How do Ampadu and Caicedo compare?

Ampadu has more season points (28 vs 11), Caicedo is more owned (1.1% vs 0.7%), Ampadu has the higher Start rate (100% vs 44%), but Caicedo has easier upcoming fixtures (average fixture difficulty 2.80 vs 3.20).

← Back to players Pick different players

Ampadu

20 stats won

Caicedo

5 stats won

Who wins more stats: Ampadu or Caicedo?

Ampadu wins 20 of 25 stats

Ampadu wins 20 of the 25 stats with an outright best. Others: Caicedo 5.

Points
Ampadu: 28Caicedo: 11
xGI (6 gw)
Ampadu: 0.07Caicedo: 0.02
Price
Ampadu: £5.3mCaicedo: £5.3m

Which sections does each player win?

Stats won by each player, by section
SectionAmpaduCaicedo
Price & ownership11
Playing time40
Recent form51
Season totals50
Set pieces00
Bonus20
Fixtures01
FPL ranks32
Total205

A stat counts when one player is strictly best. Ties and availability are not counted.

How do their key stats compare?

Each spoke is scaled against the best MID in the game. Hover for values.

Ampadu: Points 28, xGI (6 gw) 0.07, BPS 126, Mins (6 gw) 90, DC (6 gw) 11.7, Upcoming FDR 3.20. Caicedo: Points 11, xGI (6 gw) 0.02, BPS 65, Mins (6 gw) 56, DC (6 gw) 5.0, Upcoming FDR 2.80.

A tick marks the best value. Grey figures show how far each other player is from it.

Who is more expensive and more owned?

Split
Who is more expensive and more owned?
StatAmpaduCaicedo
Price

5.3m

5.3m

Ownership

0.7%−0.4% vs best

1.1%(best)

Top 10k ownership

0.2%(best)

0.0%−0.2% vs best

Availability

Available

Available

See alsoTop 10k ownership

Who starts and plays more minutes?

Ampadu leads 4 of 4
Who starts and plays more minutes?
StatAmpaduCaicedo
Starts

9(best)

4−5 vs best

Start rate

100%(best)

44%−56% vs best

Minutes (season)

810(best)

350−460 vs best

Avg minutes

90(best)

39−51 vs best

Who has better recent form?

Ampadu leads 5 of 6
Who has better recent form?
StatAmpaduCaicedo
Mins (6 gw)

90(best)

56−34 vs best

xG (6 gw)

0.02(best)

0.01−0.01 vs best

xA (6 gw)

0.06(best)

0.01−0.05 vs best

xGI (6 gw)

0.07(best)

0.02−0.05 vs best

DC (6 gw)

11.67(best)

5.00−6.67 vs best

xGC (6 gw) · lower is better

1.22+0.61 vs best

0.61(best)

Who has scored more this season?

Ampadu leads 5 of 5
Who has scored more this season?
StatAmpaduCaicedo
Points

28(best)

11−17 vs best

Goals

0

0

Assists

1(best)

0−1 vs best

Total xG

0.11(best)

0.05−0.06 vs best

Total xA

0.47(best)

0.06−0.41 vs best

DC (season)

104(best)

30−74 vs best

See alsoMidfielder stat leaders

Who takes the set pieces?

No outright winner
Who takes the set pieces?
StatAmpaduCaicedo
Corners & indirect FKs

—

—

Direct free kicks

—

—

Penalties

—

—

Penalties missed · lower is better

0

0

Who is collecting more bonus?

Ampadu leads 2 of 2
Who is collecting more bonus?
StatAmpaduCaicedo
BPS

126(best)

65−61 vs best

BPS (6 gw)

13.8(best)

10.3−3.5 vs best

Bonus

0

0

Bonus (6 gw)

0.0

0.0

Who has easier upcoming fixtures?

