How do Muharemović and Thiaw compare?

Muharemović has more season points (46 vs 16), Muharemović is more owned (6.1% vs 1.6%), Thiaw is cheaper (4.9m vs 5.1m), Muharemović has the higher Start rate (100% vs 78%), but Muharemović has more Bonus (1 vs 0).

← Back to players Pick different players

Muharemović

27 stats won

Thiaw

1 stats won

Who wins more stats: Muharemović or Thiaw?

Muharemović wins 27 of 28 stats

Muharemović wins 27 of the 28 stats with an outright best. Others: Thiaw 1.

Points
Muharemović: 46Thiaw: 16
xGI (6 gw)
Muharemović: 0.13Thiaw: 0.01
Price
Muharemović: £5.1mThiaw: £4.9m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionMuharemovićThiaw
Price & ownership30
Playing time40
Recent form51
Season totals60
Set pieces00
Bonus40
Fixtures00
FPL ranks50
Total271

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Muharemović: Points 46, xGI (6 gw) 0.13, BPS 161, Mins (6 gw) 90, DC (6 gw) 9.8, Upcoming FDR 3.20. Thiaw: Points 16, xGI (6 gw) 0.01, BPS 41, Mins (6 gw) 60, DC (6 gw) 6.8, Upcoming FDR 3.20.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Muharemović leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatMuharemovićThiaw
Price

5.1m(best)

4.9m−0.2m vs best

Ownership

6.1%(best)

1.6%−4.5% vs best

Top 10k ownership

32.2%(best)

0.4%−31.8% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Muharemović leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatMuharemovićThiaw
Starts

9(best)

7−2 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

78%−22% vs best

Minutes (season)

810(best)

631−179 vs best

Avg minutes

90(best)

70−20 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Muharemović leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatMuharemovićThiaw
Mins (6 gw)

90(best)

60−30 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.09(best)

0.00−0.09 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.04(best)

0.01−0.03 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.13(best)

0.01−0.12 vs best

DC (6 gw)

9.83(best)

6.83−3.00 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.22+0.10 vs best

1.12(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Muharemović leads 6 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatMuharemovićThiaw
Points

46(best)

16−30 vs best

Goals

0

0

Assists

2(best)

0−2 vs best

Total xG

0.65(best)

0.00−0.65 vs best

Total xA

0.23(best)

0.16−0.07 vs best

DC (season)

98(best)

62−36 vs best

Clean sheets

3(best)

1−2 vs best

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatMuharemovićThiaw
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Muharemović leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatMuharemovićThiaw
BPS

161(best)

41−120 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

18.2(best)

2.7−15.5 vs best

Bonus

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.2(best)

0.0−0.2 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatMuharemovićThiaw
Next 5 GWs

TOT

(H)

10

CHE

(A)

11

COV

(H)

12

MCI

(A)

13

IPS

(H)

14

FUL

(A)

10

ARS

(H)

11

BHA

(A)

12

MUN

(H)

13

SUN

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.20

3.20

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Muharemović leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatMuharemovićThiaw
Form

4.8(best)

17th DEF · 40th overall

0.5

116th DEF · 339th overall

ICT index

41.4(best)

11th DEF · 56th overall

19.8

66th DEF · 192nd overall

Selected

21st DEF(best)

60th overall

52nd DEF

139th overall

Points per game

5.1(best)

14th DEF · 36th overall

2.0

100th DEF · 268th overall

Cost rank

39th DEF(best)

243rd overall

62nd DEF

349th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • MuharemovićLEE

    1. LEE v TOT home, gameweek 10: 1.19 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. LEE v CHE away, gameweek 11: 0.96 projected goals, 20% clean sheet chance

  • ThiawNEW

    1. NEW v FUL away, gameweek 10: 1.12 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
    2. NEW v ARS home, gameweek 11: 0.89 projected goals, 17% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Muharemović (LEE) 0.5 expected clean sheets, Thiaw (NEW) 0.4 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Muharemović−0.7Muharemović: 0 goals from 0.65 xG (−0.7)
  • Thiaw±0.0Thiaw: 0 goals from 0.00 xG (±0.0)

Muharemović has 0.7 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Muharemović+1.8Muharemović: 2 assists from 0.23 xA (+1.8)
  • Thiaw−0.2Thiaw: 0 assists from 0.16 xA (−0.2)

