How do Kudus and Tavernier compare?

Tavernier has more season points (55 vs 26), Tavernier is more owned (27.7% vs 1.7%), Tavernier has the higher Start rate (100% vs 44%), but Tavernier has more Bonus (12 vs 2).

← Back to players Pick different players

Kudus

2 stats won

Tavernier

27 stats won

Who wins more stats: Kudus or Tavernier?

Tavernier wins 27 of 29 stats

Tavernier wins 27 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Kudus 2.

Points
Kudus: 26Tavernier: 55
xGI (6 gw)
Kudus: 0.31Tavernier: 0.54
Price
Kudus: £6.6mTavernier: £6.6m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionKudusTavernier
Price & ownership02
Playing time04
Recent form15
Season totals15
Set pieces02
Bonus04
Fixtures00
FPL ranks05
Total227

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Kudus: Points 26, xGI (6 gw) 0.31, BPS 133, Mins (6 gw) 67, DC (6 gw) 6.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Tavernier: Points 55, xGI (6 gw) 0.54, BPS 243, Mins (6 gw) 80, DC (6 gw) 6.3, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Tavernier leads 2 of 2
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatKudusTavernier
Price

6.6m

6.6m

Ownership

1.7%−26.0% vs best

27.7%(best)

Top 10k ownership

6.8%−58.5% vs best

65.3%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Tavernier leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatKudusTavernier
Starts

4−5 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

44%−56% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

452−298 vs best

750(best)

Avg minutes

50−33 vs best

83(best)

Who has better recent form?

Tavernier leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatKudusTavernier
Mins (6 gw)

67−13 vs best

80(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.20−0.17 vs best

0.37(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.11−0.06 vs best

0.17(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.31−0.23 vs best

0.54(best)

DC (6 gw)

6.00−0.33 vs best

6.33(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.37(best)

0.78+0.41 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Tavernier leads 5 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatKudusTavernier
Points

26−29 vs best

55(best)

Goals

0−5 vs best

5(best)

Assists

3(best)

0−3 vs best

Total xG

1.23−2.48 vs best

3.71(best)

Total xA

0.82−0.54 vs best

1.36(best)

DC (season)

41−25 vs best

66(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Tavernier leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatKudusTavernier
Corners & indirect FKs

7th choice

1st choice(best)

Direct free kicks

6th choice

1st choice(best)

Penalties

3rd choice

3rd choice

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Tavernier leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatKudusTavernier
BPS

133−110 vs best

243(best)

BPS (6 gw)

19.3−5.4 vs best

24.7(best)

Bonus

2−10 vs best

12(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.3−0.7 vs best

1.0(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatKudusTavernier
Next 5 GWs

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

IPS

(A)

10

NFO

(H)

11

FUL

(A)

12

BHA

(H)

13

HUL

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80

2.80

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Tavernier leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatKudusTavernier
Form

4.8

16th MID · 44th overall

6.0(best)

7th MID · 19th overall

ICT index

35.8

46th MID · 78th overall

73.0(best)

3rd MID · 4th overall

Selected

46th MID

136th overall

5th MID(best)

10th overall

Points per game

3.2

58th MID · 146th overall

6.1(best)

4th MID · 11th overall

Cost rank

25th MID

37th overall

22nd MID(best)

34th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • KudusTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

  • TavernierBOU

    1. BOU v IPS away, gameweek 10: 1.56 projected goals, 35% clean sheet chance
    2. BOU v NFO home, gameweek 11: 1.54 projected goals, 39% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Tavernier (BOU) 3.1 projected team goals, Kudus (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Kudus−1.2Kudus: 0 goals from 1.23 xG (−1.2)
  • Tavernier+1.3Tavernier: 5 goals from 3.71 xG (+1.3)

Kudus has 1.2 fewer goals than xG; Tavernier has 1.3 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Kudus+2.2Kudus: 3 assists from 0.82 xA (+2.2)
  • Tavernier−1.4Tavernier: 0 assists from 1.36 xA (−1.4)

