How do Hinshelwood and Scott compare?
Scott has more season points (30 vs 24), Scott is more owned (2.2% vs 0.6%), Scott has the higher Start rate (56% vs 11%), but Scott has more Bonus (5 vs 3).
Comparing 2 midfielders
Scott wins most stats
Who wins more stats: Hinshelwood or Scott?
Scott wins 20 of 27 stats
Scott wins 20 of the 27 stats with an outright best. Others: Hinshelwood 7.
- Points
- Hinshelwood: 24Scott: 30
- xGI (6 gw)
- Hinshelwood: 0.18Scott: 0.07
- Price
- Hinshelwood: £5.9mScott: £5.9m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 1 | 1 |
| Playing time | 0 | 4 |
| Recent form | 3 | 3 |
| Season totals | 2 | 4 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 2 |
| Bonus | 0 | 3 |
| Fixtures | 0 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 1 | 3 |
| Total | 7 | 20 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Split
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 5.9m | 5.9m |
| Ownership | 0.6%−1.6% vs best | 2.2%(best) |
| Top 10k ownership | 0.2%(best) | 0.0%−0.2% vs best |
| Availability | Available | 0% · Thigh injury - Expected back 21 Nov |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Scott leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 1−4 vs best | 5(best) |
| Start rate | 11%−45% vs best | 56%(best) |
| Minutes (season) | 145−301 vs best | 446(best) |
| Avg minutes | 16−34 vs best | 50(best) |
Who has better recent form?
Split
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 14−16 vs best | 30(best) |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.18(best) | 0.05−0.13 vs best |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.01−0.01 vs best | 0.02(best) |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.18(best) | 0.07−0.11 vs best |
| DC (6 gw) | 1.50−2.33 vs best | 3.83(best) |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 0.18(best) | 0.36+0.18 vs best |
Who has scored more this season?
Scott leads 4 of 6
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 24−6 vs best | 30(best) |
| Goals | 3(best) | 1−2 vs best |
| Assists | 0−2 vs best | 2(best) |
| Total xG | 2.47(best) | 0.64−1.83 vs best |
| Total xA | 0.06−0.36 vs best | 0.42(best) |
| DC (season) | 12−48 vs best | 60(best) |
See alsoMidfielder stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
Scott leads 2 of 2
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | 2nd choice(best) |
| Direct free kicks | — | 4th choice(best) |
| Penalties | — | — |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Scott leads 3 of 3
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 81−48 vs best | 129(best) |
| BPS (6 gw) | 4.5−1.5 vs best | 6.0(best) |
| Bonus | 3−2 vs best | 5(best) |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
No outright winner
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | BRE (H) 10 HUL (A) 11 NEW (H) 12 BOU (A) 13 NFO (A) 14 | IPS (A) 10 NFO (H) 11 FUL (A) 12 BHA (H) 13 HUL (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 2.80 | 2.80 |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Scott leads 3 of 4
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 2.0(best) 86th MID · 198th overall | 0.0 294th MID · 659th overall |
| ICT index | 23.7 83rd MID · 157th overall | 30.5(best) 66th MID · 118th overall |
| Selected | 74th MID 223rd overall | 42nd MID(best) 126th overall |
| Points per game | 6.0 7th MID · 16th overall | 6.0 6th MID · 15th overall |
| Cost rank | 60th MID 91st overall | 59th MID(best) 90th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
HinshelwoodBHA
- BHA v BRE home, gameweek 10: 1.68 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
- BHA v HUL away, gameweek 11: 1.95 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
ScottBOU
- BOU v IPS away, gameweek 10: 1.56 projected goals, 35% clean sheet chance
- BOU v NFO home, gameweek 11: 1.54 projected goals, 39% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Hinshelwood (BHA) 3.6 projected team goals, Scott (BOU) 3.1 projected team goals.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals vs xG
- Hinshelwood+0.5Hinshelwood: 3 goals from 2.47 xG (+0.5)
- Scott+0.4Scott: 1 goals from 0.64 xG (+0.4)
Hinshelwood has 0.5 more goals than xG.
