How do Hinshelwood and J.Murphy compare?

Hinshelwood has more season points (24 vs 11), Hinshelwood is more owned (0.6% vs 0.1%), J.Murphy has the higher Start rate (44% vs 11%), Hinshelwood has more Bonus (3 vs 0), but Hinshelwood has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).

Hinshelwood

14 stats won

J.Murphy

13 stats won

Who wins more stats: Hinshelwood or J.Murphy?

Hinshelwood wins 14 of 27 stats

Hinshelwood wins 14 of the 27 stats with an outright best. Others: J.Murphy 13.

Points
Hinshelwood: 24J.Murphy: 11
xGI (6 gw)
Hinshelwood: 0.18J.Murphy: 0.17
Price
Hinshelwood: £5.9mJ.Murphy: £5.9m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
Price & ownership20
Playing time04
Recent form33
Season totals33
Set pieces01
Bonus21
Fixtures10
FPL ranks31
Total1413

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Hinshelwood: Points 24, xGI (6 gw) 0.18, BPS 81, Mins (6 gw) 14, DC (6 gw) 1.5, Upcoming FDR 2.80. J.Murphy: Points 11, xGI (6 gw) 0.17, BPS 59, Mins (6 gw) 51, DC (6 gw) 3.8, Upcoming FDR 3.20.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Hinshelwood leads 2 of 2
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
Price

5.9m

5.9m

Ownership

0.6%(best)

0.1%−0.5% vs best

Top 10k ownership

0.2%(best)

0.0%−0.2% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

J.Murphy leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
Starts

1−3 vs best

4(best)

Start rate

11%−33% vs best

44%(best)

Minutes (season)

145−198 vs best

343(best)

Avg minutes

16−22 vs best

38(best)

Who has better recent form?

Split
Who has better recent form?
StatHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
Mins (6 gw)

14−37 vs best

51(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.18(best)

0.05−0.13 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.01−0.11 vs best

0.12(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.18(best)

0.17−0.01 vs best

DC (6 gw)

1.50−2.33 vs best

3.83(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.18(best)

1.03+0.85 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Split
Who has scored more this season?
StatHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
Points

24(best)

11−13 vs best

Goals

3(best)

0−3 vs best

Assists

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Total xG

2.47(best)

0.29−2.18 vs best

Total xA

0.06−0.85 vs best

0.91(best)

DC (season)

12−17 vs best

29(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

J.Murphy leads 1 of 1
Who takes the set pieces?
StatHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
Corners & indirect FKs

—

3rd choice(best)

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Hinshelwood leads 2 of 3
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
BPS

81(best)

59−22 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

4.5−4.2 vs best

8.7(best)

Bonus

3(best)

0−3 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0

0.0

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Hinshelwood leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
Next 5 GWs

BRE

(H)

10

HUL

(A)

11

NEW

(H)

12

BOU

(A)

13

NFO

(A)

14

FUL

(A)

10

ARS

(H)

11

BHA

(A)

12

MUN

(H)

13

SUN

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80(best)

3.20+0.40 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Hinshelwood leads 3 of 4
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
Form

2.0

86th MID · 198th overall

2.0

84th MID · 196th overall

ICT index

23.7(best)

83rd MID · 157th overall

22.5

86th MID · 167th overall

Selected

74th MID(best)

223rd overall

134th MID

377th overall

Points per game

6.0(best)

7th MID · 16th overall

1.4

156th MID · 332nd overall

Cost rank

60th MID

91st overall

52nd MID(best)

76th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • HinshelwoodBHA

    1. BHA v BRE home, gameweek 10: 1.68 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. BHA v HUL away, gameweek 11: 1.95 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
  • J.MurphyNEW

    1. NEW v FUL away, gameweek 10: 1.12 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
    2. NEW v ARS home, gameweek 11: 0.89 projected goals, 17% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Hinshelwood (BHA) 3.6 projected team goals, J.Murphy (NEW) 2.0 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Hinshelwood+0.5Hinshelwood: 3 goals from 2.47 xG (+0.5)
  • J.Murphy−0.3J.Murphy: 0 goals from 0.29 xG (−0.3)

