How do Maatsen and Mykolenko compare?

Mykolenko has more season points (34 vs 13), Mykolenko is more owned (2.4% vs 0.4%), Maatsen is cheaper (4.4m vs 4.6m), Mykolenko has the higher Start rate (89% vs 67%), Mykolenko has more Bonus (3 vs 1), but Maatsen has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.40 vs 3.00).

← Back to players Pick different players

Maatsen

5 stats won

Mykolenko

22 stats won

Who wins more stats: Maatsen or Mykolenko?

Mykolenko wins 22 of 27 stats

Mykolenko wins 22 of the 27 stats with an outright best. Others: Maatsen 5.

Points
Maatsen: 13Mykolenko: 34
xGI (6 gw)
Maatsen: 0.06Mykolenko: 0.06
Price
Maatsen: £4.4mMykolenko: £4.6m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionMaatsenMykolenko
Price & ownership03
Playing time04
Recent form23
Season totals23
Set pieces00
Bonus04
Fixtures10
FPL ranks05
Total522

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Maatsen: Points 13, xGI (6 gw) 0.06, BPS 39, Mins (6 gw) 45, DC (6 gw) 2.8, Upcoming FDR 2.40. Mykolenko: Points 34, xGI (6 gw) 0.06, BPS 149, Mins (6 gw) 72, DC (6 gw) 5.7, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Mykolenko leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatMaatsenMykolenko
Price

4.4m−0.2m vs best

4.6m(best)

Ownership

0.4%−2.0% vs best

2.4%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.2%−1.4% vs best

1.6%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Mykolenko leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatMaatsenMykolenko
Starts

6−2 vs best

8(best)

Start rate

67%−22% vs best

89%(best)

Minutes (season)

515−188 vs best

703(best)

Avg minutes

57−21 vs best

78(best)

Who has better recent form?

Mykolenko leads 3 of 5
Who has better recent form?
StatMaatsenMykolenko
Mins (6 gw)

45−27 vs best

72(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.05(best)

0.01−0.04 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.01−0.05 vs best

0.06(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.06

0.06

DC (6 gw)

2.83−2.84 vs best

5.67(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.91(best)

1.13+0.22 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Mykolenko leads 3 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatMaatsenMykolenko
Points

13−21 vs best

34(best)

Goals

0

0

Assists

0

0

Total xG

0.40(best)

0.04−0.36 vs best

Total xA

0.50(best)

0.42−0.08 vs best

DC (season)

37−19 vs best

56(best)

Clean sheets

1−3 vs best

4(best)

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatMaatsenMykolenko
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Mykolenko leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatMaatsenMykolenko
BPS

39−110 vs best

149(best)

BPS (6 gw)

4.0−13.8 vs best

17.8(best)

Bonus

1−2 vs best

3(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.5 vs best

0.5(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Maatsen leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatMaatsenMykolenko
Next 5 GWs

MUN

(A)

10

SUN

(H)

11

IPS

(A)

12

EVE

(H)

13

CRY

(H)

14

COV

(H)

10

BRE

(A)

11

LIV

(H)

12

AVL

(A)

13

FUL

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.40(best)

3.00+0.60 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Mykolenko leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatMaatsenMykolenko
Form

1.0

98th DEF · 270th overall

1.8(best)

78th DEF · 206th overall

ICT index

15.7

84th DEF · 233rd overall

25.4(best)

46th DEF · 143rd overall

Selected

103rd DEF

281st overall

45th DEF(best)

119th overall

Points per game

2.2

93rd DEF · 238th overall

4.2(best)

31st DEF · 70th overall

Cost rank

137th DEF

537th overall

82nd DEF(best)

427th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • MaatsenAVL

    1. AVL v MUN away, gameweek 10: 1.24 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance
    2. AVL v SUN home, gameweek 11: 1.44 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

  • MykolenkoEVE

    1. EVE v COV home, gameweek 10: 1.64 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
    2. EVE v BRE away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Mykolenko (EVE) 0.6 expected clean sheets, Maatsen (AVL) 0.6 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Maatsen−0.4Maatsen: 0 goals from 0.40 xG (−0.4)
  • Mykolenko±0.0Mykolenko: 0 goals from 0.04 xG (±0.0)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Maatsen−0.5Maatsen: 0 assists from 0.50 xA (−0.5)
  • Mykolenko−0.4Mykolenko: 0 assists from 0.42 xA (−0.4)

