How do E.Le Fée and Tielemans compare?

E.Le Fée has more season points (35 vs 24), E.Le Fée is more owned (2.7% vs 1.2%), E.Le Fée has the higher Start rate (100% vs 89%), but Tielemans has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 3.00 vs 3.40).

← Back to players Pick different players

E.Le Fée

23 stats won

Tielemans

7 stats won

Who wins more stats: E.Le Fée or Tielemans?

E.Le Fée wins 23 of 30 stats

E.Le Fée wins 23 of the 30 stats with an outright best. Others: Tielemans 7.

Points
E.Le Fée: 35Tielemans: 24
xGI (6 gw)
E.Le Fée: 0.57Tielemans: 0.15
Price
E.Le Fée: £5.7mTielemans: £5.7m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionE.Le FéeTielemans
Price & ownership20
Playing time40
Recent form42
Season totals41
Set pieces31
Bonus21
Fixtures01
FPL ranks41
Total237

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

E.Le Fée: Points 35, xGI (6 gw) 0.57, BPS 164, Mins (6 gw) 86, DC (6 gw) 6.2, Upcoming FDR 3.40. Tielemans: Points 24, xGI (6 gw) 0.15, BPS 136, Mins (6 gw) 57, DC (6 gw) 7.2, Upcoming FDR 3.00.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

E.Le Fée leads 2 of 2
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatE.Le FéeTielemans
Price

5.7m

5.7m

Ownership

2.7%(best)

1.2%−1.5% vs best

Top 10k ownership

1.9%(best)

0.0%−1.9% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

E.Le Fée leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatE.Le FéeTielemans
Starts

9(best)

8−1 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

89%−11% vs best

Minutes (season)

776(best)

588−188 vs best

Avg minutes

86(best)

65−21 vs best

Who has better recent form?

E.Le Fée leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatE.Le FéeTielemans
Mins (6 gw)

86(best)

57−29 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.30(best)

0.02−0.28 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.26(best)

0.13−0.13 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.57(best)

0.15−0.42 vs best

DC (6 gw)

6.17−1.00 vs best

7.17(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.87+0.93 vs best

0.94(best)

Who has scored more this season?

E.Le Fée leads 4 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatE.Le FéeTielemans
Points

35(best)

24−11 vs best

Goals

2(best)

0−2 vs best

Assists

1

1

Total xG

3.04(best)

0.67−2.37 vs best

Total xA

1.80(best)

1.07−0.73 vs best

DC (season)

51−17 vs best

68(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

E.Le Fée leads 3 of 4
Who takes the set pieces?
StatE.Le FéeTielemans
Corners & indirect FKs

1st choice(best)

—

Direct free kicks

3rd choice(best)

—

Penalties

2nd choice(best)

3rd choice

Penalties missed · lower is better

1+1 vs best

0(best)

Who is collecting more bonus?

E.Le Fée leads 2 of 3
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatE.Le FéeTielemans
BPS

164(best)

136−28 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

18.8(best)

13.3−5.5 vs best

Bonus

2

2

Bonus (6 gw)

0.2−0.1 vs best

0.3(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Tielemans leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatE.Le FéeTielemans
Next 5 GWs

CHE

(H)

10

AVL

(A)

11

TOT

(H)

12

LIV

(A)

13

NEW

(A)

14

AVL

(H)

10

LIV

(A)

11

BRE

(H)

12

NEW

(A)

13

COV

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.40+0.40 vs best

3.00(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

E.Le Fée leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatE.Le FéeTielemans
Form

4.2(best)

23rd MID · 59th overall

2.5

72nd MID · 159th overall

ICT index

53.3(best)

22nd MID · 30th overall

34.8

50th MID · 85th overall

Selected

37th MID(best)

111th overall

52nd MID

159th overall

Points per game

3.9(best)

36th MID · 98th overall

3.0

71st MID · 169th overall

Cost rank

70th MID

112th overall

67th MID(best)

106th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • E.Le FéeSUN

    1. SUN v CHE home, gameweek 10: 1.03 projected goals, 23% clean sheet chance
    2. SUN v AVL away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 24% clean sheet chance

  • TielemansMUN

    1. MUN v AVL home, gameweek 10: 1.50 projected goals, 29% clean sheet chance
    2. MUN v LIV away, gameweek 11: 1.00 projected goals, 18% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Tielemans (MUN) 2.5 projected team goals, E.Le Fée (SUN) 2.0 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • E.Le Fée−1.0E.Le Fée: 2 goals from 3.04 xG (−1.0)
  • Tielemans−0.7Tielemans: 0 goals from 0.67 xG (−0.7)