Caicedo leads 1 of 1
Who has easier upcoming fixtures?
StatAmpaduCaicedo
Next 5 GWs

TOT

(H)

10

CHE

(A)

11

COV

(H)

12

MCI

(A)

13

IPS

(H)

14

SUN

(A)

10

LEE

(H)

11

NFO

(A)

12

CRY

(H)

13

LIV

(H)

14

Avg FDR · lower is better

3.20+0.40 vs best

2.80(best)

See alsoSeason calendarTeam ratingProjected goals and clean sheet probability

How do their official FPL ranks compare?

Ampadu leads 3 of 5
How do their official FPL ranks compare?
StatAmpaduCaicedo
Form

1.8

93rd MID · 212th overall

2.5(best)

70th MID · 155th overall

ICT index

28.2(best)

70th MID · 127th overall

8.3

147th MID · 316th overall

Selected

68th MID

212th overall

56th MID(best)

172nd overall

Points per game

3.1(best)

59th MID · 149th overall

2.2

107th MID · 248th overall

Cost rank

122nd MID(best)

197th overall

136th MID

216th overall

What do the bookies expect from their next fixtures?

  • AmpaduLEE

    1. LEE v TOT home, gameweek 10: 1.19 projected goals, 31% clean sheet chance
    2. LEE v CHE away, gameweek 11: 0.96 projected goals, 20% clean sheet chance

  • CaicedoCHE

    1. CHE v SUN away, gameweek 10: 1.48 projected goals, 36% clean sheet chance
    2. CHE v LEE home, gameweek 11: 1.60 projected goals, 38% clean sheet chance

Over their next 2 fixtures: Caicedo (CHE) 3.1 projected team goals, Ampadu (LEE) 2.1 projected team goals.

Team projections from bookmaker odds; shaded by projected goals. All projections

Who is over- or under-performing their expected stats?

Goals vs xG

  • Ampadu−0.1Ampadu: 0 goals from 0.11 xG (−0.1)
  • Caicedo−0.1Caicedo: 0 goals from 0.05 xG (−0.1)

Everyone is within half a goal of expected.

Assists vs xA

  • Ampadu+0.5Ampadu: 1 assists from 0.47 xA (+0.5)
  • Caicedo−0.1Caicedo: 0 assists from 0.06 xA (−0.1)

Ampadu has 0.5 more assists than xA.

Where do their FPL points come from?

  • Ampadu · 28 pts56% from appearances

    −4 from goals conceded, cards and other deductions

  • Caicedo · 11 pts82% from appearances

Season points by source
SourceAmpaduCaicedo
Appearances189
Assists30
Clean sheets32
Defensive contribution80
Deductions−40
Total2811

Worked out match by match from FPL's scoring rules; deductions are what's left against FPL's total.

Who scores against good teams?

Easy (FDR 1–2)

  • Ampadu5.0(2)
  • CaicedoNo games

Medium (FDR 3)

  • Ampadu3.0(4)
  • Caicedo2.5(4)

Hard (FDR 4–5)

  • Ampadu2.0(3)
  • Caicedo1.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Against hard opponents: Ampadu 2.0 points per game, Caicedo 1.0 points per game.

Who is better at home, and who away?

Home

  • Ampadu3.8(4)
  • Caicedo2.0(4)

Away

  • Ampadu2.6(5)
  • Caicedo3.0(1)

Points per game in matches played (games in brackets). Away from home: Caicedo 3.0 points per game, Ampadu 2.6 points per game.

Who is more central to their team's attack?

  • Ampadu11%

    0 goals and 1 assist of 9 LEE goals

  • Caicedo0%

    0 goals and 0 assists of 13 CHE goals

Ampadu is involved in 11% of LEE's goals, against 0% for Caicedo.

Who is a rotation risk?

  • Ampadu9 of 9 full games

    9 × 90 minutes

  • Caicedo2 of 9 full games

    2 × 90 minutes, 2 × 60–89, 1 × 1–59, 4 × Didn't play

Is each player a creator or a goal threat?

Influence

  • Ampadu143.6
  • Caicedo44.4

Creativity

  • Ampadu126.2
  • Caicedo23.8

Threat

  • Ampadu12.0
  • Caicedo14.0

FPL's season ICT scores. Ampadu's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence; Caicedo's biggest score is influence, an all-round influence.

