How do Fofana and N.Williams compare?

N.Williams has more season points (32 vs 19), N.Williams is more owned (5.7% vs 0.2%), N.Williams is cheaper (4.9m vs 5.0m), N.Williams has the higher Start rate (100% vs 56%), Fofana has more Bonus (2 vs 1), but Fofana has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.60).

Fofana

10 stats won

N.Williams

20 stats won

Who wins more stats: Fofana or N.Williams?

N.Williams wins 20 of 30 stats

N.Williams wins 20 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Fofana 10.

Points
Fofana: 19N.Williams: 32
xGI (6 gw)
Fofana: 0.03N.Williams: 0.29
Price
Fofana: £5.0mN.Williams: £4.9m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionFofanaN.Williams
Price & ownership12
Playing time04
Recent form24
Season totals14
Set pieces02
Bonus31
Fixtures10
FPL ranks23
Total1020

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Fofana: Points 19, xGI (6 gw) 0.03, BPS 81, Mins (6 gw) 41, DC (6 gw) 4.8, Upcoming FDR 2.80. N.Williams: Points 32, xGI (6 gw) 0.29, BPS 122, Mins (6 gw) 89, DC (6 gw) 4.0, Upcoming FDR 3.60.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

N.Williams leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatFofanaN.Williams
Price

5.0m(best)

4.9m−0.1m vs best

Ownership

0.2%−5.5% vs best

5.7%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.0%−2.0% vs best

2.0%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

N.Williams leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatFofanaN.Williams
Starts

5−4 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

56%−44% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

402−401 vs best

803(best)

Avg minutes

45−44 vs best

89(best)

Who has better recent form?

N.Williams leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatFofanaN.Williams
Mins (6 gw)

41−48 vs best

89(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.02−0.12 vs best

0.14(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.01−0.14 vs best

0.15(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.03−0.26 vs best

0.29(best)

DC (6 gw)

4.83(best)

4.00−0.83 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.60(best)

0.98+0.38 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

N.Williams leads 4 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatFofanaN.Williams
Points

19−13 vs best

32(best)

Goals

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Assists

1

1

Total xG

0.13−0.83 vs best

0.96(best)

Total xA

0.10−1.06 vs best

1.16(best)

DC (season)

55(best)

48−7 vs best

Clean sheets

1

1

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

N.Williams leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatFofanaN.Williams
Corners & indirect FKs

—

2nd choice(best)

Direct free kicks

—

3rd choice(best)

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Fofana leads 3 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatFofanaN.Williams
BPS

81−41 vs best

122(best)

BPS (6 gw)

11.2(best)

10.8−0.4 vs best

Bonus

2(best)

1−1 vs best

Bonus (6 gw)

0.3(best)

0.0−0.3 vs best

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Fofana leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatFofanaN.Williams
Next 5 GWs

SUN

(A)

10

LEE

(H)

11

NFO

(A)

12

CRY

(H)

13

LIV

(H)

14

MCI

(H)

10

BOU

(A)

11

CHE

(H)

12

HUL

(A)

13

BHA

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

2.80(best)

3.60+0.80 vs best

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

N.Williams leads 3 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatFofanaN.Williams
Form

2.8

46th DEF · 127th overall

3.2(best)

37th DEF · 94th overall

ICT index

17.8

76th DEF · 214th overall

45.6(best)

5th DEF · 42nd overall

Selected

116th DEF

320th overall

22nd DEF(best)

64th overall

Points per game

3.8(best)

46th DEF · 104th overall

3.6

52nd DEF · 118th overall

Cost rank

46th DEF(best)

278th overall

57th DEF

336th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • FofanaCHE

    1. CHE v SUN away, gameweek 10: 1.48 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. CHE v LEE home, gameweek 11: 1.60 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance
  • N.WilliamsNFO

    1. NFO v MCI home, gameweek 10: 1.02 projected goals, 18% clean sheet chance
    2. NFO v BOU away, gameweek 11: 0.95 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Fofana (CHE) 0.7 expected clean sheets, N.Williams (NFO) 0.4 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Fofana−0.1Fofana: 0 goals from 0.13 xG (−0.1)
  • N.Williams±0.0N.Williams: 1 goals from 0.96 xG (±0.0)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Fofana+0.9Fofana: 1 assists from 0.10 xA (+0.9)
  • N.Williams−0.2N.Williams: 1 assists from 1.16 xA (−0.2)