E.Le Fée has 1.0 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • E.Le Fée−0.8E.Le Fée: 1 assists from 1.80 xA (−0.8)
  • Tielemans−0.1Tielemans: 1 assists from 1.07 xA (−0.1)

E.Le Fée has 0.8 fewer assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • E.Le Fée · 35 pts49% from appearances

    −2 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Tielemans · 24 pts56% from appearances

    −1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceE.Le FéeTielemans
Appearances1814
Goals100
Assists33
Clean sheets20
Defensive contribution26
Bonus22
Deductions−2−1
Total3524

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • E.Le Fée4.3(3)
  • Tielemans3.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • E.Le Fée3.0(1)
  • Tielemans3.2(5)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • E.Le Fée3.8(5)
  • Tielemans2.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: E.Le Fée 3.8 points per game, Tielemans 2.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • E.Le Fée2.0(4)
  • Tielemans2.3(4)

Away

  • E.Le Fée5.4(5)
  • Tielemans3.8(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: E.Le Fée 5.4 points per game, Tielemans 3.8 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • E.Le Fée43%

    2 goals and 1 assist of 7 SUN goals

  • Tielemans10%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 10 MUN goals

E.Le Fée is involved in 43% of SUN's goals, against 10% for Tielemans.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • E.Le Fée5 of 9 full games

    5 × 90 minutes, 4 × 60–89

  • Tielemans3 of 9 full games

    3 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • E.Le Fée159.2
  • Tielemans130.0

Creativity

  • E.Le Fée252.2
  • Tielemans169.0

Threat

  • E.Le Fée119.0
  • Tielemans49.0

FPL's season ICT scores. E.Le Fée's biggest score is creativity, a creator; Tielemans's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • E.Le Fée−4.0k6.7k out2.7k in
  • Tielemans−5.5k5.9k out384 in

Managers are selling all of them; E.Le Fée the least (−4.0k net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: E.Le Fée 6.1 points per £m (20th), Tielemans 4.2 points per £m (64th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • E.Le Fée
  • Tielemans

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: E.Le Fée 22, Tielemans 16.

How far ahead is E.Le Fée? Above zero E.Le Fée leads; below, Tielemans.

E.Le Fée is 6 points ahead of Tielemans over these gameweeks. E.Le Fée's biggest lead was 6 (GW 9); Tielemans's was 5 (GW 7).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    E.Le Fée, gameweek 4: 0 points v ARS home, 90 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 4: 2 points v MCI home, 66 minutes

  2. GW 5

    E.Le Fée, gameweek 5: 5 points v MCI away, 90 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 5: 4 points v FUL away, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    E.Le Fée, gameweek 6: 2 points v BHA home, 80 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 6: 3 points v TOT home, 58 minutes

  4. GW 7

    E.Le Fée, gameweek 7: 4 points v BOU away, 90 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 7: 7 points v LEE away, 83 minutes

  5. GW 8

    E.Le Fée, gameweek 8: 3 points v LEE home, 78 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 8: 0 points v BOU home, 45 minutes

  6. GW 9

    E.Le Fée, gameweek 9: 8 points v COV away, 90 minutes
    Tielemans, gameweek 9: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutes

E.Le Fée: 0 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2); Tielemans: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWE.Le FéeTielemans
402
554
623
747
830
980

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWE.Le FéeTielemans
49066
59090
68058
79083
87845
9900

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWE.Le FéeTielemans
40.850.00
50.000.09
60.020.00
70.010.02
80.100.00
90.850.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWE.Le FéeTielemans
40.590.04
50.520.20
60.250.14
70.010.41
80.170.00
90.030.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWE.Le FéeTielemans
41.440.04
50.520.29
60.270.14
70.020.43
80.270.00
90.880.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWE.Le FéeTielemans
445
5313
6418
7127
830
9110

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWE.Le FéeTielemans
400
500
600
700
800
910

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWE.Le FéeTielemans
400
510
600
701
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWE.Le FéeTielemans
44.2%1.7%
53.4%1.5%
63.2%1.4%
73.0%1.4%
82.9%1.4%
92.8%1.3%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWE.Le FéeTielemans
4£5.8m£5.9m
5£5.8m£5.8m
6£5.7m£5.8m
7£5.7m£5.7m
8£5.7m£5.7m
9£5.7m£5.7m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWE.Le FéeTielemans
4——
54.2%0.0%
62.5%0.0%
72.1%0.0%
81.8%0.0%
91.9%0.0%