How do Kudus and Neto compare?

Neto has more season points (40 vs 26), Neto is more owned (5% vs 1.7%), Neto has the higher Start rate (89% vs 44%), but Neto has more Bonus (3 vs 2).

← Back to players Pick different players

Kudus

5 stats won

Neto

24 stats won

Who wins more stats: Kudus or Neto?

Neto wins 24 of 29 stats

Neto wins 24 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Kudus 5.

Points
Kudus: 26Neto: 40
xGI (6 gw)
Kudus: 0.31Neto: 0.31
Price
Kudus: £6.6mNeto: £6.6m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionKudusNeto
Price & ownership11
Playing time04
Recent form23
Season totals15
Set pieces12
Bonus04
Fixtures00
FPL ranks05
Total524

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Kudus: Points 26, xGI (6 gw) 0.31, BPS 133, Mins (6 gw) 67, DC (6 gw) 6.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Neto: Points 40, xGI (6 gw) 0.31, BPS 185, Mins (6 gw) 86, DC (6 gw) 7.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Split
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatKudusNeto
Price

6.6m

6.6m

Ownership

1.7%−3% vs best

5%(best)

Top 10k ownership

6.8%(best)

1.1%−5.7% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Neto leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatKudusNeto
Starts

4−4 vs best

8(best)

Start rate

44%−45% vs best

89%(best)

Minutes (season)

452−225 vs best

677(best)

Avg minutes

50−25 vs best

75(best)

Who has better recent form?

Neto leads 3 of 5
Who has better recent form?
StatKudusNeto
Mins (6 gw)

67−19 vs best

86(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.20−0.02 vs best

0.22(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.11(best)

0.09−0.02 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.31

0.31

DC (6 gw)

6.00−1.00 vs best

7.00(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.37(best)

1.13+0.76 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Neto leads 5 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatKudusNeto
Points

26−14 vs best

40(best)

Goals

0−3 vs best

3(best)

Assists

3(best)

1−2 vs best

Total xG

1.23−0.56 vs best

1.79(best)

Total xA

0.82−0.16 vs best

0.98(best)

DC (season)

41−16 vs best

57(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Neto leads 2 of 3
Who takes the set pieces?
StatKudusNeto
Corners & indirect FKs

7th choice

2nd choice(best)

Direct free kicks

6th choice

5th choice(best)

Penalties

3rd choice(best)

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Neto leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatKudusNeto
BPS

133−52 vs best

185(best)

BPS (6 gw)

19.3−3.0 vs best

22.3(best)

Bonus

2−1 vs best

3(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.3−0.2 vs best

0.5(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatKudusNeto
Next 5 GWs

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

SUN

(A)

10

LEE

(H)

11

NFO

(A)

12

CRY

(H)

13

LIV

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80

2.80

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Neto leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatKudusNeto
Form

4.8

16th MID · 44th overall

6.5(best)

3rd MID · 13th overall

ICT index

35.8

46th MID · 78th overall

65.7(best)

9th MID · 11th overall

Selected

46th MID

136th overall

25th MID(best)

71st overall

Points per game

3.2

58th MID · 146th overall

4.4(best)

24th MID · 60th overall

Cost rank

25th MID

37th overall

24th MID(best)

36th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • KudusTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

  • NetoCHE

    1. CHE v SUN away, gameweek 10: 1.48 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. CHE v LEE home, gameweek 11: 1.60 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Neto (CHE) 3.1 projected team goals, Kudus (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Kudus−1.2Kudus: 0 goals from 1.23 xG (−1.2)
  • Neto+1.2Neto: 3 goals from 1.79 xG (+1.2)

Kudus has 1.2 fewer goals than xG; Neto has 1.2 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Kudus+2.2Kudus: 3 assists from 0.82 xA (+2.2)
  • Neto±0.0Neto: 1 assists from 0.98 xA (±0.0)

Kudus has 2.2 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Kudus · 26 pts46% from appearances

  • Neto · 40 pts40% from appearances

    −2 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceKudusNeto
Appearances1217
Goals015
Assists93
Clean sheets22
Defensive contribution02
Bonus23
Other10
Deductions0−2
Total2640

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Kudus4.7(3)
  • Neto2.0(1)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Kudus2.3(4)
  • Neto5.4(5)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Kudus3.0(1)
  • Neto3.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Neto 3.7 points per game, Kudus 3.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Kudus3.8(5)
  • Neto4.0(5)

Away

  • Kudus2.3(3)
  • Neto5.0(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Neto 5.0 points per game, Kudus 2.3 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Kudus30%

    0 goals and 3 assists of 10 TOT goals

  • Neto21%

    3 goals and 1 assist of 19 CHE goals

Kudus is involved in 30% of TOT's goals, against 21% for Neto.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Kudus1 of 9 full games

    1 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

  • Neto1 of 9 full games

    1 × 90 minutes, 7 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Kudus98.8
  • Neto217.4

Creativity

  • Kudus152.2
  • Neto181.4

Threat

  • Kudus108.0
  • Neto258.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Kudus's biggest score is creativity, a creator; Neto's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Kudus+32.8k2.6k out35.4k in
  • Neto+14.9k17.5k out32.4k in

Kudus has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+32.8k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Kudus 3.9 points per £m (73rd), Neto 6.1 points per £m (22nd). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Kudus
  • Neto

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Neto 30, Kudus 24.

How far ahead is Kudus? Above zero Kudus leads; below, Neto.

Neto is 6 points ahead of Kudus over these gameweeks. Kudus's biggest lead was 1 (GW 5); Neto's was 10 (GW 7).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Kudus, gameweek 4: 1 points v EVE home, 27 minutes
    Neto, gameweek 4: 2 points v HUL home, 85 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Kudus, gameweek 5: 4 points v AVL home, 45 minutes
    Neto, gameweek 5: 2 points v BRE away, 86 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Kudus, gameweek 6: 3 points v MUN away, 65 minutes
    Neto, gameweek 6: 5 points v BOU home, 82 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Kudus, gameweek 7: 6 points v COV home, 86 minutes
    Neto, gameweek 7: 15 points v EVE away, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Kudus, gameweek 8: 3 points v CHE away, 88 minutes
    Neto, gameweek 8: 3 points v TOT home, 87 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Kudus, gameweek 9: 7 points v CRY home, 90 minutes
    Neto, gameweek 9: 3 points v MUN home, 86 minutes

Kudus: 0 hauls (10+), 1 blank (0–2); Neto: 1 haul (10+), 2 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWKudusNeto
412
542
635
7615
833
973

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWKudusNeto
42785
54586
66582
78690
88887
99086

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWKudusNeto
40.000.05
50.070.16
60.280.16
70.040.37
80.040.16
90.760.42

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWKudusNeto
40.050.10
50.200.05
60.010.06
70.090.24
80.030.05
90.270.05

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWKudusNeto
40.050.15
50.270.21
60.290.22
70.130.61
80.070.21
91.030.47

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWKudusNeto
427
576
656
799
81112
922

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWKudusNeto
400
500
600
702
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWKudusNeto
400
510
601
710
800
910

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWKudusNeto
40.1%1.5%
50.1%1.4%
60.2%1.4%
70.4%1.4%
80.4%3.6%
92.0%5.0%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWKudusNeto
4£6.5m£6.5m
5£6.5m£6.5m
6£6.5m£6.5m
7£6.5m£6.5m
8£6.5m£6.5m
9£6.5m£6.6m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWKudusNeto
4——
50.0%0.1%
60.0%0.1%
70.2%0.2%
80.1%1.0%
96.8%1.1%