How do Muharemović and Van de Ven compare?
Muharemović has more season points (46 vs 30), Muharemović is more owned (6.1% vs 3.9%), Van de Ven is cheaper (5.0m vs 5.1m), Muharemović has the higher Start rate (100% vs 78%), Van de Ven has more Bonus (3 vs 1), but Van de Ven has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).
Comparing 2 defenders
Muharemović wins most stats
Who wins more stats: Muharemović or Van de Ven?
Muharemović wins 24 of 29 stats
Muharemović wins 24 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Van de Ven 5.
- Points
- Muharemović: 46Van de Ven: 30
- xGI (6 gw)
- Muharemović: 0.13Van de Ven: 0.04
- Price
- Muharemović: £5.1mVan de Ven: £5.0m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 3 | 0 |
| Playing time | 4 | 0 |
| Recent form | 5 | 1 |
| Season totals | 4 | 2 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 0 |
| Bonus | 3 | 1 |
| Fixtures | 0 | 1 |
| FPL ranks | 5 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 5 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Muharemović leads 3 of 3
| Stat | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 5.1m(best) | 5.0m−0.1m vs best |
| Ownership | 6.1%(best) | 3.9%−2.2% vs best |
| Top 10k ownership | 32.2%(best) | 1.9%−30.3% vs best |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Muharemović leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 9(best) | 7−2 vs best |
| Start rate | 100%(best) | 78%−22% vs best |
| Minutes (season) | 810(best) | 646−164 vs best |
| Avg minutes | 90(best) | 72−18 vs best |
Who has better recent form?
Muharemović leads 5 of 6
| Stat | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 90(best) | 78−12 vs best |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.09(best) | 0.02−0.07 vs best |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.04(best) | 0.03−0.01 vs best |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.13(best) | 0.04−0.09 vs best |
| DC (6 gw) | 9.83(best) | 3.83−6.00 vs best |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 1.22+0.54 vs best | 0.68(best) |
Who has scored more this season?
Muharemović leads 4 of 6
| Stat | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 46(best) | 30−16 vs best |
| Goals | 0 | 0 |
| Assists | 2(best) | 0−2 vs best |
| Total xG | 0.65−0.02 vs best | 0.67(best) |
| Total xA | 0.23(best) | 0.17−0.06 vs best |
| DC (season) | 98(best) | 40−58 vs best |
| Clean sheets | 3−1 vs best | 4(best) |
See alsoDefender stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
No outright winner
| Stat | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Muharemović leads 3 of 4
| Stat | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 161(best) | 135−26 vs best |
| BPS (6 gw) | 18.2(best) | 16.7−1.5 vs best |
| Bonus | 1−2 vs best | 3(best) |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.2(best) | 0.0−0.2 vs best |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Van de Ven leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | TOT (H) 10 CHE (A) 11 COV (H) 12 MCI (A) 13 IPS (H) 14 | LEE (A) 10 IPS (H) 11 SUN (A) 12 FUL (H) 13 ARS (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 3.20+0.40 vs best | 2.80(best) |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Muharemović leads 5 of 5
| Stat | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 4.8(best) 17th DEF · 40th overall | 3.5 32nd DEF · 81st overall |
| ICT index | 41.4(best) 11th DEF · 56th overall | 21.1 61st DEF · 183rd overall |
| Selected | 21st DEF(best) 60th overall | 34th DEF 89th overall |
| Points per game | 5.1(best) 14th DEF · 36th overall | 3.8 47th DEF · 105th overall |
| Cost rank | 38th DEF(best) 242nd overall | 51st DEF 295th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
MuharemovićLEE
- LEE v TOT home, gameweek 10: 1.19 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
- LEE v CHE away, gameweek 11: 0.96 projected goals, 20% clean sheet chance
Van de VenTOT
- TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
- TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Van de Ven (TOT) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Muharemović (LEE) 0.5 expected clean sheets.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals vs xG
- Muharemović−0.7Muharemović: 0 goals from 0.65 xG (−0.7)
- Van de Ven−0.7Van de Ven: 0 goals from 0.67 xG (−0.7)
Van de Ven has 0.7 fewer goals than xG.
Assists vs xA
- Muharemović+1.8Muharemović: 2 assists from 0.23 xA (+1.8)
- Van de Ven−0.2Van de Ven: 0 assists from 0.17 xA (−0.2)
Muharemović has 1.8 more assists than xA.
Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better
- Muharemović−3.8Muharemović: 8 conceded from 11.83 xGC (−3.8)
- Van de Ven+0.3Van de Ven: 6 conceded from 5.74 xGC (+0.3)
Muharemović has conceded 3.8 fewer than xGC.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Muharemović · 46 pts37% from appearances
−3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Van de Ven · 30 pts47% from clean sheets
−4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
| Source | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 18 | 15 |
| Assists | 6 | 0 |
| Clean sheets | 12 | 16 |
| Defensive contribution | 12 | 0 |
| Bonus | 1 | 3 |
| Deductions | −3 | −4 |
| Total | 46 | 30 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Muharemović6.0(2)
- Van de Ven5.7(3)
Medium (FDR 3)
- Muharemović6.3(4)
- Van de Ven2.0(4)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Muharemović3.0(3)
- Van de Ven5.0(1)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Van de Ven 5.0 points per game, Muharemović 3.0 points per game.
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Muharemović5.5(4)
- Van de Ven3.0(5)
Away
- Muharemović4.8(5)
- Van de Ven5.0(3)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Van de Ven 5.0 points per game, Muharemović 4.8 points per game.
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Muharemović22%
0 goals and 2 assists of 9 LEE goals
Van de Ven0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 10 TOT goals
Muharemović is involved in 22% of LEE's goals, against 0% for Van de Ven.
Who is a rotation risk?
Muharemović9 of 9 full games
9 × 90 minutes
Van de Ven7 of 9 full games
7 × 90 minutes, 1 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Muharemović264.6
- Van de Ven131.0
Creativity
- Muharemović38.1
- Van de Ven56.6
Threat
- Muharemović111.0
- Van de Ven22.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Muharemović's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Van de Ven's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Muharemović+2959.3k out9.6k in
- Van de Ven+3.2k4.4k out7.6k in
Van de Ven has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+3.2k).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Muharemović
- Van de Ven
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Muharemović, gameweek 4: 7 points v NEW home, 90 minutesVan de Ven, gameweek 4: 6 points v EVE home, 90 minutesGW 5
Muharemović, gameweek 5: 6 points v CRY home, 90 minutesVan de Ven, gameweek 5: 1 points v AVL home, 90 minutesGW 6
Muharemović, gameweek 6: 2 points v ARS away, 90 minutesVan de Ven, gameweek 6: 1 points v MUN away, 16 minutesGW 7
Muharemović, gameweek 7: 5 points v MUN home, 90 minutesVan de Ven, gameweek 7: 2 points v COV home, 90 minutesGW 8
Muharemović, gameweek 8: 9 points v SUN away, 90 minutesVan de Ven, gameweek 8: 5 points v CHE away, 90 minutesGW 9
Muharemović, gameweek 9: 3 points v BOU away, 90 minutesVan de Ven, gameweek 9: 6 points v CRY home, 90 minutes
Muharemović: 0 hauls (10+), 1 blank (0–2); Van de Ven: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 7 | 6 |
| 5 | 6 | 1 |
| 6 | 2 | 1 |
| 7 | 5 | 2 |
| 8 | 9 | 5 |
| 9 | 3 | 6 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 90 | 90 |
| 5 | 90 | 90 |
| 6 | 90 | 16 |
| 7 | 90 | 90 |
| 8 | 90 | 90 |
| 9 | 90 | 90 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.40 | 0.02 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.06 | 0.08 |
| 8 | 0.10 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 5 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.16 | 0.02 |
| 8 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.01 | 0.10 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 5 | 0.41 | 0.03 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.22 | 0.10 |
| 8 | 0.11 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.01 | 0.10 |
Defensive contribution
Values by gameweek
| GW | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 11 | 6 |
| 5 | 8 | 6 |
| 6 | 10 | 0 |
| 7 | 5 | 7 |
| 8 | 13 | 1 |
| 9 | 12 | 3 |
Expected goals conceded (xGC)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.88 | 1.11 |
| 5 | 1.06 | 1.16 |
| 6 | 2.33 | 0.45 |
| 7 | 0.92 | 0.77 |
| 8 | 0.83 | 0.47 |
| 9 | 1.29 | 0.14 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 1 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 1 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 3.8% | 3.9% |
| 5 | 4.5% | 4.0% |
| 6 | 4.5% | 3.7% |
| 7 | 4.7% | 3.7% |
| 8 | 5.6% | 3.5% |
| 9 | 6.2% | 4.1% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 5 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 6 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 7 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 8 | £5.0m | £5.0m |
| 9 | £5.1m | £5.0m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Muharemović | Van de Ven |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 20.6% | 0.3% |
| 6 | 19.0% | 0.1% |
| 7 | 21.7% | 0.2% |
| 8 | 36.8% | 0.2% |
| 9 | 32.2% | 1.9% |

