How do Hume and Robertson compare?

Robertson has more season points (36 vs 21), Robertson is more owned (2.4% vs 1.8%), Hume is cheaper (4.2m vs 4.3m), Robertson has the higher Start rate (78% vs 67%), Robertson has more Bonus (3 vs 0), but Robertson has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.40).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hume

4 stats won

Robertson

26 stats won

Who wins more stats: Hume or Robertson?

Robertson wins 26 of 30 stats

Robertson wins 26 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Hume 4.

Points
Hume: 21Robertson: 36
xGI (6 gw)
Hume: 0.05Robertson: 0.24
Price
Hume: £4.2mRobertson: £4.3m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionHumeRobertson
Price & ownership03
Playing time04
Recent form14
Season totals24
Set pieces11
Bonus04
Fixtures01
FPL ranks05
Total426

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Hume: Points 21, xGI (6 gw) 0.05, BPS 70, Mins (6 gw) 59, DC (6 gw) 5.2, Upcoming FDR 3.40. Robertson: Points 36, xGI (6 gw) 0.24, BPS 139, Mins (6 gw) 65, DC (6 gw) 2.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Robertson leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatHumeRobertson
Price

4.2m−0.1m vs best

4.3m(best)

Ownership

1.8%−0.6% vs best

2.4%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.8%−1.7% vs best

2.5%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Robertson leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatHumeRobertson
Starts

6−1 vs best

7(best)

Start rate

67%−11% vs best

78%(best)

Minutes (season)

550−24 vs best

574(best)

Avg minutes

61−3 vs best

64(best)

Who has better recent form?

Robertson leads 4 of 5
Who has better recent form?
StatHumeRobertson
Mins (6 gw)

59−6 vs best

65(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.04

0.04

xA (6 gw)

0.01−0.20 vs best

0.21(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.05−0.19 vs best

0.24(best)

DC (6 gw)

5.17(best)

2.00−3.17 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.39+0.84 vs best

0.55(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Robertson leads 4 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatHumeRobertson
Points

21−15 vs best

36(best)

Goals

0

0

Assists

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Total xG

0.28(best)

0.27−0.01 vs best

Total xA

0.35−0.97 vs best

1.32(best)

DC (season)

43(best)

27−16 vs best

Clean sheets

2−1 vs best

3(best)

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Split
Who takes the set pieces?
StatHumeRobertson
Corners & indirect FKs

3rd choice(best)

6th choice

Direct free kicks

—

7th choice(best)

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Robertson leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatHumeRobertson
BPS

70−69 vs best

139(best)

BPS (6 gw)

4.0−15.3 vs best

19.3(best)

Bonus

0−3 vs best

3(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.5 vs best

0.5(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Robertson leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatHumeRobertson
Next 5 GWs

CHE

(H)

10

AVL

(A)

11

TOT

(H)

12

LIV

(A)

13

NEW

(A)

14

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.40+0.60 vs best

2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Robertson leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatHumeRobertson
Form

2.8

43rd DEF · 121st overall

4.8(best)

13th DEF · 34th overall

ICT index

18.5

73rd DEF · 205th overall

45.0(best)

6th DEF · 45th overall

Selected

51st DEF

133rd overall

44th DEF(best)

118th overall

Points per game

2.6

77th DEF · 196th overall

4.5(best)

23rd DEF · 55th overall

Cost rank

159th DEF

585th overall

146th DEF(best)

571st overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • HumeSUN

    1. SUN v CHE home, gameweek 10: 1.03 projected goals, 23% clean sheet chance
    2. SUN v AVL away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 24% clean sheet chance

  • RobertsonTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Robertson (TOT) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Hume (SUN) 0.5 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Hume−0.3Hume: 0 goals from 0.28 xG (−0.3)
  • Robertson−0.3Robertson: 0 goals from 0.27 xG (−0.3)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Hume−0.3Hume: 0 assists from 0.35 xA (−0.3)
  • Robertson+0.7Robertson: 2 assists from 1.32 xA (+0.7)

Robertson has 0.7 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Hume−2.4Hume: 9 conceded from 11.42 xGC (−2.4)
  • Robertson−0.1Robertson: 8 conceded from 8.10 xGC (−0.1)

Hume has conceded 2.4 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Hume · 21 pts58% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Robertson · 36 pts39% from appearances

    −2 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceHumeRobertson
Appearances1415
Assists06
Clean sheets812
Defensive contribution22
Bonus03
Deductions−3−2
Total2136

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Hume3.0(3)
  • Robertson4.7(3)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Hume6.0(1)
  • Robertson4.3(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Hume1.5(4)
  • Robertson4.5(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Robertson 4.5 points per game, Hume 1.5 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Hume4.3(3)
  • Robertson5.2(5)

Away

  • Hume1.6(5)
  • Robertson3.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Robertson 3.3 points per game, Hume 1.6 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Hume0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 7 SUN goals

  • Robertson22%

    0 goals and 2 assists of 9 TOT goals

Robertson is involved in 22% of TOT's goals, against 0% for Hume.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Hume4 of 9 full games

    4 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

  • Robertson3 of 9 full games

    3 × 90 minutes, 4 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Hume75.6
  • Robertson143.8

Creativity

  • Hume69.5
  • Robertson213.0

Threat

  • Hume39.0
  • Robertson93.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Hume's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Robertson's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Hume−6.5k7.0k out447 in
  • Robertson+11.7k2.3k out14.0k in

Robertson has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+11.7k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Hume 5.0 points per £m (56th), Robertson 8.4 points per £m (14th). Median 3.2.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Hume
  • Robertson

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Robertson 30, Hume 12.

How far ahead is Hume? Above zero Hume leads; below, Robertson.

Robertson is 18 points ahead of Hume over these gameweeks. Robertson's was 18 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Hume, gameweek 4: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 4: 7 points v EVE home, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Hume, gameweek 5: 1 points v MCI away, 11 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 5: 4 points v AVL home, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Hume, gameweek 6: 1 points v BHA home, 90 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 6: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Hume, gameweek 7: 3 points v BOU away, 90 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 7: 5 points v COV home, 68 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Hume, gameweek 8: 6 points v LEE home, 90 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 8: 6 points v CHE away, 64 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Hume, gameweek 9: 1 points v COV away, 74 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 9: 8 points v CRY home, 76 minutes

Hume: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2); Robertson: 0 hauls (10+), 1 blank (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWHumeRobertson
407
514
610
735
866
918

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWHumeRobertson
4090
51190
6900
79068
89064
97476

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWHumeRobertson
40.000.07
50.100.00
60.000.00
70.020.00
80.000.04
90.120.10

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWHumeRobertson
40.000.09
50.010.26
60.030.00
70.010.02
80.020.10
90.000.77

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWHumeRobertson
40.000.16
50.110.26
60.030.00
70.030.02
80.020.14
90.120.87

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWHumeRobertson
402
513
680
7102
852
973

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWHumeRobertson
40.001.11
51.481.16
61.410.00
74.230.52
80.760.39
90.450.14

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWHumeRobertson
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWHumeRobertson
400
501
600
701
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWHumeRobertson
43.7%2.6%
52.9%2.6%
62.4%2.4%
72.1%2.2%
82.0%2.1%
91.9%2.5%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWHumeRobertson
4£4.4m£4.4m
5£4.4m£4.4m
6£4.3m£4.4m
7£4.3m£4.4m
8£4.3m£4.4m
9£4.2m£4.3m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWHumeRobertson
4——
54.2%1.2%
62.7%0.6%
71.8%0.6%
81.3%0.5%
90.8%2.5%