How do Maddison and Schade compare?

Schade has more season points (45 vs 14), Schade is more owned (14.3% vs 0.6%), Schade has the higher Start rate (89% vs 22%), Schade has more Bonus (6 vs 2), but Maddison has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.60).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hide stats where they're level

Comparing 2 midfielders

Schade wins most stats

Spurs

TOT · 6.2m

6 stats won

Brentford

BRE · 6.2m

25 stats won

Who wins more stats: Maddison or Schade?

Schade wins 25 of 31 stats

Schade wins 25 of the 31 stats with an outright best. Others: Maddison 6.

Points: Maddison: 14Schade: 45
xGI (6 gw): Maddison: 0.04Schade: 0.25
Price: Maddison: £6.2mSchade: £6.2m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
Section	Maddison	Schade
Price & ownership	0	2
Playing time	0	4
Recent form	1	5
Season totals	0	6
Set pieces	2	1
Bonus	0	4
Fixtures	1	0
FPL ranks	2	3
Total	6	25

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Maddison: Points 14, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 75, Mins (6 gw) 29, DC (6 gw) 3.8, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Schade: Points 45, xGI (6 gw) 0.25, BPS 161, Mins (6 gw) 70, DC (6 gw) 5.5, Upcoming FDR 3.60.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Schade leads 2 of 2

Who is more expensive and more owned?
Stat	Maddison	Schade
Price	6.2m	6.2m
Ownership	0.6%−13.7% vs best	14.3%(best)

Top 10k ownership	0.3%−17.7% vs best	18.0%(best)

Availability	Available	Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Schade leads 4 of 4

Who starts and plays more minutes?
Stat	Maddison	Schade
Starts	2−6 vs best	8(best)

Start rate	22%−67% vs best	89%(best)

Minutes (season)	193−494 vs best	687(best)

Avg minutes	21−55 vs best	76(best)

Who has better recent form?

Schade leads 5 of 6

Who has better recent form?
Stat	Maddison	Schade
Mins (6 gw)	29−41 vs best	70(best)

xG (6 gw)	0.03−0.19 vs best	0.22(best)

xA (6 gw)	0.01−0.01 vs best	0.02(best)

xGI (6 gw)	0.04−0.21 vs best	0.25(best)

DC (6 gw)	3.83−1.67 vs best	5.50(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better	0.23(best)	1.16+0.93 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Schade leads 6 of 6

Who has scored more this season?
Stat	Maddison	Schade
Points	14−31 vs best	45(best)

Goals	1−2 vs best	3(best)

Assists	0−2 vs best	2(best)

Total xG	0.16−1.96 vs best	2.12(best)

Total xA	0.10−0.24 vs best	0.34(best)

DC (season)	25−31 vs best	56(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Maddison leads 2 of 3

Who takes the set pieces?
Stat	Maddison	Schade
Corners & indirect FKs	5th choice(best)	—
Direct free kicks	5th choice(best)	—
Penalties	—	2nd choice(best)
Penalties missed · lower is better	0	0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Schade leads 4 of 4

Who is collecting more bonus?
Stat	Maddison	Schade
BPS	75−86 vs best	161(best)

BPS (6 gw)	11.5−5.0 vs best	16.5(best)

Bonus	2−4 vs best	6(best)

Bonus (6 gw)	0.3−0.2 vs best	0.5(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Maddison leads 1 of 1

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Stat	Maddison	Schade
Next 5 GWs	LEE (A) 10 IPS (H) 11 SUN (A) 12 FUL (H) 13 ARS (H) 14	BHA (A) 10 EVE (H) 11 MUN (A) 12 ARS (H) 13 MCI (H) 14
Avg FDR · lower is better	2.80(best)	3.60+0.80 vs best

See alsoSeason calendar Team rating Projected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Schade leads 3 of 5

How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Stat	Maddison	Schade
Form	2.8(best) 57th MID · 137th overall	1.5 109th MID · 242nd overall
ICT index	15.9 110th MID · 232nd overall	41.5(best) 35th MID · 55th overall
Selected	75th MID 224th overall	9th MID(best) 28th overall
Points per game	2.3 101st MID · 233rd overall	5.0(best) 16th MID · 40th overall
Cost rank	37th MID(best) 55th overall	41st MID 60th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

MaddisonTOT
1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance
SchadeBRE
1. BRE v BHA away, gameweek 10: 1.17 projected goals, 19% clean sheet chance
2. BRE v EVE home, gameweek 11: 1.53 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Maddison (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals, Schade (BRE) 2.7 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

Maddison+0.8Maddison: 1 goals from 0.16 xG (+0.8)
Schade+0.9Schade: 3 goals from 2.12 xG (+0.9)

