How do Barcola and Semenyo compare?
Semenyo has more season points (37 vs 20), Semenyo is more owned (6.2% vs 4.3%), Barcola is cheaper (8.1m vs 8.2m), Barcola has the higher Start rate (86% vs 67%), Semenyo has more Bonus (2 vs 0), but Barcola has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).
Comparing 2 midfielders
Semenyo wins most stats
Who wins more stats: Barcola or Semenyo?
Semenyo wins 16 of 29 stats
Semenyo wins 16 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Barcola 13.
- Points
- Barcola: 20Semenyo: 37
- xGI (6 gw)
- Barcola: 0.29Semenyo: 0.12
- Price
- Barcola: £8.1mSemenyo: £8.2m
Which sections does each player win?
| Section | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| Price & ownership | 1 | 2 |
| Playing time | 2 | 1 |
| Recent form | 6 | 0 |
| Season totals | 2 | 4 |
| Set pieces | 0 | 1 |
| Bonus | 0 | 4 |
| Fixtures | 1 | 0 |
| FPL ranks | 1 | 4 |
| Total | 13 | 16 |
A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.
How do their key stats compare?
Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.
A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.
Who is more expensive and more owned?
Semenyo leads 2 of 3
| Stat | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 8.1m−0.1m vs best | 8.2m(best) |
| Ownership | 4.3%−1.9% vs best | 6.2%(best) |
| Top 10k ownership | 0.8%(best) | 0.2%−0.6% vs best |
| Availability | Available | 0% · Knee injury - Unknown return date |
See alsoTop 10k ownership
Who starts and plays more minutes?
Barcola leads 2 of 3
| Stat | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| Starts | 6 | 6 |
| Start rate | 86%(best) | 67%−19% vs best |
| Minutes (season) | 511−42 vs best | 553(best) |
| Avg minutes | 73(best) | 61−12 vs best |
Who has better recent form?
Barcola leads 6 of 6
| Stat | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| Mins (6 gw) | 81(best) | 47−34 vs best |
| xG (6 gw) | 0.16(best) | 0.03−0.13 vs best |
| xA (6 gw) | 0.13(best) | 0.09−0.04 vs best |
| xGI (6 gw) | 0.29(best) | 0.12−0.17 vs best |
| DC (6 gw) | 7.00(best) | 2.33−4.67 vs best |
| xGC (6 gw) · lower is better | 0.88(best) | 1.07+0.19 vs best |
Who has scored more this season?
Semenyo leads 4 of 6
| Stat | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| Points | 20−17 vs best | 37(best) |
| Goals | 0−2 vs best | 2(best) |
| Assists | 2−1 vs best | 3(best) |
| Total xG | 0.98(best) | 0.34−0.64 vs best |
| Total xA | 0.85−0.62 vs best | 1.47(best) |
| DC (season) | 42(best) | 26−16 vs best |
See alsoMidfielder stat leaders
Who takes the set pieces?
Semenyo leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| Corners & indirect FKs | — | — |
| Direct free kicks | — | — |
| Penalties | — | 2nd choice(best) |
| Penalties missed · lower is better | 0 | 0 |
Who is collecting more bonus?
Semenyo leads 4 of 4
| Stat | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| BPS | 83−80 vs best | 163(best) |
| BPS (6 gw) | 13.0−1.7 vs best | 14.7(best) |
| Bonus | 0−2 vs best | 2(best) |
| Bonus (6 gw) | 0.0−0.3 vs best | 0.3(best) |
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Barcola leads 1 of 1
| Stat | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| Next 5 GWs | CRY (A) 10 MUN (H) 11 EVE (A) 12 SUN (H) 13 CHE (A) 14 | NFO (A) 10 FUL (H) 11 ARS (A) 12 LEE (H) 13 BRE (A) 14 |
| Avg FDR · lower is better | 2.80(best) | 3.20+0.40 vs best |
See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Semenyo leads 4 of 5
| Stat | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 3.2(best) 43rd MID · 108th overall | 1.0 139th MID · 291st overall |
| ICT index | 27.6 72nd MID · 130th overall | 46.3(best) 28th MID · 39th overall |
| Selected | 28th MID 83rd overall | 20th MID(best) 59th overall |
| Points per game | 2.9 79th MID · 181st overall | 5.3(best) 13th MID · 31st overall |
| Cost rank | 6th MID 8th overall | 5th MID(best) 7th overall |
What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?
BarcolaLIV
- LIV v CRY away, gameweek 10: 1.91 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
- LIV v MUN home, gameweek 11: 1.70 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
SemenyoMCI
- MCI v NFO away, gameweek 10: 1.74 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
- MCI v FUL home, gameweek 11: 2.13 projected goals, 40% clean sheet chance
Over their next 2 fixtures: Semenyo (MCI) 3.9 projected team goals, Barcola (LIV) 3.6 projected team goals.
Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections
Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?
Goals vs xG
- Barcola−1.0Barcola: 0 goals from 0.98 xG (−1.0)
- Semenyo+1.7Semenyo: 2 goals from 0.34 xG (+1.7)
Barcola has 1.0 fewer goals than xG; Semenyo has 1.7 more goals than xG.
Assists vs xA
- Barcola+1.1Barcola: 2 assists from 0.85 xA (+1.1)
- Semenyo+1.5Semenyo: 3 assists from 1.47 xA (+1.5)
Semenyo has 1.5 more assists than xA.
Where do their FPL points come from?
