How do Chilwell and Robertson compare?

Robertson has more season points (36 vs 8), Robertson is more owned (2.4% vs 0.3%), Robertson is cheaper (4.3m vs 4.4m), Robertson has the higher Start rate (78% vs 0%), Robertson has more Bonus (3 vs 0), but Robertson has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

← Back to players Pick different players

Chilwell

4 stats won

Robertson

27 stats won

Who wins more stats: Chilwell or Robertson?

Robertson wins 27 of 31 stats

Robertson wins 27 of the 31 stats with an outright best. Others: Chilwell 4.

Points
Chilwell: 8Robertson: 36
xGI (6 gw)
Chilwell: 0.02Robertson: 0.24
Price
Chilwell: £4.4mRobertson: £4.3m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionChilwellRobertson
Price & ownership12
Playing time04
Recent form15
Season totals15
Set pieces02
Bonus04
Fixtures01
FPL ranks14
Total427

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best DEF in the game. Hover for values.

Chilwell: Points 8, xGI (6 gw) 0.02, BPS 21, Mins (6 gw) 2, DC (6 gw) 0.2, Upcoming FDR 3.00. Robertson: Points 36, xGI (6 gw) 0.24, BPS 139, Mins (6 gw) 65, DC (6 gw) 2.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Robertson leads 2 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatChilwellRobertson
Price

4.4m(best)

4.3m−0.1m vs best

Ownership

0.3%−2.1% vs best

2.4%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.0%−2.5% vs best

2.5%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Robertson leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatChilwellRobertson
Starts

0−7 vs best

7(best)

Start rate

0%−78% vs best

78%(best)

Minutes (season)

29−545 vs best

574(best)

Avg minutes

4−60 vs best

64(best)

Who has better recent form?

Robertson leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatChilwellRobertson
Mins (6 gw)

2−63 vs best

65(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.02−0.02 vs best

0.04(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.00−0.21 vs best

0.21(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.02−0.22 vs best

0.24(best)

DC (6 gw)

0.17−1.83 vs best

2.00(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.09(best)

0.55+0.46 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Robertson leads 5 of 6
Who has scored more this season?
StatChilwellRobertson
Points

8−28 vs best

36(best)

Goals

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Assists

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Total xG

0.27

0.27

Total xA

0.01−1.31 vs best

1.32(best)

DC (season)

1−26 vs best

27(best)

Clean sheets

0−3 vs best

3(best)

See alsoDefender stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Robertson leads 2 of 2
Who takes the set pieces?
StatChilwellRobertson
Corners & indirect FKs

—

6th choice(best)

Direct free kicks

—

7th choice(best)

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Robertson leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatChilwellRobertson
BPS

21−118 vs best

139(best)

BPS (6 gw)

0.2−19.1 vs best

19.3(best)

Bonus

0−3 vs best

3(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.5 vs best

0.5(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Robertson leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatChilwellRobertson
Next 5 GWs

LIV

(H)

10

COV

(A)

11

HUL

(H)

12

CHE

(A)

13

AVL

(A)

14

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.00+0.20 vs best

2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Robertson leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatChilwellRobertson
Form

0.0

177th DEF · 464th overall

4.8(best)

13th DEF · 34th overall

ICT index

5.9

124th DEF · 346th overall

45.0(best)

6th DEF · 45th overall

Selected

106th DEF

299th overall

44th DEF(best)

118th overall

Points per game

4.0

41st DEF · 88th overall

4.5(best)

23rd DEF · 55th overall

Cost rank

129th DEF(best)

525th overall

146th DEF

570th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • ChilwellCRY

    1. CRY v LIV home, gameweek 10: 1.00 projected goals, 15% clean sheet chance
    2. CRY v COV away, gameweek 11: 1.18 projected goals, 25% clean sheet chance

  • RobertsonTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Robertson (TOT) 0.7 expected clean sheets, Chilwell (CRY) 0.4 expected clean sheets.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by clean sheet chance. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Chilwell+0.7Chilwell: 1 goals from 0.27 xG (+0.7)
  • Robertson−0.3Robertson: 0 goals from 0.27 xG (−0.3)

Chilwell has 0.7 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Chilwell±0.0Chilwell: 0 assists from 0.01 xA (±0.0)
  • Robertson+0.7Robertson: 2 assists from 1.32 xA (+0.7)

Robertson has 0.7 more assists than xA.

