How do Chilwell and F.Kadıoğlu compare?

F.Kadıoğlu has more season points (29 vs 8), F.Kadıoğlu is more owned (1.4% vs 0.3%), F.Kadıoğlu has the higher Start rate (78% vs 0%), F.Kadıoğlu has more Bonus (1 vs 0), but F.Kadıoğlu has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

← Back to players Pick different players

Chilwell

5 stats won

F.Kadıoğlu

24 stats won

Who wins more stats: Chilwell or F.Kadıoğlu?

F.Kadıoğlu wins 24 of 29 stats

F.Kadıoğlu wins 24 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Chilwell 5.

Points
Chilwell: 8F.Kadıoğlu: 29
xGI (6 gw)
Chilwell: 0.02F.Kadıoğlu: 0.04
Price
Chilwell: £4.4mF.Kadıoğlu: £4.4m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
Price & ownership02
Playing time04
Recent form24
Season totals24
Set pieces01
Bonus04
Fixtures01
FPL ranks14
Total524

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Chilwell: Points 8, xGI (6 gw) 0.02, BPS 21, Mins (6 gw) 2, DC (6 gw) 0.2, Upcoming FDR 3.00. F.Kadıoğlu: Points 29, xGI (6 gw) 0.04, BPS 101, Mins (6 gw) 58, DC (6 gw) 3.8, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

F.Kadıoğlu leads 2 of 2
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
Price

4.4m

4.4m

Ownership

0.3%−1.1% vs best

1.4%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.0%−0.1% vs best

0.1%(best)

Availability

Available

75% · Hip injury - 75% chance of playing

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

F.Kadıoğlu leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
Starts

0−7 vs best

7(best)

Start rate

0%−78% vs best

78%(best)

Minutes (season)

29−488 vs best

517(best)

Avg minutes

4−53 vs best

57(best)

Who has better recent form?

F.Kadıoğlu leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
Mins (6 gw)

2−56 vs best

58(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.02(best)

0.01−0.01 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.00−0.02 vs best

0.02(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.02−0.02 vs best

0.04(best)

DC (6 gw)

0.17−3.66 vs best

3.83(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.09(best)

0.62+0.53 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

F.Kadıoğlu leads 4 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
Points

8−21 vs best

29(best)

Goals

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Assists

0

0

Total xG

0.27(best)

0.15−0.12 vs best

Total xA

0.01−0.15 vs best

0.16(best)

DC (season)

1−27 vs best

28(best)

Clean sheets

0−4 vs best

4(best)

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

F.Kadıoğlu leads 1 of 1
Who takes the set pieces?
StatChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
Corners & indirect FKs

—

3rd choice(best)

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

F.Kadıoğlu leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
BPS

21−80 vs best

101(best)

BPS (6 gw)

0.2−16.0 vs best

16.2(best)

Bonus

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.2 vs best

0.2(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

F.Kadıoğlu leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
Next 5 GWs

LIV

(H)

10

COV

(A)

11

HUL

(H)

12

CHE

(A)

13

AVL

(A)

14

BRE

(H)

10

HUL

(A)

11

NEW

(H)

12

BOU

(A)

13

NFO

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.00+0.20 vs best

2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

F.Kadıoğlu leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
Form

0.0

177th DEF · 463rd overall

4.0(best)

25th DEF · 62nd overall

ICT index

5.9

124th DEF · 346th overall

17.4(best)

77th DEF · 215th overall

Selected

106th DEF

299th overall

57th DEF(best)

149th overall

Points per game

4.0

41st DEF · 88th overall

4.1(best)

34th DEF · 78th overall

Cost rank

129th DEF(best)

525th overall

132nd DEF

530th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • ChilwellCRY

    1. CRY v LIV home, gameweek 10: 1.00 projected goals, 15% clean sheet chance
    2. CRY v COV away, gameweek 11: 1.18 projected goals, 25% clean sheet chance

  • F.KadıoğluBHA

    1. BHA v BRE home, gameweek 10: 1.68 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. BHA v HUL away, gameweek 11: 1.95 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: F.Kadıoğlu (BHA) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Chilwell (CRY) 0.4 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Chilwell+0.7Chilwell: 1 goals from 0.27 xG (+0.7)
  • F.Kadıoğlu−0.1F.Kadıoğlu: 0 goals from 0.15 xG (−0.1)

