How do Chilwell and Udogie compare?

Udogie has more season points (10 vs 8), Udogie has the higher Start rate (22% vs 0%), but Udogie has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

← Back to players Pick different players

Chilwell

8 stats won

Udogie

16 stats won

Who wins more stats: Chilwell or Udogie?

Udogie wins 16 of 24 stats

Udogie wins 16 of the 24 stats with an outright best. Others: Chilwell 8.

Points
Chilwell: 8Udogie: 10
xGI (6 gw)
Chilwell: 0.02Udogie: 0.01
Price
Chilwell: £4.4mUdogie: £4.4m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionChilwellUdogie
Price & ownership00
Playing time04
Recent form24
Season totals24
Set pieces00
Bonus02
Fixtures01
FPL ranks41
Total816

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Chilwell: Points 8, xGI (6 gw) 0.02, BPS 21, Mins (6 gw) 2, DC (6 gw) 0.2, Upcoming FDR 3.00. Udogie: Points 10, xGI (6 gw) 0.01, BPS 28, Mins (6 gw) 14, DC (6 gw) 1.2, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

No outright winner
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatChilwellUdogie
Price

4.4m

4.4m

Ownership

0.3%

0.3%

Top 10k ownership

0.0%

0.0%

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Udogie leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatChilwellUdogie
Starts

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Start rate

0%−22% vs best

22%(best)

Minutes (season)

29−143 vs best

172(best)

Avg minutes

4−15 vs best

19(best)

Who has better recent form?

Udogie leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatChilwellUdogie
Mins (6 gw)

2−12 vs best

14(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.02(best)

0.00−0.02 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.00−0.01 vs best

0.01(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.02(best)

0.01−0.01 vs best

DC (6 gw)

0.17−1.00 vs best

1.17(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.09+0.03 vs best

0.06(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Udogie leads 4 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatChilwellUdogie
Points

8−2 vs best

10(best)

Goals

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Assists

0

0

Total xG

0.27(best)

0.00−0.27 vs best

Total xA

0.01−0.28 vs best

0.29(best)

DC (season)

1−10 vs best

11(best)

Clean sheets

0−1 vs best

1(best)

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatChilwellUdogie
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Udogie leads 2 of 2
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatChilwellUdogie
BPS

21−7 vs best

28(best)

BPS (6 gw)

0.2−1.0 vs best

1.2(best)

Bonus

0

0

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0

0.0

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Udogie leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatChilwellUdogie
Next 5 GWs

LIV

(H)

10

COV

(A)

11

HUL

(H)

12

CHE

(A)

13

AVL

(A)

14

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.00+0.20 vs best

2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Chilwell leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatChilwellUdogie
Form

0.0

177th DEF · 464th overall

0.8(best)

103rd DEF · 297th overall

ICT index

5.9(best)

124th DEF · 346th overall

4.1

133rd DEF · 367th overall

Selected

106th DEF(best)

299th overall

107th DEF

301st overall

Points per game

4.0(best)

41st DEF · 88th overall

2.0

98th DEF · 260th overall

Cost rank

129th DEF(best)

525th overall

139th DEF

541st overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • ChilwellCRY

    1. CRY v LIV home, gameweek 10: 1.00 projected goals, 15% clean sheet chance
    2. CRY v COV away, gameweek 11: 1.18 projected goals, 25% clean sheet chance

  • UdogieTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Udogie (TOT) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Chilwell (CRY) 0.4 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Chilwell+0.7Chilwell: 1 goals from 0.27 xG (+0.7)
  • Udogie±0.0Udogie: 0 goals from 0.00 xG (±0.0)

Chilwell has 0.7 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Chilwell±0.0Chilwell: 0 assists from 0.01 xA (±0.0)
  • Udogie−0.3Udogie: 0 assists from 0.29 xA (−0.3)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Chilwell−0.1Chilwell: 1 conceded from 1.12 xGC (−0.1)
  • Udogie+0.5Udogie: 2 conceded from 1.52 xGC (+0.5)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Chilwell · 8 pts75% from goals

  • Udogie · 10 pts64% from appearances

    −1 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceChilwellUdogie
Appearances27
Goals60
Clean sheets04
Deductions0−1
Total810

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Chilwell1.0(1)
  • Udogie3.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Chilwell7.0(1)
  • Udogie1.5(2)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • ChilwellNo games
  • Udogie1.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Chilwell1.0(1)
  • Udogie1.0(2)

Away

  • Chilwell7.0(1)
  • Udogie2.7(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Chilwell 7.0 points per game, Udogie 2.7 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Chilwell20%

    1 goal and 0 assists of 5 CRY goals

  • Udogie0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 3 TOT goals

Chilwell is involved in 20% of CRY's goals, against 0% for Udogie.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Chilwell0 of 7 full games

    2 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

  • Udogie0 of 9 full games

    2 × 60–89, 3 × 1–59, 4 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Chilwell33.4
  • Udogie19.6

Creativity

  • Chilwell4.2
  • Udogie18.1

Threat

  • Chilwell21.0
  • Udogie4.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Chilwell's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Udogie's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Chilwell−699827 out128 in
  • Udogie−148373 out225 in

Managers are selling all of them; Udogie the least (−148 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Chilwell 1.8 points per £m (109th), Udogie 2.3 points per £m (94th). Median 3.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Chilwell
  • Udogie

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Udogie 3, Chilwell 1.

How far ahead is Chilwell? Above zero Chilwell leads; below, Udogie.

Udogie is 2 points ahead of Chilwell over these gameweeks. Chilwell's biggest lead was 1 (GW 4); Udogie's was 2 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Chilwell, gameweek 4: 1 points v IPS home, 13 minutes
    Udogie, gameweek 4: 0 points v EVE home, 0 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Chilwell, gameweek 5: 0 points v LEE away, 0 minutes
    Udogie, gameweek 5: 0 points v AVL home, 0 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Chilwell, gameweek 6: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutes
    Udogie, gameweek 6: 2 points v MUN away, 73 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Chilwell, gameweek 7: 0 points v BHA away, 0 minutes
    Udogie, gameweek 7: 0 points v COV home, 0 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Chilwell, gameweek 8: 0 points v NEW home, 0 minutes
    Udogie, gameweek 8: 0 points v CHE away, 0 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Chilwell, gameweek 9: 0 points v TOT away, 0 minutes
    Udogie, gameweek 9: 1 points v CRY home, 13 minutes

Chilwell: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Udogie: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWChilwellUdogie
410
500
602
700
800
901

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWChilwellUdogie
4130
500
6073
700
800
9013

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWChilwellUdogie
40.120.00
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWChilwellUdogie
40.010.00
50.000.00
60.000.05
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.01

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWChilwellUdogie
40.130.00
50.000.00
60.000.05
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.01

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWChilwellUdogie
410
500
606
700
800
901

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWChilwellUdogie
40.550.00
50.000.00
60.000.35
70.000.00
80.000.00
90.000.00

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWChilwellUdogie
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWChilwellUdogie
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWChilwellUdogie
40.6%0.4%
50.5%0.3%
60.4%0.3%
70.3%0.3%
80.3%0.3%
90.3%0.3%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWChilwellUdogie
4£4.5m£4.5m
5£4.5m£4.4m
6£4.5m£4.4m
7£4.4m£4.4m
8£4.4m£4.4m
9£4.4m£4.4m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWChilwellUdogie
4——
50.1%0.0%
60.1%0.0%
70.0%0.0%
80.0%0.0%
90.0%0.0%