Who are managers buying this gameweek?

  • Ampadu−1.5k1.9k out433 in
  • Caicedo+6031.7k out2.3k in

Caicedo has the most net transfers in this gameweek (+603).

Which player gives more points per million?

Every MID who has played, by price and season points. Above the line is better value than the median.

Of 218 midfielders who have played: Ampadu 5.3 points per £m (34th), Caicedo 2.1 points per £m (126th). Median 2.5.

How have their stats tracked by gameweek?

  • Ampadu
  • Caicedo

Who has scored more points over these gameweeks?

Points over GW 4 to 9: Ampadu 19, Caicedo 10.

How far ahead is Ampadu? Above zero Ampadu leads; below, Caicedo.

Ampadu is 9 points ahead of Caicedo over these gameweeks. Ampadu's biggest lead was 12 (GW 5).

Who hauls more often, and who blanks?

  1. GW 4

    Ampadu, gameweek 4: 7 points v NEW home, 90 minutes
    Caicedo, gameweek 4: 0 points v HUL home, 0 minutes

  2. GW 5

    Ampadu, gameweek 5: 5 points v CRY home, 90 minutes
    Caicedo, gameweek 5: 0 points v BRE away, 0 minutes

  3. GW 6

    Ampadu, gameweek 6: 1 points v ARS away, 90 minutes
    Caicedo, gameweek 6: 2 points v BOU home, 71 minutes

  4. GW 7

    Ampadu, gameweek 7: 1 points v MUN home, 90 minutes
    Caicedo, gameweek 7: 3 points v EVE away, 90 minutes

  5. GW 8

    Ampadu, gameweek 8: 2 points v SUN away, 90 minutes
    Caicedo, gameweek 8: 2 points v TOT home, 90 minutes

  6. GW 9

    Ampadu, gameweek 9: 3 points v BOU away, 90 minutes
    Caicedo, gameweek 9: 3 points v MUN home, 86 minutes

Ampadu: 0 hauls (10+), 3 blanks (0–2); Caicedo: 0 hauls (10+), 4 blanks (0–2).

Points

Values by gameweek
Points by gameweek
GWAmpaduCaicedo
470
550
612
713
822
933

Minutes

Values by gameweek
Minutes by gameweek
GWAmpaduCaicedo
4900
5900
69071
79090
89090
99086

Expected goals (xG)

Values by gameweek
Expected goals (xG) by gameweek
GWAmpaduCaicedo
40.070.00
50.000.00
60.030.01
70.000.04
80.000.00
90.000.00

Expected assists (xA)

Values by gameweek
Expected assists (xA) by gameweek
GWAmpaduCaicedo
40.020.00
50.100.00
60.040.00
70.040.02
80.090.01
90.040.03

Expected goal involvements (xGI)

Values by gameweek
Expected goal involvements (xGI) by gameweek
GWAmpaduCaicedo
40.090.00
50.100.00
60.070.01
70.040.06
80.090.01
90.040.03

Defensive contribution

Values by gameweek
Defensive contribution by gameweek
GWAmpaduCaicedo
4120
5140
6811
7104
81011
9164

Goals

Values by gameweek
Goals by gameweek
GWAmpaduCaicedo
400
500
600
700
800
900

Assists

Values by gameweek
Assists by gameweek
GWAmpaduCaicedo
410
500
600
700
800
900

Ownership

Values by gameweek
Ownership by gameweek
GWAmpaduCaicedo
41.0%1.4%
50.9%1.1%
60.9%1.0%
70.8%1.0%
80.8%1.1%
90.7%1.1%

Price

Values by gameweek
Price by gameweek
GWAmpaduCaicedo
4£5.4m£5.4m
5£5.4m£5.3m
6£5.4m£5.3m
7£5.4m£5.3m
8£5.3m£5.3m
9£5.3m£5.3m

Top 10k ownership

Values by gameweek
Top 10k ownership by gameweek
GWAmpaduCaicedo
4——
51.2%0.2%
60.4%0.1%
70.3%0.0%
80.2%0.0%
90.2%0.0%