How do Hinshelwood and Kluivert compare?
Kluivert has more season points (28 vs 24), Kluivert is more owned (0.9% vs 0.6%), Kluivert has the higher Start rate (67% vs 11%), but Hinshelwood has more Bonus (3 vs 1).
Comparing 2 midfielders
Kluivert wins most stats
Who wins more stats: Hinshelwood or Kluivert?
Kluivert wins 22 of 29 stats
Kluivert wins 22 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Hinshelwood 7.
- Points
- Hinshelwood: 24Kluivert: 28
- xGI (6 gw)
- Hinshelwood: 0.18Kluivert: 0.14
- Price
- Hinshelwood: £5.9mKluivert: £5.9m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 0 | 1 |
| Playing time | 0 | 4 |
| Recent form | 3 | 3 |
| Season totals | 2 | 4 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 3 |
| Bonus | 1 | 3 |
| Fixtures | 0 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 1 | 4 |
| Total | 7 | 22 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Kluivert leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 5.9m | 5.9m |
| Ownership | 0.6%−0.3% vs best | 0.9%(best) |
| Top 10k ownership | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Availability | Available | Available |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Kluivert leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 1−5 vs best | 6(best) |
| Start rate | 11%−56% vs best | 67%(best) |
| Minutes (season) | 145−306 vs best | 451(best) |
| Avg minutes | 16−34 vs best | 50(best) |
Who has better recent form?
Split
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 14−23 vs best | 37(best) |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.18(best) | 0.10−0.08 vs best |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.01−0.03 vs best | 0.04(best) |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.18(best) | 0.14−0.04 vs best |
| DC (6 gw) | 1.50−1.00 vs best | 2.50(best) |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 0.18(best) | 0.21+0.03 vs best |
Who has scored more this season?
Kluivert leads 4 of 6
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 24−4 vs best | 28(best) |
| Goals | 3(best) | 1−2 vs best |
| Assists | 0−2 vs best | 2(best) |
| Total xG | 2.47(best) | 1.40−1.07 vs best |
| Total xA | 0.06−0.22 vs best | 0.28(best) |
| DC (season) | 12−21 vs best | 33(best) |
See alsoMidfielder stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
Kluivert leads 3 of 3
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | 4th choice(best) |
| Direct free kicks | — | 2nd choice(best) |
| Penalties | — | 2nd choice(best) |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Kluivert leads 3 of 4
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 81−21 vs best | 102(best) |
| BPS (6 gw) | 4.5−7.0 vs best | 11.5(best) |
| Bonus | 3(best) | 1−2 vs best |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.0−0.2 vs best | 0.2(best) |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
No outright winner
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | BRE (H) 10 HUL (A) 11 NEW (H) 12 BOU (A) 13 NFO (A) 14 | IPS (A) 10 NFO (H) 11 FUL (A) 12 BHA (H) 13 HUL (H) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 2.80 | 2.80 |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Kluivert leads 4 of 5
| Stat | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 2.0 86th MID · 198th overall | 3.2(best) 41st MID · 106th overall |
| ICT index | 23.7 83rd MID · 157th overall | 35.4(best) 47th MID · 81st overall |
| Selected | 74th MID 223rd overall | 64th MID(best) 196th overall |
| Points per game | 6.0(best) 7th MID · 16th overall | 4.0 35th MID · 94th overall |
| Cost rank | 60th MID 91st overall | 55th MID(best) 81st overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
HinshelwoodBHA
- BHA v BRE home, gameweek 10: 1.68 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
- BHA v HUL away, gameweek 11: 1.95 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
KluivertBOU
- BOU v IPS away, gameweek 10: 1.56 projected goals, 35% clean sheet chance
- BOU v NFO home, gameweek 11: 1.54 projected goals, 39% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Hinshelwood (BHA) 3.6 projected team goals, Kluivert (BOU) 3.1 projected team goals.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals vs xG
- Hinshelwood+0.5Hinshelwood: 3 goals from 2.47 xG (+0.5)
- Kluivert−0.4Kluivert: 1 goals from 1.40 xG (−0.4)
Hinshelwood has 0.5 more goals than xG.