Goals conceded vs xGC · fewer is better

  • Chilwell−0.1Chilwell: 1 conceded from 1.12 xGC (−0.1)
  • Robertson−0.1Robertson: 8 conceded from 8.10 xGC (−0.1)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Chilwell · 8 pts75% from goals

  • Robertson · 36 pts39% from appearances

    −2 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
SourceChilwellRobertson
Appearances215
Goals60
Assists06
Clean sheets012
Defensive contribution02
Bonus03
Deductions0−2
Total836

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Chilwell1.0(1)
  • Robertson4.7(3)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Chilwell7.0(1)
  • Robertson4.3(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • ChilwellNo games
  • Robertson4.5(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets).

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Chilwell1.0(1)
  • Robertson5.2(5)

Away

  • Chilwell7.0(1)
  • Robertson3.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Chilwell 7.0 points per game, Robertson 3.3 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Chilwell20%

    1 goal and 0 assists of 5 CRY goals

  • Robertson22%

    0 goals and 2 assists of 9 TOT goals

Robertson is involved in 22% of TOT's goals, against 20% for Chilwell.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Chilwell0 of 7 full games

    2 × 1–59, 5 × Didn't play

  • Robertson3 of 9 full games

    3 × 90 minutes, 4 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 1 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Chilwell33.4
  • Robertson143.8

Creativity

  • Chilwell4.2
  • Robertson213.0

Threat

  • Chilwell21.0
  • Robertson93.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Chilwell's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Robertson's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Chilwell−700827 out127 in
  • Robertson+12.0k2.3k out14.4k in

Robertson has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+12.0k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every DEF who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 159 defenders who have played: Chilwell 1.8 points per £m (109th), Robertson 8.4 points per £m (14th). Median 3.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Chilwell
  • Robertson

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Robertson 30, Chilwell 1.

How far ahead is Chilwell? Above zero Chilwell leads; below, Robertson.

Robertson is 29 points ahead of Chilwell over these gameweeks. Robertson's was 29 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Chilwell, gameweek 4: 1 points v IPS home, 13 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 4: 7 points v EVE home, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Chilwell, gameweek 5: 0 points v LEE away, 0 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 5: 4 points v AVL home, 90 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Chilwell, gameweek 6: 0 points v NFO home, 0 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 6: 0 points v MUN away, 0 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Chilwell, gameweek 7: 0 points v BHA away, 0 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 7: 5 points v COV home, 68 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Chilwell, gameweek 8: 0 points v NEW home, 0 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 8: 6 points v CHE away, 64 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Chilwell, gameweek 9: 0 points v TOT away, 0 minutes
    Robertson, gameweek 9: 8 points v CRY home, 76 minutes

Chilwell: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Robertson: 0 hauls (10+), 1 blank (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWChilwellRobertson
417
504
600
705
806
908

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWChilwellRobertson
41390
5090
600
7068
8064
9076

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWChilwellRobertson
40.120.07
50.000.00
60.000.00
70.000.00
80.000.04
90.000.10

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWChilwellRobertson
40.010.09
50.000.26
60.000.00
70.000.02
80.000.10
90.000.77

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWChilwellRobertson
40.130.16
50.000.26
60.000.00
70.000.02
80.000.14
90.000.87

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWChilwellRobertson
412
503
600
702
802
903

Expected goals conceded (xGC)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals conceded (xGC) by gameweek
GWChilwellRobertson
40.551.11
50.001.16
60.000.00
70.000.52
80.000.39
90.000.14

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWChilwellRobertson
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWChilwellRobertson
400
501
600
701
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWChilwellRobertson
40.6%2.6%
50.5%2.6%
60.4%2.4%
70.3%2.2%
80.3%2.1%
90.3%2.5%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWChilwellRobertson
4£4.5m£4.4m
5£4.5m£4.4m
6£4.5m£4.4m
7£4.4m£4.4m
8£4.4m£4.4m
9£4.4m£4.3m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWChilwellRobertson
4——
50.1%1.2%
60.1%0.6%
70.0%0.6%
80.0%0.5%
90.0%2.5%