Tavernier has 1.4 fewer assists than xA; Kudus has 2.2 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Kudus · 26 pts46% from appearances

  • Tavernier · 55 pts43% from goals

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceKudusTavernier
Appearances1218
Goals025
Assists90
Clean sheets23
Bonus212
Other10
Deductions0−3
Total2655

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Kudus4.7(3)
  • Tavernier10.0(1)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Kudus2.3(4)
  • Tavernier6.4(5)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Kudus3.0(1)
  • Tavernier4.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Tavernier 4.3 points per game, Kudus 3.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Kudus3.8(5)
  • Tavernier4.8(5)

Away

  • Kudus2.3(3)
  • Tavernier7.8(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Tavernier 7.8 points per game, Kudus 2.3 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Kudus30%

    0 goals and 3 assists of 10 TOT goals

  • Tavernier36%

    5 goals and 0 assists of 14 BOU goals

Tavernier is involved in 36% of BOU's goals, against 30% for Kudus.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Kudus1 of 9 full games

    1 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

  • Tavernier3 of 9 full games

    3 × 90 minutes, 6 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Kudus98.8
  • Tavernier258.0

Creativity

  • Kudus152.2
  • Tavernier240.0

Threat

  • Kudus108.0
  • Tavernier231.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Kudus's biggest score is creativity, a creator; Tavernier's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Kudus+32.9k2.6k out35.5k in
  • Tavernier+268k12.0k out280k in

Tavernier has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+268k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Kudus 3.9 points per £m (73rd), Tavernier 8.3 points per £m (4th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Kudus
  • Tavernier

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Tavernier 34, Kudus 24.

How far ahead is Kudus? Above zero Kudus leads; below, Tavernier.

Tavernier is 10 points ahead of Kudus over these gameweeks. Tavernier's was 14 (GW 8).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Kudus, gameweek 4: 1 points v EVE home, 27 minutes
    Tavernier, gameweek 4: 8 points v BRE home, 82 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Kudus, gameweek 5: 4 points v AVL home, 45 minutes
    Tavernier, gameweek 5: 2 points v LIV home, 74 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Kudus, gameweek 6: 3 points v MUN away, 65 minutes
    Tavernier, gameweek 6: 1 points v CHE away, 72 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Kudus, gameweek 7: 6 points v COV home, 86 minutes
    Tavernier, gameweek 7: 10 points v SUN home, 78 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Kudus, gameweek 8: 3 points v CHE away, 88 minutes
    Tavernier, gameweek 8: 10 points v MUN away, 86 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Kudus, gameweek 9: 7 points v CRY home, 90 minutes
    Tavernier, gameweek 9: 3 points v LEE home, 90 minutes

Kudus: 0 hauls (10+), 1 blank (0–2); Tavernier: 2 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWKudusTavernier
418
542
631
7610
8310
973

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWKudusTavernier
42782
54574
66572
78678
88886
99090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWKudusTavernier
40.000.20
50.070.00
60.280.00
70.041.19
80.040.72
90.760.10

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWKudusTavernier
40.050.47
50.200.11
60.010.04
70.090.16
80.030.21
90.270.03

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWKudusTavernier
40.050.67
50.270.11
60.290.04
70.131.35
80.070.93
91.030.13

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWKudusTavernier
428
576
655
7910
8116
923

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWKudusTavernier
401
500
600
701
801
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWKudusTavernier
400
510
600
710
800
910

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWKudusTavernier
40.1%3.9%
50.1%6.6%
60.2%7.3%
70.4%7.9%
80.4%13.5%
92.0%27.0%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWKudusTavernier
4£6.5m£6.0m
5£6.5m£6.1m
6£6.5m£6.1m
7£6.5m£6.1m
8£6.5m£6.2m
9£6.5m£6.5m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWKudusTavernier
4——
50.0%4.8%
60.0%4.1%
70.2%15.0%
80.1%42.4%
96.8%65.3%