Barcola · 20 pts59% from appearances
−2 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Semenyo · 37 pts35% from appearances
| Source | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances | 13 | 13 |
| Goals | 0 | 10 |
| Assists | 6 | 9 |
| Clean sheets | 3 | 3 |
| Bonus | 0 | 2 |
| Deductions | −2 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 37 |
Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.
Who scores against good teams?
Easy (FDR 1–2)
- Barcola2.0(2)
- Semenyo7.3(4)
Medium (FDR 3)
- BarcolaNo games
- Semenyo2.5(2)
Hard (FDR 4–5)
- Barcola3.2(5)
- Semenyo3.0(1)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Barcola 3.2 points per game, Semenyo 3.0 points per game.
Who is better at home, and who away?
Home
- Barcola3.0(4)
- Semenyo6.5(4)
Away
- Barcola2.7(3)
- Semenyo3.7(3)
Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Semenyo 3.7 points per game, Barcola 2.7 points per game.
Who is more central to their team's attack?
Barcola29%
0 goals and 2 assists of 7 LIV goals
Semenyo26%
2 goals and 3 assists of 19 MCI goals
Barcola is involved in 29% of LIV's goals, against 26% for Semenyo.
Who is a rotation risk?
Barcola2 of 7 full games
2 × 90 minutes, 4 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59
Semenyo6 of 9 full games
6 × 90 minutes, 1 × 1–59, 2 × Didn't play
Is each player a creator or a goal threat?
Influence
- Barcola62.6
- Semenyo158.0
Creativity
- Barcola95.3
- Semenyo166.0
Threat
- Barcola117.0
- Semenyo139.0
FPL's season ICT scores. Barcola's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Semenyo's biggest score is creativity, a creator.
Who are managers buying this gameweek?
- Barcola+15.4k11.9k out27.3k in
- Semenyo−41.5k41.6k out137 in
Barcola has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+15.4k).
Which player gives more points per million?
Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.
How have their stats tracked by gameweek?
- Barcola
- Semenyo
Who hauls more often, and who blanks?
GW 4
Barcola, gameweek 4: 3 points v FUL home, 71 minutesSemenyo, gameweek 4: 3 points v MUN away, 90 minutesGW 5
Barcola, gameweek 5: 3 points v BOU away, 71 minutesSemenyo, gameweek 5: 17 points v SUN home, 90 minutesGW 6
Barcola, gameweek 6: 2 points v MCI home, 87 minutesSemenyo, gameweek 6: 3 points v LIV away, 90 minutesGW 7
Barcola, gameweek 7: 4 points v BRE away, 90 minutesSemenyo, gameweek 7: 1 points v IPS home, 13 minutesGW 8
Barcola, gameweek 8: 6 points v BHA home, 76 minutesSemenyo, gameweek 8: 0 points v AVL away, 0 minutesGW 9
Barcola, gameweek 9: 1 points v ARS home, 90 minutesSemenyo, gameweek 9: 0 points v BHA home, 0 minutes
Barcola: 0 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2); Semenyo: 1 haul (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).
Points
Values by gameweek
| GW | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 3 | 3 |
| 5 | 3 | 17 |
| 6 | 2 | 3 |
| 7 | 4 | 1 |
| 8 | 6 | 0 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 |
Minutes
Values by gameweek
| GW | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 71 | 90 |
| 5 | 71 | 90 |
| 6 | 87 | 90 |
| 7 | 90 | 13 |
| 8 | 76 | 0 |
| 9 | 90 | 0 |
Expected goals (xG)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.21 | 0.00 |
| 5 | 0.05 | 0.16 |
| 6 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| 7 | 0.53 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.07 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.07 | 0.00 |
Expected assists (xA)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.03 | 0.06 |
| 5 | 0.03 | 0.17 |
| 6 | 0.02 | 0.31 |
| 7 | 0.19 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.37 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.14 | 0.00 |
Expected goal involvements (xGI)
Values by gameweek
| GW | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0.24 | 0.06 |
| 5 | 0.08 | 0.33 |
| 6 | 0.07 | 0.32 |
| 7 | 0.72 | 0.00 |
| 8 | 0.44 | 0.00 |
| 9 | 0.21 | 0.00 |
Defensive contribution
Values by gameweek
| GW | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 5 | 3 |
| 5 | 3 | 7 |
| 6 | 10 | 3 |
| 7 | 9 | 1 |
| 8 | 10 | 0 |
| 9 | 5 | 0 |
Goals
Values by gameweek
| GW | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 2 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 8 | 0 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Assists
Values by gameweek
| GW | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 | 1 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | 1 | 0 |
| 8 | 1 | 0 |
| 9 | 0 | 0 |
Ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2.2% | 15.8% |
| 5 | 1.9% | 14.8% |
| 6 | 2.1% | 13.3% |
| 7 | 2.9% | 14.7% |
| 8 | 3.4% | 8.8% |
| 9 | 4.2% | 6.4% |
Price
Values by gameweek
| GW | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | £8.0m | £8.4m |
| 5 | £8.0m | £8.4m |
| 6 | £8.0m | £8.4m |
| 7 | £8.0m | £8.3m |
| 8 | £8.0m | £8.3m |
| 9 | £8.1m | £8.2m |
Top 10k ownership
Values by gameweek
| GW | Barcola | Semenyo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | — | — |
| 5 | 0.2% | 19.9% |
| 6 | 0.3% | 8.9% |
| 7 | 0.6% | 9.3% |
| 8 | 1.1% | 1.3% |
| 9 | 0.8% | 0.2% |

