How do Beto and Emersonn compare?

Emersonn has more season points (33 vs 2), Emersonn is more owned (3.1% vs 0.4%), Beto is cheaper (5.4m vs 5.5m), Emersonn has the higher Start rate (100% vs 0%), Emersonn has more Bonus (6 vs 0), but Emersonn has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.00).

← Back to players Pick different players

Beto

1 stats won

Emersonn

27 stats won

Who wins more stats: Beto or Emersonn?

Emersonn wins 27 of 28 stats

Emersonn wins 27 of the 28 stats with an outright best. Others: Beto 1.

Points
Beto: 2Emersonn: 33
xGI (6 gw)
Beto: 0.00Emersonn: 0.29
Price
Beto: £5.4mEmersonn: £5.5m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionBetoEmersonn
Price & ownership03
Playing time04
Recent form15
Season totals05
Set pieces00
Bonus04
Fixtures01
FPL ranks05
Total127

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best FWD in the game. Hover for values.

Beto: Points 2, xGI (6 gw) 0.00, BPS 5, Mins (6 gw) 0, xG (6 gw) 0.00, Upcoming FDR 3.00. Emersonn: Points 33, xGI (6 gw) 0.29, BPS 128, Mins (6 gw) 71, xG (6 gw) 0.27, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Emersonn leads 3 of 3
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatBetoEmersonn
Price

5.4m−0.1m vs best

5.5m(best)

Ownership

0.4%−2.7% vs best

3.1%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.0%−0.1% vs best

0.1%(best)

Availability

0% · Has joined Fiorentina permanently

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Emersonn leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatBetoEmersonn
Starts

0−9 vs best

9(best)

Start rate

0%−100% vs best

100%(best)

Minutes (season)

31−568 vs best

599(best)

Avg minutes

3−64 vs best

67(best)

Who has better recent form?

Emersonn leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatBetoEmersonn
Mins (6 gw)

0−71 vs best

71(best)

xG (6 gw)

0.00−0.27 vs best

0.27(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.00−0.02 vs best

0.02(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.00−0.29 vs best

0.29(best)

DC (6 gw)

0.00−2.33 vs best

2.33(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

0.00(best)

1.35+1.35 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Emersonn leads 5 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatBetoEmersonn
Points

2−31 vs best

33(best)

Goals

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Assists

0−1 vs best

1(best)

Total xG

0.09−2.58 vs best

2.67(best)

Total xA

0.00−0.19 vs best

0.19(best)

See alsoForward stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatBetoEmersonn
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Emersonn leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatBetoEmersonn
BPS

5−123 vs best

128(best)

BPS (6 gw)

0.0−12.0 vs best

12.0(best)

Bonus

0−6 vs best

6(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.5 vs best

0.5(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Emersonn leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatBetoEmersonn
Next 5 GWs

COV

(H)

10

BRE

(A)

11

LIV

(H)

12

AVL

(A)

13

FUL

(H)

14

BOU

(H)

10

TOT

(A)

11

AVL

(H)

12

COV

(A)

13

LEE

(A)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.00+0.20 vs best

2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Emersonn leads 5 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatBetoEmersonn
Form

0.0

67th FWD · 635th overall

1.8(best)

23rd FWD · 218th overall

ICT index

0.8

48th FWD · 425th overall

34.4(best)

13th FWD · 89th overall

Selected

40th FWD

264th overall

15th FWD(best)

102nd overall

Points per game

1.0

43rd FWD · 420th overall

3.7(best)

12th FWD · 113th overall

Cost rank

43rd FWD

181st overall

36th FWD(best)

149th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • BetoEVE

    1. EVE v COV home, gameweek 10: 1.64 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
    2. EVE v BRE away, gameweek 11: 0.97 projected goals, 22% clean sheet chance

  • EmersonnIPS

    1. IPS v BOU home, gameweek 10: 1.06 projected goals, 21% clean sheet chance
    2. IPS v TOT away, gameweek 11: 0.90 projected goals, 16% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Beto (EVE) 2.6 projected team goals, Emersonn (IPS) 2.0 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Beto−0.1Beto: 0 goals from 0.09 xG (−0.1)
  • Emersonn−0.7Emersonn: 2 goals from 2.67 xG (−0.7)

