How do Ampadu and Tonali compare?

Tonali has more season points (33 vs 28), Tonali is more owned (2% vs 0.7%), Tonali has more Bonus (2 vs 0), but Tonali has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).

← Back to players Pick different players

Ampadu

6 stats won

Tonali

19 stats won

Who wins more stats: Ampadu or Tonali?

Tonali wins 19 of 25 stats

Tonali wins 19 of the 25 stats with an outright best. Others: Ampadu 6.

Points
Ampadu: 28Tonali: 33
xGI (6 gw)
Ampadu: 0.07Tonali: 0.26
Price
Ampadu: £5.3mTonali: £5.3m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionAmpaduTonali
Price & ownership02
Playing time20
Recent form24
Season totals13
Set pieces01
Bonus04
Fixtures01
FPL ranks14
Total619

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Ampadu: Points 28, xGI (6 gw) 0.07, BPS 126, Mins (6 gw) 90, DC (6 gw) 11.7, Upcoming FDR 3.20. Tonali: Points 33, xGI (6 gw) 0.26, BPS 170, Mins (6 gw) 89, DC (6 gw) 11.3, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Tonali leads 2 of 2
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatAmpaduTonali
Price

5.3m

5.3m

Ownership

0.7%−1% vs best

2%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.2%−0.3% vs best

0.5%(best)

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Ampadu leads 2 of 2
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatAmpaduTonali
Starts

9

9

Start rate

100%

100%

Minutes (season)

810(best)

787−23 vs best

Avg minutes

90(best)

87−3 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Tonali leads 4 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatAmpaduTonali
Mins (6 gw)

90(best)

89−1 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.02−0.03 vs best

0.05(best)

xA (6 gw)

0.06−0.15 vs best

0.21(best)

xGI (6 gw)

0.07−0.19 vs best

0.26(best)

DC (6 gw)

11.67(best)

11.33−0.34 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.22+0.49 vs best

0.73(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Tonali leads 3 of 4
Who has scored more this season?
StatAmpaduTonali
Points

28−5 vs best

33(best)

Goals

0

0

Assists

1

1

Total xG

0.11−0.29 vs best

0.40(best)

Total xA

0.47−0.85 vs best

1.32(best)

DC (season)

104(best)

88−16 vs best

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

Tonali leads 1 of 1
Who takes the set pieces?
StatAmpaduTonali
Corners & indirect FKs

—

9th choice(best)

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Tonali leads 4 of 4
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatAmpaduTonali
BPS

126−44 vs best

170(best)

BPS (6 gw)

13.8−5.9 vs best

19.7(best)

Bonus

0−2 vs best

2(best)

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0−0.3 vs best

0.3(best)

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Tonali leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatAmpaduTonali
Next 5 GWs

TOT

(H)

10

CHE

(A)

11

COV

(H)

12

MCI

(A)

13

IPS

(H)

14

LEE

(A)

10

IPS

(H)

11

SUN

(A)

12

FUL

(H)

13

ARS

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.20+0.40 vs best

2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Tonali leads 4 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatAmpaduTonali
Form

1.8

93rd MID · 212th overall

4.8(best)

14th MID · 41st overall

ICT index

28.2

70th MID · 127th overall

36.6(best)

45th MID · 76th overall

Selected

68th MID

212th overall

43rd MID(best)

129th overall

Points per game

3.1

59th MID · 149th overall

3.7(best)

40th MID · 111th overall

Cost rank

122nd MID(best)

197th overall

128th MID

205th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • AmpaduLEE

    1. LEE v TOT home, gameweek 10: 1.19 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. LEE v CHE away, gameweek 11: 0.96 projected goals, 20% clean sheet chance

  • TonaliTOT

    1. TOT v LEE away, gameweek 10: 1.16 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. TOT v IPS home, gameweek 11: 1.82 projected goals, 41% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Tonali (TOT) 3.0 projected team goals, Ampadu (LEE) 2.1 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Ampadu−0.1Ampadu: 0 goals from 0.11 xG (−0.1)
  • Tonali−0.4Tonali: 0 goals from 0.40 xG (−0.4)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Ampadu+0.5Ampadu: 1 assists from 0.47 xA (+0.5)
  • Tonali−0.3Tonali: 1 assists from 1.32 xA (−0.3)

