How do Kudus and Ødegaard compare?

Ødegaard has more season points (39 vs 26), Ødegaard is more owned (16.5% vs 1.8%), Kudus is cheaper (6.6m vs 6.7m), Ødegaard has the higher Start rate (100% vs 44%), Ødegaard has more Bonus (6 vs 2), but Kudus has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).

← Back to players Pick different players

Kudus

9 stats won

Ødegaard

22 stats won

Who wins more stats: Kudus or Ødegaard?

Ødegaard wins 22 of 31 stats

Ødegaard wins 22 of the 31 stats with an outright best. Others: Kudus 9.

Points
Kudus: 26Ødegaard: 39
xGI (6 gw)
Kudus: 0.31Ødegaard: 0.37
Price
Kudus: £6.6mØdegaard: £6.7m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionKudusØdegaard
Price & ownership12
Playing time04
Recent form33
Season totals15
Set pieces02
Bonus22
Fixtures10
FPL ranks14
Total922

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Kudus: Points 26, xGI (6 gw) 0.31, BPS 133, Mins (6 gw) 67, DC (6 gw) 6.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Ødegaard: Points 39, xGI (6 gw) 0.37, BPS 194, Mins (6 gw) 85, DC (6 gw) 4.3, Upcoming FDR 3.20.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Ødegaard leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatKudusØdegaard
Price

6.6m−0.1m vs best

6.7m(best)

Ownership

1.8%−14.7% vs best

16.5%(best)

Top 10k ownership

6.8%(best)

4.0%−2.8% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Ødegaard leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatKudusØdegaard
Starts

4−5 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

44%−56% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

452−281 vs best

733(best)

Avg minutes

50−31 vs best

81(best)

Who has better recent form?

Split
Who has better recent form?
StatKudusØdegaard
Mins (6 gw)

67−18 vs best

85(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.20(best)

0.19−0.01 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.11−0.07 vs best

0.18(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.31−0.06 vs best

0.37(best)

DC (6 gw)

6.00(best)

4.33−1.67 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.37(best)

0.94+0.57 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Ødegaard leads 5 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatKudusØdegaard
Points

26−13 vs best

39(best)

Goals

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Assists

3(best)

0−3 vs best

Total xG

1.23−0.93 vs best

2.16(best)

Total xA

0.82−1.32 vs best

2.14(best)

DC (season)

41−1 vs best

42(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Ødegaard leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatKudusØdegaard
Corners & indirect FKs

7th choice

3rd choice(best)

Direct free kicks

6th choice

4th choice(best)

Penalties

3rd choice

3rd choice

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Split
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatKudusØdegaard
BPS

133−61 vs best

194(best)

BPS (6 gw)

19.3(best)

15.5−3.8 vs best

Bonus

2−4 vs best

6(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.3(best)

0.0−0.3 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Kudus leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatKudusØdegaard
Next 5 GWs

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

HUL

(H)

10

NEW

(A)

11

MCI

(H)

12

BRE

(A)

13

TOT

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80(best)

3.20+0.40 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Ødegaard leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatKudusØdegaard
Form

4.8(best)

16th MID · 44th overall

2.5

73rd MID · 161st overall

ICT index

35.8

46th MID · 78th overall

60.7(best)

13th MID · 18th overall

Selected

46th MID

136th overall

8th MID(best)

23rd overall

Points per game

3.2

58th MID · 146th overall

4.3(best)

27th MID · 67th overall

Cost rank

25th MID

37th overall

19th MID(best)

31st overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • KudusTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

  • ØdegaardARS

    1. ARS v HUL home, gameweek 10: 2.75 projected goals, 53% clean sheet chance
    2. ARS v NEW away, gameweek 11: 1.80 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Ødegaard (ARS) 4.5 projected team goals, Kudus (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Kudus−1.2Kudus: 0 goals from 1.23 xG (−1.2)
  • Ødegaard−0.2Ødegaard: 2 goals from 2.16 xG (−0.2)