Emersonn has 0.7 fewer goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

  • Beto±0.0Beto: 0 assists from 0.00 xA (±0.0)
  • Emersonn+0.8Emersonn: 1 assists from 0.19 xA (+0.8)

Emersonn has 0.8 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Beto · 2 pts100% from appearances

  • Emersonn · 33 pts48% from appearances

Season points by source
SourceBetoEmersonn
Appearances216
Goals08
Assists03
Bonus06
Deductions00
Total233

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Beto1.0(1)
  • Emersonn6.3(4)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • BetoNo games
  • Emersonn1.3(3)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Beto1.0(1)
  • Emersonn2.0(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Emersonn 2.0 points per game, Beto 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Beto1.0(1)
  • Emersonn3.5(4)

Away

  • Beto1.0(1)
  • Emersonn3.8(5)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Emersonn 3.8 points per game, Beto 1.0 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Beto0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 3 EVE goals

  • Emersonn21%

    2 goals and 1 assist of 14 IPS goals

Emersonn is involved in 21% of IPS's goals, against 0% for Beto.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Beto0 of 9 full games

    2 × 1–59, 7 × Didn't play

  • Emersonn0 of 9 full games

    7 × 60–89, 2 × 1–59

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Beto3.0
  • Emersonn106.6

Creativity

  • Beto0.3
  • Emersonn96.3

Threat

  • Beto5.0
  • Emersonn148.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Beto's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Emersonn's biggest score is threat, a goal threat.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Beto−772772 out0 in
  • Emersonn−14.3k15.7k out1.4k in

Managers are selling all of them; Beto the least (−772 net).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every FWD who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 52 forwards who have played: Beto 0.4 points per £m (48th), Emersonn 6.0 points per £m (8th). Median 2.3.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Beto
  • Emersonn

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Emersonn 21, Beto 0.

How far ahead is Beto? Above zero Beto leads; below, Emersonn.

Emersonn is 21 points ahead of Beto over these gameweeks. Emersonn's was 21 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Beto, gameweek 4: 0 points v TOT away, 0 minutes
    Emersonn, gameweek 4: 12 points v CRY away, 62 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Beto, gameweek 5: 0 points v IPS home, 0 minutes
    Emersonn, gameweek 5: 2 points v EVE away, 80 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Beto, gameweek 6: 0 points v HUL away, 0 minutes
    Emersonn, gameweek 6: 2 points v FUL home, 70 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Beto, gameweek 7: 0 points v CHE home, 0 minutes
    Emersonn, gameweek 7: 2 points v MCI away, 77 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Beto, gameweek 8: 0 points v ARS away, 0 minutes
    Emersonn, gameweek 8: 1 points v NFO home, 59 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Beto, gameweek 9: 0 points v NEW away, 0 minutes
    Emersonn, gameweek 9: 2 points v HUL away, 76 minutes

Beto: 0 hauls (10+), 6 blanks (0–2); Emersonn: 1 haul (10+), 5 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWBetoEmersonn
4012
502
602
702
801
902

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWBetoEmersonn
4062
5080
6070
7077
8059
9076

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWBetoEmersonn
40.000.44
50.000.13
60.000.44
70.000.43
80.000.00
90.000.19

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWBetoEmersonn
40.000.05
50.000.01
60.000.01
70.000.00
80.000.05
90.000.01

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWBetoEmersonn
40.000.49
50.000.14
60.000.45
70.000.43
80.000.05
90.000.20

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWBetoEmersonn
402
501
604
701
802
904

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWBetoEmersonn
401
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWBetoEmersonn
401
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWBetoEmersonn
40.9%1.7%
50.7%3.3%
60.5%4.2%
70.5%3.8%
80.5%3.6%
90.4%3.2%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWBetoEmersonn
4£5.4m£5.5m
5£5.4m£5.5m
6£5.4m£5.6m
7£5.4m£5.6m
8£5.4m£5.6m
9£5.4m£5.5m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWBetoEmersonn
4——
50.1%0.4%
60.0%0.7%
70.0%0.3%
80.0%0.3%
90.0%0.1%