schade
Points	38−7 vs best	45(best)

Goals	2−1 vs best	3(best)

Assists	3(best)	2−1 vs best

Total xG	1.60−0.52 vs best	2.12(best)

Total xA	0.58(best)	0.34−0.24 vs best

DC (season)	28−28 vs best	56(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Split

Who takes the set pieces?
Stat	Manzambi	Schade
Corners & indirect FKs	—	—
Direct free kicks	2nd choice(best)	—
Penalties	—	2nd choice(best)
Penalties missed · lower is better	0	0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Manzambi leads 3 of 4

Who is collecting more bonus?
Stat	Manzambi	Schade
BPS	138−23 vs best	161(best)

BPS (6 gw)	23.0(best)	16.5−6.5 vs best

Bonus	7(best)	6−1 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)	1.2(best)	0.5−0.7 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Manzambi leads 1 of 1

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Stat	Manzambi	Schade
Next 5 GWs	MUN (A) 10 SUN (H) 11 IPS (A) 12 EVE (H) 13 CRY (H) 14	BHA (A) 10 EVE (H) 11 MUN (A) 12 ARS (H) 13 MCI (H) 14
Avg FDR · lower is better	2.40(best)	3.60+1.20 vs best

See alsoSeason calendar Team rating Projected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Manzambi leads 3 of 5

How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Stat	Manzambi	Schade
Form	6.0(best) 6th MID · 17th overall	1.5 109th MID · 242nd overall
ICT index	43.6(best) 34th MID · 51st overall	41.5 35th MID · 55th overall
Selected	15th MID 49th overall	9th MID(best) 28th overall
Points per game	6.3(best) 2nd MID · 8th overall	5.0 16th MID · 40th overall
Cost rank	45th MID 65th overall	41st MID(best) 60th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

ManzambiAVL
1. AVL v MUN away, gameweek 10: 1.24 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance
2. AVL v SUN home, gameweek 11: 1.44 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
SchadeBRE
1. BRE v BHA away, gameweek 10: 1.17 projected goals, 19% clean sheet chance
2. BRE v EVE home, gameweek 11: 1.53 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Schade (BRE) 2.7 projected team goals, Manzambi (AVL) 2.7 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

Manzambi+0.4Manzambi: 2 goals from 1.60 xG (+0.4)
Schade+0.9Schade: 3 goals from 2.12 xG (+0.9)

Schade has 0.9 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

Manzambi+2.4Manzambi: 3 assists from 0.58 xA (+2.4)
Schade+1.7Schade: 2 assists from 0.34 xA (+1.7)

Manzambi has 2.4 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

Manzambi · 38 pts29% from appearances
Schade · 45 pts35% from appearances
−1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
Source	Manzambi	Schade
Appearances	11	16
Goals	10	15
Assists	9	6
Clean sheets	1	3
Bonus	7	6
Deductions	0	−1
Total	38	45

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

Manzambi7.0(1)
Schade2.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

Manzambi7.5(4)
Schade4.3(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

Manzambi1.0(1)
Schade8.0(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Schade 8.0 points per game, Manzambi 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

Manzambi3.5(4)
Schade3.4(5)

Away

Manzambi12.0(2)
Schade7.0(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Manzambi 12.0 points per game, Schade 7.0 points per game.

Manzambi50%
2 goals and 3 assists of 10 AVL goals
Schade31%
3 goals and 2 assists of 16 BRE goals

Manzambi is involved in 50% of AVL's goals, against 31% for Schade.

Who is a rotation risk?

Manzambi0 of 9 full games
5 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 3 × Didn't play
Schade4 of 9 full games
4 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

Manzambi161.6
Schade159.4

Creativity

Manzambi106.7
Schade52.3

Threat

Manzambi168.0
Schade203.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Manzambi's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Schade's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

Manzambi+95.1k5.8k out101k in
Schade−55.4k67.0k out11.7k in

Manzambi has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+95.1k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Manzambi 6.2 points per £m (17th), Schade 7.3 points per £m (7th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

From To

Manzambi
Schade

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Manzambi 38, Schade 30.

How far ahead is Manzambi? Above zero Manzambi leads; below, Schade.

Manzambi is 8 points ahead of Schade over these gameweeks. Manzambi's biggest lead was 8 (GW 9); Schade's was 14 (GW 4).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

GW 4
Manzambi, gameweek 4: 1 points v NFO home, 27 minutes
Schade, gameweek 4: 15 points v BOU away, 90 minutes
GW 5
Manzambi, gameweek 5: 13 points v TOT away, 71 minutes
Schade, gameweek 5: 9 points v CHE home, 90 minutes
GW 6
Manzambi, gameweek 6: 5 points v BRE home, 85 minutes
Schade, gameweek 6: 1 points v AVL away, 51 minutes
GW 7
Manzambi, gameweek 7: 11 points v NEW away, 71 minutes
Schade, gameweek 7: 0 points v LIV home, 45 minutes
GW 8
Manzambi, gameweek 8: 1 points v MCI home, 65 minutes
Schade, gameweek 8: 2 points v HUL away, 61 minutes
GW 9
Manzambi, gameweek 9: 7 points v FUL home, 65 minutes
Schade, gameweek 9: 3 points v NFO home, 83 minutes

Manzambi: 2 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2); Schade: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek

Points by gameweek
GW	Manzambi	Schade
4	1	15
5	13	9
6	5	1
7	11	0
8	1	2
9	7	3

Minutes

Values by gameweek

Minutes by gameweek
GW	Manzambi	Schade
4	27	90
5	71	90
6	85	51
7	71	45
8	65	61
9	65	83

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GW	Manzambi	Schade
4	0.00	0.21
5	0.44	0.54
6	0.54	0.41
7	0.45	0.00
8	0.07	0.19
9	0.10	0.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek

Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GW	Manzambi	Schade
4	0.08	0.10
5	0.16	0.02
6	0.16	0.01
7	0.17	0.01
8	0.00	0.00
9	0.01	0.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek

Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GW	Manzambi	Schade
4	0.08	0.31
5	0.60	0.56
6	0.70	0.42
7	0.62	0.01
8	0.07	0.19
9	0.11	0.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek

Defensive contribution by gameweek
GW	Manzambi	Schade
4	2	4
5	7	7
6	4	4
7	3	5
8	6	6
9	6	7

Goals

Values by gameweek

Goals by gameweek
GW	Manzambi	Schade
4	0	2
5	1	0
6	0	0
7	1	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Assists

Values by gameweek

Assists by gameweek
GW	Manzambi	Schade
4	0	0
5	1	2
6	1	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	1	0

Ownership

Values by gameweek

Ownership by gameweek
GW	Manzambi	Schade
4	0.1%	3.5%
5	0.1%	7.8%
6	0.8%	16.5%
7	2.1%	13.5%
8	3.0%	15.2%
9	7.4%	15.0%

Price

Values by gameweek

Price by gameweek
GW	Manzambi	Schade
4	£5.9m	£6.0m
5	£5.9m	£6.1m
6	£5.9m	£6.2m
7	£5.9m	£6.2m
8	£6.0m	£6.2m
9	£6.1m	£6.2m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek

Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GW	Manzambi	Schade
4	—	—
5	0.0%	23.5%
6	0.4%	20.6%
7	6.4%	16.0%
8	7.8%	21.1%
9	34.6%	18.0%