How do Hume and Mykolenko compare?

Mykolenko has more season points (34 vs 21), Mykolenko is more owned (2.4% vs 1.8%), Hume is cheaper (4.2m vs 4.6m), Mykolenko has the higher Start rate (89% vs 67%), Mykolenko has more Bonus (3 vs 0), but Mykolenko has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 3.00 vs 3.40).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hide stats where they're level

Comparing 2 defenders

Mykolenko wins most stats

Sunderland

SUN · 4.2m

4 stats won

Everton

EVE · 4.6m

25 stats won

Who wins more stats: Hume or Mykolenko?

Mykolenko wins 25 of 29 stats

Mykolenko wins 25 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Hume 4.

Points: Hume: 21Mykolenko: 34
xGI (6 gw): Hume: 0.05Mykolenko: 0.06
Price: Hume: £4.2mMykolenko: £4.6m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
Section	Hume	Mykolenko
Price & ownership	0	3
Playing time	0	4
Recent form	1	5
Season totals	1	4
Set pieces	1	0
Bonus	0	4
Fixtures	0	1
FPL ranks	1	4
Total	4	25

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Hume: Points 21, xGI (6 gw) 0.05, BPS 70, Mins (6 gw) 59, DC (6 gw) 5.2, Upcoming FDR 3.40. Mykolenko: Points 34, xGI (6 gw) 0.06, BPS 149, Mins (6 gw) 72, DC (6 gw) 5.7, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Mykolenko leads 3 of 3

Who is more expensive and more owned?
Stat	Hume	Mykolenko
Price	4.2m−0.4m vs best	4.6m(best)
Ownership	1.8%−0.6% vs best	2.4%(best)

Top 10k ownership	0.8%−0.8% vs best	1.6%(best)

Availability	Available	Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Mykolenko leads 4 of 4

Who starts and plays more minutes?
Stat	Hume	Mykolenko
Starts	6−2 vs best	8(best)

Start rate	67%−22% vs best	89%(best)

Minutes (season)	550−153 vs best	703(best)

Avg minutes	61−17 vs best	78(best)

Who has better recent form?

Mykolenko leads 5 of 6

Who has better recent form?
Stat	Hume	Mykolenko
Mins (6 gw)	59−13 vs best	72(best)

xG (6 gw)	0.04(best)	0.01−0.03 vs best

xA (6 gw)	0.01−0.05 vs best	0.06(best)

xGI (6 gw)	0.05−0.01 vs best	0.06(best)

DC (6 gw)	5.17−0.50 vs best	5.67(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better	1.39+0.26 vs best	1.13(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Mykolenko leads 4 of 5

Who has scored more this season?
Stat	Hume	Mykolenko
Points	21−13 vs best	34(best)

Goals	0	0
Assists	0	0
Total xG	0.28(best)	0.04−0.24 vs best

Total xA	0.35−0.07 vs best	0.42(best)

DC (season)	43−13 vs best	56(best)

Clean sheets	2−2 vs best	4(best)

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Hume leads 1 of 1

Who takes the set pieces?
Stat	Hume	Mykolenko
Corners & indirect FKs	3rd choice(best)	—
Direct free kicks	—	—
Penalties	—	—
Penalties missed · lower is better	0	0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Mykolenko leads 4 of 4

Who is collecting more bonus?
Stat	Hume	Mykolenko
BPS	70−79 vs best	149(best)

BPS (6 gw)	4.0−13.8 vs best	17.8(best)

Bonus	0−3 vs best	3(best)

Bonus (6 gw)	0.0−0.5 vs best	0.5(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Mykolenko leads 1 of 1

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Stat	Hume	Mykolenko
Next 5 GWs	CHE (H) 10 AVL (A) 11 TOT (H) 12 LIV (A) 13 NEW (A) 14	COV (H) 10 BRE (A) 11 LIV (H) 12 AVL (A) 13 FUL (H) 14
Avg FDR · lower is better	3.40+0.40 vs best	3.00(best)

See alsoSeason calendar Team rating Projected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Mykolenko leads 4 of 5

How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Stat	Hume	Mykolenko
Form	2.8(best) 43rd DEF · 121st overall	1.8 78th DEF · 206th overall
ICT index	18.5 73rd DEF · 205th overall	25.4(best) 46th DEF · 143rd overall
Selected	51st DEF 133rd overall	45th DEF(best) 119th overall
Points per game	2.6 77th DEF · 196th overall	4.2(best) 31st DEF · 70th overall
Cost rank	159th DEF 585th overall	82nd DEF(best) 427th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

HumeSUN
1. SUN v CHE home, gameweek 10: 1.03 projected goals, 23% clean sheet chance
2. SUN v AVL away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 24% clean sheet chance
MykolenkoEVE
1. EVE v COV home, gameweek 10: 1.64 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
2. EVE v BRE away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Mykolenko (EVE) 0.6 expected clean sheets, Hume (SUN) 0.5 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

Hume−0.3Hume: 0 goals from 0.28 xG (−0.3)
Mykolenko±0.0Mykolenko: 0 goals from 0.04 xG (±0.0)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

Hume−0.3Hume: 0 assists from 0.35 xA (−0.3)
Mykolenko−0.4Mykolenko: 0 assists from 0.42 xA (−0.4)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