Maatsen has 0.5 fewer assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Maatsen−1.3Maatsen: 9 conceded from 10.34 xGC (−1.3)
  • Mykolenko−4.6Mykolenko: 7 conceded from 11.61 xGC (−4.6)

Mykolenko has conceded 4.6 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Maatsen · 13 pts71% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Mykolenko · 34 pts41% from appearances

    −5 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceMaatsenMykolenko
Appearances1216
Clean sheets416
Defensive contribution04
Bonus13
Deductions−4−5
Total1334

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Maatsen4.5(2)
  • Mykolenko5.5(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Maatsen1.0(1)
  • Mykolenko6.0(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Maatsen1.0(3)
  • Mykolenko1.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Mykolenko 1.7 points per game, Maatsen 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Maatsen1.5(4)
  • Mykolenko3.3(4)

Away

  • Maatsen3.5(2)
  • Mykolenko5.3(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Mykolenko 5.3 points per game, Maatsen 3.5 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Maatsen0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 4 AVL goals

  • Mykolenko0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 7 EVE goals

Maatsen is involved in 0% of AVL's goals, against 0% for Mykolenko.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Maatsen4 of 9 full games

    4 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 3 × Didn't play

  • Mykolenko7 of 9 full games

    7 × 90 minutes, 1 × 60–89, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Maatsen61.2
  • Mykolenko157.0

Creativity

  • Maatsen38.8
  • Mykolenko72.7

Threat

  • Maatsen57.0
  • Mykolenko23.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Maatsen's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Mykolenko's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Maatsen+418473 out891 in
  • Mykolenko+53.8k out3.8k in

Maatsen has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+418).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Maatsen 3.0 points per £m (84th), Mykolenko 7.4 points per £m (25th). Median 3.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Maatsen
  • Mykolenko

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Mykolenko 23, Maatsen 5.

How far ahead is Maatsen? Above zero Maatsen leads; below, Mykolenko.

Mykolenko is 18 points ahead of Maatsen over these gameweeks. Mykolenko's was 18 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Maatsen, gameweek 4: 1 points v NFO home, 90 minutes
    Mykolenko, gameweek 4: 11 points v TOT away, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Maatsen, gameweek 5: 0 points v TOT away, 0 minutes
    Mykolenko, gameweek 5: 5 points v IPS home, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Maatsen, gameweek 6: 0 points v BRE home, 0 minutes
    Mykolenko, gameweek 6: 0 points v HUL away, 0 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Maatsen, gameweek 7: 0 points v NEW away, 0 minutes
    Mykolenko, gameweek 7: 1 points v CHE home, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Maatsen, gameweek 8: 2 points v MCI home, 90 minutes
    Mykolenko, gameweek 8: 0 points v ARS away, 73 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Maatsen, gameweek 9: 2 points v FUL home, 90 minutes
    Mykolenko, gameweek 9: 6 points v NEW away, 90 minutes

Maatsen: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Mykolenko: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWMaatsenMykolenko
4111
505
600
701
820
926

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWMaatsenMykolenko
49090
5090
600
7090
89073
99090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWMaatsenMykolenko
40.180.00
50.000.04
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.070.00
90.050.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWMaatsenMykolenko
40.030.07
50.000.02
60.000.00
70.000.21
80.030.01
90.020.04

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWMaatsenMykolenko
40.210.07
50.000.06
60.000.00
70.000.21
80.100.01
90.070.04

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWMaatsenMykolenko
4411
506
600
704
876
967

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWMaatsenMykolenko
41.660.69
50.001.44
60.000.00
70.001.47
81.561.91
92.241.29

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWMaatsenMykolenko
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWMaatsenMykolenko
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWMaatsenMykolenko
40.9%2.0%
50.5%4.3%
60.4%3.5%
70.4%2.7%
80.3%2.6%
90.4%2.3%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWMaatsenMykolenko
4£4.5m£4.5m
5£4.5m£4.5m
6£4.4m£4.6m
7£4.4m£4.6m
8£4.4m£4.6m
9£4.4m£4.6m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWMaatsenMykolenko
4——
50.1%6.8%
60.1%4.5%
70.1%3.2%
80.0%2.6%
90.2%1.6%