Kudus has 1.2 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Kudus+2.2Kudus: 3 assists from 0.82 xA (+2.2)
  • Ødegaard−2.1Ødegaard: 0 assists from 2.14 xA (−2.1)

Ødegaard has 2.1 fewer assists than xA; Kudus has 2.2 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Kudus · 26 pts46% from appearances

  • Ødegaard · 39 pts45% from appearances

    −1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceKudusØdegaard
Appearances1218
Goals010
Assists90
Clean sheets26
Bonus26
Other10
Deductions0−1
Total2639

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Kudus4.7(3)
  • Ødegaard7.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Kudus2.3(4)
  • Ødegaard2.5(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Kudus3.0(1)
  • Ødegaard5.0(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Ødegaard 5.0 points per game, Kudus 3.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Kudus3.8(5)
  • Ødegaard6.3(4)

Away

  • Kudus2.3(3)
  • Ødegaard2.8(5)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Ødegaard 2.8 points per game, Kudus 2.3 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Kudus30%

    0 goals and 3 assists of 10 TOT goals

  • Ødegaard14%

    2 goals and 0 assists of 14 ARS goals

Kudus is involved in 30% of TOT's goals, against 14% for Ødegaard.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Kudus1 of 9 full games

    1 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89, 4 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

  • Ødegaard2 of 9 full games

    2 × 90 minutes, 7 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Kudus98.8
  • Ødegaard163.6

Creativity

  • Kudus152.2
  • Ødegaard274.1

Threat

  • Kudus108.0
  • Ødegaard169.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Kudus's biggest score is creativity, a creator; Ødegaard's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Kudus+33.0k2.6k out35.7k in
  • Ødegaard−31.2k50.0k out18.8k in

Kudus has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+33.0k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Kudus 3.9 points per £m (73rd), Ødegaard 5.8 points per £m (26th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Kudus
  • Ødegaard

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Kudus 24, Ødegaard 15.

How far ahead is Kudus? Above zero Kudus leads; below, Ødegaard.

Kudus is 9 points ahead of Ødegaard over these gameweeks. Kudus's biggest lead was 9 (GW 9); Ødegaard's was 2 (GW 4).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Kudus, gameweek 4: 1 points v EVE home, 27 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 4: 3 points v SUN away, 84 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Kudus, gameweek 5: 4 points v AVL home, 45 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 5: 2 points v BHA away, 72 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Kudus, gameweek 6: 3 points v MUN away, 65 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 6: 1 points v LEE home, 89 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Kudus, gameweek 7: 6 points v COV home, 86 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 7: 3 points v NFO away, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Kudus, gameweek 8: 3 points v CHE away, 88 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 8: 3 points v EVE home, 90 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Kudus, gameweek 9: 7 points v CRY home, 90 minutes
    Ødegaard, gameweek 9: 3 points v LIV away, 87 minutes

Kudus: 0 hauls (10+), 1 blank (0–2); Ødegaard: 0 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWKudusØdegaard
413
542
631
763
833
973

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWKudusØdegaard
42784
54572
66589
78690
88890
99087

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWKudusØdegaard
40.000.00
50.070.07
60.280.82
70.040.00
80.040.26
90.760.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWKudusØdegaard
40.050.25
50.200.02
60.010.12
70.090.16
80.030.42
90.270.12

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWKudusØdegaard
40.050.25
50.270.09
60.290.94
70.130.16
80.070.68
91.030.12

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWKudusØdegaard
425
572
656
792
8113
928

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWKudusØdegaard
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWKudusØdegaard
400
510
600
710
800
910

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWKudusØdegaard
40.1%19.1%
50.1%20.0%
60.2%20.4%
70.4%19.0%
80.4%18.4%
92.0%16.4%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWKudusØdegaard
4£6.5m£6.7m
5£6.5m£6.8m
6£6.5m£6.8m
7£6.5m£6.8m
8£6.5m£6.8m
9£6.5m£6.7m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWKudusØdegaard
4——
50.0%16.7%
60.0%14.5%
70.2%9.5%
80.1%7.1%
96.8%4.0%