Hume−2.4Hume: 9 conceded from 11.42 xGC (−2.4)
Mykolenko−4.6Mykolenko: 7 conceded from 11.61 xGC (−4.6)

Mykolenko has conceded 4.6 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

Hume · 21 pts58% from appearances
−3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Mykolenko · 34 pts41% from appearances
−5 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
Source	Hume	Mykolenko
Appearances	14	16
Clean sheets	8	16
Defensive contribution	2	4
Bonus	0	3
Deductions	−3	−5
Total	21	34

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

Hume3.0(3)
Mykolenko5.5(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

Hume6.0(1)
Mykolenko6.0(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

Hume1.5(4)
Mykolenko1.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Mykolenko 1.7 points per game, Hume 1.5 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

Hume4.3(3)
Mykolenko3.3(4)

Away

Hume1.6(5)
Mykolenko5.3(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Mykolenko 5.3 points per game, Hume 1.6 points per game.

Hume0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 7 SUN goals
Mykolenko0%
0 goals and 0 assists of 7 EVE goals

Hume is involved in 0% of SUN's goals, against 0% for Mykolenko.

Who is a rotation risk?

Hume4 of 9 full games
4 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play
Mykolenko7 of 9 full games
7 × 90 minutes, 1 × 60–89, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

Hume75.6
Mykolenko157.0

Creativity

Hume69.5
Mykolenko72.7

Threat

Hume39.0
Mykolenko23.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Hume's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Mykolenko's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

Hume−6.6k7.1k out452 in
Mykolenko+43.7k out3.8k in

Mykolenko has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+4).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Hume 5.0 points per £m (56th), Mykolenko 7.4 points per £m (25th). Median 3.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

From To

Hume
Mykolenko

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Mykolenko 23, Hume 12.

How far ahead is Hume? Above zero Hume leads; below, Mykolenko.

Mykolenko is 11 points ahead of Hume over these gameweeks. Mykolenko's was 15 (GW 5).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

GW 4
Hume, gameweek 4: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutes
Mykolenko, gameweek 4: 11 points v TOT away, 90 minutes
GW 5
Hume, gameweek 5: 1 points v MCI away, 11 minutes
Mykolenko, gameweek 5: 5 points v IPS home, 90 minutes
GW 6
Hume, gameweek 6: 1 points v BHA home, 90 minutes
Mykolenko, gameweek 6: 0 points v HUL away, 0 minutes
GW 7
Hume, gameweek 7: 3 points v BOU away, 90 minutes
Mykolenko, gameweek 7: 1 points v CHE home, 90 minutes
GW 8
Hume, gameweek 8: 6 points v LEE home, 90 minutes
Mykolenko, gameweek 8: 0 points v ARS away, 73 minutes
GW 9
Hume, gameweek 9: 1 points v COV away, 74 minutes
Mykolenko, gameweek 9: 6 points v NEW away, 90 minutes

Hume: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2); Mykolenko: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek

Points by gameweek
GW	Hume	Mykolenko
4	0	11
5	1	5
6	1	0
7	3	1
8	6	0
9	1	6

Minutes

Values by gameweek

Minutes by gameweek
GW	Hume	Mykolenko
4	0	90
5	11	90
6	90	0
7	90	90
8	90	73
9	74	90

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GW	Hume	Mykolenko
4	0.00	0.00
5	0.10	0.04
6	0.00	0.00
7	0.02	0.00
8	0.00	0.00
9	0.12	0.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek

Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GW	Hume	Mykolenko
4	0.00	0.07
5	0.01	0.02
6	0.03	0.00
7	0.01	0.21
8	0.02	0.01
9	0.00	0.04

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek

Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GW	Hume	Mykolenko
4	0.00	0.07
5	0.11	0.06
6	0.03	0.00
7	0.03	0.21
8	0.02	0.01
9	0.12	0.04

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek

Defensive contribution by gameweek
GW	Hume	Mykolenko
4	0	11
5	1	6
6	8	0
7	10	4
8	5	6
9	7	7

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GW	Hume	Mykolenko
4	0.00	0.69
5	1.48	1.44
6	1.41	0.00
7	4.23	1.47
8	0.76	1.91
9	0.45	1.29

Goals

Values by gameweek

Goals by gameweek
GW	Hume	Mykolenko
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Assists

Values by gameweek

Assists by gameweek
GW	Hume	Mykolenko
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	0

Ownership

Values by gameweek

Ownership by gameweek
GW	Hume	Mykolenko
4	3.7%	2.0%
5	2.9%	4.3%
6	2.4%	3.5%
7	2.1%	2.7%
8	2.0%	2.6%
9	1.9%	2.3%

Price

Values by gameweek

Price by gameweek
GW	Hume	Mykolenko
4	£4.4m	£4.5m
5	£4.4m	£4.5m
6	£4.3m	£4.6m
7	£4.3m	£4.6m
8	£4.3m	£4.6m
9	£4.2m	£4.6m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek

Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GW	Hume	Mykolenko
4	—	—
5	4.2%	6.8%
6	2.7%	4.5%
7	1.8%	3.2%
8	1.3%	2.6%
9	0.8%	1.6%