Assists vs xA
- Hinshelwood−0.1Hinshelwood: 0 assists from 0.06 xA (−0.1)
- Kluivert+1.7Kluivert: 2 assists from 0.28 xA (+1.7)
Kluivert has 1.7 more assists than xA.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Hinshelwood · 24 pts63% from goals
Kluivert · 28 pts46% from appearances
| Source | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 5 | 13 |
| Goals | 15 | 5 |
| Assists | 0 | 6 |
| Clean sheets | 1 | 2 |
| Bonus | 3 | 1 |
| Other | 0 | 1 |
| Deductions | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 24 | 28 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Hinshelwood6.0(1)
- Kluivert1.0(1)
Medium (FDR 3)
- Hinshelwood16.0(1)
- Kluivert4.8(5)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Hinshelwood1.0(2)
- Kluivert3.0(1)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Kluivert 3.0 points per game, Hinshelwood 1.0 points per game.
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Hinshelwood11.0(2)
- Kluivert4.5(4)
Away
- Hinshelwood1.0(2)
- Kluivert3.3(3)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Kluivert 3.3 points per game, Hinshelwood 1.0 points per game.
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Hinshelwood30%
3 goals and 0 assists of 10 BHA goals
Kluivert23%
1 goal and 2 assists of 13 BOU goals
Hinshelwood is involved in 30% of BHA's goals, against 23% for Kluivert.
Who is a rotation risk?
Hinshelwood0 of 9 full games
1 × 60–89, 3 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play
Kluivert0 of 9 full games
6 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Hinshelwood110.8
- Kluivert101.2
Creativity
- Hinshelwood16.3
- Kluivert115.7
Threat
- Hinshelwood110.0
- Kluivert144.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Hinshelwood's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Kluivert's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Hinshelwood−5971.7k out1.1k in
- Kluivert+9.5k1.3k out10.8k in
Kluivert has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+9.5k).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Hinshelwood
- Kluivert
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Hinshelwood, gameweek 4: 0 points v COV away, 0 minutesKluivert, gameweek 4: 8 points v BRE home, 65 minutesGW 5
Hinshelwood, gameweek 5: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutesKluivert, gameweek 5: 0 points v LIV home, 0 minutesGW 6
Hinshelwood, gameweek 6: 0 points v SUN away, 0 minutesKluivert, gameweek 6: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutesGW 7
Hinshelwood, gameweek 7: 6 points v CRY home, 19 minutesKluivert, gameweek 7: 1 points v SUN home, 28 minutesGW 8
Hinshelwood, gameweek 8: 1 points v LIV away, 45 minutesKluivert, gameweek 8: 6 points v MUN away, 62 minutesGW 9
Hinshelwood, gameweek 9: 1 points v MCI away, 18 minutesKluivert, gameweek 9: 6 points v LEE home, 67 minutes
Hinshelwood: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); Kluivert: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 8 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 6 | 1 |
| 8 | 1 | 6 |
| 9 | 1 | 6 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 65 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 19 | 28 |
| 8 | 45 | 62 |
| 9 | 18 | 67 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.21 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.92 | 0.29 |
| 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.14 | 0.12 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.02 | 0.01 |
| 8 | 0.02 | 0.18 |
| 9 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 7 | 0.94 | 0.30 |
| 8 | 0.02 | 0.18 |
| 9 | 0.14 | 0.13 |
Defensive contribution
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 4 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 2 | 1 |
| 8 | 3 | 5 |
| 9 | 4 | 5 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 1 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 1 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 1 |
| 9 | 0 | 1 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.9% | 1.0% |
| 5 | 0.6% | 1.0% |
| 6 | 0.5% | 0.7% |
| 7 | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| 8 | 0.6% | 0.6% |
| 9 | 0.6% | 0.8% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £6.0m | £6.0m |
| 5 | £5.9m | £6.0m |
| 6 | £5.9m | £5.9m |
| 7 | £5.9m | £5.9m |
| 8 | £5.9m | £5.9m |
| 9 | £5.9m | £5.9m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Hinshelwood | Kluivert |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 0.3% | 0.3% |
| 6 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| 7 | 0.1% | 0.0% |
| 8 | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| 9 | 0.2% | 0.2% |

