How do Barcola and Rogers compare?

Rogers has more season points (50 vs 20), Rogers is more owned (52.5% vs 4.3%), Rogers has the higher Start rate (100% vs 86%), but Rogers has more Bonus (3 vs 0).

← Back to players Pick different players

Hide stats where they're level

Comparing 2 midfielders

Rogers wins most stats

Liverpool

LIV · 8.1m

3 stats won

Chelsea

CHE · 8.1m

26 stats won

Who wins more stats: Barcola or Rogers?

Rogers wins 26 of 29 stats

Rogers wins 26 of the 29 stats with an outright best. Others: Barcola 3.

Points: Barcola: 20Rogers: 50
xGI (6 gw): Barcola: 0.29Rogers: 0.32
Price: Barcola: £8.1mRogers: £8.1m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
Section	Barcola	Rogers
Price & ownership	0	2
Playing time	0	4
Recent form	2	4
Season totals	1	5
Set pieces	0	2
Bonus	0	4
Fixtures	0	0
FPL ranks	0	5
Total	3	26

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Barcola: Points 20, xGI (6 gw) 0.29, BPS 83, Mins (6 gw) 81, DC (6 gw) 7.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80. Rogers: Points 50, xGI (6 gw) 0.32, BPS 230, Mins (6 gw) 89, DC (6 gw) 8.7, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Rogers leads 2 of 2

Who is more expensive and more owned?
Stat	Barcola	Rogers
Price	8.1m	8.1m
Ownership	4.3%−48.2% vs best	52.5%(best)

Top 10k ownership	0.8%−89.1% vs best	89.9%(best)

Availability	Available	Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Rogers leads 4 of 4

Who starts and plays more minutes?
Stat	Barcola	Rogers
Starts	6−3 vs best	9(best)

Start rate	86%−14% vs best	100%(best)

Minutes (season)	511−279 vs best	790(best)

Avg minutes	73−15 vs best	88(best)

Who has better recent form?

Rogers leads 4 of 6

Who has better recent form?
Stat	Barcola	Rogers
Mins (6 gw)	81−8 vs best	89(best)

xG (6 gw)	0.16−0.11 vs best	0.27(best)

xA (6 gw)	0.13(best)	0.05−0.08 vs best

xGI (6 gw)	0.29−0.03 vs best	0.32(best)

DC (6 gw)	7.00−1.67 vs best	8.67(best)

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better	0.88(best)	1.29+0.41 vs best

Who has scored more this season?

Rogers leads 5 of 6

Who has scored more this season?
Stat	Barcola	Rogers
Points	20−30 vs best	50(best)

Goals	0−5 vs best	5(best)

Assists	2(best)	1−1 vs best

Total xG	0.98−1.80 vs best	2.78(best)

Total xA	0.85−0.59 vs best	1.44(best)

DC (season)	42−27 vs best	69(best)

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Rogers leads 2 of 2

Who takes the set pieces?
Stat	Barcola	Rogers
Corners & indirect FKs	—	6th choice(best)
Direct free kicks	—	4th choice(best)
Penalties	—	—
Penalties missed · lower is better	0	0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Rogers leads 4 of 4

Who is collecting more bonus?
Stat	Barcola	Rogers
BPS	83−147 vs best	230(best)

BPS (6 gw)	13.0−10.8 vs best	23.8(best)

Bonus	0−3 vs best	3(best)

Bonus (6 gw)	0.0−0.3 vs best	0.3(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

No outright winner

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
Stat	Barcola	Rogers
Next 5 GWs	CRY (A) 10 MUN (H) 11 EVE (A) 12 SUN (H) 13 CHE (A) 14	SUN (A) 10 LEE (H) 11 NFO (A) 12 CRY (H) 13 LIV (H) 14
Avg FDR · lower is better	2.80	2.80

See alsoSeason calendar Team rating Projected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Rogers leads 5 of 5

How do their official FPL ranks compare?
Stat	Barcola	Rogers
Form	3.2 43rd MID · 108th overall	5.2(best) 12th MID · 29th overall
ICT index	27.6 72nd MID · 130th overall	70.7(best) 7th MID · 9th overall
Selected	28th MID 83rd overall	1st MID(best) 2nd overall
Points per game	2.9 79th MID · 181st overall	5.6(best) 9th MID · 25th overall
Cost rank	6th MID 8th overall	5th MID(best) 7th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

BarcolaLIV
1. LIV v CRY away, gameweek 10: 1.91 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
2. LIV v MUN home, gameweek 11: 1.70 projected goals, 37% clean sheet chance
RogersCHE
1. CHE v SUN away, gameweek 10: 1.48 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
2. CHE v LEE home, gameweek 11: 1.60 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Barcola (LIV) 3.6 projected team goals, Rogers (CHE) 3.1 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

Barcola−1.0Barcola: 0 goals from 0.98 xG (−1.0)
Rogers+2.2Rogers: 5 goals from 2.78 xG (+2.2)

Barcola has 1.0 fewer goals than xG; Rogers has 2.2 more goals than xG.