Fofana has 0.9 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Fofana+0.1Fofana: 7 conceded from 6.89 xGC (+0.1)
  • N.Williams+2.8N.Williams: 12 conceded from 9.18 xGC (+2.8)

N.Williams has conceded 2.8 more than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Fofana · 19 pts43% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • N.Williams · 32 pts50% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceFofanaN.Williams
Appearances1018
Goals06
Assists33
Clean sheets44
Defensive contribution44
Bonus21
Deductions−4−4
Total1932

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Fofana1.0(1)
  • N.Williams3.7(3)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Fofana11.0(1)
  • N.Williams3.7(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Fofana2.3(3)
  • N.Williams3.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: N.Williams 3.3 points per game, Fofana 2.3 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Fofana4.0(3)
  • N.Williams3.5(4)

Away

  • Fofana3.5(2)
  • N.Williams3.6(5)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: N.Williams 3.6 points per game, Fofana 3.5 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Fofana11%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 9 CHE goals

  • N.Williams33%

    1 goal and 1 assist of 6 NFO goals

N.Williams is involved in 33% of NFO's goals, against 11% for Fofana.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Fofana2 of 9 full games

    2 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89, 4 × Didn't play

  • N.Williams8 of 9 full games

    8 × 90 minutes, 1 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Fofana119.4
  • N.Williams175.4

Creativity

  • Fofana30.6
  • N.Williams205.7

Threat

  • Fofana28.0
  • N.Williams75.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Fofana's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; N.Williams's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Fofana+2.2k413 out2.6k in
  • N.Williams−21.9k23.4k out1.5k in

Fofana has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+2.2k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Fofana 3.8 points per £m (72nd), N.Williams 6.5 points per £m (39th). Median 3.3.
  • Fofana
  • N.Williams

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: N.Williams 17, Fofana 16.

How far ahead is Fofana? Above zero Fofana leads; below, N.Williams.

N.Williams is 1 point ahead of Fofana over these gameweeks. Fofana's biggest lead was 1 (GW 5); N.Williams's was 11 (GW 8).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Fofana, gameweek 4: 1 points v HUL home, 85 minutes
    N.Williams, gameweek 4: 2 points v AVL away, 90 minutes
  2. GW 5

    Fofana, gameweek 5: 4 points v BRE away, 70 minutes
    N.Williams, gameweek 5: 2 points v COV home, 90 minutes
  3. GW 6

    Fofana, gameweek 6: 0 points v BOU home, 0 minutes
    N.Williams, gameweek 6: 1 points v CRY away, 90 minutes
  4. GW 7

    Fofana, gameweek 7: 0 points v EVE away, 0 minutes
    N.Williams, gameweek 7: 3 points v ARS home, 90 minutes
  5. GW 8

    Fofana, gameweek 8: 0 points v TOT home, 0 minutes
    N.Williams, gameweek 8: 8 points v IPS away, 83 minutes
  6. GW 9

    Fofana, gameweek 9: 11 points v MUN home, 90 minutes
    N.Williams, gameweek 9: 1 points v BRE away, 90 minutes

Fofana: 1 haul (10+), 4 blanks (0–2); N.Williams: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWFofanaN.Williams
412
542
601
703
808
9111

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWFofanaN.Williams
48590
57090
6090
7090
8083
99090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWFofanaN.Williams
40.000.20
50.000.09
60.000.17
70.000.08
80.000.30
90.130.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWFofanaN.Williams
40.030.16
50.000.21
60.000.29
70.000.00
80.000.21
90.020.05

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWFofanaN.Williams
40.030.36
50.000.30
60.000.46
70.000.08
80.000.51
90.150.05

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWFofanaN.Williams
463
5152
602
7010
802
985

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWFofanaN.Williams
40.890.82
51.450.67
60.002.41
70.001.14
80.000.40
91.240.46

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWFofanaN.Williams
400
500
600
700
801
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWFofanaN.Williams
400
500
600
700
800
910

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWFofanaN.Williams
40.2%8.1%
50.2%9.8%
60.2%7.2%
70.2%6.3%
80.2%6.3%
90.2%5.8%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWFofanaN.Williams
4£5.0m£5.0m
5£5.0m£5.0m
6£5.0m£5.0m
7£5.0m£5.0m
8£5.0m£5.0m
9£5.0m£5.0m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWFofanaN.Williams
4——
50.0%14.2%
60.0%4.8%
70.0%3.7%
80.0%5.0%
90.0%2.0%