Ampadu has 0.5 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Ampadu · 28 pts56% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Tonali · 33 pts55% from appearances

Season points by source
SourceAmpaduTonali
Appearances1818
Assists33
Clean sheets34
Defensive contribution86
Bonus02
Deductions−40
Total2833

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Ampadu5.0(2)
  • Tonali4.0(3)

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Ampadu3.0(4)
  • Tonali3.5(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Ampadu2.0(3)
  • Tonali3.5(2)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Tonali 3.5 points per game, Ampadu 2.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Ampadu3.8(4)
  • Tonali2.8(5)

Away

  • Ampadu2.6(5)
  • Tonali4.8(4)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Tonali 4.8 points per game, Ampadu 2.6 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Ampadu11%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 9 LEE goals

  • Tonali10%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 10 TOT goals

Ampadu is involved in 11% of LEE's goals, against 10% for Tonali.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Ampadu9 of 9 full games

    9 × 90 minutes

  • Tonali7 of 9 full games

    7 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Ampadu143.6
  • Tonali129.8

Creativity

  • Ampadu126.2
  • Tonali183.2

Threat

  • Ampadu12.0
  • Tonali53.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Ampadu's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Tonali's biggest score is creativity, a creator.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Ampadu−1.5k1.9k out433 in
  • Tonali+1.5k4.4k out5.9k in

Tonali has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+1.5k).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Ampadu 5.3 points per £m (34th), Tonali 6.2 points per £m (18th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Ampadu
  • Tonali

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Tonali 24, Ampadu 19.

How far ahead is Ampadu? Above zero Ampadu leads; below, Tonali.

Tonali is 5 points ahead of Ampadu over these gameweeks. Ampadu's biggest lead was 7 (GW 5); Tonali's was 5 (GW 8).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Ampadu, gameweek 4: 7 points v NEW home, 90 minutes
    Tonali, gameweek 4: 3 points v EVE home, 90 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Ampadu, gameweek 5: 5 points v CRY home, 90 minutes
    Tonali, gameweek 5: 2 points v AVL home, 83 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Ampadu, gameweek 6: 1 points v ARS away, 90 minutes
    Tonali, gameweek 6: 7 points v MUN away, 90 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Ampadu, gameweek 7: 1 points v MUN home, 90 minutes
    Tonali, gameweek 7: 4 points v COV home, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Ampadu, gameweek 8: 2 points v SUN away, 90 minutes
    Tonali, gameweek 8: 5 points v CHE away, 90 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Ampadu, gameweek 9: 3 points v BOU away, 90 minutes
    Tonali, gameweek 9: 3 points v CRY home, 90 minutes

Ampadu: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Tonali: 0 hauls (10+), 1 blank (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWAmpaduTonali
473
552
617
714
825
933

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWAmpaduTonali
49090
59083
69090
79090
89090
99090

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWAmpaduTonali
40.070.09
50.000.06
60.030.01
70.000.05
80.000.07
90.000.03

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWAmpaduTonali
40.020.31
50.100.21
60.040.28
70.040.30
80.090.03
90.040.10

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWAmpaduTonali
40.090.40
50.100.27
60.070.29
70.040.35
80.090.10
90.040.13

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWAmpaduTonali
41211
51411
689
71015
81012
91610

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWAmpaduTonali
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWAmpaduTonali
410
500
601
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWAmpaduTonali
41.0%2.5%
50.9%1.9%
60.9%1.7%
70.8%1.8%
80.8%1.8%
90.7%2.1%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWAmpaduTonali
4£5.4m£5.4m
5£5.4m£5.4m
6£5.4m£5.3m
7£5.4m£5.3m
8£5.3m£5.3m
9£5.3m£5.3m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWAmpaduTonali
4——
51.2%0.2%
60.4%0.1%
70.3%0.2%
80.2%0.2%
90.2%0.5%