Assists vs xA

Barcola+1.1Barcola: 2 assists from 0.85 xA (+1.1)
Rogers−0.4Rogers: 1 assists from 1.44 xA (−0.4)

Barcola has 1.1 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

Barcola · 20 pts59% from appearances
−2 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions
Rogers · 50 pts47% from goals
−3 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

Season points by source
Source	Barcola	Rogers
Appearances	13	18
Goals	0	25
Assists	6	3
Clean sheets	3	2
Defensive contribution	0	2
Bonus	0	3
Deductions	−2	−3
Total	20	50

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

Barcola2.0(2)
Rogers8.0(1)

Medium (FDR 3)

BarcolaNo games
Rogers5.8(5)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

Barcola3.2(5)
Rogers4.3(3)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Rogers 4.3 points per game, Barcola 3.2 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

Barcola3.0(4)
Rogers6.4(5)

Away

Barcola2.7(3)
Rogers4.5(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Rogers 4.5 points per game, Barcola 2.7 points per game.

Barcola29%
0 goals and 2 assists of 7 LIV goals
Rogers32%
5 goals and 1 assist of 19 CHE goals

Rogers is involved in 32% of CHE's goals, against 29% for Barcola.

Who is a rotation risk?

Barcola2 of 7 full games
2 × 90 minutes, 4 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59
Rogers6 of 9 full games
6 × 90 minutes, 3 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

Barcola62.6
Rogers272.6

Creativity

Barcola95.3
Rogers222.8

Threat

Barcola117.0
Rogers212.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Barcola's biggest score is threat, a goal threat; Rogers's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

Barcola+15.2k11.6k out26.8k in
Rogers+173k6.9k out179k in

Rogers has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+173k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Barcola 2.5 points per £m (108th), Rogers 6.2 points per £m (20th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

From To

Barcola
Rogers

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Rogers 31, Barcola 19.

How far ahead is Barcola? Above zero Barcola leads; below, Rogers.

Rogers is 12 points ahead of Barcola over these gameweeks. Rogers's was 12 (GW 9).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

GW 4
Barcola, gameweek 4: 3 points v FUL home, 71 minutes
Rogers, gameweek 4: 8 points v HUL home, 90 minutes
GW 5
Barcola, gameweek 5: 3 points v BOU away, 71 minutes
Rogers, gameweek 5: 2 points v BRE away, 90 minutes
GW 6
Barcola, gameweek 6: 2 points v MCI home, 87 minutes
Rogers, gameweek 6: 9 points v BOU home, 83 minutes
GW 7
Barcola, gameweek 7: 4 points v BRE away, 90 minutes
Rogers, gameweek 7: 2 points v EVE away, 90 minutes
GW 8
Barcola, gameweek 8: 6 points v BHA home, 76 minutes
Rogers, gameweek 8: 1 points v TOT home, 90 minutes
GW 9
Barcola, gameweek 9: 1 points v ARS home, 90 minutes
Rogers, gameweek 9: 9 points v MUN home, 90 minutes

Barcola: 0 hauls (10+), 2 blanks (0–2); Rogers: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek

Points by gameweek
GW	Barcola	Rogers
4	3	8
5	3	2
6	2	9
7	4	2
8	6	1
9	1	9

Minutes

Values by gameweek

Minutes by gameweek
GW	Barcola	Rogers
4	71	90
5	71	90
6	87	83
7	90	90
8	76	90
9	90	90

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek

Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GW	Barcola	Rogers
4	0.21	0.21
5	0.05	0.33
6	0.05	0.18
7	0.53	0.17
8	0.07	0.06
9	0.07	0.65

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek

Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GW	Barcola	Rogers
4	0.03	0.02
5	0.03	0.07
6	0.02	0.07
7	0.19	0.06
8	0.37	0.03
9	0.14	0.05

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek

Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GW	Barcola	Rogers
4	0.24	0.23
5	0.08	0.40
6	0.07	0.25
7	0.72	0.23
8	0.44	0.09
9	0.21	0.70

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek

Defensive contribution by gameweek
GW	Barcola	Rogers
4	5	6
5	3	8
6	10	13
7	9	11
8	10	6
9	5	8

Goals

Values by gameweek

Goals by gameweek
GW	Barcola	Rogers
4	0	1
5	0	0
6	0	1
7	0	0
8	0	0
9	0	1

Assists

Values by gameweek

Assists by gameweek
GW	Barcola	Rogers
4	0	0
5	0	0
6	0	0
7	1	0
8	1	0
9	0	0

Ownership

Values by gameweek

Ownership by gameweek
GW	Barcola	Rogers
4	2.2%	35.9%
5	1.9%	40.4%
6	2.1%	43.1%
7	2.9%	47.4%
8	3.4%	49.9%
9	4.2%	51.2%

Price

Values by gameweek

Price by gameweek
GW	Barcola	Rogers
4	£8.0m	£7.6m
5	£8.0m	£7.7m
6	£8.0m	£7.8m
7	£8.0m	£7.9m
8	£8.0m	£8.0m
9	£8.1m	£8.1m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek

Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GW	Barcola	Rogers
4	—	—
5	0.2%	53.6%
6	0.3%	78.3%
7	0.6%	81.0%
8	1.1%	83.0%
9	0.8%	89.9%