Hinshelwood has 0.5 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Hinshelwood−0.1Hinshelwood: 0 assists from 0.06 xA (−0.1)
  • J.Murphy+0.1J.Murphy: 1 assists from 0.91 xA (+0.1)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Hinshelwood · 24 pts63% from goals

  • J.Murphy · 11 pts71% from appearances

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
Appearances510
Goals150
Assists03
Clean sheets11
Bonus30
Deductions0−3
Total2411

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Hinshelwood6.0(1)
  • J.Murphy2.7(3)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Hinshelwood16.0(1)
  • J.Murphy0.8(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Hinshelwood1.0(2)
  • J.Murphy0.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Hinshelwood 1.0 points per game, J.Murphy 0.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Hinshelwood11.0(2)
  • J.Murphy0.8(4)

Away

  • Hinshelwood1.0(2)
  • J.Murphy2.0(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: J.Murphy 2.0 points per game, Hinshelwood 1.0 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Hinshelwood30%

    3 goals and 0 assists of 10 BHA goals

  • J.Murphy8%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 12 NEW goals

Hinshelwood is involved in 30% of BHA's goals, against 8% for J.Murphy.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Hinshelwood0 of 9 full games

    1 × 60–89, 3 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

  • J.Murphy2 of 9 full games

    2 × 90 minutes, 6 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Hinshelwood110.8
  • J.Murphy58.0

Creativity

  • Hinshelwood16.3
  • J.Murphy142.3

Threat

  • Hinshelwood110.0
  • J.Murphy26.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Hinshelwood's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; J.Murphy's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Hinshelwood−5971.7k out1.1k in
  • J.Murphy−154338 out184 in

Managers are selling all of them; J.Murphy the least (−154 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Hinshelwood 4.1 points per £m (70th), J.Murphy 1.9 points per £m (131st). Median 2.5.
  • Hinshelwood
  • J.Murphy

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: J.Murphy 9, Hinshelwood 8.

How far ahead is Hinshelwood? Above zero Hinshelwood leads; below, J.Murphy.

J.Murphy is 1 point ahead of Hinshelwood over these gameweeks. Hinshelwood's biggest lead was 4 (GW 7); J.Murphy's was 2 (GW 6).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Hinshelwood, gameweek 4: 0 points v COV away, 0 minutes
    J.Murphy, gameweek 4: 0 points v LEE away, 56 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Hinshelwood, gameweek 5: 0 points v ARS home, 0 minutes
    J.Murphy, gameweek 5: 1 points v HUL home, 90 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Hinshelwood, gameweek 6: 0 points v SUN away, 0 minutes
    J.Murphy, gameweek 6: 1 points v COV away, 58 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Hinshelwood, gameweek 7: 6 points v CRY home, 19 minutes
    J.Murphy, gameweek 7: 0 points v AVL home, 0 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Hinshelwood, gameweek 8: 1 points v LIV away, 45 minutes
    J.Murphy, gameweek 8: 6 points v CRY away, 90 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Hinshelwood, gameweek 9: 1 points v MCI away, 18 minutes
    J.Murphy, gameweek 9: 1 points v EVE home, 14 minutes

Hinshelwood: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2); J.Murphy: 0 hauls (10+), 5 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
400
501
601
760
816
911

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
4056
5090
6058
7190
84590
91814

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
40.000.00
50.000.03
60.000.26
70.920.00
80.000.00
90.140.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
40.000.14
50.000.07
60.000.15
70.020.00
80.020.28
90.000.07

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
40.000.14
50.000.10
60.000.41
70.940.00
80.020.28
90.140.07

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
404
508
602
720
838
941

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
400
500
600
710
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
400
500
600
700
801
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
40.9%0.1%
50.6%0.1%
60.5%0.1%
70.6%0.1%
80.6%0.1%
90.6%0.1%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
4£6.0m£5.9m
5£5.9m£5.9m
6£5.9m£5.9m
7£5.9m£5.9m
8£5.9m£5.9m
9£5.9m£5.9m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWHinshelwoodJ.Murphy
4——
50.3%0.0%
60.0%0.0%
70.1%0.0%
80.2%0.0%
90.2%0.0%