How do Mateta and McBurnie compare?

McBurnie has more season points (36 vs 3), McBurnie is more owned (1.7% vs 1.2%), McBurnie is cheaper (5.5m vs 6.3m), McBurnie has the higher Start rate (100% vs 33%), McBurnie has more Bonus (5 vs 0), but Mateta has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 3.00 vs 3.60).

Mateta

4 stats won

McBurnie

25 stats won

Who wins more stats: Mateta or McBurnie?

McBurnie wins 25 of 29 stats

McBurnie wins 25 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Mateta 4.

Points
Mateta: 3McBurnie: 36
xGI (6 gw)
Mateta: 0.21McBurnie: 0.31
Price
Mateta: £6.3mMcBurnie: £5.5m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionMatetaMcBurnie
Price & ownership12
Playing time04
Recent form15
Season totals05
Set pieces01
Bonus04
Fixtures10
FPL ranks14
Total425

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

Mateta: Points 3, xGI (6 gw) 0.21, BPS -2, Mins (6 gw) 17, xG (6 gw) 0.21, Upcoming FDR 3.00. McBurnie: Points 36, xGI (6 gw) 0.31, BPS 133, Mins (6 gw) 88, xG (6 gw) 0.28, Upcoming FDR 3.60.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

McBurnie leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatMatetaMcBurnie
Price

6.3m(best)

5.5m−0.8m vs best

Ownership

1.2%−0.5% vs best

1.7%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.0%−0.6% vs best

0.6%(best)

Availability

0% · Suspended until 2 Dec

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

McBurnie leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatMatetaMcBurnie
Starts

3−6 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

33%−67% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

164−632 vs best

796(best)

Avg minutes

18−70 vs best

88(best)

Who has better recent form?

McBurnie leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatMatetaMcBurnie
Mins (6 gw)

17−71 vs best

88(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.21−0.07 vs best

0.28(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.00−0.03 vs best

0.03(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.21−0.10 vs best

0.31(best)

DC (6 gw)

1.17−3.00 vs best

4.17(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.32(best)

1.33+1.01 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

McBurnie leads 5 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatMatetaMcBurnie
Points

3−33 vs best

36(best)

Goals

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Assists

0−3 vs best

3(best)

Total xG

1.96−0.26 vs best

2.22(best)

Total xA

0.04−0.20 vs best

0.24(best)

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

McBurnie leads 1 of 1
Who takes the set pieces?
StatMatetaMcBurnie
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

2nd choice(best)

Penalties

1st choice

1st choice

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

McBurnie leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatMatetaMcBurnie
BPS

-2−135 vs best

133(best)

BPS (6 gw)

0.2−17.0 vs best

17.2(best)

Bonus

0−5 vs best

5(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.8 vs best

0.8(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Mateta leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatMatetaMcBurnie
Next 5 GWs

LIV

(H)

10

COV

(A)

11

HUL

(H)

12

CHE

(A)

13

AVL

(A)

14

ARS

(A)

10

BHA

(H)

11

CRY

(A)

12

NFO

(H)

13

BOU

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.00(best)

3.60+0.60 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

McBurnie leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatMatetaMcBurnie
Form

0.2

43rd FWD · 386th overall

5.8(best)

4th FWD · 21st overall

ICT index

11.3

29th FWD · 280th overall

41.1(best)

11th FWD · 57th overall

Selected

23rd FWD

163rd overall

20th FWD(best)

135th overall

Points per game

0.8

50th FWD · 444th overall

4.0(best)

9th FWD · 91st overall

Cost rank

13th FWD(best)

47th overall

33rd FWD

125th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • MatetaCRY

    1. CRY v LIV home, gameweek 10: 1.00 projected goals, 15% clean sheet chance
    2. CRY v COV away, gameweek 11: 1.18 projected goals, 25% clean sheet chance
  • McBurnieHUL