Schade has 0.9 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

Maddison−0.1Maddison: 0 assists from 0.10 xA (−0.1)
Schade+1.7Schade: 2 assists from 0.34 xA (+1.7)

Schade has 1.7 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

Maddison · 14 pts50% from appearances
Schade · 45 pts35% from appearances
−1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
Source	Maddison	Schade
Appearances	7	16
Goals	5	15
Assists	0	6
Clean sheets	0	3
Bonus	2	6
Deductions	0	−1
Total	14	45

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

Maddison9.0(1)
Schade2.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

Maddison1.0(3)
Schade4.3(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

Maddison1.0(2)
Schade8.0(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Schade 8.0 points per game, Maddison 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

Maddison3.7(3)
Schade3.4(5)

Away

Maddison1.0(3)
Schade7.0(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Schade 7.0 points per game, Maddison 1.0 points per game.

Maddison13%
1 goal and 0 assists of 8 TOT goals
Schade31%
3 goals and 2 assists of 16 BRE goals

Schade is involved in 31% of BRE's goals, against 13% for Maddison.

Who is a rotation risk?

Maddison0 of 9 full games
1 × 60–89, 5 × 1–59, 3 × Didn't play
Schade4 of 9 full games
4 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

Maddison75.2
Schade159.4

Creativity

Maddison42.1
Schade52.3

Threat

Maddison41.0
Schade203.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Maddison's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Schade's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

Maddison+3652.0k out2.4k in
Schade−55.4k67.0k out11.7k in

Maddison has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+365).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Maddison 2.3 points per £m (119th), Schade 7.3 points per £m (7th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

From To

Maddison
Schade

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Schade 30, Maddison 13.

How far ahead is Maddison? Above zero Maddison leads; below, Schade.

Schade is 17 points ahead of Maddison over these gameweeks. Schade's was 22 (GW 5).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

GW 4
Maddison, gameweek 4: 1 points v EVE home, 13 minutes
Schade, gameweek 4: 15 points v BOU away, 90 minutes
GW 5
Maddison, gameweek 5: 1 points v AVL home, 24 minutes
Schade, gameweek 5: 9 points v CHE home, 90 minutes
GW 6
Maddison, gameweek 6: 1 points v MUN away, 16 minutes
Schade, gameweek 6: 1 points v AVL away, 51 minutes
GW 7
Maddison, gameweek 7: 9 points v COV home, 68 minutes
Schade, gameweek 7: 0 points v LIV home, 45 minutes
GW 8
Maddison, gameweek 8: 1 points v CHE away, 50 minutes
Schade, gameweek 8: 2 points v HUL away, 61 minutes
GW 9
Maddison, gameweek 9: 0 points v CRY home, 0 minutes
Schade, gameweek 9: 3 points v NFO home, 83 minutes

Maddison: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Schade: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek

Points by gameweek
GW	Maddison	Schade
4	1	15
5	1	9
6	1	1
7	9	0
8	1	2
9	0	3

Minutes

Values by gameweek

Minutes by gameweek
GW	Maddison	Schade
4	13	90
5	24	90
6	16	51
7	68	45
8	50	61
9	0	83

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GW	Maddison	Schade
4	0.00	0.21
5	0.06	0.54
6	0.00	0.41
7	0.10	0.00
8	0.00	0.19
9	0.00	0.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek

Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GW	Maddison	Schade
4	0.01	0.10
5	0.02	0.02
6	0.01	0.01
7	0.04	0.01
8	0.01	0.00
9	0.00	0.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek

Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GW	Maddison	Schade
4	0.01	0.31
5	0.08	0.56
6	0.01	0.42
7	0.14	0.01
8	0.01	0.19
9	0.00	0.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek

Defensive contribution by gameweek
GW	Maddison	Schade
4	3	4
5	6	7
6	4	4
7	6	5
8	4	6
9	0	7

Goals

Values by gameweek

Goals by gameweek
GW	Maddison	Schade
4	0	2
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	1	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Assists

Values by gameweek

Assists by gameweek
GW	Maddison	Schade
4	0	0
5	0	2
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Ownership

Values by gameweek

Ownership by gameweek
GW	Maddison	Schade
4	0.4%	3.5%
5	0.4%	7.8%
6	0.4%	16.5%
7	0.4%	13.5%
8	0.5%	15.2%
9	0.6%	15.0%

Price

Values by gameweek

Price by gameweek
GW	Maddison	Schade
4	£6.3m	£6.0m
5	£6.3m	£6.1m
6	£6.3m	£6.2m
7	£6.2m	£6.2m
8	£6.2m	£6.2m
9	£6.2m	£6.2m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek

Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GW	Maddison	Schade
4	—	—
5	0.0%	23.5%
6	0.0%	20.6%
7	0.0%	16.0%
8	0.1%	21.1%
9	0.3%	18.0%