Assists vs xA
- Hinshelwood−0.1Hinshelwood: 0 assists from 0.06 xA (−0.1)
- Scott+1.6Scott: 2 assists from 0.42 xA (+1.6)
Scott has 1.6 more assists than xA.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Hinshelwood · 24 pts63% from goals
Scott · 30 pts33% from appearances
| Source | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 5 | 10 |
| Goals | 15 | 5 |
| Assists | 0 | 6 |
| Clean sheets | 1 | 0 |
| Defensive contribution | 0 | 4 |
| Bonus | 3 | 5 |
| Deductions | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 30 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Hinshelwood6.0(1)
- ScottNo games
Medium (FDR 3)
- Hinshelwood16.0(1)
- Scott8.7(3)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Hinshelwood1.0(2)
- Scott2.0(2)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Scott 2.0 points per game, Hinshelwood 1.0 points per game.
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Hinshelwood11.0(2)
- Scott6.0(3)
Away
- Hinshelwood1.0(2)
- Scott6.0(2)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Scott 6.0 points per game, Hinshelwood 1.0 points per game.
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Hinshelwood30%
3 goals and 0 assists of 10 BHA goals
Scott50%
1 goal and 2 assists of 6 BOU goals
Scott is involved in 50% of BOU's goals, against 30% for Hinshelwood.
Who is a rotation risk?
Hinshelwood0 of 9 full games
1 × 60–89, 3 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play
Scott4 of 9 full games
4 × 90 minutes, 1 × 60–89, 4 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Hinshelwood110.8
- Scott102.8
Creativity
- Hinshelwood16.3
- Scott146.4
Threat
- Hinshelwood110.0
- Scott56.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Hinshelwood's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Scott's biggest score is creativity, a creator.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Hinshelwood−5971.7k out1.1k in
- Scott−9.5k9.6k out128 in
Managers are selling all of them; Hinshelwood the least (−597 net).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Hinshelwood
- Scott
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Hinshelwood, gameweek 4: 0 points v COV away, 0 minutesScott, gameweek 4: 4 points v BRE home, 90 minutesGW 5
Hinshelwood, gameweek 5: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutesScott, gameweek 5: 2 points v LIV home, 90 minutesGW 6
Hinshelwood, gameweek 6: 0 points v SUN away, 0 minutesScott, gameweek 6: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutesGW 7
Hinshelwood, gameweek 7: 6 points v CRY home, 19 minutesScott, gameweek 7: 0 points v SUN home, 0 minutesGW 8
Hinshelwood, gameweek 8: 1 points v LIV away, 45 minutesScott, gameweek 8: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutesGW 9
Hinshelwood, gameweek 9: 1 points v MCI away, 18 minutesScott, gameweek 9: 0 points v LEE home, 0 minutes
Hinshelwood: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Scott: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 6 | 0 |
| 8 | 1 | 0 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 90 |
| 5 | 0 | 90 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 19 | 0 |
| 8 | 45 | 0 |
| 9 | 18 | 0 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.19 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.12 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.92 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.14 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.05 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.07 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.24 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.19 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.94 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.14 | 0.00 |
Defensive contribution
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 15 |
| 5 | 0 | 8 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 2 | 0 |
| 8 | 3 | 0 |
| 9 | 4 | 0 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 1 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.9% | 6.2% |
| 5 | 0.6% | 5.8% |
| 6 | 0.5% | 4.2% |
| 7 | 0.6% | 3.1% |
| 8 | 0.6% | 2.6% |
| 9 | 0.6% | 2.3% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £6.0m | £6.1m |
| 5 | £5.9m | £6.1m |
| 6 | £5.9m | £6.1m |
| 7 | £5.9m | £6.0m |
| 8 | £5.9m | £6.0m |
| 9 | £5.9m | £5.9m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Scott |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 0.3% | 1.5% |
| 6 | 0.0% | 0.5% |
| 7 | 0.1% | 0.2% |
| 8 | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| 9 | 0.2% | 0.0% |