    1. HUL v ARS away, gameweek 10: 0.64 projected goals, 6% clean sheet chance
    2. HUL v BHA home, gameweek 11: 0.91 projected goals, 14% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Mateta (CRY) 2.2 projected team goals, McBurnie (HUL) 1.6 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Mateta−2.0Mateta: 0 goals from 1.96 xG (−2.0)
  • McBurnie−0.2McBurnie: 2 goals from 2.22 xG (−0.2)

Mateta has 2.0 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Mateta±0.0Mateta: 0 assists from 0.04 xA (±0.0)
  • McBurnie+2.8McBurnie: 3 assists from 0.24 xA (+2.8)

McBurnie has 2.8 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Mateta · 3 pts100% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • McBurnie · 36 pts45% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceMatetaMcBurnie
Appearances618
Goals08
Assists09
Bonus05
Deductions−3−4
Total336

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • MatetaNo games
  • McBurnie6.5(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Mateta0.7(3)
  • McBurnie3.2(6)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Mateta1.0(1)
  • McBurnie4.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: McBurnie 4.0 points per game, Mateta 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Mateta2.0(1)
  • McBurnie5.6(5)

Away

  • Mateta0.3(3)
  • McBurnie2.0(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: McBurnie 2.0 points per game, Mateta 0.3 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Mateta

    No CRY goals yet in matches played

  • McBurnie45%

    2 goals and 3 assists of 11 HUL goals

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Mateta0 of 9 full games

    2 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

  • McBurnie7 of 9 full games

    7 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Mateta7.0
  • McBurnie150.4

Creativity

  • Mateta23.9
  • McBurnie104.4

Threat

  • Mateta84.0
  • McBurnie156.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Mateta's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; McBurnie's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Mateta−4.4k4.9k out451 in
  • McBurnie+5.1k5.4k out10.6k in

McBurnie has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+5.1k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: Mateta 0.5 points per £m (46th), McBurnie 6.5 points per £m (4th). Median 2.3.
  • Mateta
  • McBurnie

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: McBurnie 28, Mateta 1.

How far ahead is Mateta? Above zero Mateta leads; below, McBurnie.

McBurnie is 27 points ahead of Mateta over these gameweeks. McBurnie's was 27 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Mateta, gameweek 4: 0 points v IPS home, 0 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 4: 4 points v CHE away, 81 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Mateta, gameweek 5: 0 points v LEE away, 0 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 5: 1 points v NEW away, 90 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Mateta, gameweek 6: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 6: 1 points v EVE home, 90 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Mateta, gameweek 7: 1 points v BHA away, 29 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 7: 2 points v FUL away, 90 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Mateta, gameweek 8: 2 points v NEW home, 61 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 8: 8 points v BRE home, 85 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Mateta, gameweek 9: -2 points v TOT away, 12 minutes
    McBurnie, gameweek 9: 12 points v IPS home, 90 minutes

Mateta: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); McBurnie: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWMatetaMcBurnie
404
501
601
712
828
9-212

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWMatetaMcBurnie
4081
5090
6090
72990
86185
91290

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWMatetaMcBurnie
40.000.33
50.000.36
60.000.00
70.460.00
80.800.79
90.000.20

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWMatetaMcBurnie
40.000.04
50.000.02
60.000.09
70.010.00
80.000.01
90.010.01

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWMatetaMcBurnie
40.000.37
50.000.38
60.000.09
70.470.00
80.800.80
90.010.21

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWMatetaMcBurnie
403
506
605
743
813
925

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWMatetaMcBurnie
400
500
600
700
801
901

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWMatetaMcBurnie
401
500
600
700
800
901

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWMatetaMcBurnie
41.6%1.9%
51.4%2.0%
61.2%1.9%
71.2%1.8%
81.2%1.6%
91.2%1.7%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWMatetaMcBurnie
4£6.4m£5.5m
5£6.3m£5.5m
6£6.3m£5.5m
7£6.3m£5.5m
8£6.3m£5.5m
9£6.3m£5.5m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWMatetaMcBurnie
4——
50.0%0.4%
60.0%0.3%
70.0%0.2%
80.0%0.2%
90.0%0.6%