Chilwell has 0.7 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Chilwell±0.0Chilwell: 0 assists from 0.01 xA (±0.0)
  • F.Kadıoğlu−0.2F.Kadıoğlu: 0 assists from 0.16 xA (−0.2)

Everyone is within half a assist of expected.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Chilwell−0.1Chilwell: 1 conceded from 1.12 xGC (−0.1)
  • F.Kadıoğlu−4.0F.Kadıoğlu: 5 conceded from 9.04 xGC (−4.0)

F.Kadıoğlu has conceded 4.0 fewer than xGC.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Chilwell · 8 pts75% from goals

  • F.Kadıoğlu · 29 pts50% from clean sheets

    −3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
Appearances213
Goals60
Clean sheets016
Defensive contribution02
Bonus01
Deductions0−3
Total829

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Chilwell1.0(1)
  • F.Kadıoğlu6.0(2)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Chilwell7.0(1)
  • F.Kadıoğlu5.5(2)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • ChilwellNo games
  • F.Kadıoğlu2.0(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Chilwell1.0(1)
  • F.Kadıoğlu4.3(3)

Away

  • Chilwell7.0(1)
  • F.Kadıoğlu4.0(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Chilwell 7.0 points per game, F.Kadıoğlu 4.0 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Chilwell20%

    1 goal and 0 assists of 5 CRY goals

  • F.Kadıoğlu0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 19 BHA goals

Chilwell is involved in 20% of CRY's goals, against 0% for F.Kadıoğlu.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Chilwell0 of 7 full games

    2 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

  • F.Kadıoğlu4 of 9 full games

    4 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Chilwell33.4
  • F.Kadıoğlu69.2

Creativity

  • Chilwell4.2
  • F.Kadıoğlu63.5

Threat

  • Chilwell21.0
  • F.Kadıoğlu41.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Chilwell's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; F.Kadıoğlu's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Chilwell−693819 out126 in
  • F.Kadıoğlu−8.1k8.4k out254 in

Managers are selling all of them; Chilwell the least (−693 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Chilwell 1.8 points per £m (109th), F.Kadıoğlu 6.6 points per £m (38th). Median 3.2.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Chilwell
  • F.Kadıoğlu

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: F.Kadıoğlu 27, Chilwell 1.

How far ahead is Chilwell? Above zero Chilwell leads; below, F.Kadıoğlu.

F.Kadıoğlu is 26 points ahead of Chilwell over these gameweeks. F.Kadıoğlu's was 26 (GW 8).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Chilwell, gameweek 4: 1 points v IPS home, 13 minutes
    F.Kadıoğlu, gameweek 4: 6 points v COV away, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Chilwell, gameweek 5: 0 points v LEE away, 0 minutes
    F.Kadıoğlu, gameweek 5: 5 points v ARS home, 75 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Chilwell, gameweek 6: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutes
    F.Kadıoğlu, gameweek 6: 9 points v SUN away, 90 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Chilwell, gameweek 7: 0 points v BHA away, 0 minutes
    F.Kadıoğlu, gameweek 7: 6 points v CRY home, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Chilwell, gameweek 8: 0 points v NEW home, 0 minutes
    F.Kadıoğlu, gameweek 8: 1 points v LIV away, 5 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Chilwell, gameweek 9: 0 points v TOT away, 0 minutes
    F.Kadıoğlu, gameweek 9: 0 points v MCI away, 0 minutes

Chilwell: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); F.Kadıoğlu: 0 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
416
505
609
706
801
900

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
41390
5075
6090
7090
805
900

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
40.120.00
50.000.04
60.000.00
70.000.03
80.000.00
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
40.010.09
50.000.02
60.000.01
70.000.02
80.000.00
90.000.00

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
40.130.09
50.000.06
60.000.01
70.000.05
80.000.00
90.000.00

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
412
503
6012
706
800
900

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
40.551.33
50.000.89
60.000.72
70.000.77
80.000.00
90.000.00

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
400
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
40.6%1.7%
50.5%1.6%
60.4%1.5%
70.3%1.7%
80.3%1.7%
90.3%1.5%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
4£4.5m£4.4m
5£4.5m£4.4m
6£4.5m£4.4m
7£4.4m£4.4m
8£4.4m£4.4m
9£4.4m£4.4m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWChilwellF.Kadıoğlu
4——
50.1%0.5%
60.1%0.4%
70.0%0.3%
80.0%0.4%
90.0%0.1%