Muharemović has 1.8 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Muharemović−3.8Muharemović: 8 conceded from 11.83 xGC (−3.8)
  • Thiaw+1.8Thiaw: 14 conceded from 12.21 xGC (+1.8)

Thiaw has conceded 1.8 more than xGC; Muharemović has conceded 3.8 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Muharemović · 46 pts37% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Thiaw · 16 pts60% from appearances

    −9 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceMuharemovićThiaw
Appearances1815
Assists60
Clean sheets124
Defensive contribution126
Bonus10
Deductions−3−9
Total4616

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Muharemović6.0(2)
  • Thiaw1.7(3)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Muharemović6.3(4)
  • Thiaw2.0(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Muharemović3.0(3)
  • Thiaw3.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Muharemović 3.0 points per game, Thiaw 3.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Muharemović5.5(4)
  • Thiaw1.8(4)

Away

  • Muharemović4.8(5)
  • Thiaw2.3(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Muharemović 4.8 points per game, Thiaw 2.3 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Muharemović22%

    0 goals and 2 assists of 9 LEE goals

  • Thiaw0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 12 NEW goals

Muharemović is involved in 22% of LEE's goals, against 0% for Thiaw.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Muharemović9 of 9 full games

    9 × 90 minutes

  • Thiaw7 of 9 full games

    7 × 90 minutes, 1 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Muharemović264.6
  • Thiaw162.0

Creativity

  • Muharemović38.1
  • Thiaw29.5

Threat

  • Muharemović111.0
  • Thiaw6.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Muharemović's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Thiaw's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Muharemović+1959.6k out9.8k in
  • Thiaw−8.9k9.2k out303 in

Muharemović has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+195).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Muharemović 9.0 points per £m (7th), Thiaw 3.3 points per £m (80th). Median 3.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Muharemović
  • Thiaw

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Muharemović 32, Thiaw 8.

How far ahead is Muharemović? Above zero Muharemović leads; below, Thiaw.

Muharemović is 24 points ahead of Thiaw over these gameweeks. Muharemović's biggest lead was 24 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Muharemović, gameweek 4: 7 points v NEW home, 90 minutes
    Thiaw, gameweek 4: 2 points v LEE away, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Muharemović, gameweek 5: 6 points v CRY home, 90 minutes
    Thiaw, gameweek 5: 4 points v HUL home, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Muharemović, gameweek 6: 2 points v ARS away, 90 minutes
    Thiaw, gameweek 6: 0 points v COV away, 90 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Muharemović, gameweek 7: 5 points v MUN home, 90 minutes
    Thiaw, gameweek 7: 1 points v AVL home, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Muharemović, gameweek 8: 9 points v SUN away, 90 minutes
    Thiaw, gameweek 8: 1 points v CRY away, 1 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Muharemović, gameweek 9: 3 points v BOU away, 90 minutes
    Thiaw, gameweek 9: 0 points v EVE home, 0 minutes

Muharemović: 0 hauls (10+), 1 blank (0–2); Thiaw: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWMuharemovićThiaw
472
564
620
751
891
930

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWMuharemovićThiaw
49090
59090
69090
79090
8901
9900

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWMuharemovićThiaw
40.000.00
50.400.00
60.000.00
70.060.00
80.100.00
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWMuharemovićThiaw
40.020.00
50.010.01
60.000.02
70.160.06
80.010.00
90.010.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWMuharemovićThiaw
40.020.00
50.410.01
60.000.02
70.220.06
80.110.00
90.010.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWMuharemovićThiaw
41111
5813
6108
759
8130
9120

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWMuharemovićThiaw
40.882.08
51.061.59
62.331.47
70.921.57
80.830.03
91.290.00

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWMuharemovićThiaw
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWMuharemovićThiaw
410
500
600
710
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWMuharemovićThiaw
43.8%2.1%
54.5%2.2%
64.5%2.3%
74.7%2.0%
85.6%1.8%
96.2%1.6%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWMuharemovićThiaw
4£5.0m£5.0m
5£5.0m£5.0m
6£5.0m£5.0m
7£5.0m£5.0m
8£5.0m£5.0m
9£5.1m£5.0m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWMuharemovićThiaw
4——
520.6%1.8%
619.0%1.4%
721.7%1.4%
836.8%0.9%
932.2%0.4%